Point-of-care-Ultrasound (POCUS) Training Curriculum for Pediatric Nephrology: PCRRT-ICONIC Group Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is commonly used in adult specialties, pediatric emergency medicine, and neonatal and pediatric critical care. Specifically, in the field of pediatric nephrology, POCUS plays a valuable role in the critical inpatient and outpatient settings. However, the lack of guidelines and a standardized curriculum for POCUS in pediatric nephrology has led to substantial discrepancies in both clinical practice and training. METHODS: A multinational, multicenter survey regarding POCUS usefulness and training was sent to 225 pediatric nephrology residents, fellows, and physicians with expertise in pediatric nephrology. Based on the results, an ideal pediatric nephrology POCUS curriculum was formulated with a panel of experts from across the world. Eighteen experts were included, with each expert having greater than 10 years of experience in using POCUS in adult and pediatric nephrology. A Delphi method was utilized to further solidify guidelines regarding the content, curriculum, and vital skills of using POCUS in pediatric nephrology. RESULTS: A total of 134 pediatric nephrology trainees, specialists, and faculty responded to the survey (59.6% completion rate). A total of 87.4% of respondents believe that formal POCUS training is either highly desirable or should be mandatory in pediatric nephrology fellowship programs. Identified barriers to receiving training included lack of an organized curriculum, lack of POCUS experts and Pediatric intensivists, lack of ultrasound equipment, lack of financial support, and lack of dedicated time during training. An expert panel was convened and a Delphi survey was conducted to formulate guidelines to overcome the barriers to pediatric nephrology POCUS and standardize the training process. CONCLUSIONS: After collaborating with prominent pediatric nephrologists and global POCUS experts proposed a comprehensive POCUS training curriculum tailored specifically for pediatric nephrology trainees, with an appeal for all pediatric nephrology education programs to integrate POCUS instruction into their curricula.

Communication Training for Pediatric Hospitalists and its Impact on Clinical Practice with Families Using Languages Other than English.

OBJECTIVE: Providing equitable health care for children of families speaking Language Other than English (LOE) relies on linguistic services, including interpretation and translation. Inadequate education on effectively utilizing linguistic services can lead to a knowledge gap and subsequent challenges in leveraging these services. This study aims to evaluate the educational training provided to pediatric hospitalists and its association with clinical practice. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional survey of pediatric hospitalists was conducted through the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Setting (PRIS) network, a hospital-based independent research network. The survey was distributed to PRIS site leads with one response per institution. Associations between educational training received on proper communication with families speaking LOE and practice behaviors were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: We received responses from 72 out of 112 PRIS hospital site-leads. Among the respondents, 56% did not receive training on communication during their Graduate Medical Education years (residency or fellowship); 47% did not receive training at their current workplace. Only 6% of those receiving workplace training reported annual updates or refresher courses. Furthermore, 26% of respondents rated the training as "good," while 35% considered it "fair." Respondents who received training during Graduate Medical Education years and at their workplace reported that they asserted/advocated more on behalf of patients speaking LOE than those who did not (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Pediatric hospitalists lack adequate training to communicate effectively with families speaking LOE. Increased training is associated with increased advocacy. Further work should explore increasing communication training and its effect on patient outcomes.

A survey on nutritional management of critically ill children on continuous renal replacement therapy.

We conducted a survey of pediatric nephrologists to examine the knowledge and current practices of and identify challenges in the nutritional management of critically ill children during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Although it is known that there is a significant effect on nutrition during CRRT, there seems to be a lack of knowledge as well as variability in the practices of nutritional management in these patients, as indicated by our survey results. The heterogeneity of our survey results highlights the need to establish clinical practice guidelines and develop consensus around optimal nutritional management in pediatric patients requiring CRRT. The results as well as the known effects of CRRT on metabolism should be considered during the development of guidelines in critically ill children on CRRT. Our survey findings also highlight the need for further research in the assessment of nutrition, determination of energy needs and caloric dosing, specific nutrient needs, and management.

