Risk Factors for Eribulin-induced Severe Neutropenia in Patients With Recurrent Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Eribulin is an effective chemotherapeutic agent for advanced and metastatic breast cancer. However, severe neutropenia occurs in 30-40% of patients and interferes with the recommended treatment schedule. Neutropenia is a major cause of treatment interruptions, delays, or even relative dose reductions. This study aimed to examine the risk factors for severe neutropenia after eribulin treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 263 patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received eribulin therapy. Risk factors for severe neutropenia in the first cycle were evaluated. RESULTS: Severe neutropenia in cycle 1 occurred in 50% of the patients. Multivariate analysis suggested six risk factors for severe neutropenia: low baseline neutrophil count and body mass index, high aspartate aminotransferase and bilirubin levels, creatinine clearance (CrCl) less than 50 ml/min, and eribulin dose of 1.4 mg/m2 Conclusion: This is one of the few studies to simultaneously examine both hepatic and renal functions in relation to severe neutropenia induced by eribulin. We have provided important information to support the close monitoring of patients with these risk factors and subsequent dosage adjustments, if necessary.

Serum Albumin Affects the Time-to-treatment Failure of Alectinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Alectinib is recommended for anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We have experienced early alectinib discontinuation due to disease progression and adverse effects in real world. Because alectinib has a high protein-binding rate of >99%, low serum albumin may increase the concentration of free drug and affect efficacy and adverse events. However, no association between serum albumin and the clinical impact of alectinib has been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of serum albumin on time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in alectinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients who were admitted to four hospitals (National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo Minami-Sanjo Hospital, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Otaru General Hospital) between October 2014 and September 2020 were retrospectively evaluated to identify those treated with alectinib. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis showed that the risk of discontinuation was significantly higher with serum albumin <3.6 g/dl compared to ≥3.6 g/dl at the start of alectinib administration (hazard ratio=3.00; 95% confidence interval=1.36-6.66; p<0.01). On Kaplan-Meier curves, TTF for serum albumin <3.6 was significantly shorter than that for ≥3.6. (median TTF: 12.1 months vs. not reach, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report that serum albumin <3.6 g/dl at alectinib induction is associated with poor TTF. Low serum albumin is a poor prognostic factor in cancer patients. Thus, serum albumin levels must be measured before treatment.

Real-World Predictors of Severe Neutropenia Associated with Palbociclib and Endocrine Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Japanese Patients.

Therapy for patients of metastatic breast cancer based on palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, has been approved in Japan. However, the risk factors for palbociclib-induced severe neutropenia in Japanese patients are rarely reported. Hence, the present study is aimed to identify the risk factors for adverse events requiring palbociclib dose reduction or discontinuation, and to identify the factors necessary to identify a more stable strategy for treatment continuation. This retrospective cohort analysis included patients with advanced breast cancer treated with 125 mg/d palbociclib. We demonstrated that severe neutropenia required significant dose reduction or therapy cessation. Most (77%) of the patients had severe neutropenia within the three courses. Risk factors for grade 3 or higher included low neutrophil counts (< 3250 /µL) before treatment [odds ratio (OR) = 9.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.80-29.41), p < 0.001] and high age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (> 9) [OR = 1.64, 95% CI (1.09-2.48), p = 0.018]. Thus, low baseline neutrophil counts and high values for Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index are prospective predictive markers for palbociclib-induced severe neutropenia.

Clinical Management of Potential Toxicity of Abemaciclib and Approaches to Ensure Treatment Continuation.

INTRODUCTION: The association between abemaciclib dose reduction and treatment adherence is not clear. In this study, we examined real-world data of Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) to determine how abemaciclib dose reduction is related to treatment continuation. METHODS: This retrospective observational study involved 120 consecutive patients with ABC who received abemaciclib from December 2018 to March 2021. The time to treatment failure (TTF) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a TTF of >365 days (TTF365). RESULTS: According to the dose reduction during treatment, the patients were classified into 100, 200, and 300 mg/day abemaciclib groups. The 300 mg/day group had a TTF of 7.4 months, whereas the 100 and 200 mg/day groups had significantly longer TTFs (17.9 and 17.3 months, respectively; P = 0.0002). In this study, relative to the 300 mg/day arm, TTF was improved in 200mg/day arm and 100 mg/day arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.93) and [HR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.74). For patients who received 300mg/day of abemaciclib dose arm, 200mg/day, and 100mg/day, the median TTF was 7.4 ,17.9 and 17.3 months. The frequently reported adverse effects (AEs) were anemia, increased blood creatinine levels, diarrhea, and neutropenia (90%, 83%, 83%, and 75% of the patients, respectively). Neutropenia, fatigue, and diarrhea were the top AEs causing dose reduction. A multivariate analysis that examined factors associated with achieving TTF 365 confirmed that dose down was an important factor (odds ratio: 3.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.68-9.36, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the 100 and 200 mg/day groups had a longer TTF than the 300 mg/day group, and dose reduction was identified as an important factor in achieving longer TTF.

