RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of sexualized drug use, or chemsex, in a wide group of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) in Belgium. It examined which drugs gbMSM used before and during sex, the frequency with which they used it, whether they experienced non-consensual sex, and evaluated the impact of chemsex on the health and professional and social lives of respondents. METHODS: We conducted an online survey among Belgian gbMSM. Five specific questions on chemsex were included in the survey. These questions assessed whether gbMSM engaged in chemsex. If they did, they were asked to provide information on which drugs they had used and how often. We asked whether their and their partners' boundaries had been respected and whether and how engaging in chemsex had affected a range of life domains. RESULTS: Of 836 respondents, 258 (30.9%) self-reported having had sex under the influence of substances ("chemsex") in the previous 6 months. Of these, 227 (88%) were considered chemsex users according to the definition used for the analysis. Poppers (73%), gamma-hydroxybutyrate/gamma-butyrolactone (GHB/GBL; 69%) and cathinones (68%) were the most commonly reported substances. Almost half of respondents (45%) engaging in chemsex were high on drugs during at least half of their sexual encounters. Nearly 1 in 10 (9%) reported that boundaries had not been respected, suggesting non-consensual sexual activities. The 82 respondents experiencing negative impacts from their chemsex use reported that mental health (65%), physical health (40%) and sexual health (38%) were most impacted. DISCUSSION: Our findings provide a snapshot of the current chemsex situation in Belgium. The frequency of chemsex is concerning because several health, professional and social aspects are impacted. Almost 1 in 10 respondents using chemsex reported that chemsex impacted consent around sex, requiring additional efforts to eradicate these non-consensual sexual experiences. Therefore, larger scale research focusing on respected boundaries and consent during chemsex and the frequency of drug use for sex seems required. Additionally, sensitisation, as well as care and support programmes are critical.
RESUMO
Non-consensual sex poses a threat not only to sexual health but also to mental and physical health in general. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users might be particularly vulnerable to non-consensual sex because of interplaying factors such as mental health disorders, a high number of sex partners, engagement in chemsex, and the widespread use of dating apps. The objectives of this study were to assess the occurrence of non-consensual sex, its associated factors, and related help-seeking behavior among PrEP users. We analyzed data from an online survey among PrEP users in Belgium (09/2020-02/2022). Almost one in five participants (34/187, 18.2%) reported having ever experienced non-consensual sex. The most reported form was having sex against one's will, followed by having been given drugs against one's will, and having had sex without a condom against one's will. The vast majority of those who had experienced non-consensual sex (29/34, 85.3%) did not seek help afterward, mostly due to a lack of perceived need (21/29, 72.4%). Reported barriers to seeking help were shame (6/29, 20.7%) and lack of awareness of help services (3/29, 10.3%). Having experienced non-consensual sex in the past five years was associated with younger age and suicidal ideation in a multivariable logistic regression model. We conclude that addressing barriers to non-consensual sex help services is crucial to maximize their use and minimize the consequences of non-consensual sex experiences. PrEP consultations also represent an opportunity to offer such help given PrEP users are already familiar with these PrEP services and engaged in care.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chemsex involves the use of psychoactive drugs in a sexual context and is a growing phenomenon among men who have sex with men (MSM) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users. Investigating how its negative consequences can be avoided is important. The objective of this study was to explore the perceived impact of chemsex, the willingness to reduce chemsex activities and associated risks and preferred interventions to do so among PrEP users. METHODS: We analysed data from an online survey among PrEP users in Belgium. Chemsex was assessed in two questionnaires distributed between September 2020 and January 2022. RESULTS: A total of 326 participants completed the baseline questionnaire, and 186 the follow-up questionnaire. About one in three participants (36.5%, 119/326) reported engaging in chemsex, and half of those (49.6%, 59/119) were willing to reduce chemsex-related risks. The most preferred strategies for reducing risks were online support via an app (37.3%, 22/59) and face-to-face counselling with a health care professional (30.5%, 18/59). Among those reporting recent chemsex in the follow-up questionnaire, about one in five (21.9%, 14/64) wanted to reduce or stop chemsex activities. About 23.4% (15/64) also reported experiencing negative consequences of chemsex on their health, social or professional life. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that one in four PrEP users engaging in chemsex experienced negative consequences of these activities and about one in five was willing to reduce or stop chemsex activities. We recommend embedding comprehensive chemsex support in the PrEP package of care and developing novel tools and interventions in order to reach maximum impact.