Evaluation of serum cytokines and acute phase proteins as possible pharmacodynamic biomarkers to monitor endoscopic remission during ustekinumab therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.

Background: Since not all Crohn's disease (CD) patients respond adequately to ustekinumab therapy, biomarkers could aid to monitor treatment response and optimize therapeutic outcomes. Objectives: To explore the dynamics of serum biomarker concentrations to monitor the response to ustekinumab treatment in CD patients. Design: Retrospective, exploratory study to evaluate concentrations of serum cytokines and acute phase proteins and their relation to endoscopic remission in CD patients during ustekinumab treatment. Methods: Serum concentrations of 16 proteins including cytokines and acute phase proteins were measured using the Mesoscale Discovery Platform in serum of healthy controls (n = 13), and CD patients (n = 61) at baseline (week 0), week 8 and week 24 during ustekinumab treatment. Endoscopic remission was defined as simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) <3 after 6 months of therapy. Results: Absolute concentrations of serum amyloid A protein (SAA; week 8), IL-6 (week 24), AGP (weeks 8 and 24), interferon (IFN)-γ (weeks 8 and 24), lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP; weeks 8 and 24) and IL-22 (weeks 8 and 24) were significantly lower in endoscopic remitters compared to non-responders (p-values ranging between <0.001 and <0.05). SAA (week 8) and AGP (week 24) were the biomarkers with the highest area under the ROC curve (AUROC; 0.761 and 0.760, respectively) for identifying patients in endoscopic remission, though their performance was not superior to C-reactive protein (CRP) or faecal calprotectin. AUROCs of the predictive probability of biomarker combinations showed superiority in discriminating endoscopic remitters from non-responders in comparison to single biomarker measurements, but not as compared to faecal calprotectin. Conclusion: Although not superior to faecal calprotectin, measurement of AGP, SAA, LBF, IFN-γ, IL-6 and IL-22 concentrations, and combinations thereof with or without CRP and faecal calprotectin, during ustekinumab therapy might contribute to adequate monitoring of treatment response in CD patients.

Potent neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 human antibodies cure infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants in hamster model.

Treatment with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) contributes to COVID-19 management. Unfortunately, SARS-CoV-2 variants escape several of these recently approved mAbs, highlighting the need for additional discovery and development. In a convalescent patient with COVID-19, we identified six mAbs, classified in four epitope groups, that potently neutralized SARS-CoV-2 D614G, beta, gamma, and delta infection in vitro, with three mAbs neutralizing omicron as well. In hamsters, mAbs 3E6 and 3B8 potently cured infection with SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan, beta, and delta when administered post-viral infection at 5 mg/kg. Even at 0.2 mg/kg, 3B8 still reduced viral titers. Intramuscular delivery of DNA-encoded 3B8 resulted in in vivo mAb production of median serum levels up to 90 µg/mL, and protected hamsters against delta infection. Overall, our data mark 3B8 as a promising candidate against COVID-19, and highlight advances in both the identification and gene-based delivery of potent human mAbs.

Tissue Exposure does not Explain Non-Response in Ulcerative Colitis Patients with Adequate Serum Vedolizumab Concentrations.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Some patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] do not respond to vedolizumab treatment despite adequate drug exposure in serum. This study aimed to investigate vedolizumab in tissue and questioned whether insufficient tissue exposure could explain non-response in UC patients with adequate serum vedolizumab concentrations. METHODS: A paired serum sample and colonic mucosal biopsy was collected from 40 UC patients [20 endoscopic responders, 20 non-responders] at week 14 of vedolizumab treatment. Vedolizumab, soluble [s]-mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 [MAdCAM-1], s-vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1] and s-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [ICAM-1] were measured in serum and/or tissue. Endoscopic response was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score ≤1. RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was observed between vedolizumab serum and colonic tissue concentrations [ρ = 0.84, p < 0.0001], regardless of the macroscopic inflammatory state of the tissue. Vedolizumab tissue concentrations were lower in non-responders than in responders [0.07 vs 0.11 µg/mg, p = 0.04]. In the subgroup of patients with adequate vedolizumab serum concentrations [>14.6 µg/mL], tissue vedolizumab was not significantly different between responders and non-responders [0.15 vs 0.13 µg/mg; p = 0.92]. Serum sMAdCAM-1 concentrations, but not serum sICAM-1 or sVCAM-1 concentrations, were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders with adequate vedolizumab serum concentrations [1.04 vs 0.83 ng/mL, p = 0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab concentrations in colonic mucosal tissue of UC patients reflect the concentration in serum regardless of the macroscopic inflammatory state of the tissue. Our data show that insufficient tissue exposure does not explain non-response in UC patients with adequate serum vedolizumab concentrations.

