Effects of mechanical in-exsufflation in preventing postextubation acute respiratory failure in intensive care acquired weakness patients: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation can reduce the incidence of acute respiratory failure within the 48-hour post-extubation period in intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled open-label trial. Patients diagnosed with intensive care unit-acquired weakness were consecutively enrolled based on a Medical Research Council score ≤ 48/60. The patients randomly received two daily sessions; in the control group, conventional chest physiotherapy was performed, while in the intervention group, chest physiotherapy was associated with mechanical insufflation-exsufflation. The incidence of acute respiratory failure within 48 hours of extubation was evaluated. Similarly, the reintubation rate, intensive care unit length of stay, mortality at 28 days, and survival probability at 90 days were assessed. The study was stopped after futility results in the interim analysis. RESULTS: We included 122 consecutive patients (n = 61 per group). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute respiratory failure between treatments (11.5% control group versus 16.4%, intervention group; p = 0.60), the need for reintubation (3.6% versus 10.7%; p = 0.27), mean length of stay (3 versus 4 days; p = 0.33), mortality at Day 28 (9.8% versus 15.0%; p = 0.42), or survival probability at Day 90 (21.3% versus 28.3%; p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation combined with chest physiotherapy seems to have no impact in preventing postextubation acute respiratory failure in intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients. Similarly, mortality and survival probability were similar in both groups. Nevertheless, given the early termination of the trial, further clinical investigation is strongly recommended. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTER: NCT01931228.

Effects of mechanical in-exsufflation in preventing postextubation acute respiratory failure in intensive care acquired weakness patients: a randomized controlled trial / Efeitos da insuflação-exsuflação mecânica na prevenção da insuficiência respiratória aguda pós-extubação em pacientes com fraqueza adquirida em terapia intensiva: um estudo controlado e randomizado

ABSTRACT Objective: We hypothesized that the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation can reduce the incidence of acute respiratory failure within the 48-hour post-extubation period in intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients. Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled open-label trial. Patients diagnosed with intensive care unit-acquired weakness were consecutively enrolled based on a Medical Research Council score ≤ 48/60. The patients randomly received two daily sessions; in the control group, conventional chest physiotherapy was performed, while in the intervention group, chest physiotherapy was associated with mechanical insufflation-exsufflation. The incidence of acute respiratory failure within 48 hours of extubation was evaluated. Similarly, the reintubation rate, intensive care unit length of stay, mortality at 28 days, and survival probability at 90 days were assessed. The study was stopped after futility results in the interim analysis. Results: We included 122 consecutive patients (n = 61 per group). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute respiratory failure between treatments (11.5% control group versus 16.4%, intervention group; p = 0.60), the need for reintubation (3.6% versus 10.7%; p = 0.27), mean length of stay (3 versus 4 days; p = 0.33), mortality at Day 28 (9.8% versus 15.0%; p = 0.42), or survival probability at Day 90 (21.3% versus 28.3%; p = 0.41). Conclusion: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation combined with chest physiotherapy seems to have no impact in preventing postextubation acute respiratory failure in intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients. Similarly, mortality and survival probability were similar in both groups. Nevertheless, given the early termination of the trial, further clinical investigation is strongly recommended. Clinical Trials Register: NCT 01931228

RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar se o uso de insuflação-exsuflação mecânica pode reduzir a incidência da insuficiência respiratória aguda no período de 48 horas pós-extubação em pacientes com fraqueza adquirida em unidades de terapia intensiva. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo, randomizado, controlado e aberto. Os pacientes diagnosticados com fraqueza adquirida em unidade de terapia intensiva foram incluídos consecutivamente, com base em uma pontuação do Medical Research Council ≤ 48/60. Os pacientes receberam aleatoriamente duas sessões diárias; no grupo controle, realizou-se fisioterapia torácica convencional, enquanto no grupo intervenção, combinou-se fisioterapia torácica com insuflação-exsuflação mecânica. Avaliou-se a incidência de insuficiência respiratória aguda dentro de 48 horas após a extubação. Da mesma forma, avaliaram-se a taxa de reintubação, o tempo de permanência na unidade de terapia intensiva, a mortalidade aos 28 dias e a probabilidade de sobrevida aos 90 dias. O estudo foi interrompido após resultados de futilidade na análise intermediária. Resultados: Incluímos 122 pacientes consecutivos (n = 61 por grupo). Não houve diferença significativa na incidência de insuficiência respiratória aguda entre os tratamentos (11,5% no grupo controle versus 16,4% no grupo intervenção; p = 0,60), na necessidade de reintubação (3,6% versus 10,7%; p = 0,27), no tempo médio de internação (3 versus 4 dias; p = 0,33), na mortalidade aos 28 dias (9,8% versus 15,0%; p = 0,42) ou na probabilidade de sobrevida aos 90 dias (21,3% versus 28,3%; p = 0,41). Conclusão: A insuflação-exsuflação mecânica associada à fisioterapia torácica parece não ter impacto na prevenção da insuficiência respiratória aguda pós-extubação em pacientes com fraqueza adquirida na unidade de terapia intensiva. Da mesma forma, a mortalidade e a probabilidade de sobrevida foram semelhantes em ambos os grupos. No entanto, devido ao término precoce do estudo, recomenda-se enfaticamente uma investigação clínica mais aprofundada. Registro Clinical Trials: NCT 01931228

Characterization of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) frequency, severity and characterization in critically ill patients has not been reported. METHODS: Single-centre cohort performed from 3 March 2020 to 14 April 2020 in four intensive care units in Bordeaux University Hospital, France. All patients with COVID-19 and pulmonary severity criteria were included. AKI was defined using Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. A systematic urinary analysis was performed. The incidence, severity, clinical presentation, biological characterization (transient versus persistent AKI; proteinuria, haematuria and glycosuria) and short-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included, with basal serum creatinine (SCr) of 69 ± 21 µmol/L. At admission, AKI was present in 8/71 (11%) patients. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] follow-up was 17 (12-23) days. AKI developed in a total of 57/71 (80%) patients, with 35% Stage 1, 35% Stage 2 and 30% Stage 3 AKI; 10/57 (18%) required renal replacement therapy (RRT). Transient AKI was present in only 4/55 (7%) patients and persistent AKI was observed in 51/55 (93%). Patients with persistent AKI developed a median (IQR) urine protein/creatinine of 82 (54-140) (mg/mmol) with an albuminuria/proteinuria ratio of 0.23 ± 20, indicating predominant tubulointerstitial injury. Only two (4%) patients had glycosuria. At Day 7 after onset of AKI, six (11%) patients remained dependent on RRT, nine (16%) had SCr >200 µmol/L and four (7%) had died. Day 7 and Day 14 renal recovery occurred in 28% and 52%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Severe COVID-19-associated AKI is frequent, persistent, severe and characterized by an almost exclusive tubulointerstitial injury without glycosuria.

The sustainable impact of an educational approach to improve the appropriateness of laboratory test orders in the ICU.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies described strategies to improve the use of diagnostic tests in intensive care units (ICU). No study assessed whether their impact was sustained or not. In this study, we assessed whether a multi-faceted intervention for more appropriate use of laboratory testing can decrease the number of tests, is sustainable, is not associated with additional morbidity and represents a potential cost saving. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An open-label prospective cohort study in two separated units of the same medical intensive care unit (ICU) including respectively 3315 and 2392 consecutive patients. After the observation period (2010), a reduction in ICU A of unnecessary diagnostics tests as part of a program including senior supervisory of juniors' orders, encouragements for orders containment at each everyday round discussions (period 2; 2011). Period 3 (2012) consisted in the prolongation of the protocol as a routine care without supervision; Period 4 (2013) was a new period of observation without intervention. No modification was implemented in ICU B in periods 2-4. RESULTS: After the intervention, a decrease in the overall number of tests per ICU-patient-days (37.3±5.5 (baseline) to 15.2±3.2 (- 59%); p<0.0001) was observed. The total cost of the tests decreased from 239±41 to 104±28 euros per ICU-patient days; p<0.0001. The effect on laboratory test orders was sustainable in period 3 (-49%) and 4 (-30%). No significant secondary effect of the intervention was observed in period 2. In ICU B, there was no significant change in the overall laboratory test orders in between the periods. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory test containment is effective, likely safe and sustainable provided that an educational program is repeatedly promoted, that it makes sense for the whole team, that senior and junior physicians are both committed in the program, and that encouragements for laboratory orders containment at each everyday round discussions.

