Foveal photoreceptor disruption in ocular diseases: An optical coherence tomography-based differential diagnosis.

Fovea centralis, located at the center of the macula, is packed with cone photoreceptors and is responsible for central visual acuity. Isolated foveal photoreceptor disruption may occur in a variety of hereditary, degenerative, traumatic, and toxic chorioretinal diseases. These have been known previously by multiple synonyms including macular microhole, foveal spot, and outer foveal microdefects. A common clinical feature underlying these conditions is the presence of apparently normal fovea or subtle hypopigmented lesion at the foveal or juxtafoveal area. A detailed history along with high-resolution optical coherence tomography is often helpful to derive a conclusive diagnosis in majority of these cases. Focal photoreceptor disruption usually involves loss or rarefaction of ellipsoid/interdigitation zone, either in isolation or associated with external limiting membrane or retinal pigment epithelium disruption in the fovea. Vitreomacular interface (VMI) disorders including vitreomacular traction, posterior vitreous detachment, epiretinal membrane, and impending macular hole possibly remain the most common cause. Retinal dystrophies such as cone dystrophy, occult macular dystrophy, and achromatopsia may present with diminution of vision and normal appearing fundus in a younger age group. Other causes include photic retinopathy (e.g., from a history of sun gazing or laser pointer exposure), blunt trauma, drug exposure (e.g., poppers maculopathy or tamoxifen retinopathy), and acute retinal pigment epitheliopathy (ARPE). Visual prognosis depends on the underlying etiology with complete recovery common in the subset of patients with VMI, and ARPE, whereas persistent outer retinal defects are the rule in other conditions. We discuss the differential diagnoses that lead to isolated foveal photoreceptor defects. Identifying and understanding the underlying disease processes that cause foveal photoreceptor disruption may help predict visual prognosis.

Outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in retinal detachment associated with morning glory disc anomaly.

Purpose: Morning glory disc anomaly (MGDA) is associated with a high prevalence of retinal detachment (RD), sometimes requiring multiple surgeries. The study aimed to establish the outcomes of RD surgery in such eyes and predict factors influencing the outcome, if any. Methods: It was a retrospective observational study of 9 eyes that underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for RD associated with MGDA. Clinical and surgical details were correlated with outcomes of surgery as noted at the final follow-up. Results: PPV was performed in 9 eyes. Lensectomy was done in 5 of 9 eyes (55.5%) during PPV. Laser photocoagulation around the disc was performed in 55.5% (5/9) of the eyes. Silicone oil tamponade was used in 77.7% (7/9) of eyes and gas tamponade (14% C3F8) was used in 22.3% (2/9) of eyes. Attached retina at final visit was observed in 66% of the eyes (6/9). Two out of 3 eyes that were seen to have preoperative glial tissue at the disc had poor outcome (odds ratio 10, P = 0.16). Five out of 7 (71%) eyes that had silicone oil tamponade, had an attached retina. No identifiable breaks were noted preoperatively in 5 eyes, of which 4 (80%) had an attached retina postoperatively. Vision improved by 1 line in 67% of the eyes that underwent surgery. Conclusion: MGDA related RD presents a unique set of challenges; meticulous PPV with or without lensectomy can help in achieving a successful anatomical and functional outcome in about two-thirds of patients.

Is immediate treatment necessary for diabetic macular edema after pars plana vitrectomy for tractional complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy?

PURPOSE: To assess the treatment benefit of eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) in vitrectomized eyes for tractional complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS: In a retrospective multicentre observational study in India, the clinical outcomes of eyes with center-involving DME in vitrectomized eyes for tractional complications of PDR in people with type 2 diabetes with at least 12 months follow-up data were assessed. The DME status and visual acuity outcomes were compared between those who received treatment versus those observed. RESULTS: In the 10-year study period, 45 eyes of 44 patients from 5 tertiary centers in India met the inclusion criteria. Center-involving DME was documented after a mean of 7 ± 7 months following pars plan vitrectomy (PPV) for tractional complications of PDR. More than half of the (n = 25) eyes were immediately treated for DME, and treatment was deferred for the rest. At one year, there was a statistically significant reduction in mean central subfield thickness in treated (467.9 ± 124.8 µm to 367.8 ± 143.7 µm; p < 0.001) as well as observed (405.2 ± 132.6 µm to 325.6 ± 149 µm; p < 0.001) eyes, and the change was comparable (p = 0.574). The change in vision was also comparable (0.12 ± 0.31 and 0.22 ± 0.54 Log MAR in the treated and observed group, respectively; p = 0.443). CONCLUSION: Treatment for pre-existing or new-onset DME after PPV for tractional complications of PDR may be deferred for up to one year because the DME may resolve spontaneously with time.