Association between bariatric surgery preoperative chemoprophylaxis and postoperative bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Use of chemoprophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after bariatric surgery is a generally accepted principle; however, the optimal strategy in terms of medication type and pre- and postoperative dosing is uncertain. In our healthcare system, four hospitals performed bariatric surgery and utilized differing protocols for VTE prophylaxis. The analysis sought to evaluate the association of differing prophylaxis strategies on bleeding and VTE occurrence. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from 2018 to 2021 at four hospitals were studied. Patients were grouped by whether or not they received preoperative chemoprophylaxis. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding, defined as requiring a blood transfusion or reoperation for bleeding within 30 days. Bivariate analyses were performed with Chi-square and Wilcoxon Rank tests where applicable. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for the outcome of postoperative bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 2145 bariatric surgeries were evaluated (33.6% RYGB, 66.4% SG). Among 1712 patients who underwent surgery at Hospitals A, B, and C, 93.1% received preoperative VTE prophylaxis, compared with 1 patient (0.1%) among 433 patients operated on at Hospital D. Postoperative bleeding occurred more frequently in patients who received preoperative VTE prophylaxis versus those who did not (3.7% vs 1.1%; p < 0.01). After multivariable regression analysis, only RYGB (OR 3.59; p < 0.01) and preoperative VTE prophylaxis (OR 3.54; p = 0.02) were significantly associated with postoperative bleeding. Rates of VTE for patients receiving preoperative VTE prophylaxis or no prophylaxis were not significantly different (0.6% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.26). DISCUSSION: Preoperative VTE prophylaxis prior to bariatric surgery was associated with postoperative bleeding without differences in VTE occurrence. These results call into question the routine use of VTE chemoprophylaxis for all patients undergoing bariatric surgery and favor selective usage.

Association of operative time and approach on postoperative complications for esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with decreased postoperative complications compared with open esophagectomy. However, the risks of complications for minimally invasive esophagectomy compared with open esophagectomy may be affected by operative time. The objectives of this study are to (1) compare the incidence of postoperative complications for minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy and (2) evaluate the association of postoperative complications on operative approach and operative time. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent an esophagectomy in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure-Targeted Data File was performed from 2016 to 2020. For analysis, minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy were stratified into tertiles of operative time. A bivariate analysis of postoperative complications comparing minimally invasive esophagectomy with open esophagectomy was performed. Multivariable Poisson regression models were estimated evaluating the association of the likelihood of postoperative complications with operative approach and operative time. RESULTS: In total, 8,574 patients who underwent esophagectomy were included: 5,369 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy, and 3,205 patients underwent open esophagectomy. Median operative time was 402 minutes for minimally invasive esophagectomy and 321 minutes for open esophagectomy. The incidence of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality was lower in the minimally invasive esophagectomy group than the open esophagectomy group within the same tertiles of operative time. When we compared patients who underwent short open esophagectomy with those who underwent long minimally invasive esophagectomy, there were no significant differences in complications. CONCLUSION: There is no significant association of postoperative complications for short open esophagectomy compared with long minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients should be selected for minimally invasive esophagectomy when there is appropriate surgeon experience and hospital resources.

Surgeon variability in repair of hiatal hernia at the time of bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia (HH) is estimated to affect between 20 and 50% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the preoperative assessment and intraoperative repair of HH. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation in surgeon assessment and repair of HH during bariatric surgery across a multi-hospital healthcare system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data obtained from the metabolic and bariatric accreditation quality improvement program (MBSAQIP) and institutional medical records. All adult patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were included. Preoperative assessment of HH was defined as either EGD or upper GI/Esophagram (UGI) within one year of surgery. Surgeons were evaluated individually and by hospital. Chi-square analysis and ANOVA were performed. RESULTS: From January 2018 to February 2023, 3,487 bariatric surgeries were performed across 4 hospitals and 11 surgeons (2481 SG and 1006 RYGB). HH were concurrently repaired during 24% of operations. The rate of HH repair in SG was 25 and 22% in RYGB (p = 0.06). Preoperatively, 41% of patients underwent EGD and 23% had an UGI. HH was diagnosed in 22% of EGDs. Patients who underwent preoperative EGD had higher rates of HH repair than those without a preop EGD (33% vs. 17%; p < 0.001). The rate of preoperative EGD utilization by surgeon varied significantly from 3 to 92% (p < 0.001) as did HH repair rates between surgeons (range 8-57%; p < 0.001). Even among patients with a preoperatively diagnosed HH, the repair rate ranged 20-91% between individual surgeons (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Within a healthcare system there was significant heterogeneity in approach to assessment and repair of HH during bariatric surgery. This appears to be mediated by multiple factors, including utilization of preoperative studies, individual surgeon differences, and differences between hospitals.