Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modelling in Hemophilia A: Relating Thrombin and Plasmin Generation to Factor VIII Activity After Administration of a VWF/FVIII Concentrate.

BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A patients are treated with factor (F) VIII prophylactically to prevent bleeding. In general, dosage and frequency are based on pharmacokinetic measurements. Ideally, an alternative dose adjustment can be based on the hemostatic potential, measured with a thrombin generation assay (TGA), like the Nijmegen hemostasis assay. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the predicted performance of a previously developed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for FVIII replacement therapy, relating FVIII dose and FVIII activity levels with thrombin and plasmin generation parameters. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measurements were obtained from 29 severe hemophilia A patients treated with pdVWF/FVIII concentrate (Haemate P®). The predictive performance of the previously developed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was evaluated using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM). When predictions of FVIII activity or TGA parameters were inadequate [median prediction error (MPE) > 20%], a new model was developed. RESULTS: The original pharmacokinetic model underestimated clearance and was refined based on a two-compartment model. The pharmacodynamic model displays no bias in the observed normalized thrombin peak height and normalized thrombin potential (MPE of 6.83% and 7.46%). After re-estimating pharmacodynamic parameters, EC50 and Emax values were relatively comparable between the original model and this group. Prediction of normalized plasmin peak height was inaccurate (MPE 58.9%). CONCLUSION: Our predictive performance displayed adequate thrombin pharmacodynamic predictions of the original model, but a new pharmacokinetic model was required. The pharmacodynamic model is not factor specific and applicable to multiple factor concentrates. A prospective study is needed to validate the impact of the FVIII dosing pharmacodynamic model on bleeding reduction in patients.

The Nijmegen ultra-sensitive Bethesda Assay detects very low-titer factor VIII inhibitors in patients with congenital and acquired hemophilia A.

BACKGROUND: An inhibitor can develop in congenital hemophilia A (HA) patients against exogenous infused factor (F)VIII, whereas in acquired HA (AHA) inhibitors initially develop against endogenous FVIII. Inhibitors can be detected with the Nijmegen Bethesda Assay (NBA), which has an international cut-off level of 0.60 Nijmegen Bethesda Units/mL (NBU/mL). Thereby, very low-titer inhibitors may remain undetected. AIM: To describe the design and validation of the Nijmegen ultra-sensitive Bethesda Assay (NusBA) for the detection of very low-titer inhibitors. METHODS: The NusBA is a modification of the NBA in which the ratio of patient plasma to normal pooled plasma is changed from 1:1 to 9:1. Analytical validation was performed according to the CLSI EP10 guideline in order to determine trueness and reproducibility. Clinical validation was performed in two cohorts of congenital HA patients (82 adults) with pharmacokinetic data and four AHA patients. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was determined by measuring plasma samples spiked with inhibitor levels in the low range (0.05-0.80 NBU/mL). RESULTS: The LOQ for the NusBA was 0.10 NusBU/mL, with a coefficient of variation of 24.2 %. Seven (8.5 %) congenital HA patients had a positive NusBA result, of which only one was detected with the NBA. There was no correlation between NusBA and FVIII half-life. In three of the AHA patients the NusBA remained positive, when the NBA became negative. DISCUSSION: The NusBA is able to detect very low-titer FVIII inhibitors of ≥0.10 NBU/mL. Thereby, it may have added value in early inhibitor detection and therapy adjustments in patients with congenital HA and AHA.

Thrombin generation assays to personalize treatment in bleeding and thrombotic diseases.

Treatment of bleeding and thrombotic disorders is highly standardized and based on evidence-based medicine guidelines. These evidence-based treatment schemes are well accepted but may lead to either insufficient treatment or over-dosing, because the individuals' hemostatic properties are not taken into account. This can potentially introduce bleeding or thrombotic complications in individual patients. With the incorporation of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters, based on global assays such as thrombin generation assays (TGAs), a more personalized approach can be applied to treat either bleeding or thrombotic disorders. In this review, we will discuss the recent literature about the technical aspects of TGAs and the relation to diagnosis and management of bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In patients with bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia A or factor VII deficiency, TGAs can be used to identify patients with a more severe bleeding phenotype and also in the management with non-replacement therapy and/or bypassing therapy. These assays have also a role in patients with venous thrombo-embolism, but the usage of TGAs in patients with arterial thrombosis is less clear. However, there is a potential role for TGAs in the monitoring of (long-term) antithrombotic therapy, for example with the use of direct oral anticoagulants. Finally this review will discuss controversies, limitations and knowledge gaps in relation to the introduction of TGAs to personalize medicine in daily medical practice.

Fibrinolytic assays in bleeding of unknown cause: Improvement in diagnostic yield.

Introduction: Analysis of fibrinolytic disorders is challenging and may potentially lead to underdiagnosis of patients with an increased bleeding tendency. Aim: To compare clinical characteristics, laboratory measurements, and treatment modalities in a monocenter cohort of patients in whom fibrinolytic studies were performed. Methods: Retrospective study of patients in whom fibrinolytic studies were performed between January 2016 and February 2020 in the Hemophilia Treatment Center, Nijmegen-Eindhoven-Maastricht, the Netherlands. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) antigen and activity level, α2-antiplasmin activity, tissue plasminogen activator, and euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT) before and after venous compression were determined in all patients. Data of bleeding assessment tool (BAT) score, clinical characteristics, results of primary and secondary hemostasis assays, and general treatment plans were collected. Results: In total, 160 patients were included: 97 (61%) without and 63 (39%) with a laboratory-based fibrinolytic disorder. Mean BAT score did not differ between the groups (9.3 vs 9.8, respectively). The presumptive fibrinolytic disorders were distributed as follows: 34 patients had an increased ECLT ratio or low baseline ECLT, 25 patients had low PAI-1 antigen and activity level, and four patients had both. The majority of these patients were treated with tranexamic acid monotherapy (60%) with only 40% additional treatment options, whereas 80% of patients without a presumptive fibrinolytic disorder had multiple treatment modalities. Discussion: Analysis of fibrinolytic disorders in selected patients has a high diagnostic yield. General incorporation of fibrinolytic analysis in the diagnostic workup of patients with bleeding of unknown cause can improve diagnosis and management of their bleeding episodes.

Thrombin generation for monitoring hemostatic therapy in hemophilia A: A narrative review.

Patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) have an increased risk of spontaneous and trauma-related bleeding because of a congenital absence of factor VIII (FVIII). Most severe HA patients use prophylactic FVIII concentrate, the effect of which can be monitored with FVIII activity level measurement. However, FVIII activity level is less valuable in predicting the potential clinical bleeding risk. Some patients still experience breakthrough bleeds despite adequate FVIII trough levels, whereas others do not bleed with trough levels below threshold. This difference may be caused by inter-individual differences in pro- and anticoagulant factors, the so-called hemostatic balance. Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) measure the hemostatic balance as a whole. Thereby, the TGAs may be a better tool in the guidance and monitoring of treatment in HA patients. In addition, TGAs offer the opportunity to determine the response to bypassing agents and treatment with non-factor replacement therapy, in which FVIII activity assays are not suitable for monitoring. This review summarizes the current knowledge about monitoring different HA treatment modalities by TGA, as a single treatment option and when used in a concomitant fashion.

Combining factor VIII levels and thrombin/plasmin generation: A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for patients with haemophilia A.

AIMS: Prophylactic treatment of haemophilia A patients with factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate focuses on maintaining a minimal trough FVIII activity level to prevent bleeding. However, due to differences in bleeding tendency, the pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing approach may be suboptimal. An alternative approach could be the addition of haemostatic pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, reflecting a patient's unique haemostatic balance. Our aim was to develop a population PK/PD model, based on FVIII activity levels and Nijmegen Haemostasis Assay (NHA) patterns, a global haemostatic assay that measures thrombin/plasmin generation simultaneously. METHODS: PK/PD measurements were collected from 30 patients treated with standard half-life FVIII concentrate. The relationship between FVIII activity levels and the thrombin/plasmin generation parameters (thrombin potential, thrombin peak height and plasmin peak height), were described by sigmoidal Emax functions. RESULTS: The obtained EC50 value was smallest for the normalized thrombin potential (11.6 IU/dL), followed by normalized thrombin peak height (56.6 IU/dL) and normalized plasmin peak height (593 IU/dL), demonstrating that normalized thrombin potential showed 50% of the maximal effect at lower FVIII activity levels. Substantial inter-individual variability in the PD parameters, such as EC50 of thrombin potential (86.9%) was observed, indicating that, despite similar FVIII activity levels, haemostatic capacity varies significantly between patients. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that dosing based on patients' individual PK/PD parameters may be beneficial over dosing solely on individual PK parameters. This model could be used as proof-of-principle to examine the application of PK/PD-guided dosing. However, the relation between the PD parameters and bleeding has to be better defined.

