Enhanced sensitivity of postsynaptic serotonin-1A receptors in rats and mice with high trait aggression.

Individual differences in aggressive behaviour have been linked to variability in central serotonergic activity, both in humans and animals. A previous experiment in mice, selectively bred for high or low levels of aggression, showed an up-regulation of postsynaptic serotonin-1A (5-HT(1A)) receptors, both in receptor binding and in mRNA levels, in the aggressive line [Brain Res 736 (1996) 338]. The aim of this experiment was to study whether similar differences in 5-HT(1A) receptors exist in individuals from a random-bred rat strain, varying in aggressiveness. In addition, because little is known about the functional consequences of these receptor differences, a response mediated via postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors (i.e., hypothermia) was studied both in the selection lines of mice and in the randomly bred rats. The difference in receptor binding, as demonstrated in mice previously, could not be shown in rats. However, both in rats and mice, the hypothermic response to the 5-HT(1A) agonist alnespirone was larger in aggressive individuals. So, in the rat strain as well as in the mouse lines, there is, to a greater or lesser extent, an enhanced sensitivity of postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in aggressive individuals. This could be a compensatory up-regulation induced by a lower basal 5-HT neurotransmission, which is in agreement with the serotonin deficiency hypothesis of aggression.

The effect of parity and environmental restriction on behavioural and physiological responses of pre-parturient pigs.

There is increasing evidence that restriction of pre-parturient behaviour in pigs is stress-inducing, characterised by an elevation in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) activity in gilts. To determine whether pigs adapt to behavioural restriction, through modification of nest-building behaviour, we studied pre-parturient pigs in either farrowing crates (no bedding, n=7) or straw-bedded pens (n=7) in their first (gilts) and second (sows) parity, with physiological measurements being taken in the second parity. Observations and blood sampling were carried out during the pre-parturient phase. Crated pigs changed posture more often than penned pigs (F(1,12)=7.06, P<0.05), with the number of posture changes reducing across parities in both environments. The reduction in posture changing was more apparent in the crated sows which may indicate that attempted nest-building behaviour of sows with prior experience of farrowing crates is less fragmented. The crated pigs spent a greater proportion of time sitting across both parities (F(1,12)=9.4, P<0.01), and spent less time manipulating available substrates (F(1,12)=10.67, P<0.05). There was a tendency for penned pigs to spend a greater proportion of time standing (F(1,12)=3.77, P=0.076) with peak nesting behaviour occurring earlier in relation to parturition than in crated pigs. In addition penned sows performed more floor-directed behaviour than penned gilts, and at an earlier stage in relation to parturition. However, crated sows also performed peak nest-building earlier than crated gilts. Plasma cortisol profiles indicated elevated HPA activity in crated sows during the pre-parturient period (F(42,303)=1.43, P<0.05) suggesting increased physiological stress, however, the difference between crated and penned sows was less than that previously seen in gilts. The increased range of pre-parturient behaviours seen in the penned sows suggests that experience may result in an 'improvement' in their nest-building behaviour: earlier preparation of the nest site and then subsequent manipulation of substrates. The crated sows appeared to show some behavioural adaptation to the crate environment; earlier peak in floor directed behaviour and total substrate directed behaviour, reduced posture changing. In conclusion the nest-building behaviour of pigs is modified over parities with adaptation to the behavioural restrictions imposed by the farrowing crate. However, this adaptation, through prior experience, does not completely reduce the elevation in HPA activity previously reported in pre-parturient crated gilts.

Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology.

This paper summarizes the current views on coping styles as a useful concept in understanding individual adaptive capacity and vulnerability to stress-related disease. Studies in feral populations indicate the existence of a proactive and a reactive coping style. These coping styles seem to play a role in the population ecology of the species. Despite domestication, genetic selection and inbreeding, the same coping styles can, to some extent, also be observed in laboratory and farm animals. Coping styles are characterized by consistent behavioral and neuroendocrine characteristics, some of which seem to be causally linked to each other. Evidence is accumulating that the two coping styles might explain a differential vulnerability to stress mediated disease due to the differential adaptive value of the two coping styles and the accompanying neuroendocrine differentiation.

Long-lasting deficient dexamethasone suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical activation following peripheral CRF challenge in socially defeated rats.

The present study focuses on the long-term changes in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis following two short-lasting episodes of intensive stress in the rat stress model of social defeat and the possible similarities with HPA functioning in human affective disorders. Male Wistar rats experienced social defeats on 2 consecutive days by an aggressive male conspecific. The long-term effect of these defeats on resting and ovine corticotropin-releasing factor (oCRF; intravenous (i.v.) 0. 5 microg/kg) induced levels of plasma ACTH and corticosterone (CORT) were measured 1 and 3 weeks later. In a second experiment the glucocorticoid feedback regulation of HPA function was tested in a combined dexamethasone (DEX)/CRF test (DEX; 25 microg/kg s.c., 90 min before oCRF injection, 0.5 microg/kg). The oCRF challenges were performed between 11.00 and 13.00 h (about three hours after start of the light phase). One week after defeat the ACTH response to CRF was significantly enhanced in defeated rats as compared to controls. Three weeks after defeat the ACTH response was back to control levels. The increased ACTH response 1 week after the stressor was not reflected in higher CORT levels. Neither were baseline ACTH and CORT levels affected by the prior stress exposure. DEX pretreatment inhibited pituitary adrenocortical activity, reflected both in reduced baseline and response values of ACTH and CORT. The ACTH response to CRF following DEX administration was significantly higher in defeated rats as compared to controls both at one and three weeks after defeat. A reduced DEX suppression of baseline secretion of ACTH appeared 3 weeks after defeat. The same tendency was apparent in response and baseline values of CORT. The differences in CORT between socially stressed and control treated rats, however, did not reach significance. The possible role of changes in glucocorticoid-(GR) and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) binding in the altered regulation of HPA activity following defeat were studied in brain and pituitary of male Wistar rats 1 and 3 weeks after defeat. One week after defeat GR-binding decreased in hippocampus and hypothalamus. No changes were observed in GR-binding in the pituitary nor in MR-binding in any of the regions analysed. Three weeks after defeat GR-binding recovered in hippocampus and hypothalamus but at this time MR-binding in hippocampal tissue was seriously decreased. In a fourth experiment vasopressin (AVP) and CRF stores in the external zone of the median eminence (ZEME) were measured by quantitative immunocytochemistry one and three weeks after defeat and compared with controls. Social defeat failed to induce a change in the immunocytochemical stores of AVP or CRF. The present findings show that in rats short-lasting stressors like defeat induce long-lasting, temporal dynamic changes in the regulation of the HPA axis. Since these changes in time are reflected in GRs and MRs in different brain areas an altered corticosteroid receptor binding might play an important role in the affected HPA activity following defeat.

