Adverse events with transvenous left ventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure: early experience from a single centre.

AIMS: Assessment of complications following implantation of transvenous ventricular electrodes to pace the left ventricle. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with severe cardiac failure and left bundle branch block were prospectively followed for adverse effects of implantation of a left ventricular transvenous pacing system. Immediate follow-up was associated with loss of left ventricular pacing in nine patients (32%). This was due to lead dislodgement in four cases (corrected by re-operation in three of these cases), and due to increased threshold in five cases (corrected by programming a higher pacing amplitude in all five cases, but with intermittent diaphragmatic contraction in one case). After 1 month, one patient died, one patient with severe coronary heart disease suffered a myocardial infarction, and left ventricular pacing was lost in two patients. Pericardial effusion, new significant ventricular arrhythmias or other adverse effects were not observed. After a mean follow-up of 16 +/- 9.2 months, pacing leads remained stable and no late complications related to the transvenous left ventricular epicardial pacing were observed. CONCLUSION: Placement of a permanent lead in a tributary of the coronary sinus is feasible without serious adverse effects during the first month. The only frequent adverse event was lead dislodgement; a finding which emphasizes the need for development of specially designed leads for this application.

Left ventricular-based pacing in patients with chronic heart failure: comparison of acute hemodynamic benefits according to underlying heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Acute left ventricular-based pacing has been shown to improve hemodynamics in patients with severe heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, it is not known whether the cause of the underlying heart disease influences the potential effect of left ventricular-based pacing. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether beneficial hemodynamic effects of acute left ventricular-based pacing in severe chronic heart failure are dependent on underlying heart disease. METHODS: After coronary angiography, patients with severe heart failure and LBBB were separated into two groups: dilated (25 patients; 20 male) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (21 patients; 20 male). Hemodynamic parameters were evaluated at baseline and during left ventricular-based pacing. RESULTS: Improvement in hemodynamic parameters were similar in both groups, during acute left ventricular pacing (changes expressed in percentage): pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, -16+/-15% vs. -14+/-10%; V wave amplitude, -25+/-18% vs. -21+/-17%; and biventricular pacing, -15+/-15% vs. -11+/-11% and -23+/-18% vs. -16+/-18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Underlying heart disease does not influence the response to acute left ventricular-based pacing in patients with severe heart failure and LBBB. This finding provides support for including all patients with enlarged heart and heart failure in future studies evaluating left ventricular-based pacing.

Evaluation of left ventricular based pacing in patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation.

Acute hemodynamic data of left ventricular based pacing were assessed in 2 groups of patients with severe cardiac failure: 11 patients with atrial fibrillation and 17 patients with sinus rhythm. Both biventricular and left ventricular pacing significantly improved acute hemodynamic findings to a similar degree in both groups, suggesting that left ventricular based pacing may be beneficial in patients with severe cardiac failure regardless of whether or not they are in sinus rhythm.

Internal right atrial cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: effects of low-energy biphasic shocks.

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of internal right atrial cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using a defibrillation right atrial catheter and 2 thoracic patches with low-energy biphasic shocks.