Low bleeding and thromboembolic risk with continued dabigatran during cardiovascular interventions: the GLORIA-AF study.

BACKGROUND: Prospective data on nonvitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) management during cardiovascular interventions are limited. We therefore evaluated the safety and effectiveness of uninterrupted dabigatran therapy as well as dabigatran management during atrial fibrillation (AF)-cardioversions, AF-ablations, pacemaker implantations and coronary angiography and/or stenting procedures. METHOD: GLORIA-AF is an international registry programme involving patients with newly diagnosed AF. Dabigatran users were followed for ≤2 years. The primary outcome was occurrence of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding ≤8 weeks after a cardiovascular intervention during uninterrupted dabigatran therapy. RESULTS: During the 2-year follow-up, 599 cardiovascular interventions were identified in 479 eligible patients. 412/599 (69%) interventions were performed with uninterrupted dabigatran therapy: 299/354 (84%) AF-cardioversions, 38/89 (43%) AF-ablations, 25/58 (43%) pacemaker implantations, and 50/98 (51%) coronary angiography and/or stenting procedures. During an average follow-up of 8.4 weeks after intervention, one major bleed and one systemic embolic event occurred (risk 0.25% for both outcomes; 95% confidence interval, 0.01%-1.36%). CONCLUSIONS: More than two thirds of the interventions were performed with uninterrupted dabigatran therapy, of which most were AF-cardioversions. Uninterrupted dabigatran therapy was associated with low major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism risk, supporting the favourable safety and effectiveness profile of dabigatran in clinical practice-based settings.

Anticoagulation Prescription and Outcomes in Relation to Renal Function in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Results from GLORIA-AF.

Objective Anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and impaired renal function is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate anticoagulation prescription patterns in relation to renal function and to describe 2-year clinical outcomes among dabigatran users. Methods Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF) is an international, prospective, and observational study program involving patients with newly diagnosed AF at risk for stroke. Prescription patterns were assessed by creatinine clearance (CrCl) at enrollment. Dabigatran users were followed for 2 years. Clinical outcomes were standardized for stroke and bleeding risk, based on CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc and HAS-BLED scores, with missing values imputed. Results Baseline CrCl values were available for 12,056 of 15,308 eligible patients (79%). With declining renal function, prescriptions increased for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and decreased for dabigatran (30-47% and 34-12%, respectively). The prescription of other non-vitamin K antagonists remained similar across CrCl groups (14-19%). In 4,873 dabigatran users, standardized stroke rates were low across all CrCl groups; 0.58/100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.90) in CrCl ≥80 mL/min, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.48-1.21) in CrCl 50 to 79 mL/min, and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.06-1.11) in CrCl 30 to 49 mL/min. Similarly, major bleeding rates were low and numerically increased with declining renal function (0.68/100 patient-years, 95% CI: 0.39-1.03; 0.92, 95% CI: 0.58-1.32; and 1.26, 95% CI: 0.66-1.97, respectively). Conclusion In patients with AF, VKA prescriptions increased and dabigatran prescriptions decreased with declining renal function. Rates of stroke and major bleeding in dabigatran patients remained low across the categories of renal impairment.

Tailoring anticoagulant treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation using a novel bleeding risk score.