Tailoring Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy in Subjects With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia With a 10-Hour E-Test Approach.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study of subjects suspected of having ventilator-associated pneumonia, a rapid susceptibility testing approach by using ETEST (BioMérieux) strips directly applied to bronchoalveolar lavage samples provided valuable information at hour 24. The primary objective of this study was to assess a new direct specimen testing by using an even more-rapid E-test approach (at hour 10), which could promote an early de-escalation of the antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects with ventilator-associated pneumonia admitted to a medical ICU were prospectively included. In parallel with standard routine methods, E-test strips were directly applied onto agar plates seeded with bronchoalveolar lavage samples and were analyzed after 10 h of incubation. E-test results were used to identify potential drug choices by simulating clinical decision making if the microscopy results had been available at the point of care. These choices were analyzed for concordance with the narrowest adequate antimicrobial therapy according to the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) provided by the reference method (ie, the laboratory routine diagnostic). RESULTS: At hour 10, direct specimen testing was readable in 18 of 28 bronchoalveolar lavage samples (64%). Total agreement between the 10-h direct specimen testing approach and the laboratory routine diagnostic approach was 90%, with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 95%, with 8% major errors and 3% very major errors. The concordance between the 2 tests was very good (kappa = 0.79). If the 10-h E-test results were taken into account, then an early de-escalation strategy would have been possible in 10 of 18 cases (55%) at hour 10. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid susceptibility testing approach provided early (10 h) and valuable information that could lead to an early adjustment of empirical antimicrobial treatment in a ventilator-associated pneumonia setting. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01266863.).

Multicentric Standardized Flow Cytometry Routine Assessment of Patients With Sepsis to Predict Clinical Worsening.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we primarily sought to assess the ability of flow cytometry to predict early clinical deterioration and overall survival in patients with sepsis admitted in the ED and ICU. METHODS: Patients admitted for community-acquired acute sepsis from 11 hospital centers were eligible. Early (day 7) and late (day 28) deaths were notified. Levels of CD64pos granulocytes, CD16pos monocytes, CD16dim immature granulocytes (IGs), and T and B lymphocytes were assessed by flow cytometry using an identical, cross-validated, robust, and simple consensus standardized protocol in each center. RESULTS: Among 1,062 patients screened, 781 patients with confirmed sepsis were studied (age, 67 ± 48 years; Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, 36 ± 17; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, 5 ± 4). Patients were divided into three groups (sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock) on day 0 and on day 2. On day 0, patients with sepsis exhibited increased levels of CD64pos granulocytes, CD16pos monocytes, and IGs with T-cell lymphopenia. Clinical severity was associated with higher percentages of IGs and deeper T-cell lymphopenia. IG percentages tended to be higher in patients whose clinical status worsened on day 2 (35.1 ± 35.6 vs 43.5 ± 35.2, P = .07). Increased IG percentages were also related to occurrence of new organ failures on day 2. Increased IG percentages, especially when associated with T-cell lymphopenia, were independently associated with early (P < .01) and late (P < .01) death. CONCLUSIONS: Increased circulating IGs at the acute phase of sepsis are linked to clinical worsening, especially when associated with T-cell lymphopenia. Early flow cytometry could help clinicians to target patients at high risk of clinical deterioration. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01995448; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Hemodynamic Assessment of Patients With Septic Shock Using Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Critical Care Echocardiography: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: To assess the agreement between transpulmonary thermodilution (TPT) and critical care echocardiography (CCE) in ventilated patients with septic shock. METHODS: Ventilated patients in sinus rhythm requiring advanced hemodynamic assessment for septic shock were included in this prospective multicenter descriptive study. Patients were assessed successively using TPT and CCE in random order. Data were interpreted independently at bedside by two investigators who proposed therapeutic changes on the basis of predefined algorithms. TPT and CCE hemodynamic assessments were reviewed offline by two independent experts who identified potential sources of discrepant results by consensus. Lactate clearance and outcome were studied. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were studied (71 men; age, 61 ± 15 years; Simplified Acute Physiologic Score, 58 ± 18; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, 10 ± 3). TPT and CCE interpretations at bedside were concordant in 87/132 patients (66%) without acute cor pulmonale (ACP), resulting in a moderate agreement (kappa, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.37-0.60). Experts' adjudications were concordant in 100/129 patients without ACP (77.5%), resulting in a good intertechnique agreement (kappa, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77). In addition to ACP (n = 8), CCE depicted a potential source of TPT inaccuracy in 8/29 patients (28%). Lactate clearance at H6 was similar irrespective of the concordance of online interpretations of TPT and CCE (55/84 [65%] vs 32/45 [71%], P = .55). ICU and day 28 mortality rates were similar between patients with concordant and discordant interpretations (29/87 [36%] vs 13/45 [29%], P = .60; and 31/87 [36%] vs 16/45 [36%], P = .99, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between TPT and CCE was moderate when interpreted at bedside and good when adjudicated offline by experts, but without impact on lactate clearance and mortality.