Linguistic Services for Hospitalized Children With Non-English Language Preference: A PRIS Network Survey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Linguistic services, including verbal interpretation and written translation, are critical to providing equitable health care for families with non-English language preference (NELP). Despite evidence of provider disuse and misuse of linguistic services and resultant adverse outcomes, few studies have assessed the practices of pediatric hospitalists related to the use of linguistic services. Our objectives were to evaluate the current practices of communication and linguistic services used by pediatric hospitalists for hospitalized children with NELP and the barriers encountered in their use. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey of pediatric hospitalist site leaders through the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Setting network, an independent, hospital-based research network. The survey was created through an iterative process and underwent a face validation process with hospitalists and a survey methodology expert. RESULTS: We received responses from 72 out of 112 hospitalists (64%). Interpreter services were available widely; translation services were available in 49% of institutions. Difficulty accessing the services timely was reported as the most common barrier. Among respondents, 64% "strongly agree" or "somewhat agree" that they visit and give updates more frequently to English-speaking families than to NELP. Hospitalists reported using interpreter services "always" during 65% of admissions, 57% of discharges, and 40% on rounds. CONCLUSIONS: Families with NELP do not receive appropriate linguistic care when hospitalized. Providers update English-speaking families more frequently than non-English speaking families. Future directions include optimizing workflow to reduce the time constraints on hospitalists and increasing the timeliness and quality of interpreters and translators.

Distinct subgroups of emergency department frequent users: A latent class analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) frequent users have high resource utilization and associated costs. Many interventions have been designed to reduce utilization, but few have proved effective. This may be because this group is more heterogeneous than initially assumed, limiting the effectiveness of targeted interventions. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe distinct subgroups of ED frequent users and to estimate costs to provide hospital-based care to each group. METHODS: Latent class analysis was used to identify homogeneous subgroups of ED frequent users. ED frequent users (n = 5731) from a single urban tertiary hospital-based ED and level 1 trauma center in 2014 were included. Descriptive statistics (counts and percentages) are described to characterize subgroups. A cost analysis was performed to examine differences in direct medical costs between subgroups from the healthcare provider perspective. RESULTS: Four subgroups were identified and characterized: Short-term ED Frequent Users, Heart-related ED Frequent Users, Long-term ED Frequent Users, and Minor Care ED Frequent Users. The Heart-related group had the largest per person costs and the Long-term group had the largest total group costs. CONCLUSION: Distinct subgroups of ED frequent users were identified and described using a statistically objective method. This taxonomy of ED frequent users allows healthcare organizations to tailor interventions to specific subgroups of ED frequent users who can be targeted with tailored interventions. Cost data suggest intervention for long-term ED frequent users offers the greatest cost-avoidance benefit from a hospital perspective.

State anxiety in pregnancies affected by obstetric complications: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Maternal mental health status remains an important area of study due to its influence on maternal health outcomes. Past reviews on anxiety in pregnancy have included multiple mental health diagnoses and pre-existing conditions. A systematic review was performed to understand maternal state anxiety during pregnancies affected by obstetrical complications. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed including quantitative, primary studies in the English language. The population of interest was women whose pregnancies were affected by maternal and/or fetal obstetric (not pre-existing) complications with state anxiety as the outcome. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion and methodological criteria and were included in the review. RESULTS: The review revealed that 20% to 100% of women experiencing pregnancies affected by obstetric complications had high levels of state anxiety, and these rates are negatively influenced by complication type and severity, demographic characteristics, and maternal perceptions and expectations. Overall, antenatal state anxiety was shown to improve over the course of the pregnancy, though levels remained above clinical thresholds. LIMITATIONS: This review was based only on English peer-reviewed articles, many of which used convenience sampling with homogenous samples, limiting generalizability. Additional limitations include how anxiety prevalence was aggregated due to differences in measurement across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety is prevalent among women experiencing pregnancies affected by obstetric complications. Based on this review, we recommend that all women treated for obstetric complications are screened for anxiety; facilitating detection, referral, and treatment, ultimately contributing to optimal maternal outcomes.

Survey research in podiatric medicine: An analysis of the reporting of response rates and non-response bias.

BACKGROUND: Survey research is common practice in podiatry literature and many other health-related fields. An important component of the reporting of survey results is the provision of sufficient information to permit readers to understand the validity and representativeness of the results presented. However, the quality of survey reporting measures in the body of podiatry literature has not been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reporting of response rates and nonresponse bias within survey research articles published in the podiatric literature in order to provide a foundation with regard to the development of appropriate research reporting standards within the profession. METHODS: This study reports on a secondary analysis of survey research published in the Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the Foot, and the Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 98 surveys published from 2000 to 2018 were reviewed and data abstracted regarding the report of response rates and non-response bias. RESULTS: 67 surveys (68.4%) report a response rate while only 36 articles (36.7%) mention non-response bias in any capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that there is room for improvement in the quality of reporting response rates and nonresponse in the body of podiatric literature involving survey research. Both nonresponse and response rate should be reported to assess survey quality. This is particularly problematic for studies that contribute to best practices.

Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.

Surveys involving health care providers are characterized by low and declining response rates (RRs), and researchers have utilized various strategies to increase survey RRs among health professionals. Based on 48 studies with 156 subgroups of within-study conditions, a multilevel meta-regression analysis was conducted to summarize the effects of different strategies employed in surveys of health professionals. An estimated overall survey RR among health professionals was 0.53 with a significant downward trend during the last half century. Of the variables that were examined, mode of data collection, incentives, and number of follow-up attempts were all found to be significantly related to RR. The mail survey mode was more effective in improving RR, compared to the online or web survey mode. Relative to the non-incentive subgroups, subgroups receiving monetary incentives were more likely to respond, while nonmonetary incentive groups were not significantly different from non-incentive groups. When number of follow-ups was considered, the one or two attempts of follow-up were found to be effective in increasing survey RR among health professionals. Having noted challenges associated with surveying health professionals, researchers must make every effort to improve access to their target population by implementing appropriate incentive- and design-based strategies demonstrated to improve participation rates.

Using incentives in surveys of cancer patients: do "best practices" apply?

PURPOSE: Surveys of cancer patients are an important means of collecting data necessary to improve cancer prevention and control. However, health surveys generally are characterized by declining response rates, with incentives often employed to encourage participation. While successful, magnitude of effect is partially dependent upon situational characteristics of respondents, including health status. Given the health challenges experienced by cancer patients, it is unclear to what extent incentives can improve survey participation. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of monetary and non-monetary incentives in improving response to cancer patient surveys. METHODS: We reviewed the available experimental literature regarding efforts to improve response rates among cancer patients/survivors via incentives. Relevant studies were identified through searches of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychINFO databases from 1975 to 2012. Seed sources (e.g., Cancer Causes & Control, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, and BMC Medical Research Methodology) were also referenced extensively in order to establish a comprehensive set of studies. RESULTS: Although limited, evidence does suggest that token incentives may be less effective for improving survey participation among cancer patients, relative to other population groups. These results are contrary to well-established evidence regarding the efficacy of incentives in improving survey participation generally. Potential reasons why incentives may be less effective in this population are explored. CONCLUSIONS: While more research is necessary, results suggest that survey research strategies targeting cancer patients be purposively designed in a manner that gives consideration to the distress associated with the condition, including selection of alternative strategies to improve response.

Time, costs, and clinical utilization of screening for health literacy: a case study using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) instrument.