Association between Area under the Curve Estimated from Carboplatin Dose and Incidence of Severe Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma on DeVIC Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The degrees of adverse effects with carboplatin (CBDCA) are influenced by interindividual differences in the area under the curve (AUC), whereas renal function is not considered in the CBDCA dose design for dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and CBDCA (DeVIC) therapy. We conducted this study to evaluate the association between the AUC and incidence of severe thrombocytopenia in patients treated with DeVIC with or without rituximab (DeVIC ± R). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data for 36 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who received DeVIC ± R between May 2013 and January 2021 at the National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center. The AUC of CBDCA (AUCactual) was calculated backward using a variant of the Calvert formula. RESULTS: The median AUCactual was 4.6 (interquartile range: 4.3-5.3) min mg/mL and AUCactual was negatively correlated with the nadir platelet count (r = -0.45; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that AUCactual ≥ 4.3 versus < 4.3 was an independent factor predictive of severe thrombocytopenia (odds ratio: 19.3, and 95% confidence interval: 1.45-258; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the CBDCA dosing design considering renal function can reduce the risk of severe thrombocytopenia in DeVIC ± R therapy.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors may have an advantage over calcium channel blockers in reducing proteinuria in gastric cancer patients receiving ramucirumab.

This study aimed to investigate whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RAS-I) have an advantage over calcium channel blockers (CCB) for suppression of proteinuria in hypertensive patients with gastric cancer receiving ramucirumab (RAM) treatment. Adult Japanese patients with gastric cancer who were outpatients at Asahikawa Medical University Hospital, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, and Iwate Medical University Hospital between July 1, 2015, and March 31, 2021, were included in this study. Of these patients, those who had received first-time RAM treatment, and those treated with antihypertensive agents including RAS-I or a CCB at initial RAM administration were included. A total of 36 patients were analyzed in this study. Of these patients, 17 patients were classified into the RAS-I group and the remaining 19 into the CCB group. After 12 weeks of RAM administration, the prevalence of proteinuria in the RAS-I group was significantly lower than that in the CCB group. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative occurrence of proteinuria in the RAS-I group over 12 weeks following RAM administration was significantly lower than that in the CCB group. Furthermore, simulation of the time course of RAM blood concentrations based on the O'Brien model showed that there may not be differences in the RAM blood concentration profiles over 12 weeks between the two groups. RAS-I may have an advantage over CCB for suppressing proteinuria in hypertensive patients with gastric cancer treated with blood pressure antihypertensive agents. Our results provide useful information to healthcare professionals involved in the administration of RAM treatment.

Identifying Early Predictive Markers for Immune-Related Adverse Events in Nivolumab-Treated Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma and Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratios can indicate poor disease prognosis and are inflammation markers. We investigated the role of NLR and PLR as effective predictive markers of immune-related adverse event (irAE) onset in patients treated with nivolumab. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 73 gastric and renal cancer patients treated with nivolumab at the Hokkaido Cancer Centre from January 2017 to June 2020. NLR and PLR were calculated at the initiation of nivolumab treatment and irAE onset. We identified the risk factors for Grade 3-4 irAE onset using NLR, PLR, sex, cancer type, and age. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated from the initiation of nivolumab treatment to the date of death or censored at last follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 73 patients included, 17 (18%) had at least one grade3-4 irAE. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that pretreatment NLR<4.3 was significantly associated with a reduced risk for onset of grade3-4 irAEs, whereas rate of NLR change after treatment, ΔNLR>120% was significantly associated with an increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: NLR is an effective marker for prognosis and onset of grade 3-4 irAEs.

