Thrombolysis and thrombectomy for stroke in octogenarians and nonagenarians: A regional observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients are a growing population in stroke units, characterized by higher frailty, but underrepresented in clinical trials about acute care. We investigated efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in elderlies in current practice. METHODS: We assessed consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) hospitalized in the four stroke units of the French Northern Alps Emergency Network between 2015 and 2020. We compared baseline characteristics, early neurological evolution and outcome of patients aged 80-89 and≥90years old (yo). RESULTS: Among 8367 patients, 2744 (32.8%) were 80-89 yo and 541 (6.5%) were≥90 yo. IVT and/or MT were performed in 787 patients≥80 yo (632 patients aged 80-89, 155 patients aged>90). Early neurological improvement was more frequent in patients≥80 yo treated by IVT and/or MT compared to untreated patients (45.6% versus 38.4%, P=0.002). After adjustment, reperfusion treatments improved likelihood of good outcome at discharge (OR=2.0 [1.6-2.7]) and reduced in-hospital mortality (OR=0.5 [0.4-0.7]). Age and initial NIHSS score were independent factors of poor functional outcome at discharge and in-hospital mortality. The rate of successful recanalization was comparable between octogenarians and nonagenarians (87% versus 85.2%, P=0.8). Octogenarians had better functional outcome at discharge compared to nonagenarians [modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-2: 36% versus 25.7%, P=0.02], whatever IVT or MT strategy. In-hospital mortality was lower for octogenarians compared to nonagenarians (19.5% versus 27.1%, P=0.04). DISCUSSION: IVT and MT improve early neurological recovery and functional outcome at discharge of both octogenarians and nonagenarians in current practice. Despite a poorer outcome for nonagenarians than octogenarians, these reperfusion treatments should not be withheld on the basis of age only.

Intra- and inter-rater consistency of dual assessment by radiologist and neurologist for evaluating DWI-ASPECTS in ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the intra -and inter-rater consistency of radiologist and neurologist working in pairs attributing DWI-ASPECTS (Diffusion Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) in patients with acute middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke referred for mechanical thrombectomy, intravenous thrombolysis or bridging therapy. METHODS: Five neurologists and 5 radiologists working in pairs and in hour period scored independently and in two reading sessions anonymized DWI-ASPECTS of 80 patients presenting with acute anterior ischaemic stroke in our center. We measured agreement between pairs using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). A Fleiss kappa was used for dichotomized (0-6;7-10) and trichotomized (0-3;4-6;7-10) ASPECTS. The interrater distribution of the score in the trichotomized (0-3;4-6;7-10) ASPECTS was calculated. We determined the interrater (Cohen kappa) and intrarater (Fleiss kappa) agreement on the ASPECTS regions. RESULTS: The average DWI-ASPECTS was 6.35 (SD±2.44) for the first reading, and 6.47 (SD±2.44) for the second one. The ICC was 0.853 (95%CI, 0.798-0.896) for the interrater, and 0.862 (95%CI, 0.834-0.885) for the intrarater evaluation. Kappa coefficients were high for dichotomized (k=0.75) and trichotomized (k=0.64) ASPECTS. Evaluators agreement on the ASPECTS category (0-3), (4-6) and (7-10) was 88, 76 and 93% respectively. The anatomic region infarcted was well identified (k=0.70-0.77), except for the internal capsula (k=0.57). Interrater agreement was fair for M5 (k=0.37), moderate for internal capsula (0.52) and substantial for the other regions (0.60-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of DWI-ASPECTS is good when determined by radiologist and neurologist working in pairs, which corresponds to our current clinical practice. However, discrepancies are possible for cut-off determination, which may impact the indication of thrombectomy, and for the determination of the exact infarcted region. Agreement to propose category (4-6) is lower than for (0-3) and (8-10) ASPECTS categories.

[TIMMA: Ultrasonographic scale of carotid atherosclerosis by vascular neurologists]. / TIMMA : échelle échographique de la surcharge athéromateuse en carotide pratiquée par des neurologues vasculaires.

BACKGROUND: Carotid atherosclerosis is a powerful predictive factor of vascular risk at the individual patient level. Ultrasonography is a reference technique for the evaluation of this condition. However, its use in common practice remains difficult due to a lack of standardization and inter-operator variability. We present a new and simple technique for the assessment of carotid atherosclerosis; and evaluate the ability of vascular neurologists to obtain results consistent with those of an expert in vascular ultrasound. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The TIMMA scale is an acronym for the five classes of carotid atherosclerosis in French, VIMMA in English: very important, important, moderate, minimal and absent. Combined, the first two classes make up the group "significant atheroma" and the last three classes make up the group "no significant atheroma". This scale was evaluated in 38 patients (76 carotid arteries) suffering from ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack by five operators who are competent in carotid echocardiography: one TIMMA-trained (40 hours of training) vascular neurologist physician (VNP), three VNPs informed on the measurement method (1 hour of information) and one specialized vascular physician (SVP) who was considered to be the reference examiner. We evaluated the concordance between the VNPs and the SVP in classifying patients, firstly into the significant or not atheroma group and, secondly, into the five TIMMA classes. RESULTS: The evaluation of the two-group clustering scale found a concordance between the informed VNPs and the SVP on 76 carotid arteries of 86% (kappa=0.7) and between the trained VNP and the SVP on 58 carotid arteries of 90% (kappa=0.8). The positive and negative predictive values for significant atheroma diagnosis were 100% and 81%, respectively, for the informed VNPs, and 100% and 80% for the trained VNP. The evaluation of the Five-Class Scale showed a concordance between the informed VNPs and the SVP of 46% (kappa=0.3), and between the trained VNP and the SVP of 74% (kappa=0.7). CONCLUSION: TIMMA allows VNPs who are competent in carotid ultrasonography to reproducibly identify subjects with significant carotid atheroma. The contribution of this scale to the determination of cardiovascular risk should be evaluated.

[Efficacy of replacement enzyme therapy on central nervous system manifestations in Fabry's disease]. / Efficacité de l'enzymothérapie substitutive sur le système nerveux central dans la maladie de Fabry.

INTRODUCTION: Fabry's disease (FD) an X-linked inherited lysosomal sphingolipidosis leads to a multisystemic disease. The efficacy of replacement enzyme therapy on the central nervous system manifestations has not been evaluated. OBSERVATION: A 38-year-old patient suffered from a Fabry's disease diagnosed at the age of 10. Since the age of 26, he suffered from repeated ischemic strokes. Since the age of 34, he was treated by enzyme replacement therapy (agalsidase beta, 1 mg/kg/14 days). He had a cerebral MRI evaluation 1 year and 4 years after the initiation of the enzyme therapy. No new clinical event occurred during the follow-up and the imaging did not evidence new lesion. DISCUSSION: We report the cerebral MRI follow-up under enzyme replacement therapy in a patient with Fabry's disease with central nervous system involvement. No new lesion appeared. CONCLUSION: Enzyme replacement therapy seems beneficial in Fabry's disease with central nervous system involvement.