Perception of Dental and Smile Esthetics by Orthodontists and Prosthodontists: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To examine if there are differences in smile esthetic evaluation scores by orthodontists and prosthodontists and if there are changes in those scores when two evaluations are performed, when the time of observation is increased, and when the lips are present or absent from the images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 12 individuals participated in this pilot study. Two digital images were taken from each individual. The first digital image was a smile view, and the second image was an intraoral view. Two presentation files were prepared, with two images for each individual. The smile and dental attractiveness ratings were obtained from 10 specialists. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA was applied including all four within-subject factors, the evaluator (E), the repetition (R), the time of observation (T), and the presence or not of lips (L). Factors E, T, and L each had a statistically significant main effect. E and R had a statistically significant combined effect. In particular, the esthetic score for the view with smile was overall higher than for the intraoral view. The same results were obtained when the analysis was repeated with the 10 evaluators grouped to prosthodontists and orthodontists, and the prosthodontists tended to score higher than the orthodontists. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluator and the presence of lips have a statistically significant effect. The present pilot study has found that three (E, L, R) out of four factors (T) are important for the evaluation of dental esthetics.

Hybrid chitosan/gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite scaffolds promote odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells and in vitro biomineralization.

OBJECTIVE: Hybrid chitosan/gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite (CS/Gel/nHA) scaffolds have attracted considerable interest in tissue engineering (TE) of mineralized tissues. The present study aimed to investigate the potential of CS/Gel/nHA scaffolds loaded with dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) to induce odontogenic differentiation and in vitro biomineralization. METHODS: CS/Gel/nHA scaffolds were synthesized by freeze-drying, seeded with DPSCs, and characterized with flow cytometry. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), live/dead staining, and MTT assays were used to evaluate cell morphology and viability; real-time PCR for odontogenesis-related gene expression analysis; SEM-EDS (Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy), and X-ray Diffraction analysis (XRD) for structural and chemical characterization of the mineralized constructs, respectively. RESULTS: CS/Gel/nHA scaffolds supported viability and proliferation of DPSCs over 14 days in culture. Gene expression patterns indicated pronounced odontogenic shift of DPSCs, evidenced by upregulation of DSPP, BMP-2, ALP, and the transcription factors RunX2 and Osterix. SEM-EDS showed the production of a nanocrystalline mineralized matrix inside the cell-based and - to a lesser extent - the cell-free constructs, with a time-dependent production of net-like nanocrystals (appr. 25-30nm in diameter). XRD analysis gave the crystallite size (D=50nm) but could not distinguish between the initially incorporated and the biologically produced nHA. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study validating the potential of CS/Gel/nHA scaffolds to support viability and proliferation of DPSCs, and to provide a biomimetic microenvironment favoring odontogenic differentiation and in vitro biomineralization without the addition of any inductive factors, including dexamethasone and/or growth/morphogenetic factors. These results reveal a promising strategy towards TE of mineralized dental tissues.

Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: A systematic review and analysis of studies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify if different types of indirect restorations used for single teeth had different biological and technical complications, as well as survival rates. METHOD: An electronic search was performed in various electronic databases to identify articles, published between 1980 and 2017. The search terms were categorised into 4 groups: inlay, onlay, inlay/onlay and crown. Manual searches of published full-text articles and related reviews were also performed. RESULTS: A total number of 2849 papers were retrieved initially. After a detailed assessment for eligibility, 9 studies were selected for inclusion. The heterogeneity of the studies did allow neither a meta-analysis nor any meaningful comparison between types of restorations or materials. Only some pooling was performed for representative reasons. The mean survival rate of inlays was 90.89%, while for onlays and crowns it was 93.50% and 95.38%, respectively. For the fourth study group, consisting of both inlays and onlays, the survival rate was found to be 99.43%. Statistical analysis demonstrated caries to be the main biological complication for all types of restorations, followed by a root and/or tooth fracture incidence (11.34%) and endodontic incidence. Ceramic fractures represented the most common technical complication, followed by loss of retention and porcelain chipping. CONCLUSION: The 5-year survival rate for crowns and inlays/onlays is very high, exceeding 90%. An association between the kind of complications and different types of restorations could not be established. Nevertheless, a relatively high failure rate due to caries and ceramic fractures was noted.