Effect of Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy on the Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroids are used to treat immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with nivolumab. However, patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who are administered corticosteroids before the initiation of nivolumab treatment are commonly excluded from clinical trials. The appropriate timing for corticosteroid administration in relation to nivolumab treatment, effects of corticosteroids on the efficacy of nivolumab, and resulting adverse events are not clearly understood. In this study, the effects of differences in the timing of corticosteroid administration on nivolumab efficacy and the resulting adverse events were examined. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with 109 patients who were treated with nivolumab at Sapporo Minami-Sanjo Hospital between December 2015 and March 2018. RESULTS: Of the 109 patients treated with nivolumab, 12 patients were administered corticosteroids before the first cycle of nivolumab (pre-CS), and 33 patients were administered corticosteroids after the first cycle of nivolumab (post-CS). These 2 groups were compared with the control group comprising 64 patients who were not administered corticosteroids (non-CS). The objective response rate in the post-CS group was significantly higher than that in the non-CS group, and the disease control rate in the pre-CS group was significantly lower than that in the non-CS group. The overall survival time and progression-free survival time in the pre-CS group were significantly shorter than those observed in the non-CS group; however, these did not differ from those in the post-CS group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that corticosteroids administered to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after initiation of nivolumab treatment did not affect the disease prognosis. Thus, corticosteroids can be administered immediately for rapid treatment of irAEs.

[Comparative Study of the Antiemetic Palonosetron for Lung Cancer Patients Treated with a Divided Dose of Cisplatin].

Palonosetron(Palo)is a second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist(5-HT3RA)effective in suppressing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in both acute and delayed phases.Most studies have reported Palo as an effective antiemetic for cisplatin(CDDP)chemotherapy(≥50mg/m2)administered on an intermittent basis.To assess the antiemetic efficacy of Palo, we performed a retrospective study in 16 patients with lung cancer who received Palo with split-dose CDDP, ifosfamide, and irinotecan(CPT-11)triple combination(CIC)therapy at Sapporo Minami-Sanjo Hospital between October 2010 and January 2012.T he CIC regimen consisted of CPT-11(50-60mg/m2)administered on days 1, 8, and 15, in addition to CDDP(15-20mg/m2)and ifosfamide(1,500mg/kg)for 4 consecutive days.On day 1, ramosetron was replaced with Palo in patients who had insufficient antiemetic control in accordance with guidelines on the management of highly emetogenic chemotherapy(HEC).There was a lower incidence of grade 1 or higher nausea(62.5%)in patients in the Palo-combination group than in those in the non-Palo-combination group(87.5%).No incidence of grade 3 or higher nausea was reported in either group.On the fifth day of chemotherapy, the incidence of nausea was significantly lower in the Palo-combination group(43.8%)than in the non-Palo-combination group(81.3%)(p<0.05).In addition, there was a significant decrease in the number of days of incidence and a significant increase in the number of days since the last episode was observed in the Palo-combination group.These results suggest that Palo, in particular, decreases the incidence of nausea and extends the number of days since its occurrence; moreover, it is effective in accelerating recovery.In conclusion, this study suggests that Palo exhibits excellent antiemetic efficacy in patients administered split doses of CDDP.

[Study on the Antiemetic Effects of Aprepitant in Patients with Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy with Carboplatin].

Guidelines for antiemetic therapy, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines, recommend that aprepitant, an NK1 receptor antagonist, should be used in addition to conventional antiemetic therapy for acute and delayed nausea/vomiting caused by highly emetogenic chemotherapy. However, only few studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of aprepitant in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Therefore, we examined the antiemetic effects of additional doses of aprepitant in the next course in patients with lung cancer who were undergoing chemotherapy with carboplatin and who developed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) despite the preventive administration of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. Consequently, the incidences of vomiting and nausea significantly decreased from 59% to 0% and from 91% to 64%, respectively, during the entire study period. Furthermore, a significant improvement in dietary intake during the entire study period was confirmed. These results suggest that the additional administration of aprepitant has high antiemetic effects in patients with lung cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy with carbo- platin and who show insufficient control of nausea/vomiting.

[Comparative study of an antiemetic NK1 receptor-antagonist in lung cancer patients treated with divided doses for Cisplatin].

Aprepitant is a NK1 receptor-antagonist with a novel mechanism of action for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), and is recommended as a prophylactic by many international and domestic guidelines. However, domestic clinical trials of aprepitant have only been conducted using a single dose in patients who were treated with cisplatin(CDDP), and there is no evidence to support administration of aprepitant in divided doses. We administered aprepitant in divided doses to patients who were also being treated with cisplatin, ifosfamide, and irinotecan(CIC), and had CINV due to prophylactic administration of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone. This was done in order to evaluate the antiemetic effect of aprepitant. The patients with"No vomiting"increased significantly from 25% to 83%, and the"Days with nausea"in patients also decreased significantly. Consequently, administration of aprepitant in addition to current antiemetic therapy in divided doses, as well as in single doses, exhibited a greater antiemetic effect in CDDP-treated patients.