Intermittent noninvasive ventilation after extubation in patients with chronic respiratory disorders: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (VHYPER).

PURPOSE: Early noninvasive ventilation (NIV) after extubation decreases the risk of respiratory failure and lowers 90-day mortality in patients with hypercapnia. Patients with chronic respiratory disease are at risk of extubation failure. Therefore, it could be useful to determine the role of NIV with a discontinuous approach, not limited to patients with hypercapnia. We assessed the efficacy of early NIV in decreasing respiratory failure after extubation in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled multicenter study was conducted. We enrolled 144 mechanically ventilated patients with chronic respiratory disorders who tolerated a spontaneous breathing trial. Patients were randomly allocated after extubation to receive either NIV (NIV group, n = 72), performed with a discontinuous approach, for the first 48 h, or conventional oxygen treatment (usual care group, n = 72). The primary endpoint was decreased respiratory failure within 48 h after extubation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01047852). RESULTS: Respiratory failure after extubation was less frequent in the NIV group: 6 (8.5%) versus 20 (27.8%); p = 0.0016. Six patients (8.5%) in the NIV group versus 13 (18.1%) in the usual care group were reintubated; p = 0.09. Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and 90-day mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.28 and p = 0.33, respectively). Median postrandomization ICU length of stay was lower in the usual care group: 3 days (IQR 2-6) versus 4 days (IQR 2-7; p = 0.008). Patients with hypercapnia during a spontaneous breathing trial were at risk of developing postextubation respiratory failure [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) = 4.56 (1.59-14.00); p = 0.006] and being intubated [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) = 3.60 (1.07-13.31); p = 0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: Early NIV performed following a sequential protocol for the first 48 h after extubation decreased the risk of respiratory failure in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. Reintubation and mortality did not differ between NIV and conventional oxygen therapy.

Ultrasonographic diaphragmatic excursion is inaccurate and not better than the MRC score for predicting weaning-failure in mechanically ventilated patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of diaphragmatic ultrasound (US) to predict weaning failure in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing a first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). METHODS: During a 4-month period, 67 consecutive patients eligible for a first SBT underwent US measurements of maximal diaphragmatic excursion (MDE) by a right anterior subcostal approach. Weaning failure was defined as either the failure of SBT or the need for resumption of ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure or death within 48h following successful extubation. The accuracy of diaphragmatic ultrasound and the Medical Research Council (MRC) score when predicting weaning failure was assessed via a receiver operating curve analysis. RESULTS: The feasibility rate for the ultrasound measurements was 63%. Mean values of MDE were significantly higher in patients who succeeded at their first weaning attempt (4.1±2.1 versus 3±1.8cm, P=0.04). Using a threshold of MDE≤2.7cm, the sensitivity and specificity of diaphragmatic ultrasound in predicting weaning failure were 59% [39-77%] and 71% [57-82%] with an AUC at 0.65 [0.51-0.78]. There was no significant difference between MDE values and MRC scores for predicting weaning failure (P=0.73). CONCLUSION: A decrease in MDE values may be associated with an unfavourable weaning outcome. Diaphragmatic excursion measured by ultrasound is however unable by itself to predict weaning failure at the bedside of patients undergoing a first spontaneous breathing trial and does not provide any additional value compared to the MRC score.

Blood fibrocytes are recruited during acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through a CXCR4-dependent pathway.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by peribronchial fibrosis. The chronic course of COPD is worsened by recurrent acute exacerbations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the recruitment of blood fibrocytes in patients with COPD during exacerbations and, subsequently, to identify potential mechanisms implicated in such recruitment. METHODS: Using flow cytometry, we quantified circulating fibrocytes and characterized their chemokine receptor expression in 54 patients with COPD examined during an acute exacerbation (V1) and 2 months afterward (V2) and in 40 control subjects. The role of the chemokines CXCL12 and CCL11 in fibrocyte migration was investigated by using a chemotaxis assay. Patients were followed for up to 3 years after V1. RESULTS: We demonstrated a significantly increased number of circulating fibrocytes at V1 compared with control subjects. The number of circulating fibrocytes decreased at V2. A high percentage of circulating fibrocytes during exacerbation was associated with increased risk of death. The percentage of fibrocytes at V2 was negatively correlated with FEV1, forced vital capacity, FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio, transfer lung capacity of carbon monoxide, and Pao2. Fibrocytes highly expressed CXCR4 and CCR3, the chemokine receptors for CXCL12 and CCL11, respectively. Fibrocytes collected from patients with COPD at V1 had increased chemotactic migration in response to CXCL12 but not to CCL11 compared with those from control subjects. Plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, decreased fibrocyte migration to plasma from patients with exacerbating COPD. CONCLUSION: Blood fibrocytes are recruited during COPD exacerbations and related to mortality and low lung function. The CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is involved in such fibrocyte recruitment (Firebrob study; ClinicalTrials NCT01196832).

Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Critical Care Subjects.

INTRODUCTION: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) can deliver heated and humidified gas (up to 100% oxygen) at a maximum flow of 60 L/min via nasal prongs or cannula. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term physiologic effects of HFNC. Inspiratory muscle effort, gas exchange, dyspnea score, and comfort were evaluated. METHODS: Twelve subjects admitted to the ICU for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure were prospectively included. Four study sessions were performed. The first session consisted of oxygen therapy given through a high-FIO2, non-rebreathing face mask. Recordings were then obtained during periods of HFNC and CPAP at 5 cm H2O in random order, and final measurements were performed during oxygen therapy delivered via a face mask. Each of these 4 periods lasted ∼20 min. RESULTS: Esophageal pressure signals, breathing pattern, gas exchange, comfort, and dyspnea were measured. Compared with the first session, HFNC reduced inspiratory effort (pressure-time product of 156.0 [119.2-194.4] cm H2O × s/min vs 204.2 [149.6-324.7] cm H2O × s/min, P < .01) and breathing frequency (P < .01). No significant differences were observed between HFNC and CPAP for inspiratory effort and breathing frequency. Compared with the first session, PaO2/FIO2 increased significantly with HFNC (167 [157-184] mm Hg vs 156 [110-171] mm Hg, P < .01). CPAP produced significantly greater PaO2/FIO2 improvement than did HFNC. Dyspnea improved with HFNC and CPAP, but this improvement was not significant. Subject comfort was not different across the 4 sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional oxygen therapy, HFNC improved inspiratory effort and oxygenation. In subjects with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, HFNC is an alternative to conventional oxygen therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT01056952.).

Aminoglycosides in septic shock: an overview, with specific consideration given to their nephrotoxic risk.

Aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity has been reported in patients with sepsis, and several risk factors have been described. Once-daily dosing and shorter treatment have reduced nephrotoxicity risk, and simplified aminoglycoside monitoring. This review focuses on nephrotoxicity associated with aminoglycosides in the subset of patients with septic shock or severe sepsis. These patients are radically different from those with less severe sepsis. They may have, for instance, renal impairment due to the shock per se, sepsis-related acute kidney injury, frequent association with pre-existing risk factors for renal failure such as diabetes, dehydration and other nephrotoxic treatments. In this category of patients, these risk factors might modify substantially the benefit-risk ratio of aminoglycosides. In addition, aminoglycoside administration in critically ill patients with sepsis is complicated by an extreme inter- and intra-individual variability in drug pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics: the volume of distribution (Vd) is frequently increased while the elimination constant can be either increased or decreased. Consequently, and although its effect on nephrotoxicity has not been explored, a different administration schedule, i.e. a high-dose once daily (HDOD), and several therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) options have been proposed in these patients. This review describes the historical perspective of these different options, including those applying to subsets of patients in which aminoglycoside administration is even more complex (obese intensive care unit [ICU] patients, patients needing continuous or discontinuous renal replacement therapy [CRRT/DRRT]). A simple linear dose adjustment according to aminoglycoside serum concentration can be classified as low-intensity TDM. Nomograms have also been proposed, based on the maximum (peak) plasma concentration (Cmax) objectives, weight and creatinine clearance. The Sawchuk and Zaske method (based on the determination of Cmax and an intermediate aminoglycoside assay before minimum plasma concentration) and the Bayesian method were both classified as high-intensity TDM programmes. Given the mean cost of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity, these programmes may be cost-effective if its prevalence is above 10 %. However, none of these high-intensity TDM programmes have demonstrated a reduction of aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity in patients with septic shock. Therefore, the questions remain as to, first, whether a TDM programme is relevant and, second, what intensity of TDM is achievable in the ICU, i.e. how it can be practically applied in the ICU setting where urgent care and high workload are substantial obstacles to a sophisticated, optimized aminoglycoside administration.

Direct testing of bronchoalveolar lavages from ventilator-associated pneumonia patients.

In line with a rapid de-escalation of empirical antimicrobial therapy, this study assessed the validity of an E-test-based direct specimen testing method on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples from ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients. E-test strips were directly applied onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates seeded with BAL samples and read after 24 h of incubation. In parallel, the BAL samples were analyzed by the routine diagnostic laboratory. The microbroth dilution approach was used as a control method. In a cohort of 20 patients, 135 microorganism-antibiotic combinations were studied. Total agreement between the 2 methods was achieved for 88.9% combinations, with 1.5% very major errors (isolates susceptible by E-test and reported resistant by the diagnostic laboratory) and 9.6% major errors (isolates resistant by E-test and reported susceptible by the diagnostic laboratory). These results indicate that applying E-test directly on BAL samples is a promising method for obtaining susceptibility data after 24 h in critical patients with VAP.

Diaphragm ultrasonography to estimate the work of breathing during non-invasive ventilation.

PURPOSE: Ultrasonography allows the direct observation of the diaphragm. Its thickness variation measured in the zone of apposition has been previously used to diagnose diaphragm paralysis. We assessed the feasibility and accuracy of this method to assess diaphragmatic function and its contribution to respiratory workload in critically ill patients under non-invasive ventilation. METHODS: This was a preliminary physiological study in the intensive care unit of a university hospital. Twelve patients requiring planned non-invasive ventilation after extubation were studied while spontaneously breathing and during non-invasive ventilation at three levels of pressure support (5, 10 and 15 cmH(2)O). Diaphragm thickness was measured in the zone of apposition during tidal ventilation and the thickening fraction (TF) was calculated as (thickness at inspiration - thickness at expiration)/thickness at expiration. Diaphragmatic pressure-time product per breath (PTP(di)) was measured from oesophageal and gastric pressure recordings. RESULTS: PTP(di) and TF both decreased as the level of pressure support increased. A significant correlation was found between PTP(di) and TF (ρ = 0.74, p < 0.001). The overall reproducibility of TF assessment was good but the coefficient of repeatability reached 18% for inter-observer reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic assessment of the diaphragm TF is a non-invasive method that may prove useful in evaluating diaphragmatic function and its contribution to respiratory workload in intensive care unit patients.

