Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 25: 20-25, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27806840

RESUMO

The appropriate follow-up and treatment for patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ) remains controversial. Several studies have attempted to address this issue, with recommendations ranging from close clinical follow-up or surveillance to mandatory surgical excision in all cases. We report the findings at our institution, where virtually every core needle biopsy diagnosis of lobular neoplasia results in follow-up excision. The goal of the study was to identify potential predictors of upgrade to a more significant lesion. We identified 76 patients over a 15-year period with a core biopsy diagnosis of pure lobular neoplasia and no other high-risk lesions. Subsequent surgical excision identified 10 cases (13%) that were upgraded to carcinoma. Upgrade diagnoses included invasive ductal carcinoma (n=1), invasive lobular carcinoma (n=4), ductal carcinoma in situ (n=3), and pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (n=2). All 10 upgraded cases had imaging findings suspicious for malignancy including irregular masses, asymmetric densities, or pleomorphic calcifications. Of the 10 upgraded cases, 7 were diagnosed as lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy. The data support a role for radiologic-pathologic correlation in the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions and suggest that the extent of lobular neoplasia in core biopsy specimens may be an indicator of the likelihood of upgrade to carcinoma.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma in Situ/patologia , Carcinoma in Situ/terapia , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Lobular/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperplasia/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia/patologia , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia
2.
Pain Manag ; 5(6): 465-82, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26402316

RESUMO

Ultrasonography has multiple advantages over traditional radiologic imaging modalities when used for interventional procedures. It allows improved visualization of the anatomy while avoiding ionizing radiation and risks associated with contrast use. It has proved superiority at accuracy of delivery and procedural effectiveness over blind procedures when used in association with interventional pain procedures. Although limited in its ability to see through bony structures, ultrasound has utility in visualizing soft tissues and vascular structures in anatomic regions of interest resulting in increased use for posterior neuraxial, periaxial, peripheral nerve and joint-related structures. Current evidence for use in these settings is presented here. In some cases, optimal utility may be improved by combining ultrasonography with other imaging modalities.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor Crônica/terapia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares/métodos , Injeções Espinhais/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA