Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 44(4): 620-625, 2020 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32990468

RESUMO

The Physiology Majors Interest Group (P-MIG) is a grass-roots consortium of physiology educators with the common interest of creating program-level guidelines for undergraduate physiology and related programs. A key component of the consortium's activities are the annual P-MIG conferences that have been held at different universities over the past 3 yr (Michigan State University, 2017; University of Arizona, 2018; and University of Minnesota, 2019). Postconference surveys indicate that the conferences are highly valued by the participants, as they have provided an opportunity to get to know others who are passionate about undergraduate education, to discuss best practices in program and course delivery, and to form working groups with the goal to develop national and international guidelines for physiology program delivery and assessment.


Assuntos
Fisiologia , Opinião Pública , Humanos , Fisiologia/educação , Estudantes , Universidades
3.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 44(4): 613-619, 2020 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32990470

RESUMO

Physiology undergraduate degree programs operate in isolation relative to other biological science programs, with little to no understanding of how other institutions structure their course requirements and other degree requirements. The purpose of this report is to preliminarily describe the collective curriculum of physiology programs represented at the Physiology Majors Interest Group (P-MIG) annual meetings from 2018 to 2019. A short preconference survey was sent to attendees that inquired about degree requirements of their respective physiology programs. The requirement for Physiology I (69.2%) with laboratory (66.7%) and Anatomy I (57.1%) with laboratory (42.9%), or combined Anatomy and Physiology I (16.7%) and laboratory (18.2%), were common requirements, but many programs did not require Physiology II (27.3%) or Anatomy II (11.1%). There was nearly consensus on required prerequisites such as Biology (2 semesters with laboratories, 85.7%), Chemistry (2 semesters with laboratory, 88.9%), Physics (2 semesters with laboratory, 75%), Calculus I (61.1%), and Statistics (Biostatistics 42.9%; General Statistics 13.3%). There was less agreement among programs in regards to Calculus II (20.0%), Organic Chemistry (2 semesters, 55.6%), and Biochemistry I (47%), which may be reflective of individual department focus. There was considerable heterogeneity among physiology program course requirements for disciplinary core courses and upper division electives. This report is meant to generate discussion on physiology program curricula in efforts to improve physiology education for majors and assist P-MIG in determining minimal points of consensus as they write the first set of national curricular guidelines for degree programs.


Assuntos
Disciplinas das Ciências Biológicas , Fisiologia , Currículo , Humanos , Matemática , Fisiologia/educação , Opinião Pública , Estudantes
4.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 44(3): 459-463, 2020 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32795123

RESUMO

The laboratory course is an excellent venue to apply content, practice inquiry, improve critical thinking, practice key clinical skills, and work with data. The use of inquiry-based course projects allows for students to propose open ended questions, form a hypothesis, design an experiment, collect data, analyze data, draw conclusion, and present their findings. This comprehensive experience is ideal for a capstone (senior level) laboratory course that is the culmination of 4 yr of study in the degree. At Michigan State University, the capstone laboratory has incorporated a formal course-based research experience in human physiology. The rationale and logistics for running such an experience are described in this paper.


Assuntos
Currículo , Laboratórios , Fisiologia , Humanos , Fisiologia/educação , Estudantes , Pensamento , Universidades
7.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 42(2): 169-174, 2018 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29616575

RESUMO

For the past 6 yr, the Department of Physiology at Michigan State University (MSU) has partnered with Impression 5 Science Center in Lansing, MI. Together, we host a day-long community engagement event on a Saturday each year in early November coinciding with the American Physiological Society's Physiology Understanding Week. The purpose was to provide a fun and memorable hands-on experience for children and families. This paper describes the detailed planning and logistics. The event takes place in the main exhibit space at the science center, generally has 15-17 physiology activities stations set up as booths run by volunteers, and the event runs as an open-house format. Three to five trained volunteers were needed per station for the full day. Since this was primarily based on undergraduate student volunteer involvement (a population already limited for time), morning, afternoon, and/or full-day shifts were offered to accommodate a variety of schedules. Additional set-up, clean-up, and general help was also recruited. Overall, ~100-150 MSU students, faculty, and staff members served as volunteers, alongside Impression 5 staff. Hosting the event at the science center generated a larger audience, aided in advertisement, and allowed for access to a large facility capable of handling the 600-1,000 attendees. The partnership facilitated the sharing of equipment and supplies for physiology demonstrations, allowed for activities on site in the chemistry laboratory space, and facilitated the growth of new community partnerships with local schools and groups who attended the event.


Assuntos
Compreensão , Fisiologia/educação , Estudantes , Universidades , Voluntários , Currículo , Docentes , Seguimentos , Humanos , Fisiologia/métodos , Características de Residência , Fatores de Tempo
9.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 41(4): 572-577, 2017 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29138215

RESUMO

Course-level learning objectives and core concepts for undergraduate physiology teaching exist. The next step is to consider how these resources fit into generalizable program-level guidelines for Bachelor of Science (BS) degrees in Physiology. In the absence of program-level guidelines for Physiology degree programs, we compiled a selective internal report to review degree requirements from 18 peer BS programs entitled "Physiology" in the United States (U.S.). There was a range of zero to three required semesters of math, physics, physics laboratory, general biology, biology laboratory, general chemistry, chemistry laboratory, organic chemistry, organic chemistry laboratory, biochemistry, biochemistry laboratory, anatomy, anatomy laboratory, core systems physiology, and physiology laboratory. Required upper division credits ranged from 11 to 31 and included system-specific, exercise and environmental, clinically relevant, pathology/disease-related, and basic science options. We hope that this information will be useful for all programs that consider themselves to be physiology, regardless of name. Reports such as this can serve as a starting point for collaboration among BS programs to improve physiology undergraduate education and best serve our students.


Assuntos
Currículo/normas , Fisiologia/educação , Fisiologia/normas , Estudantes , Universidades/normas , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA