Association between health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: an integrated analysis of three phase 3 trials of prucalopride.

BACKGROUND: Prucalopride is a high-affinity 5-HT4 receptor agonist for the treatment of chronic constipation. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptoms of constipation, and to assess the response of HRQoL to treatment using integrated data from three phase III trials of prucalopride. METHODS: This was an integrated analysis of data from three pivotal multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00488137, NCT00483886 and NCT00485940). Relationships were investigated between Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) scores, Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) scores, bowel movement frequency (assessed using daily diaries), and treatment. KEY RESULTS: Patients treated with prucalopride 2 mg (n = 659) and placebo (n = 661) were included in the analysis. An improvement in PAC-SYM scores correlated well with an improvement in PAC-QOL overall score (r = 0.711) and satisfaction subscale score (r = 0.589). After 12 weeks, PAC-QOL overall score and satisfaction subscale score significantly (p < 0.001) improved by ≥ 1 point (clinically relevant) in 36.5% and 44.1% of patients treated with prucalopride, compared with 18.5% and 22.4% with placebo respectively. Moreover, 39.0% of patients with an improvement in satisfaction of ≥ 1 point achieved ≥ 3 spontaneous complete bowel movements/week, compared with 7.4% of those with no improvement in satisfaction (<1 point). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Improvements in PAC-QOL overall score and satisfaction score were associated with improvements in symptoms of chronic constipation. Compared with placebo, treatment with prucalopride significantly improved HRQoL.

Effect of prucalopride on symptoms of chronic constipation.

BACKGROUND: Prucalopride is a 5-HT4 receptor agonist with gastrointestinal prokinetic activities. This integrated analysis of data from three 12-week, double-blind trials evaluated the effect of prucalopride 2 mg q.d. on common constipation symptoms in women in whom laxatives had failed to provide adequate relief. The effect of prucalopride on bowel function was outside the scope of the analysis and has been described elsewhere. METHODS: Women with self-reported inadequate relief from laxatives and included in the prucalopride 2 mg or placebo arm of the trials were selected for analysis. Symptom severity was determined with the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) questionnaire. Observed changes from baseline in individual item scores were also evaluated by calculating Cohen's D effect sizes using baseline standard deviation (SD) (>0.2-0.5, >0.5-0.8 and >0.8 for small, moderate and large effects, respectively). KEY RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 936 women. The proportion of women with a PAC-SYM severity score >2 at baseline was 50.0% for abdominal symptoms, 71.4% for stool symptoms, and 15.5% for rectal symptoms. Excluding the women without presence of a symptom at baseline from the effect size calculations showed that prucalopride 2 mg had a large effect (>0.8) on all PAC-SYM items, including abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, bloating, straining, and painful bowel movements. For abdominal symptoms and stool symptoms, effect sizes with prucalopride 2 mg were 1.3-2.3 times larger than those with placebo. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Prucalopride 2 mg q.d. for 12 weeks alleviates common constipation symptoms in women in whom laxatives had failed to provide adequate relief.

Randomised clinical trial: the efficacy of prucalopride in patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction--a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, multiple n = 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction is a disabling condition for which there are no established drug therapies. The condition is caused by a diverse range of intestinal myopathies and neuropathies. AIM: To assess the therapeutic efficacy of prucalopride, a selective high-affinity 5-HT(4) receptor agonist, we employed a multiple n = 1 study design. Each patient acted as his/her own control, each day counting as one treatment episode, allowing comparison of 168 days on each of active drug and placebo. METHODS: Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial of four 12-week treatment periods, with 2-4 mg prucalopride or placebo daily. In each of the first and second 6 months there was a prucalopride and a placebo treatment. Patients with proven chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, including dilated gut, were included. Evaluation was by patient diary and global evaluation. RESULTS: Seven patients participated (mean 42 years, five female, median symptom duration 11 years). Three discontinued, two due to study length, and one on prucalopride due to unrelated malnutrition and bronchopneumonia. Four patients (three visceral myopathy and one visceral neuropathy) completed the study; prucalopride significantly improved pain in three of four patients, nausea in two, vomiting in one, bloating in four and analgesic intake. Bowel function was not changed substantially. CONCLUSIONS: n = 1 studies in rare conditions allow drug efficacy assessment. Prucalopride relieves symptoms in selected patients with chronic pseudo-obstruction.

Clinical trial: the efficacy of open-label prucalopride treatment in patients with chronic constipation - follow-up of patients from the pivotal studies.

BACKGROUND: Prucalopride is approved in Europe for symptomatic treatment of chronic constipation in women with inadequate relief from laxatives. AIM: To evaluate efficacy of prucalopride during long-term treatment of patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: Patients from three pivotal double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week studies with prucalopride could continue treatment in open-label studies up to 24 months. Efficacy was evaluated every 3 months using the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) satisfaction scale. Laxative use and reasons for study discontinuation were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-six percent of patients who completed the pivotal studies continued prucalopride treatment in the open-label studies (n = 1455, 90% female). Improvement in average PAC-QOL satisfaction score observed after 12-week, double-blind prucalopride was maintained during open-label treatment for up to 18 months; in each 3 month period, 40-50% of patients did not use any laxatives. Most frequent adverse events (AEs) resulting in discontinuation were gastrointestinal events (3.3%) and headache (1.0%). Only 10% of patients who had normalized bowel function on prucalopride at the end of pivotal trials discontinued due to insufficient response during open-label treatment. CONCLUSION: Satisfaction with bowel function is maintained for up to 18 months of treatment with prucalopride. Gastrointestinal events and headache cause discontinuation of prucalopride treatment in ∼5% of patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01070615 and NCT00987844).

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of prucalopride in elderly patients with chronic constipation.

BACKGROUND: Constipation affects up to 50% of the elderly; this study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the selective 5-HT(4) agonist prucalopride in chronically constipated elderly patients. METHODS: Three hundred chronic constipation patients aged >or=65 years were randomized to prucalopride (1, 2, or 4 mg once daily) or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with >or=3 spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBM) per week. Secondary endpoints included the percentage with an increase of >or=1 SCBM per week, BM frequency, constipation-related symptoms, quality of life (QoL), safety, and tolerability. KEY RESULTS: More patients achieved >or=3 SCBM per week with prucalopride than with placebo. This difference was largest and significant during the first week of 4 mg prucalopride (P or=1 SCBM per week from baseline vs placebo (e.g. 60% with 1 mg prucalopride vs 34% with placebo at week 4; P or=1 with 1 mg prucalopride than with placebo (P

Safety assessment of prucalopride in elderly patients with constipation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Chronic constipation is common among nursing home residents. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the selective 5HT(4) receptor agonist prucalopride in elderly, chronically constipated patients in nursing homes. A multicentre, phase II, randomized, double-blind dose-escalation study in 89 elderly constipated nursing home residents treated with placebo, 0.5, 1 or 2 mg prucalopride once daily for 28 days was analysed. Adverse events, vital signs, ECG, Holter monitor and pharmacokinetics were assessed (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00627692). Patients' mean age was 83 years; 88% had a history of cardiovascular diseases. Most frequent adverse events, at least possibly related to prucalopride, were diarrhoea and abdominal pain. Relative to placebo, there were no differences in vital signs, ECG corrected QT interval, ECG morphology parameters, or incidence of supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias on Holter monitoring. Plasma prucalopride concentrations increased proportionally with administered dose. Prucalopride up to 2 mg once daily for 4 weeks was safe and well-tolerated by constipated elderly patients, with no differences vs placebo in ECG or a range of Holter-monitoring parameters.

Prucalopride (Resolor) in the treatment of severe chronic constipation in patients dissatisfied with laxatives.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy, impact on quality of life (QOL) and safety of prucalopride, a selective, high-affinity 5-HT(4) receptor agonist, in patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel-group, phase III study, patients with chronic constipation (two or fewer spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBM)/week) received 2 mg or 4 mg prucalopride or placebo, once daily, for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients reaching three or more SCBM/week. The key secondary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients having an increase of one or more SCBM/week. The primary QOL endpoint was the patient assessment of constipation QOL satisfaction subscale score. Safety parameters included adverse events, laboratory values and cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated over 713 patients. Averaged over 12 weeks, higher proportions of patients on prucalopride 2 mg (19.5%; p<0.01), 4 mg (23.6%; p<0.001) had three or more SCBM/week (or normalisation of bowel function) compared with placebo (9.6%). Similar results were seen in the subgroup (83%) of patients dissatisfied with previous laxative treatment. Both doses of prucalopride also significantly improved secondary efficacy and QOL endpoints, including the proportion of patients with an increase of one or more SCBM/week, evacuation completeness, perceived disease severity and treatment effectiveness and QOL. Prucalopride 4 mg significantly reduced the need for straining versus placebo (p<0.05). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were headache and diarrhoea. Both doses of prucalopride were safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Prucalopride significantly and consistently improved bowel function, associated symptoms and satisfaction in chronically constipated patients.

Clinical trial: the efficacy, impact on quality of life, and safety and tolerability of prucalopride in severe chronic constipation--a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation may result in disabling symptoms, is often unsatisfactorily treated by laxatives and negatively impacts quality of life (QoL). AIM: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a selective, high-affinity 5-HT(4) receptor agonist, prucalopride, in patients with chronic constipation [or=3 SCBMs/week, averaged over 12 weeks. Other assessments included BM frequency, constipation-related QoL and symptoms and tolerability. RESULTS: Among 641 patients, significantly more patients taking prucalopride 2 or 4 mg (24%) than placebo (12%), achieved the primary efficacy endpoint (>or=3 SCBMs/week) or an increase of >or=1 SCBMs/week; 43% and 47% vs. 28% respectively. Prucalopride-treated patients also achieved significantly greater satisfaction with treatment and bowel function, and improved perception of constipation severity and constipation-related QoL, compared with placebo. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events were headache, abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhoea (mainly during day 1). There were no differences in comparison to placebo in the incidence of serious adverse effects or cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: Over 12 weeks, prucalopride was effective and well tolerated in chronic constipation.

Activity of the triazole antifungal r126638 as assessed by corneofungimetry.

BACKGROUND: R126638 is a novel triazole exhibiting potent in vitro and in vivo antifungal activity against fungal pathogens including dermatophytes and yeasts. OBJECTIVE: To determine the antifungal activity in time in the stratum corneum of healthy volunteers after oral intake of R126638 at a daily dose of 100 or 200 mg for 1 week. METHOD: Sixteen male volunteers were randomly allocated to oral treatment with either 100 or 200 mg of R126638 once daily for 1 week. Five cyanoacrylate skin surface strippings (CSSS) were obtained from the forearm of each subject before drug intake at day 1. CSSS were also collected during treatment at day 2 (24 h after the first drug intake, before the second drug intake), at day 4 (before the fourth drug intake) and at day 7 (10 h after the last drug intake). The post-treatment lingering effect was assessed at day 10 (3 days after treatment) and at day 14 (7 days after treatment). The corneofungimetry bioassay was performed on these CSSS to assess the antifungal profile of R126638. Cells of different fungal species (Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Microsporum canis, Candida albicans and Malassezia globosa) were deposited and cultured for 10 days on CSSS in a sterile and controlled environment. The extent of fungal growth on the stratum corneum was determined using computerized image analysis. RESULTS: R126638 clearly reduced the growth of all tested fungal species. The onset of effects of R126638 was evidenced at day 4 when it reached statistical significance for 3 of 5 species. At day 7, significance was reached for 4 of 5 species. During the posttreatment period, R126638 remained effective for 4 of 5 species at day 10, and this activity persisted until day 14 for 2 of 5 species. CONCLUSION: A broad spectrum antifungal activity was rapidly expressed in the stratum corneum after oral intake of R126638. The drug likely reached the upper layers of the stratum corneum by diffusion and persisted in this location for at least 7 days after treatment.

Effects of R 56865 and phenytoin on mechanical, biochemical, and morphologic changes during ouabain intoxication in isolated perfused rabbit heart.

The Na+/Ca2+ overload inhibitor R 56865 (N-[1-[4-(4-fluorophenoxy)-butyl]-4-piperidinyl)-N-methyl-2- benzothiazolamine) has been reported to prevent or attenuate ischemia- as well as ouabain-induced cellular sodium and calcium load. We investigated the potency of this compound in preventing mechanical, biochemical, and ultrastructural consequences of ouabain (OUA) intoxication in isolated rabbit heart. The protective effect of the digitalis antidote phenytoin (PHT) on the consequences of ouabain intoxication was examined for comparison. In isolated perfused rabbit heart, OUA (0.4 microM) caused an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) that was accompanied by depletion of high-energy phosphates (80% less than in control), accumulation of tissue lactate (12-fold) and damage of contractile elements and mitochondria. Accumulation of lactate was associated with a decrease in oxygen consumption by the isolated perfused heart. R 56865 (1.0 microM) and phenytoin (60 microM) prevented increase in LVEDP, breakdown of the energy-rich phosphates creatine phosphate (CrP) and ATP, accumulation of lactate, and morphologic changes induced by OUA. The above-mentioned toxic effects of OUA are interpreted as consequences of mitochondrial failure finally leading to breakdown of the oxidative phosphorylation. Thus, we conclude that the protective action of both compounds, R56865 and PHT, may be attributed to prevention or attenuation of mitochondrial failure due to OUA-induced disturbance of ion homeostasis.