OBJECTIVES: Current international guidelines advocate the application of bleeding risk scores only to identify modifiable risk factors, but not to withhold treatment in patients at high risk of bleeding. VTE-BLEED (ActiVe cancer, male with uncontrolled hyperTension, anaEmia, history of BLeeding, agE and rEnal Dysfunction) is a simple bleeding risk score that predicts major bleeding (MB) in patients with venous thromboembolism, but has never been evaluated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to evaluate VTE-BLEED in patients with AF included in the Randomised Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY (RE-LY) trial, to assess whether score classes (high vs low bleeding risk) interact with the tested dabigatran doses (150 vs 110 mg twice daily), and to investigate whether dose reductions based on this interaction might help to lower the incidence of the composite outcome MB, stroke/systemic embolism or death. METHODS: The score was calculated in the safety population of RE-LY (n=18 040) and recalibrated for AF (AF-adapted VTE-BLEED or AF-BLEED). HRs were calculated to evaluate the score's predictive accuracy for MB. The risk ratios (RRs) for the composite outcome comparing dabigatran 150 and 110 mg twice daily were calculated for the high-risk group. RESULTS: AF-BLEED classified 3534 patients (19.6%) at high bleeding risk, characterised by a 2.9-fold to 3.4-fold higher risk of bleeding than low bleeding risk patients, across the treatment arms. High bleeding risk patients randomised to 110 mg twice daily had a lower incidence of the composite outcome than those randomised to 150 mg twice daily, for an RR of 0.52 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.78). Compared with the label criteria for dose reduction, AF-BLEED identified an additional 11% of patients who might have benefited from dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS: AF-BLEED identified patients with AF at high risk of bleeding. Our findings raise the hypothesis that dabigatran 110 mg twice daily might be considered in patients classified as high risk according to the AF-BLEED score. This study provides a basis for future studies to explore safe dose reductions of direct oral anticoagulants in selected patient groups based on bleeding scores.

Antiplatelet Therapy versus Anticoagulation after Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic therapy after surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (BAVR) is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation in patients with surgical BAVR. METHODS: We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to 3 November 2017 for studies evaluating antiplatelet therapy versus anticoagulation early after surgical BAVR. We performed title and abstract screening, full-text review, risk of bias evaluation and data collection independently and in duplicate. We evaluated overall quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, and pooled data using a random effects model. RESULTS: We identified 2 RCTs (n = 397) and 5 observational studies (n = 2,012) meeting our eligibility criteria. The mean follow-up for all outcomes was 3 months in RCTs, and 10 months for observational studies. Antiplatelet compared with anticoagulant therapy demonstrated a trend towards fewer major bleeds in RCTs (relative risk [RR], 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-1.04, p = 0.06, I 2 = 0%, low quality evidence), and significantly fewer major bleeds in observational studies (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.20-0.58, p ≤ 0.0001, I 2 = 0%, very low quality evidence), but stroke, thromboembolism and mortality did not show a significant difference in either RCTs or observational studies. CONCLUSION: Antiplatelet therapy demonstrated reduced bleeding risk with no negative effects on stroke, thromboembolism or mortality compared with anticoagulation therapy after surgical BAVR. Our confidence in the results is reduced by the low quality of the available evidence.

Performance of idarucizumab as antidote of dabigatran in daily clinical practice.

AIMS: Because practice-based data on the usage of idarucizumab for urgent dabigatran reversal is unavailable, we evaluated the appropriateness of idarucizumab usage, its haemostatic effectiveness and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: An observational cohort study was performed including consecutive patients who were treated with idarucizumab between 2016 and 2018. Appropriate usage was assessed with predefined criteria. Post-reversal effectiveness was evaluated according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) recommendations. Patients were followed for 90 days for occurrence of thromboembolism, (re-)bleeding and death. Idarucizumab was used in 88 patients, of whom 53 (60%) presented with severe bleeding (20 gastrointestinal and 18 intracranial) and 35 (40%) requiring urgent surgical intervention. Use of idarucizumab was judged inappropriate in 25 patients (28%). Effective haemostasis was achieved in 32 of 48 (67%) bleeding patients in whom assessment was possible. Seven of 16 patients with major bleeding who did not achieve effective haemostasis (five intracranial) died, compared with two of 32 patients with effective haemostasis (relative risk 7.0, 95% confidence interval 1.6-30). Four patients (4.2%) developed thromboembolism [2 (2.1%) within 30 days] and four patients (4.2%) re-bleeding, all within 10 days. Seventeen patients (19%) died; 10 (11%) within 5 days. CONCLUSION: In this practice-based cohort, idarucizumab use was considered inappropriate in 28% of patients. Effective haemostasis was achieved in two-third of bleeding patients and was associated with lower mortality risk. Clinical outcomes were similar to those observed in the RE-VERSE AD trial, comprising re-bleeds and thromboembolism, and a high-mortality rate.

Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal in the Management of Patients With Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Although dabigatran has a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy for venous thromboembolism and nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, major bleeding events, including gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, may occur. Therefore, our aim was to provide insights into the efficacy and safety of idarucizumab for urgent dabigatran reversal in patients with major GI bleeding. METHODS: Patients with uncontrollable GI bleeding requiring reversal were enrolled from June 2014 through July 2016 in the RE-VERSE AD study (Reversal of Dabigatran Anticoagulant Effect With Idarucizumab), a prospective, multicenter, open-label study of idarucizumab, and were followed up for 90 days for primary and secondary outcomes. Patients were to receive a 5-g dose of intravenous idarucizumab, administered as 2 bolus infusions of 2.5 g no more than 15 minutes apart. The primary end point was the maximum reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation within 4 hours after administration of idarucizumab as measured by the dabigatran-specific assays diluted thrombin time and ecarin clotting time. Further end points included investigator-reported bleeding cessation within the first 24 hours and incidence of rebleeding, thromboembolic events, or mortality. RESULTS: GI bleeding occurred in 137 patients enrolled in RE-VERSE AD, of which 84% was adjudicated as major or life-threatening, 48 (35.0%) was upper GI tract in origin, 43 (31.4%) was lower GI in origin, and 46 (33.6%) was either both or unknown. Complete reversal of dabigatran was observed in 118 of 121 patients (97.5%) with an elevated diluted thrombin time at presentation and 95 of 131 patients (72.5%) with an elevated ecarin clotting time and was similar for upper and lower GI bleeding. Bleeding cessation within 24 hours was reported in 92 of 134 evaluable patients (68.7%) after a median duration of 2.4 hours (interquartile range, 2.0-3.9 hours). During the 90-day follow-up, 6 patients (4.4%) had a postreversal thromboembolic event, and 20 patients (14.6%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Idarucizumab showed a rapid and complete reversal of dabigatran activity in nearly all patients presenting with GI bleeding, facilitating emergency patient care without the additional presence of anticoagulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02104947.

Fatal recurrent VTE after anticoagulant treatment for unprovoked VTE: a systematic review.

Current guidelines recommend long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). The risk of fatal recurrent VTE after treatment discontinuation (versus that of fatal bleeding during anticoagulation) is of particular relevance in the decision to continue or stop anticoagulation after the first 3 months. Our primary aim was to provide a point-estimate of the yearly rate of fatal recurrent VTE and VTE case-fatality rate in patients with unprovoked VTE after anticoagulation cessation. Data were extracted from both randomised controlled trials and observational studies published before May 1, 2017. The pooled fatality rates were calculated using a random-effects model. 18 studies with low-to-moderate bias were included in the primary analysis, totalling 6758 patients with a median (range) follow-up duration of 2.2 (1-5) years. After anticoagulation cessation, the weighted pooled rate of VTE recurrence was 6.3 (95% CI 5.4-7.3) per 100 patient-years and the weighted pooled rate of fatal recurrent VTE was 0.17 (95% CI 0.047-0.33) per 100 patient-years, for a case-fatality rate of 2.6% (95% CI 0.86-5.0). These numbers are a solid benchmark for comparison to the risks associated with long-term anticoagulation treatment for the decision on the optimal duration of treatment of patients with unprovoked VTE.

Correction to: Antithrombotic therapy after mitral valve repair: VKA or aspirin?

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the author name. The co-author name should be Frederikus A. Klok instead of Frederik A. Klok. The original article has been corrected.

Antithrombotic therapy after mitral valve repair: VKA or aspirin?

