Pharmacological characterization of FR194921, a new potent, selective, and orally active antagonist for central adenosine A1 receptors.

Adenosine A1 receptors in the brain are believed to play an important role in brain functioning. We have discovered a novel adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, FR194921 (2-(1-methyl-4-piperidinyl)-6-(2-phenylpyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-3-yl)-3(2H)-pyridazinone), and characterized the pharmacological activity in the present study. FR194921 showed potent and selective affinity for the adenosine A1 receptor without affinity for A2A and A3 receptors and did not show any species differences in binding affinity profile among human, rat, and mouse. Pharmacokinetic study in rats revealed that FR194921 was orally active and highly brain penetrable. Oral administration of FR194921 dose-dependently ameliorated the hypolocomotion induced by the A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine in rats, indicating this compound exerts A1-antagonistic action in vivo. In the passive avoidance test, scopolamine (1 mg/kg)-induced memory deficits were significantly ameliorated by FR194921 (0.32, 1 mg/kg). In two animal models of anxiety, the social interaction test and elevated plus maze, FR194921 showed specific anxiolytic activity without significantly influencing general behavior. In contrast, FR194921 did not show antidepressant activity even at a dose of 32 mg/kg in the rat forced swimming test. These results indicate that the novel, potent, and selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist FR194921 exerts both cognitive-enhancing and anxiolytic activity, suggesting the therapeutic potential of this compound for dementia and anxiety disorders.

Pharmacological evidence for a correlation between hippocampal CA1 cell damage and hyperlocomotion following global cerebral ischemia in gerbils.

Global ischemia, induced in Mongolian gerbils by bilateral occlusion of the carotid arteries for 5 min, produced a significant increase in locomotor activity at 1 day post-occlusion and a severe loss of hippocampal CA1 neurons at 4 days post-occlusion. To explore the pharmacological relationship between ischemia-induced hypermotility and CA1 cell death in the hippocampus, we evaluated the efficacy of diverse classes of putative neuroprotective agents for preventing hypermotility and delayed neuronal death. Administration of any drug 30 min before global ischemia dose-dependently, and with similar potency, ameliorated both hippocampal delayed neuronal death and locomotor hyperactivity, with a rank order: tacrolimus (FK506)>nizofenone>clonindine>dizocilpine (MK-801)>6-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)-7-nitro-2,3(1H,4H)-quinoxalinedione hydrochloride (YM90K)>phencyclidine>pentobarbital>2-(4-(p-fluorobenzoyl)-piperidin-1-yl)-2'-acetonaphthone hydrochloride (E-2001)>cis-(+/-)-4-phosphonomethyl-2-piperidine carboxylic acid (CGS19755)>3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl]benzeneacetamide (U-50,488H)>piroxicam>eliprodil>vinpocetine. Furthermore, potencies of the protective effect on delayed neuronal death and inhibitory effects on hypermotility were closely correlated (r=0.98). These results suggest that post-ischemic CA1 injury and hypermotility share common mechanisms, and further imply that it is possible to predict the neuroprotective efficacy of drugs more easily by examining the inhibitory effects on post-ischemic hypermotility in global ischemia model in gerbils.

Neuroprotective action of tacrolimus (FK506) in focal and global cerebral ischemia in rodents: dose dependency, therapeutic time window and long-term efficacy.

Tacrolimus (FK506), a potent immunosuppressive drug, is effective in attenuating brain infarction after cerebral ischemia. However, there has been no report characterizing the neuroprotective action and therapeutic time window of tacrolimus systematically using different types of stroke models and extended observation periods. Therefore, we evaluated the neuroprotective effect of tacrolimus in three different animal models of cerebral ischemia: transient and permanent focal ischemia in rats and transient global ischemia in gerbils. Tacrolimus at doses higher than 0.1 mg/kg (i.v.) produced a statistically significant reduction in ischemic brain damage following permanent and transient focal ischemia in rats when administered immediately after the onset of ischemia. Tacrolimus (1 mg/kg, i.v.) demonstrated similar neuroprotective activity even after delayed administration (2 h after permanent or 1 h after transient focal ischemia). The neuroprotective effect of tacrolimus was still present 2 weeks after transient focal ischemia and 1 week after permanent focal ischemia. After transient global ischemia in gerbils, tacrolimus (1 mg/kg, i.v.) given immediately after reperfusion also produced long-lasting neuroprotective effects with a protective time-window of 1-2 h. Taken together, the results clearly indicate that tacrolimus exerts potent, long-term neuroprotective effects with a favorable therapeutic time-window, regardless of the model of cerebral ischemia. These results strengthen the notion that tacrolimus might be of clinical value for the treatment of acute stroke.

A combined treatment with tacrolimus (FK506) and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for thrombotic focal cerebral ischemia in rats: increased neuroprotective efficacy and extended therapeutic time window.

The authors evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of tacrolimus (FK506), administered alone or in combination with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), on brain infarction following thrombotic middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Thrombotic occlusion of the MCA was induced by a photochemical reaction between rose bengal and green light in Sprague-Dawley rats, and the volume of ischemic brain damage was determined 24 hours later. Intravenous administration of tacrolimus or t-PA dose-dependently reduced the volume of ischemic brain infarction, whether administered immediately or 1 hour after MCA occlusion. When tacrolimus or t-PA was administered 2 hours after MCA occlusion, each drug showed a tendency to reduce ischemic brain damage. However, combined treatment with both drugs resulted in a significant reduction in ischemic brain damage. On administration 3 hours after MCA occlusion, tacrolimus alone showed no effect, and t-PA tended to worsen ischemic brain damage. However, the combined treatment with both drugs not only ameliorated the worsening trend seen with t-PA alone, but also tended to reduce ischemic brain damage. In conclusion, tacrolimus, used in combination with t-PA, augmented therapeutic efficacy on brain damage associated with focal ischemia and extended the therapeutic time window compared to single-drug treatments.