PURPOSE: Difficulties in identifying and caring for patients with limited health literacy have prompted interest in clinical screening to assess health literacy. Little agreement exists, however, on the utility of such screening. In this case study we explore the business and clinical cases for screening for health literacy using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), a brief instrument specifically developed for use in primary care settings. METHODS: Data were collected in 2008 in the Morehouse School of Medicine Department of Family Medicine Primary Care Clinic, where health literacy screening was implemented as part of routine intake procedures within an ongoing quality improvement effort to improve cardiovascular disease and diabetes outcomes. Specifically, we monitored time requirements, administrative and training costs, and clinician utilization associated with the NVS. RESULTS: Results identified only small time and cost constraints associated with implementing NVS screening. Clinical utility was more problematic, however, because refresher trainings were needed to ensure continued staff and clinician buy-in, use of the NVS data, and implementation of best practices to communicate with at-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Though the time and cost constraints associated with screening for health literacy were small, clinician utilization of this data in decision making and care processes may require further training and/or support.

Surveying nurses: identifying strategies to improve participation.

While surveys of nurses are an important tool in health services and policy research, they are often characterized by low response rates. The authors conducted a systematic review of 22 published reports of efforts to improve response rates to nurse surveys. Two general strategies were explored in this literature: incentive and design-based approaches. Even small financial incentives were found to be effective in improving nurse survey participation. Token nonmonetary incentives, in contrast, were much less effective. In terms of design strategies, postal and telephone strategies have generally been more successful than have fax or web-based approaches, with evidence also supporting use of mixed-mode surveys in this population. In addition, use of first-class stamps on return envelopes as well as questionnaires personalized and endorsed by legitimizing professional associations were also more likely to be successful. Researchers should continue to implement evidence-based strategies in order to improve the survey response of nurses.

Patients' perceptions of screening for health literacy: reactions to the newest vital sign.

Difficulties in caring for patients with limited health literacy have prompted interest in health literacy screening. Several prior studies, however, have suggested that health literacy testing can lead to feelings of shame and stigmatization. In this study, we examine patient reaction to the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), a screening instrument developed specifically for use in primary care. Data were collected in 2008 in the Morehouse School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine Primary Care Clinics, where health literacy screening was implemented as part of routine intake procedures. Following the visit, patients completed a series of questions assessing their screening experiences. A total of 179 patients completed both the NVS and the reaction survey. Nearly all (> 99%) patients reported that the screening did not cause them to feel shameful. There were also no differences in the reported prevalence of shame (p

Managing the unmanaged: a case study of intra-institutional determinants of uncompensated care at healthcare institutions with differing ownership models.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study presents a case analysis of how 3 urban medical centers with differing ownership models, within 1 metropolitan area, ration access to uncompensated care to uninsured patients. METHODS: Data was triangulated from 3 sources: hospital financial reports by service line for a fiscal year, a survey of 292 self-pay patients, and the self-pay policies and practices of clerical personnel described in a previous publication. RESULTS: Although the public, for-profit and not-for-profit institutions used different strategies for managing self-pays, there were also commonalities in the experiences indigent patients reported. The public institution provided the broadest access to the largest percentage of self-pay patients but offset the burden with the most successful prepayment and collection practices. The for-profit site obeyed federal regulations mandating emergency care but severely curtailed other services, and the not-for-profit limited assess (but not to the extent of the for-profit) and pursued collection (but not to the extent of the public). At all sites, actual practices by clerical staff often diverged from institutions' written self-pay policies. The probability of being turned away because of inability to pay ranged from 0% to 40% with front line personnel exercising considerable discretion on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSIONS: Large institutional providers balance their particular social and legal obligations with strategies to limit access and optimize prepayment and collection. Stated policies generally do not reflect the practices of personnel. Uninsured patients are forced to navigate a capricious system that manages them as a liability rather than as a legitimate client.

Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review.

