RESUMO
Uremic calciphylaxis is a rare disease that affects patients with chronic end-stage renal disease. It is a pathology of the microvessels of the dermis and hypodermis which are calcified and whose thrombosis leads to skin necrosis. Calciphylaxis lesions can be distal and axial. They lead to pain, infection and are associated with denutrition and in high mortality rate (40-80% at 1 year). This general review describes the clinical and para-clinical presentations of calciphylaxis. It summarizes the current knowledge on its pathogenesis and the therapeutical options that can be proposed to improve the management and attempt to reduce the mortality of patients with uremic calciphylaxis.
Assuntos
Calciofilaxia , Falência Renal Crônica , Calciofilaxia/diagnóstico , Calciofilaxia/etiologia , Calciofilaxia/terapia , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/terapiaRESUMO
Frequently silent until advanced stages, bone fragility associated with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disease (CKD-MBD) is one of the most devastating complications of CKD. Its pathophysiology includes the reduction of active vitamin D metabolites, phosphate accumulation, decreased intestinal calcium absorption, renal alpha klotho production, and elevated fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) levels. Altogether, these factors contribute firstly to secondary hyperparathyroidism, and ultimately, to micro- and macrostructural bone changes, which lead to low bone mineral density and an increased risk of fracture. A vitamin D deficiency is common in CKD patients, and low circulating 25(OH)D levels are invariably associated with high serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels as well as with bone mineralization defects, such as osteomalacia in case of severe forms. It is also associated with a variety of non-skeletal diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, cancer, and reduced immunological response. Current international guidelines recommend supplementing CKD patients with nutritional vitamin D as in the general population; however, there is no randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating the effect of vitamin D (or vitamin D+calcium) supplementation on the risk of fracture in the setting of CKD. It is also unknown what level of circulating 25(OH)D would be sufficient to prevent bone abnormalities and fractures in these patients. The impact of vitamin D supplementation on other surrogate endpoints, including bone mineral density and bone-related circulating biomarkers (PTH, FGF23, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, sclerostin) has been evaluated in several RTCs; however, the results were not always translated into an improvement in long-term outcomes, such as reduced fracture risk. This review provides a brief and comprehensive update on CKD-related bone fragility and the use of natural vitamin D supplementation in these patients.
RESUMO
Although frequently silent, mineral and bone disease (MBD) is one of the most precocious complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is omnipresent in patients with CKD stage 5. Its pathophysiology is complex, but basically, disturbances in vitamin D, phosphate, and calcium metabolism lead to a diverse range of clinical manifestations with secondary hyperparathyroidism usually being the most frequent. With the decline in renal function, CKD-MBD may induce microstructural changes in bone, vascular system and soft tissues, which results in macrostructural lesions, such as low bone mineral density (BMD) resulting in skeletal fractures, vascular and soft tissue calcifications. Moreover, low BMD, fractures, and vascular calcifications are linked with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. Therefore, a better characterization of CKD-MBD patterns, beyond biochemical markers, is helpful to adapt therapies and monitor strategies as used in the general population. An in-depth characterization of bone health is required, which includes an evaluation of cortical and trabecular bone structure and density and the degree of bone remodeling through bone biomarkers. Standard radiological imaging is generally used for the diagnosis of fracture or pseudo-fractures, vascular calcifications and other features of CKD-MBD. However, bone fractures can also be diagnosed using computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). Fracture risk can be predicted by bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative computed tomography (QTC) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQTC), quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and most recently magnetic resonance micro-imaging. Quantitative methods to assess bone consistency and strength complete the study and adjust the clinical management when integrated with clinical factors. The aim of this review is to provide a brief and comprehensive update of imaging techniques available for the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and monitoring of CKD-MBD.
RESUMO
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus, generalized itching related to CKD, affects many aspects of hemodialysis patients' lives. However, information regarding the relationship between pruritus and several key outcomes in hemodialysis patients remains limited. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 23,264 hemodialysis patients from 21 countries in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) phases 4 to 6 (2009-2018). EXPOSURE: Pruritus severity, based on self-reported degree to which patients were bothered by itchy skin (5-category ordinal scale from "not at all" to "extremely"). OUTCOMES: Clinical, dialysis-related, and patient-reported outcomes. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cox regression for time-to-event outcomes and modified Poisson regression for binary outcomes, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: The proportion of patients at least moderately bothered by pruritus was 37%, and 7% were extremely bothered. Compared with the reference group ("not at all"), the adjusted mortality HR for patients extremely bothered by pruritus was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.08-1.41). Rates of cardiovascular and infection-related deaths and hospitalizations were also higher for patients extremely versus not at all bothered by pruritus (HR range, 1.17-1.44). Patients extremely bothered by pruritus were also more likely to withdraw from dialysis and miss hemodialysis sessions and were less likely to be employed. Strong monotonic associations were observed between pruritus severity and longer recovery time from a hemodialysis session, lower physical and mental quality of life, increased depressive symptoms, and poorer sleep quality. LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding, recall bias, nonresponse bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate how diverse and far-reaching poor outcomes are for patients who experience CKD-associated pruritus, specifically those with more severe pruritus. There is need for change in practice patterns internationally to effectively identify and treat patients with pruritus to reduce symptom burden and improve quality of life and possibly even survival.