Oncogenesis by mutations in anti-oncogenes: a view.

Oncogenesis is the result of accumulation of specific gene mutations. Two classes of specific cancer mutations are distinguished: namely those affecting anti-oncogenes and those in which oncogenes are involved. Anti-oncogenes are thought to regulate normal growth by encoding proteins that inhibit the expression of the oncogenes. This is in line with the observation that tumor cells are often homozygous for a defect in an anti-oncogene, as this will allow the expression of an oncogene. In this paper we attempt to calculate the number of anti-oncogenes involved in the genesis of a malignant tumour cell. These calculations were initially performed using a simplified model for oncogenesis and later applied to more complicated situations. These calculations indicate that usually four mutations in anti-oncogenes are required for oncogenesis in adults. This is in contradiction to the well-known 2-hit model of oncogenesis of Knudson which predicts about 10(9) times more de novo arising tumour cells than are observed in reality. Oncogenesis is only observed in proliferating cells. Cell proliferation and growth kinetics in various organs differ greatly. Therefore the time of oncogenesis and tumour manifestation also varies in the different organs. In organs that develop in early life (e.g. retina and neurons of the brain) mitotic activity ceases soon after birth. Consequently neural and retinal tumours emerge only early in life. In contrast, the main development of the female breast occurs after puberty, and the earliest breast tumours will become apparent in young adults. The four recessive mutations in anti-oncogenes required for oncogenesis imply that probably recessive mutations are involved in two loci. It is clear that an inherited mutation in an anti-oncogene at a particular locus causes different tumour types depending on the various organs in which the tumours arise. Comparison of (a) results of calculations about the number of malignant neuroendocrine tumour cells that arise in a pancreatic islet of a patient with inherited MEN1-syndrome with (b) the pathological anatomy of such a patient, suggests that a cell with two or three oncogenic mutations has a growth advantage over normal cells. This leads to cell proliferation in a premalignant lesion until the set of four oncogenic mutations is complete. The clinically premalignant lesions have a maximal mean diameter of about 0.4 cm when the first true malignant tumour cell develops, and the pathologist will probably note malignancy when the lesion has the size of 1-2 cm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Hereditary cancer and its clinical implications: a view.

In hereditary cancers the responsible inherited cancer genes are defective (mutated) anti-oncogenes (tumour suppressor genes). This inherited mutation is present in all cells of the organism, and only leads to cancer if in a somatic cell a complete set of specific cancer mutations is accumulated. Since one defective anti-oncogene has been inherited, only three additional somatic cancer mutations are required, according to our previously published view (Anticancer Res 10:1990). The number of de novo arising tumour cells in such a person is thus multiplied by a factor equal to the reverse of the mutant frequency, that is about 10(4)-10(5). This can be observed e.g. in retinoblastoma. Mutations occur in proliferating cells only. Consequently cancer mutations also depend on cell proliferation. If an inherited cancer mutation predisposes to cancer formation in certain organs, then the cancer risk in these organs is enhanced by 10(4)-10(5) times. Tumours in these organs will appear simultaneously if the number of cells and the growth kinetics are similar. This is of course observed in paired organs, like the retina and the female breast. In cancer family syndromes different organs may be affected at the same time. Examples are type I and type II cancer family syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 2a, and 2b. The secondly diagnosed tumours are not caused by metastatic spread. Tumours in two organs will arise at difference times if the number of end cells per organ and the growth kinetics differ. In this case the second tumour is called a second primary malignancy and is not caused by metastatic spread. A good example are the second primary malignancies in hereditary retinoblastoma. The inherited defective anti-oncogene is a recessive gene. This defective inherited gene causes a 10(4)-10(5) fold increase of the normal tumour incidence. This means that nearly always one or more tumours will arise. Evidently, this pattern of inheritance has led to the erroneous conclusion that the genetic abnormality is dominant at the level of the chromosome. The 10(4)-10(5) times enhanced tumour incidence in hereditary cancer is helpful for the clinical recognition of hereditary cancer. That is, hereditary cancer can be recognized not only by family history, but also by early occurrence, the multifocal and bilateral localisation, its occurrence as cancer family syndrome or by second primary malignancies. It is thus recommended to screen patients and families with hereditary cancer for first and second primary tumours. Treatment of patients with hereditary tumours requires extra care to avoid additional cancer mutations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)