[High time for wide application of an opting-out strategy for HIV testing]. / Hoog tijd voor brede toepassing van 'opting-out'-strategie bij hiv-tests.

--Despite the current active HIV test policy, the effects of the former policy are still visible, i.e. a relatively low number of individuals that have ever been tested for HIV. --The number of HIV tests and knowledge of current HIV status has increased among visitors to the STI clinic in Amsterdam. --Nevertheless, anonymous HIV surveillance among visitors to the STI clinic shows that a considerable proportion of HIV-infected individuals (24% of men who have sex with men (MSM) and 80% of heterosexuals) are unaware of the infection. --A new opting-out strategy for HIV testing in STI clinics is recommended. --The opting-out strategy may also be applicable to other medical settings, especially those that treat target populations such as MSM, heterosexuals with STI-related symptoms, and persons originating from AIDS-endemic regions. --The opting-out system was initiated in the Amsterdam STI clinic in 2007 in order to further reduce the number of undiagnosed HIV infections.

[Inguinal lymphogranuloma venereum in a man having sex with men: perhaps an example of the missing link to explain the transmission of the recently identified anorectal epidemic]. / Inguïnale lymphogranuloma venereum bij een man die seks heeft met mannen; wellicht een voorbeeld van de ontbrekende schakel ter verklaring van de transmissie bij de recent vastgestelde anorectale epidemie.

A 38-year-old man who had sex with men, presented at the outpatient department for Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Amsterdam with a painful, red, fluctuating swelling in the left groin and general discomfort. He had been sexually active in the population of men who have sex with men, in which an anorectal lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) epidemic has recently been discovered. Unlike other cases where there was anorectal involvement, this patient was the first case of LGV with the classical inguinal presentation although he had not visited the tropics where the inguinal form of LGV occurs as an STD. Routine investigation using PCR on material from urethra and rectum and from the urine, repeatedly failed to detect LGV. However, PCR on pus aspirated from the enlarged lymph node demonstrated Chlamydia trachomatis serovar type L2. Treatment with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily was started. This case illustrates that routine analysis from urethra and rectum and of urine may fail to detect LGV. Furthermore, this case of a patient who probably had LGV initially in the urethra may be the missing link in explaining the route of transmission of the anorectal LGV epidemic.

Randomized comparison of the type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitor cipamfylline cream, cream vehicle and hydrocortisone 17-butyrate cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options to treat atopic dermatitis are limited. Leukocytes from atopic patients have an abnormally high activity of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-phosphodiesterase (PDE), which can be normalized in vitro by PDE inhibitors. Cipamfylline is a new potent and selective inhibitor of PDE-4. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of up to 14 days' topical treatment with cipamfylline (0.15%) cream with vehicle and with hydrocortisone 17-butyrate (0.1%) cream. PATIENTS AND METHODS: International, multicentre, prospective, randomized double-blind, left-right studies of cipamfylline vs. vehicle and cipamfylline vs. hydrocortisone 17-butyrate in adult patients with stable symmetrical atopic dermatitis on the arms. RESULTS: Both cipamfylline and hydrocortisone 17-butyrate reduced the Total Severity Score significantly (P < 0.001). The reduction with cipamfylline was significantly greater than that with vehicle (difference vehicle-cipamfylline 1.67 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 2.28; P < 0.001) and was significantly less than with hydrocortisone 17-butyrate (difference hydrocortisone-cipamfylline -2.10 95% CI -2.93, -1.27; P < 0.001). Investigator and patient assessments of the overall treatment response showed a similar picture. CONCLUSIONS: Cipamfylline cream is significantly more effective than vehicle, but significantly less effective than hydrocortisone 17-butyrate cream in the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

SDZ ASM 981: an emerging safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: SDZ ASM 981 is a selective inhibitor of the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines from T cells and mast cells in vitro. It is the first ascomycin macrolactam derivative under development for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of SDZ ASM 981 cream at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.2%, 0.6% and 1.0% in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis and to select the concentration to be used in phase III studies. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre dose-finding study. A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with SDZ ASM 981 cream at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.2%, 0.6%, or 1.0%, matching vehicle cream, or the internal control 0.1% betamethasone-17-valerate cream (BMV). Treatment was given twice daily for up to 3 weeks. RESULTS: A clear dose-response relationship for SDZ ASM 981 was evident, with 0.2%, 0.6% and 1.0% SDZ ASM 981 creams all being significantly more effective than vehicle (P = 0.041, 0.001 and 0.008, respectively) in terms of baseline to end-point changes in the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) and pruritus score. The 1.0% cream was the most effective SDZ ASM 981 concentration. BMV was more effective than the SDZ ASM 981 creams tested in this study. It appears that the efficacy plateau was not reached with the SDZ ASM 981 creams within 3 weeks treatment. SDZ ASM 981 was well tolerated. Burning or a feeling of warmth were the only adverse events reported more frequently in the 0.6% and 1.0% SDZ ASM 981 treatment groups than in the vehicle treatment group (42.9%, 48.9% and 34.9%, respectively). Few systemic adverse events were reported during the study (headache was the most frequent systemic event reported by 15 of 252 patients) and none was considered to be related to treatment. The local tolerability profile of the 1.0% cream was similar to that of the lower concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: 1.0% SDZ ASM 981 cream, which was shown to be safe, well tolerated and the most effective concentration in this study, was selected as the concentration to be further developed in phase III studies.

