Factors influencing outcome of lamivudine in anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Lamivudine has been shown to benefit patients with anti-HBe/HBV-DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B. The aim of the study was to evaluate factors influencing outcome of lamivudine therapy during two years of post-treatment follow-up in a prospective clinical trial. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-one consecutive patients, submitted to liver biopsy, were treated with lamivudine at 100mg/daily for twelve months and followed-up for twenty-four months. The patients were never treated before with interferon or stopped at least six months before starting lamivudine. ALT was measured monthly and HBV-DNA every three months. RESULTS: At the end of therapy 25 (81%) patients had both biochemical and virological response; 2 (6%) patients showed persistent viremia and 4 (13%) patients developed viral resistance during treatment. Twenty-three (92%) out of 25 responders relapsed during the follow-up; over 50% of all cases relapsed within 6 months. The relapse is related to higher HBV-DNA baseline levels. At relapse, 4/23 (17%) patients had symptomatic acute hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine is associated with the risk of developing viral mutants and, after therapy discontinuation, to high rate of relapse. In relapsing patients severe acute recurrence of hepatitis B may occur. Decisions about lamivudine monotherapy should take into account the limited long-term efficacy, effects of relapse, costs and predictive factors for response.

Prognostic value of quantitative liver function tests in viral cirrhosis: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Widespread application of quantitative liver function tests as a prognostic tool is controversial. In this study we assessed the predictivity of serial evaluations of galactose elimination capacity (GEC) and the monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) test on survival in viral cirrhosis, and secondarily we compared these tests with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. METHODS: In a cohort of 35 patients with viral cirrhosis, GEC and MEGX were evaluated every 6 months for 24 months and compared with CTP and MELD scores at the same time intervals. The end points were patient death or liver transplantation. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between dead/transplanted patients and survivors were found for basal values of GEC, MEGX, CTP and MELD. Receiver-operating characteristics curves of CTP and MELD scores showed a higher prognostic accuracy than GEC and MEGX. On multivariate analysis, neither GEC nor MEGX were independent predictors of survival. Repeated-measures analysis of GEC and MEGX did not increase the prognostic accuracy of these tests and did not add useful prognostic information on patient outcome during the following 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that neither single nor repeated determinations of GEC and MEGX are superior to CTP and MELD scores in predicting prognosis of patients with viral cirrhosis.