Delivery of helium­oxygen mixture during spontaneous breathing: evaluation of three high-concentration face masks.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of delivering a mixture of helium and oxygen gas (He­O2) in spontaneous ventilation. Three high oxygen flow reservoir masks were tested: the Heliox21, specifically designed for helium; the Hi-Ox80 mask, with an inspiratory and an expiratory valve; and a standard high-concentration face mask. METHODS: This prospective randomized crossover study was performed in six healthy volunteers in a laboratory setting. Volunteers breathed a mixture of 78% He/22% O2 through each of the masks under two different breathing conditions (rest and hyperventilation: minute ventilation of 14.9 ± 6.1 and 26.7 ± 8.7 L min(−1), respectively) and four different He­O2 flow rates (7, 10, 12, and 15 L min(−1)). RESULTS: A nasopharyngeal catheter was used to estimate He pharyngeal concentration (Fp [He]) in the airways in order to determine the percentage of contamination with room air (% air cont) at end-expiration. Under all testing conditions, the Hi-Ox80 mask presented a significantly lower % air cont. During resting breathing pattern, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 54% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox80 mask compared to 29% for the Heliox21 mask and only 17% for the standard mask. At hyperventilation, a Fp [He] higher than 50% was achieved in 17% of the tests performed with the Hi-Ox mask compared to 4% for the other two masks. CONCLUSION: He­O2 administration via the usual high-concentration reservoir masks results in significant dilution by room air. The Hi-Ox80 mask minimized room air contamination and much more frequently achieved a pharyngeal He concentration higher than 50%.

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy under noninvasive ventilation and propofol target-controlled infusion in hypoxemic patients.

PURPOSE: In critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (FOB-BAL) are important tools in diagnostic strategies. In nonintubated patients, the patient's agitation may lead to desaturation and compromise the realization of FOB. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of target-controlled (TCI) propofol sedation during FOB-BAL in nonintubated hypoxemic patients. METHODS: The first end point in our prospective investigation within an intensive care unit (ICU) was the avoidance of endotracheal intubation within 24 h. Secondary end points were changes in the PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio, hemodynamic stability, patient comfort, occurrence of adverse effects, and quality of FOB. Patients self-evaluated their comfort after FOB. RESULTS: Twenty-four FOBs were performed in 23 patients with ARF. PaO(2)/FiO(2) before FOB was 181 ± 50 (range 85-286). All patients tolerated FOB with BAL. None was intubated during the 2 h after FOB. Loss of consciousness was obtained with an effect site concentration of propofol of 1.49 ± 0.46 µg/mL (range 2.6-0.6). No significant adverse events occurred. TCI propofol allowed us to obtain amnesia, patient comfort, and it did not impair airway protection. Any hemodynamic changes observed were modest and transient. CONCLUSIONS: FOB-BAL, under NIV and TCI with propofol, is feasible and safe in nonintubated patients with ARF. The TCI of propofol during FOB-BAL reduces patient discomfort with no significant adverse effects.

Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation superimposed on spontaneous breathing: a physiological study in patients at risk for extubation failure.

PURPOSE: Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) is a high-frequency ventilation modality that can be superimposed on spontaneous breathing. IPV may diminish respiratory muscle loading and help to mobilize secretions. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the short-term effects of IPV in patients at high risk for extubation failure who were receiving preventive non-invasive ventilation (NIV) after extubation. METHODS: Respiratory rate, work of breathing, and gas exchange were evaluated in 17 extubated patients during 20 min of IPV and 20 min of NIV delivered via a facial mask, separated by periods of spontaneous breathing. The pressure-support level during NIV was adjusted until tidal volume reached 6-8 ml/kg and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 4-5 cmH(2)O. For IPV, the pressurisation frequency was set at 250 cycles/min and driving pressure at 1.2 bar. The pressure-time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi/min) was measured using an oesophageal and gastric double-balloon catheter. RESULTS: Transdiaphragmatic pressure and PTPdi/min improved significantly (p < 0.01), from a median [25th-75th percentiles] of 264 [190-300] to 192 [152-221] cmH(2)O s/min with IPV and from 273 [212-397] to 176 [120-216] cmH(2)O s/min with NIV. Respiratory rate decreased significantly from 23 [19-27] to 22 [17-24] breaths/min for IPV and from 25 [19-28] to 20 [18-22] breaths/min for NIV (p < 0.01). Mean PaCO(2) decreased after NIV (from 46 [42-48] to 41 [36-42] mmHg, p < 0.01) but not after IPV. There was no noticeable effect on oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: IPV is an interesting alternative to NIV in patients at risk for post-extubation respiratory failure. Both NIV and IPV diminished the respiratory rate and work of breathing, but IPV was less effective in improving alveolar ventilation.