Development and validation of immunoassays for monitoring of guselkumab and anti-guselkumab antibodies in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring, which is the measurement of drug concentrations in the blood, is a useful tool to guide clinical decision-making and treatment adjustments, on the condition that drug concentrations are correlated with treatment response. For guselkumab, an anti-IL-23 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, such a concentration-response relationship could not yet be determined as no commercial assays for the quantification of this drug or antibodies against this drug are available. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate immunoassays for the quantification of guselkumab and anti-guselkumab antibodies according to the guidelines of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A diverse panel of 20 highly specific anti-guselkumab monoclonal antibodies (MA-GUS) was generated of which eight revealed a neutralizing capacity of ≥65 %. At least seven different antibody clusters were identified based on their epitope binning profile. Using MA-GUS9F6 as the capture antibody and MA-GUS12G12 as the detection antibody, an ELISA was developed with a dose-response curve ranging from 0.08 to 5 ng/mL. The assay was specific, selective and could accurately and precisely quantify guselkumab concentrations in spiked healthy control serum and serum from guselkumab-treated psoriasis patients with a cut-off for quantification of 0.014 µg/mL. The presence of IL-23 in physiological concentrations or of non-neutralizing antibodies did not impact the quantification of guselkumab, while the presence of neutralizing antibodies did. Using MA-GUS12A9 as a calibrator, two anti-guselkumab antibody assays were developed to detect anti-guselkumab antibodies, which differ in the threshold for detection and quantification and the tolerance to the presence of guselkumab. Together, these validated immunoassays are essential to establish a concentration-response relationship and will allow the future implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients receiving guselkumab treatment.

Evaluating an easy sampling method using dried blood spots to determine vedolizumab concentrations.

An association between vedolizumab (VDZ) trough concentrations and therapeutic outcome has been observed in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. VDZ samples are typically collected via venous sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), but can alternatively be collected via dried blood spot (DBS) samples, which can be used for intensive sampling to investigate pharmacokinetic profiles. Therefore, we have developed a DBS method for determining VDZ concentrations and validated this method by comparing VDZ measurements in paired DBS and venous patient samples. First, VDZ was spiked in citrated whole blood and spotted on filter paper. After drying, DBS were extracted and VDZ concentrations were determined in the extracts using ELISA. For clinical validation, 41 paired DBS and serum samples were collected from 19 VDZ-treated patients. VDZ concentrations measured in DBS extracts strongly correlated with serum concentrations (Pearson r = 0.978, p < 0.0001). No significant impact of the hematocrit value was observed on the VDZ DBS/serum concentration ratios. Additionally, the VDZ DBS/serum ratio was calculated in nine individual patients, which was, in general, shown to be stable over time. VDZ DBS sampling is a robust method that can be used as an alternative to venous blood collection for TDM of VDZ. VDZ concentrations in DBS highly correlated with VDZ serum concentrations over a broad concentration range, allowing DBS to be used for intensive sampling to gain more insight in VDZ pharmacokinetics.

Regulatory Role for NK Cells in a Mouse Model of Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Mice deficient in IFN-γ (IFN-γ knockout [KO] mice) develop a systemic inflammatory syndrome in response to CFA, in contrast to CFA-challenged wild-type (WT) mice who only develop a mild inflammation. Symptoms in CFA-challenged IFN-γ KO resemble systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), a childhood immune disorder of unknown cause. Dysregulation of innate immune cells is considered to be important in the disease pathogenesis. In this study, we used this murine model to investigate the role of NK cells in the pathogenesis of sJIA. NK cells of CFA-challenged IFN-γ KO mice displayed an aberrant balance of activating and inhibitory NK cell receptors, lower expression of cytotoxic proteins, and a defective NK cell cytotoxicity. Depletion of NK cells (via anti-IL-2Rß and anti-Asialo-GM1 Abs) or blockade of the NK cell activating receptor NKG2D in CFA-challenged WT mice resulted in increased severity of systemic inflammation and appearance of sJIA-like symptoms. NK cells of CFA-challenged IFN-γ KO mice and from anti-NKG2D-treated mice showed defective degranulation capacities toward autologous activated immune cells, predominantly monocytes. This is in line with the increased numbers of activated inflammatory monocytes in these mice which was particularly reflected in the expression of CCR2, a chemokine receptor, and in the expression of Rae-1, a ligand for NKG2D. In conclusion, NK cells are defective in a mouse model of sJIA and impede disease development in CFA-challenged WT mice. Our findings point toward a regulatory role for NK cells in CFA-induced systemic inflammation via a NKG2D-dependent control of activated immune cells.