Pharmacodynamic monitoring of factor VIII replacement therapy in hemophilia A: Combining thrombin and plasmin generation.

BACKGROUND: Clinical severity of hemophilia A (HA) varies, possibly due to interplay of many factors in the hemostatic pathway. Pharmacokinetic monitoring of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in HA patients consists of measuring FVIII activity levels and subsequent dose adjustment. The Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay (NHA) measures thrombin generation (TG) and plasmin generation (PG). OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in TG and PG between HA patients before and during a pharmacokinetic study and identify best parameters to develop a pharmacodynamic model. METHODS: Twenty-five HA patients (baseline FVIII < 1-9 IU/dL) underwent a pharmacokinetic study with a single dose of 25-50 IU/kg standard half-life FVIII concentrate. At baseline and after administration of FVIII TG and PG parameters were measured with the NHA. RESULTS: FVIII activity level increased from median 1.0 IU/dL (interquartile range < 1.0-6.0) to 71 IU/dL (62-82) 15 minutes after administration and decreased to 15 IU/dL (10-26) at 24 hours. TG was enhanced simultaneously, with thrombin peak height (TPH) increasing from 22nM (15-35) to 222nM (159-255), and thrombin potential (TP) from 404nM/min (undetectable-876) to 1834nM/min (1546-2353). Twenty-four hours after infusion, TG parameters remained high (TPH 73nM [58.5-126.3]; TP 1394nM/min [1066-1677]) compared to FVIII activity level. PG showed hyperfibrinolysis in severe HA patients compared to mild patients and controls, which normalized after FVIII supplementation. CONCLUSION: HA patients showed clear differences in baseline TG and PG despite having comparable FVIII activity levels. These results reveal a discrepancy between FVIII activity level and TG, in which the latter may be a better parameter to monitor individualized treatment in HA patients.

[A man with a dislocated hip]. / Een man met een heupluxatie.

A 95-year-old male presented with a dislocated hip hemiarthroplasty after falling off his chair. After closed reposition, symptoms of dislocation remained. A control X-ray showed a disassociation of the prosthesis at the head-neck interface. Therefore, open reposition was performed. X-ray control is important to encounter complications, which can occur after reposition.

Soluble CD30 does not predict late acute rejection or safe tapering of immunosuppression in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports revealed the potential value of the soluble CD30 level (sCD30) as biomarker for the risk of acute rejection and graft failure after renal transplantation, here we examined its use for the prediction of safe tapering of calcineurin inhibitors as well as late acute rejection. METHODS: In a cohort of renal transplant patients receiving triple immunosuppressive therapy we examined whether sCD30 can be used as a marker for safe (rejection-free) discontinuation of tacrolimus at six months after transplantation (TDS cohort: 24 rejectors and 44 non-rejecting controls). Also, in a second cohort of patients (n=22, rejectors n=11 and non-rejectors n=11), participating in a clinical trial of rituximab as induction therapy after renal transplantation (RITS cohort), we examined whether sCD30 could predict the occurrence of late (>3months post-transplant) acute rejection episodes. sCD30 was measured by ELISA in serum taken before and at several time points after transplantation. RESULTS: Overall, in the TDS cohort sCD30 decreased after transplantation. No difference in sCD30 was observed between rejectors and non-rejecting controls at any of the time points measured. In addition, in the RITS cohort, sCD30 measured at three months after transplantation were not indicative for the occurrence of late acute rejection. CONCLUSION: In two prospectively followed cohorts of renal transplant patients we found no association between sCD30 and the occurrence of either late acute rejection or acute rejection after reduction of immunosuppression.