The optimal antithrombotic therapy following mitral valve repair (MVr) is still a matter of debate. Therefore, we evaluated the rate of thromboembolic and bleeding complications of two antithrombotic prevention strategies: vitamin K antagonists (VKA) versus aspirin. Consecutive patients who underwent MVr between 2004 and 2016 at three Dutch hospitals were evaluated for thromboembolic and bleeding complications during three postoperative months. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding complications to determine the net clinical benefit of VKA strategy as compared with aspirin. Secondary objectives were to evaluate both thromboembolic and bleeding rates separately and to identify predictors for both complications. A total of 469 patients were analyzed, of whom 325 patients (69%) in the VKA group and 144 patients (31%) in the aspirin group. Three months postoperatively, the cumulative incidence of the combined end point of the study was 9.2% (95%CI 6.1-12) in the VKA group and 11% (95%CI 6.0-17) in the aspirin group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.6, 95%CI 0.83-3.1]. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in thromboembolic rates (adjusted HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.16-4.2) as well as in major bleeding rates (adjusted HR 1.89, 95%CI 0.90-3.9). VKA and aspirin therapy showed a similar event rate of 10% during 3 months after MVr in patients without prior history of AF. In both treatment groups thromboembolic event rate was low and major bleeding rates were comparable. Future prospective, randomized trials are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Home treatment of acute pulmonary embolism: state of the art in 2018.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Historically, because of the necessity of parenteral anticoagulation, patients with acute pulmonary embolism are hospitalized until stable oral anticoagulation is achieved. Despite improvements in prognostic risk stratification and the introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants, home treatment is still not widely applied. Main advantages of home treatment involve improvement of quality of life and significant healthcare cost reduction. In this review, we summarized recent published data on home treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. RECENT FINDINGS: Although a significant decrease in mean duration of hospital admission for pulmonary embolism has been demonstrated over the last decade in Europe, most pulmonary embolism patients are currently hospitalized while they might be treated in an outpatient setting. In recent years, five major studies have been performed, in which the decision to initiate home treatment was based on the Hestia criteria in most patients. Over 98% of patients treated at home had an uncomplicated course. SUMMARY: Home treatment of acute pulmonary embolism is suggested to be feasible and safe in 30-55% of all patients. Results of ongoing trials will provide more insight in the optimal strategy to select patients with pulmonary embolism who are eligible for home treatment and likely will result in more widespread application of this practice.

Higher Adherence to Treatment With Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin Nadroparin Than Enoxaparin Because of Side Effects in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight-heparins (LMWH) monotherapy for 3 to 6 months as first-line treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). In clinical practice, enoxaparin and nadroparin are common agents used. However, differences in therapy adherence between these LMWHs have never been reported. Therefore, our aim was to compare adherence to enoxaparin and nadroparin in patients with cancer-associated VTE. Consecutive patients with active cancer and objectively confirmed VTE, treated at a Dutch or a Spanish hospital, were followed during LMWH therapy with a maximum of 180 days. Cumulative incidences of discontinuation of both LMWHs were estimated and compared according to the Kaplan-Meier method, applying a competing risk analysis to correct for mortality. A total of 366 patients were analyzed during LMWH treatment, of whom 284 patients (78%) were treated with enoxaparin and 82 (22%) with nadroparin. The cumulative incidence of discontinuation of enoxaparin and nadroparin treatment because of side effects was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24-36) and 8.8% (95% CI 1.1-15), respectively. Competing risk analysis revealed a higher number of patients discontinuing enoxaparin due to side effects (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.8; 95% CI 1.06-7.2). Pain at the injection site was the most common reason of discontinuation in patients using enoxaparin, occurring in 32 patients, while it occurred in 1 patient using nadroparin (adjusted HR: 4.0; 95% CI 0.52-31). This analysis reveals that enoxaparin was associated with a higher risk of discontinuation because of side effects compared to nadroparin. However, given the nature of the patient groups, these findings should be followed by future studies.