Achieving Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Which Drug Concentrations Need to Be Targeted?

Biologicals introduced a major shift in the treatment of patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases. Despite providing a tight disease control for many patients, a considerable proportion of patients will fail to respond favorably to treatment or will lose response over time. Therapeutic drug monitoring emerged as a valuable tool to guide clinical decision making as serum drug concentrations have been linked to outcomes. Focusing on mucosal healing as the ultimate treatment goal, different drug concentration thresholds to achieve this outcome have been identified in the literature and are summarized in this review. For therapeutic drug monitoring to be successful in guiding clinical decision making, the used assay, the sampling time point, and the outcome that is aimed for should be taken into account when interpreting drug concentration thresholds. Awareness of these essential aspects among clinicians will improve the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring and aid in making an evidence-based decision.

Ustekinumab Exposure-outcome Analysis in Crohn's Disease Only in Part Explains Limited Endoscopic Remission Rates.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ustekinumab, an anti-IL12/23p40 monoclonal antibody, has been approved for Crohn's disease [CD]. Real-life data in CD patients receiving ustekinumab intravenously [IV] during induction, followed by subcutaneous [SC] maintenance, are lacking. We assessed efficacy of ustekinumab and studied exposure-response correlations. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 86 CD patients predominantly refractory or intolerant to anti-tumour necrosis factor agents and/or vedolizumab. All received ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV induction, with 90 mg SC every 8 weeks thereafter. Endoscopic response (50% decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for CD [SES-CD] at Week 24), endoscopic remission [SES-CD ≤2], and clinical remission [daily stool frequency ≤2.8 and abdominal pain score ≤1] were assessed at weeks 4,8,16, and 24. Further serial analyses included patient-reported outcomes [PRO2], faecal calprotectin [fCal], and ustekinumab serum levels. RESULTS: SES-CD decreased from 11.5 [8.0-18.0] at baseline to 9.0 [6.0-16.0] at week [w]24 [p = 0.0009], but proportions of patients achieving endoscopic response [20.5%] or endoscopic remission [7.1%] were low. Clinical remission rates were 39.5% at w24. After IV induction, fCal dropped from baseline [1242.9 µg/g] to w4 [529.0 µg/g] and w8 [372.2 µg/g], but increased again by w16 [537.4 µg/g] and w24 [749.0 µg/g]. A clear exposure-response relationship was observed, both during induction and during maintenance therapy, with different thresholds depending on the targeted outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of refractory CD patients, ustekinumab showed good clinical remission rates but limited endoscopic remission after 24 weeks. Our data suggest that higher doses may be required to achieve better endoscopic outcomes.

Immunogenicity is not the driving force of treatment failure in vedolizumab-treated inflammatory bowel disease patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The pivotal GEMINI trials reported low immunogenicity of vedolizumab. However, anti-vedolizumab antibodies (AVA) are frequently underestimated because most assays are not drug-tolerant and unable to detect antidrug antibodies while there is drug in the circulation. This study aimed to explore which antidrug antibody assay is best suited to detect AVA and investigated immunogenicity of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients discontinuing vedolizumab therapy. METHODS: A drug-tolerant affinity capture elution (ACE) assay was developed for the measurement of AVA in the presence of vedolizumab and compared with the previously established drug-resistant and drug-sensitive assays. Vedolizumab and AVA were measured at week 6, at the last infusion, and 12-20 weeks after treatment discontinuation in a cohort of 40 vedolizumab-treated IBD patients who stopped treatment due to primary non-response, loss of response, or adverse events. RESULTS: The drug-tolerant ACE assay could detect AVA in samples that the drug-resistant and drug-sensitive assays were unable to. Using the drug-tolerant ACE assay, 3 (8%) out of 40 vedolizumab-treated IBD patients who discontinued therapy were AVA positive at week 6, whereas no AVA were detected at the last infusion nor after treatment discontinuation. Primary non-responders had numerically lower median vedolizumab concentrations at week 6 compared with patients with loss of response (20.3 vs 30.7 µg/mL, respectively, P = 0.0570). CONCLUSIONS: Immunogenicity of vedolizumab is not the driving force of treatment failure, and AVA do not increase upon treatment discontinuation in vedolizumab-treated IBD patients. Underexposure during induction might partially be responsible for primary non-response.