Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(10): 6268-6274, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37573282

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) continues to rise despite no improvement in survival, an increased risk of surgical complications, and negative effects on quality of life. This study explored the experiences of the partners of women who undergo CPM. METHODS: This study was part of an investigation into the factors motivating women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer and low genetic risk to opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). Participating women were asked for permission to invite their partners to take part in interviews. In-depth interviews with partners were conducted using a semi-structured topic guide. A thematic analysis of the data was performed RESULTS: Of 35 partners, all men, 15 agreed to be interviewed. Most perceived their role to be strong and logical. Some hoped their wives would choose a bilateral mastectomy. All felt strongly that the final decision was up to their partners. The partners often framed the decision for CPM as one of life or death. Thus, any aesthetic effects were unimportant by comparison. The male partners had difficulty grasping the physical and emotional changes inherent in mastectomy, which made communicating about sexuality and intimacy very challenging for the couples. In the early recovery period, some noted the stress of managing home life. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of the male partners provide insight into how couples navigate complex treatment decision-making, both together and separately. There may be a benefit to including partners in pre- and post-surgical counseling to mitigate miscommunication regarding the expected oncologic and emotional outcomes related to CPM.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mastectomia Profilática , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia/psicologia , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Qualidade de Vida , Tomada de Decisões
3.
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs ; 48(4): 215-223, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36943837

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) poses risks to pregnant women and their infants. The spread of misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination is a barrier to optimizing vaccination rates among women of childbearing age. We conducted an environmental scan to identify misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination, pregnancy, and fertility, and a review to identify evidence to refute misinformation and strategies to correct and prevent the spread of misinformation. Seven identified themes of misinformation are: the vaccine causes female infertility; can cause miscarriage; and can decrease male fertility; mRNA vaccines attack the placenta; pregnant and breastfeeding persons should not get the vaccine; the vaccine can change menstrual cycles; and vaccinated people can spread infertility symptoms to unvaccinated people. Strategies that can be implemented by social media platforms to help prevent misinformation spread and correct existing health misinformation include improving information regulation by modifying community standards, implementing surveillance algorithms, and applying warning labels to potentially misleading posts. Health services organizations and clinicians can implement health misinformation policies, directly recommend vaccinations, provide credible explanations and resources to debunk misinformation, educate patients and populations on spotting misinformation, and apply effective communication strategies. More research is needed to assess longer-term effects of vaccination among women of childbearing age to strengthen the defense against misinformation and to evaluate strategies that aim to prevent and correct misinformation spread about COVID-19 vaccinations.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo , COVID-19 , Mídias Sociais , Gravidez , Lactente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Comunicação
4.
J Sch Nurs ; 30(2): 88-96, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23850988

RESUMO

Children who are exposed to diesel exhaust from idling school buses are at increased risk of asthma exacerbation, decreased lung function, immunologic reactions, leukemia, and increased susceptibility to infections. Policies and initiatives that aim to protect school children from the harmful effects of exposure to diesel exhaust range from general environmental air quality standards to more specific legislation that targets diesel exhaust near school children. School nurse standards of practice specify that school nurses should attain current knowledge of environmental health concepts, implement environmental health strategies, and advocate for environmental health principles. This article provides a description of the professional responsibilities of school nurses in protecting children from harmful environmental exposures, provides an overview of legislative initiatives intended to protect school children from diesel exhaust exposure, and summarizes one school district's effort to reduce diesel exhaust exposure among school children.


Assuntos
Asma/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ambiental/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Serviços de Enfermagem Escolar/métodos , Emissões de Veículos/prevenção & controle , Asma/induzido quimicamente , Criança , Defesa da Criança e do Adolescente , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Humanos , North Carolina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA