Lack of Follow-Up for Celiac Disease During Childhood Not Associated With Poor Health Outcomes: A Regional Swedish Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to examine the association between the lack of follow-up for celiac disease (CD) during childhood and dietary adherence, disease remission, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: We invited 243 randomly selected children diagnosed with CD in 2013-2018 in Gothenburg, Sweden, and 162 consented to participate (67%). We retrieved information on clinical follow-up and current wellbeing using medical and laboratory records data, as well as validated questionnaires on symptoms of CD, dietary adherence, and HRQoL. We analyzed tissue-transglutaminase antibodies (tTGA) as a measure of disease remission. We defined lack of follow-up as no CD-related physician/dietician-led visit or measurement of tTGA over the past 24 months of study enrollment. RESULTS: The mean age at study enrolment was 12.7 (range 7.8-18.2) years. Out of 162 children with an average disease duration of 5.3 (range 2.3-8.8) years, 23 (14%) lacked follow-up. tTGA had normalized in 94% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 71%-100%] of children without follow-up versus 91% (95% CI: 85%-95%) of children with continued follow-up. Of children without follow-up, 65% (95% CI: 38%-86%) reported a dietary adherence score indicating very good adherence, versus 72% (95% CI: 63%-80%) of those with continued follow-up. Also, lack of follow-up was not significantly associated with growth, symptom scores, or HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: In this regional cohort study of mostly older children and adolescents, lack of follow-up for CD was not significantly linked to dietary adherence, disease remission, or HRQoL. How these results hold in larger, unselected samples with longer follow-up, including transition to adult care, warrants further study.

Regional Swedish study found that one in seven coeliac patients experienced loss of follow up during childhood.

AIM: To examine the clinical follow up of paediatric coeliac disease and the rate of loss of follow up during childhood, for which data are scarce. METHODS: In a cohort of coeliac children diagnosed in 2013-2018 in Gothenburg, Sweden, we retrospectively explored the follow-up practice of paediatric coeliac disease until June 2021. We used medical records from hospital-based paediatric gastroenterology and general paediatric outpatient clinics, laboratory records, and questionnaires. Loss of follow up was defined no coeliac disease-related follow up or tissue transglutaminase test over the past 2 years of study enrolment. RESULTS: We included 162 children (58% girls) aged 7.8-18.2 years (average 12.7). Most participants (76%) were followed at general paediatric outpatient clinics rather than hospital-based clinics. After 2.3-8.8 (average 5.3) years since diagnosis, 23 patients (14%; 95% confidence interval, 9%-21%) had been lost to follow up. Patients with loss of follow up were more often boys (61% versus 39%, p = 0.08), with a somewhat longer average disease duration of 5.8 versus 5.2 years (p = 0.11). There were no between-group differences in socio-economic characteristics and patient-reported experience measures of coeliac disease care. CONCLUSION: One in seven coeliac patients may experience loss of follow up during childhood.