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Optimal parathyroid hormone (PTH) control during non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) might decrease the subsequent risk of parathyroid hyperplasia and uncontrolled secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) on dialysis. However, the evidence for recommending PTH targets and therapeutic strategies is weak for ND-CKD. We evaluated the patient characteristics, treatment patterns and PTH control over the first year of haemodialysis (HD) by PTH prior to HD initiation. METHODS: We studied 5683 incident HD patients from 21 countries in Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study Phases 4-6 (2009-18). We stratified by PTH measured immediately prior to HD initiation and reported the monthly prescription prevalence of active vitamin D and calcimimetics over the first year of HD and risk of PTH >600 pg/mL after 9-12 months on HD. RESULTS: The 16% of patients with PTH >600 pg/mL prior to HD initiation were more likely to be prescribed active vitamin D and calcimimetics during the first year of HD. The prevalence of PTH >600 pg/mL 9-12 months after start of HD was greater for patients who initiated HD with PTH >600 (29%) versus 150-300 (7%) pg/mL (adjusted risk difference: 19%; 95% confidence interval : 15%, 23%). The patients with sustained PTH >600 pg/mL after 9-12 months on HD were younger, more likely to be black, and had higher serum phosphorus and estimated glomerular filtration rates at HD initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Increased PTH before HD start predicted a higher PTH level 9-12 months later, despite greater use of active vitamin D and calcimimetics. More targeted PTH control during ND-CKD may influence outcomes during HD, raising the need for PTH target guidelines in these patients.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/etiologia , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Fósforo/sangue , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/sangue , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is one of the most frequent and deleterious complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). SHPT is also one of the principal components of the now called CKD-mineral and bone disorders (MBD) syndrome. It is usually prevented and treated by vitamin D derivatives. However, the rationale for the prescription of vitamin D sterols in those patients is still a matter of hotly debates, mainly because of unsatisfactory results from numerous observational and not well-controlled studies. Scanty clinical data on head-to-head comparisons between the multiple vitamin D sterols are currently available. Moreover, there is crescent expectations on nutritional vitamin D, as well as vitamin D receptor activators (VDRA), regarding their putative pleiotropic effects even in CKD patients, and the promising effects of VDRA against proteinuria and myocardial hypertrophy in diabetic CKD cohorts. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials (RCT) are needed to answer to many open questions and incertitude considering the effect of nutritional vitamin D and VDRA on hard end points including the risk of skeletal fractures and of mortality in CKD patients. RCT comparing VDRA to calcimimetics in the control of SHPT are also needed in dialysis patients. The present review will visit these open questions that nephrologists should ask before starting a treatment by nutritional vitamin D or VDRA.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Distúrbio Mineral e Ósseo na Doença Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hidroxicolecalciferóis/uso terapêutico , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/etiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina D/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Chronic kidney disease is known to be associated with phosphate retention. The mechanisms are complex and the early increase in serum phosphate levels in chronic kidney disease is not strictly related to the dietary phosphate load or to the degree of phosphate retention. It also implicates the activity of intestinal sodium-phosphate cotransporters, the degree of bone turnover and the retention and/or phosphate release from the skeleton, and the feedback mechanisms regulating the phosphaturia. Indeed, the increase in serum phosphate levels is only a reflection of underlying complex mechanisms, and many important factors play a role including parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), and others. Hyperphosphatemia increases the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease as well as in subjects with normal renal function. Oral phosphate binders are prescribed in patients with chronic kidney disease and in those treated by dialysis, to prevent intestinal absorption of dietary phosphate and reduce serum phosphate. In prospective observational studies, they have been shown to decrease all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk. However, different problems have been associated with currently available phosphate binders including the induction of a positive calcium balance and impaired outcomes with calcium-based phosphate binders or increased costs with non-calcium-based phosphate binders. Iron-based phosphate binders represent a new class of phosphate binders. The aim of this article is to provide an update review of the pathophysiological mechanisms leading and maintaining elevated serum phosphate levels in patients with chronic kidney disease and patients in dialysis, and the educational, nutritional, and therapeutic strategies that can be undertaken to control the hyperphosphatemia.
Assuntos
Quelantes/administração & dosagem , Hiperfosfatemia/terapia , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Sevelamer/administração & dosagem , Biomarcadores/sangue , Cálcio/sangue , Fator de Crescimento de Fibroblastos 23 , Humanos , Hiperfosfatemia/etiologia , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Fosfatos/sangue , Diálise Renal/métodos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/sangue , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has been associated with the hyperphosphatemia seen in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD). Oral phosphate binders are prescribed in these patients to prevent intestinal absorption of dietary phosphate and reduce serum phosphate. In prospective observational cohorts they have shown to decrease all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk. Different problems have been associated with currently available phosphate binders as positive calcium balance and impaired outcomes with calcium-based phosphate binders or increased costs with non-calcium-based phosphate binders. Iron-based phosphate binders represent a new class of phosphate binders. Several iron-based phosphate binders have undergone testing in clinical trials. Ferric citrate (JTT-751) and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21) are the two iron-based binders that have passed to the clinical field after being found safe and effective in decreasing serum phosphate. Iron from ferric citrate is partially absorbed compared to sucroferric oxyhydroxide. Ferric citrate usage could result in an important reduction in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) and IV iron usage, resulting in significant cost savings. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide was effective in lowering serum phosphorus in dialysis patients with similar efficacy to sevelamer carbonate, but with lower pill burden, and better adherence. Ferric citrate may be more suited for the treatment of chronic hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients requiring iron supplements but its use may have been hampered by potential aluminum overload, as citrate facilitates its absorption; sucroferric oxyhydroxide may be more suited for hyperphosphatemic CKD patients not requiring iron supplementation, with low pill burden.