The millennium criteria for the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis forms an active area of basic and clinical research, where important new knowledge about genetics and immunopathogenesis has surfaced over the past years, and where simultaneous development of new and innovative therapies is under way. However, the inclusion of any patient in an atopic dermatitis study, whether it is on its genetics, pathogenesis or therapy, requires a diagnosis which is irrefutable. Since there is no simple and also no complicated laboratory procedure to reach a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis, different sets of clinical criteria have been developed for the purpose of making the diagnosis uniformly in different studies as well as in different study centers. The most commonly used are Hanifin and Rajka's set of diagnostic features, which have major and minor clinical criteria to be fulfilled in order to establish a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis. Recent developments in the immunology of atopy have clearly established the major abnormality in this syndrome, the preferential production of allergen-specific IgE. In this contribution, it is suggested that the presence of such antibodies in a given patient should be a mandatory criterium for the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis. Such a diagnostic test however establishes a diagnosis of atopic syndrome, not atopic dermatitis. Thus, for atopic dermatitis we have to rely, for the time being, on additional clinical criteria. The clinical features described in the literature are critically evaluated, and it is suggested that in addition to the mandatory presence of allergen-specific IgE, 2 of 3 principal criteria (pruritus, typical morphology and distribution, chronic or chronically relapsing) should be present for such a diagnosis. Finally, the minor features originally described by Hanifin and Rajka and later evaluated by others are revised and divided over 4 subcategories; a) related to subclinical eczema; b) related to dry skin; c) extra skin folds; and d) ophthalmological pathology. They are suggested to be used as additional criteria only, needed when clinical suspicion is high but the new mandatory and principal diagnostic criteria described here are inconclusive. For study purposes, we suggest that the mandatory and principal criteria are sufficient. They are now evaluated and validated in ongoing atopic dermatitis treatment studies.

Effectiveness of the ascomycin macrolactam SDZ ASM 981 in the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of 1% SDZ ASM 981 cream and a matching placebo cream in the treatment of patients with moderate atopic dermatitis. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, right-and-left comparison study. SETTING: Academic referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-four adult patients with moderate atopic dermatitis. INTERVENTION: Topical 1% SDZ ASM 981 cream was applied twice daily (n=16) or once daily (n=18) and compared with a corresponding placebo cream base. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy was measured using a 4-point (0-3) scale for erythema, pruritus, exudation, excoriation, and lichenification (Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index [ADSI]). The ADSI score was defined as the sum of these 5 ratings (range, 0-15) and was determined on the pretreatment day (1 to 14 days before day 0) and on days 0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 16, 18, and 21. The percentage change from baseline (day 0) in the ADSI score was calculated on each of these days. Safety was evaluated by monitoring of adverse events, physical examination, hematologic examination, clinical chemistry studies, urinalysis, and measurement of blood levels of SDZ ASM 981. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients recruited, 34 started and 28 completed treatment according to the protocol. Sixteen patients used the cream twice daily, with significant improvement after 2 days of treatment. Within 3 weeks of topical therapy with 1% SDZ ASM 981 cream twice daily, a mean reduction of 71.9% in the ADSI score was observed at the actively treated test sites compared with a mean reduction of 10.3% at the placebo-treated test sites (P<.001). Efficacy was significantly less in the group treated once daily (n=18), with mean reductions of 37.7% and 6.2%, respectively. The efficacy was especially apparent for pruritus and excoriation. There were no clinically relevant drug-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with 1% SDZ ASM 981 cream was well tolerated. Twice-daily application of 1% SDZ ASM 981 cream was significantly more effective than use of the corresponding placebo and more effective than once-daily treatment. The new macrolactam ascomycin derivative SDZ ASM 981 is a promising agent for the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis. More elaborate phase 2 and 3 trials are under way to fully investigate the potential of this medication.