Although physician surveys are an important tool in health services and policy research, they are often characterized by low response rates. The authors conducted a systematic review of 66 published reports of efforts to improve response rates to physician surveys. Two general strategies were explored in this literature: incentive and design-based approaches. Even small financial incentives were found to be effective in improving physician response. Token nonmonetary incentives were much less effective. In terms of design strategies, postal and telephone strategies have generally been more successful than have fax or Web-based approaches, with evidence also supporting use of mixed-mode surveys in this population. In addition, use of first-class stamps on return envelopes and questionnaires designed to be brief, personalized, and endorsed by legitimizing professional associations were also more likely to be successful. Researchers should continue to implement design strategies that have been documented to improve the survey response of physicians.

Communication techniques for patients with low health literacy: a survey of physicians, nurses, and pharmacists.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the self-reported techniques used by health care professionals to enhance communication with patients with low health literacy. METHODS: A survey was administered to physicians (n=99), nurses (n=87), and pharmacists (n=121) attending continuing education programs on patient safety and health care quality. Each was asked to rate communication-enhancing strategies by frequency of use and effectiveness with patients with low health literacy. RESULTS: Using simple language (94.7%), handing out printed materials (70.3%), and speaking more slowly (67.3%) were the most commonly used strategies. Strategies currently recommended by health literacy experts were less routinely used. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed that evaluates the effectiveness of communication strategies for patients with limited literacy skills within diverse clinical encounters.

Impact of managed care on physicians' decisions to manipulate reimbursement rules: an explanatory model.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test an explanatory model of the impact of managed care on physicians' decisions to manipulate reimbursement rules for patients. METHODS: A self-administered mailed questionnaire of a national random sample of 1124 practicing physicians in the USA. Structural equation modelling was used. The main outcome measure assessed whether or not physicians had manipulated reimbursement rules (such as exaggerated the severity of patients conditions, changed billing diagnoses, or reported signs or symptoms that the patients did not have) to help patients secure coverage for needed treatment or services. RESULTS: The response rate was 64% (n = 720). Physicians' decisions to manipulate reimbursement rules for patients are directly driven not only by ethical beliefs about gaming the system but also by requests from patients, the perception of insufficient time to deliver care, and the proportion of Medicaid patients. Covert advocacy is also the indirect result of utilization review hassles, primary care specialty, and practice environment. CONCLUSIONS: Managed care is not just a set of rules that physicians choose to follow or disobey, but an environment of competing pressures from patients, purchasers, and high workload. Reimbursement manipulation is a response to that environment, rather than simply a reflection of individual physicians' values.

The use of human patient simulators: best practices with novice nursing students.

Only recently have nursing educators begun to consider the enormous implications of using high-fidelity human patient simulation in general nursing education. As a first step in exploring the potential of this new technology with novice nursing students, faculty conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of students' reactions to a simulation. In addition, from the analysis and the review of literature, the faculty identified specific best practices for using this educational methodology with novice nursing students.

Avoiding free care at all costs: a survey of uninsured patients choosing not to seek emergency services at an urban county hospital.

The purpose of this case study was to understand why many uninsured patients opt not to make use of a free public hospital when it is available, instead seeking emergency department care at sites where they will be billed for the services they receive. One hundred fifty seven uninsured patients were interviewed over an 8-week period at three emergency departments that bill for services near a county hospital that provides free care. Data was gathered on income, health status, and credit history. Subjects were also asked if they had previously sought care at the county hospital and, if they had, how satisfied they were with the quality of care and with the wait time. Seventy two percent of the subjects reported household incomes of <$20,000, 48% reported they were in fair or poor health, and 33% said they were unable to pay at least one medical bill at the site where they were seeking care. 65% reported they had previously received care at the county hospital, and of these 61% said they were not-too-likely or not-at-all likely to return. In a regression analysis, experience with wait time correlated with subjects willingness to return, whereas their satisfaction with quality, their income, problems with debt, and reported health status did not. Access involves more than geographic proximity and affordability. Excessive wait times can deter even patients who are poor, in ill health and in debt from making use of services that are intended for their benefit.