LDCT lung cancer screening in populations at different risk for lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The improvement of low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening selection criteria could help to include more individuals who have lung cancer, or in whom lung cancer will develop, while avoiding significant cost increase. We evaluated baseline results of LDCT lung cancer screening in a population with a heterogeneous risk profile for lung cancer. METHODS: LDCT lung cancer screening was implemented alongside a preventive health programme in a private hospital in Brazil. Individuals older than 45 years, smokers and former smokers, regardless of tobacco exposure, were included. Patients were classified according to the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) eligibility criteria and to PLCOm2012 6-year lung cancer risk. Patient characteristics, CT positivity rate, detection rate of lung cancer and false-positive rate were assessed. RESULTS: LDCT scans of 472 patients were evaluated and three lung adenocarcinomas were diagnosed. CT positivity rate (Lung-RADS 3/4) was significantly higher (p=0.019) in the NLST group (10.1% (95% CI, 5.9% to 16.9%)) than in the non-NLST group (3.6% (95% CI, 2.62% to 4.83%)) and in the PLCOm2012 high-risk group (14.3% (95% CI, 6.8% to 27.7%)) than in the PLCOm2012 low-risk group (3.7% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.8%)) (p=0.016). Detection rate of lung cancer was also significantly higher (p=0.018) among PLCOm2012 high-risk patients (5.7% (95% CI, 2.5% to 12.6%)) than in the PLCOm2012 low-risk individuals (0.2% (95% CI, 0.1% to 1.1%)). The false-positive rate for NLST criteria (16.4% (95% CI, 13.2% to 20.1%)) was higher (p<0.001) than for PLCOm2012 criteria (7.6 (95% CI, 5.3% to 10.5%)). DISCUSSION: Our study indicates a lower performance when screening low-risk individuals in comparison to screening patients meeting NLST criteria and PLCOm2012 high-risk patients. Also, incorporating PLCOm2012 6-year lung cancer risk ≥0.0151 as an eligibility criterion seems to increase lung cancer screening effectiveness.

Association between Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Levels and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Not Independent from Metabolic Syndrome Criteria.

INTRODUCTION: Thyroid hormones are involved in the regulation of body composition, lipid metabolism, and insulin resistance. Thus, it is possible that they might play a role in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the role of thyroid function on NAFLD is not well defined. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels, within the reference range, and presence of NAFLD in asymptomatic individuals. STUDY DESIGN: We included all individuals evaluated at a preventive clinic of the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, between 2014 and 2015. The prevalence of NAFLD (analyzed by abdominal ultrasound), according to TSH quartiles, within the reference range, was determined. The association between TSH quartiles and NAFLD was analyzed by logistic regression adjusted for possible confounders. RESULTS: We evaluated 10,539 individuals (73% male, age 43.4 ± 9.4 years). The prevalence of NAFLD was 34, 38, 38, and 39% in the first to the fourth TSH quartiles (0.46-1.44, 1.45-1.97, 1.98-2.68, and 2.69-4.68 mUI/L, respectively, p for trend < 0.001). At univariate analysis, higher TSH levels were associated with the diagnosis of NAFLD. When data were adjusted for the metabolic syndrome characteristics (waist circumference, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides levels, presence of diabetes, and systemic arterial hypertension), the association was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although the TSH variability within the reference range is associated with NAFLD in univariable models, once adjusted for metabolic syndrome factors no significant association is noted.