A reentry study on the use of bovine porous bone mineral, GTR, and platelet-rich plasma in the regenerative treatment of intrabony defects in humans.

This study compared the clinical effectiveness of a combination therapy consisting of bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM), guided tissue regeneration (GTR), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the regeneration of periodontal intrabony defects in humans. Twenty-eight paired intrabony defects were surgically treated using a split-mouth design. Defects were treated with BPBM, GTR, and PRP (experimental), or with open-flap debridement (control). Clinical parameters evaluated included changes in attachment level, pocket depth, and defect fill as revealed by reentry at 6 months. Preoperative pocket depths, attachment levels, and transoperative bone measurements were similar for the two groups. Postsurgical measurements taken at 6 months revealed that both treatment modalities significantly decreased pocket depth and increased clinical attachment and defect fill compared to baseline. The differences between the experimental and control groups were 2.22+/-0.39 mm on buccal and 2.12+/-0.34 mm on lingual sites for pocket depth, 3.05+/-0.51 mm on buccal and 2.88+/-0.46 mm on lingual sites for gain in clinical attachment, and 3.46+/-0.96 mm on buccal and 3.42+/-0.02 mm on lingual sites for defect fill. These differences between groups were statistically significant in favor of the experimental defects. The combined therapy was also clinically more effective than open-flap debridement. The superiority of the experimental group could not be attributed solely to the surgical intervention and was likely a result of the BPBM/GTR/ PRP application. Combining BPBM, GTR, and PRP was an effective modality of regenerative treatment for intrabony defects in patients with advanced periodontitis.

Effectiveness of a combination of platelet-rich plasma, bovine porous bone mineral and guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of mandibular grade II molar furcations in humans.

OBJECTIVE: A combination of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has been shown to be effective as regenerative treatment for intrabony periodontal defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PRP, BPBM and GTR used in combination as regenerative treatment for grade II molar furcation defects in humans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using a split-mouth design, a total of 52 grade II mandibular molar furcation defects were treated either with PRP/BPBM/GTR (experimental group, n=26) or with an open flap debridement (control group, n=26). The primary outcomes evaluated in this study included changes in pocket depth, attachment level and re-entry bone levels (horizontal and vertical) between baseline and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The results showed that the experimental group presented with significantly greater pocket reduction (4.07+/-0.33 mm for experimental and 2.49+/-0.38 mm for control sites), gain in clinical attachment (3.29 +/- 0.42 mm for experimental and 1.68+/-0.31 mm for control sites), vertical defect fill (2.56+/- 0.36 mm for experimental and -0.19+/-0.02 for control sites) and horizontal defect fill (2.28+/-0.33 mm for experimental and 0.08+/-0.02 mm for control sites) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the PRP/BPBM/GTR combined technique is an effective modality of regenerative treatment for mandibular grade II furcation defects. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the role played by each component of the combined therapy in achieving these results.

The use of bovine porous bone mineral in combination with collagen membrane or autologous fibrinogen/fibronectin system for ridge preservation following tooth extraction.

Preservation of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction is desirable since it facilitates placement of endosseous implants and may improve the adverse esthetics often associated with fixed partial dentures. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) used as a graft material combined with either guided tissue regeneration (GTR) or with the autologous fibrinogen/fibronectin system (AFFS) in preserving alveolar ridges following tooth extraction. Twenty-six patients who required extraction of two or more anterior or bicuspid teeth participated in a split-mouth design study. Following tooth extraction and elevation of a buccal full thickness flap, sockets were filled with bovine porous bone mineral which was then covered with either a collagen membrane or mixed and covered with an AFFS system. An acrylic stent served as a reference point for measurements. Primary flap closure was achieved in all surgical sites, and reentry surgery was performed at 6 months. Reentry surgery showed that BPBM/GTR sites presented with [1] significantly more internal socket bone fill (6.04 +/- 0.21 mm vs. 4.98 +/- 0.26 mm), [2] less, although not statistically significant, resorption of alveolar bone height (0.23 +/- 0.28 mm vs. 0.3 +/- 0.21 mm), and [3] significantly less horizontal resorption of the alveolar bony ridge as compared to BPBM/AFFS (1.06 +/- 0.28 mm vs. 2.60 +/- 0.25 mm). This study suggests that treatment of extraction sockets with a combination of bovine porous bone mineral and guided tissue regeneration is of slightly more benefit in preserving alveolar ridge dimensions following tooth extraction than treatment with a combination of bovine porous bone mineral and the autologous fibrinogen/fibronectin system.

Platelet-rich plasma and bovine porous bone mineral combined with guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans.

BACKGROUND: A combination of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has been shown to be effective in promoting clinical signs of periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects. As an initial attempt to clarify the role played by each of the three treatment components, this study was performed to compare the clinical effectiveness of two regenerative techniques for intrabony defects in humans: a combination of PRP/BPBM/GTR vs. GTR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen patients participated in the study. Using a split-mouth design, interproximal bony defects were surgically treated with either an absorbable membrane made of polylactic acid for GTR or a combination of PRP/BPBM/GTR. Changes in pocket depth, attachment level and defect fill as revealed by 6-month reentry surgeries were evaluated. RESULTS: Both treatment modalities resulted in significant pocket depth reduction and clinical attachment gain as compared to baseline values. Pocket depth reduction was 4.98 +/- 0.96 mm on buccal and 4.93 +/- 0.92 mm on lingual sites of the PRP/BPBM/GTR group and 3.62 +/- 0.81 mm on buccal and 3.54 +/- 0.88 mm on lingual sites of the GTR group. The gain in clinical attachment observed was 4.37 +/- 1.31 mm on buccal and 4.28 +/- 1.33 mm on lingual sites of the PRP/BPBM/GTR group and 2.62 +/- 1.23 mm on buccal and 2.44 +/- 1.21 mm on lingual sites of the GTR group. The amount of defect fill observed was 4.78 +/- 1.26 mm on buccal and 4.66 +/- 1.32 mm on lingual sites of the PRP/BPBM/GTR group and 2.31 +/- 0.76 mm on buccal and 2.26 +/- 0.81 mm on lingual sites of the GTR group. All differences between the two groups were statistically significant in favor of the PRP/BPBM/GTR group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that PRP and BPBM provide an added regenerative effect to GTR in promoting the clinical resolution of intrabony defects on patients with severe periodontitis.

Comparison of platelet-rich plasma, bovine porous bone mineral, and guided tissue regeneration versus platelet-rich plasma and bovine porous bone mineral in the treatment of intrabony defects: a reentry study.

BACKGROUND: A combination of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM), and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) has been shown to be effective in promoting reduction in probing depth, gain in clinical attachment, and defect fill in intrabony periodontal lesions. The individual role played by PRP, BPBM, and GTR in this combined therapy is unclear and needs to be elucidated. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of 2 regenerative techniques for intrabony defects in humans: a combination of PRP/BPBM/GTR versus a combination of PRP/BPBM. METHODS: Twenty-one patients participated in the study. Using a split-mouth design, interproximal bony defects were surgically treated with either a combination of PRP/BPBM/GTR or PRP/BPBM. The primary outcomes of the study included changes in probing depth, attachment level, and defect fill as revealed by reentry surgeries at 6 months post-treatment. RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, clinical examination of the treated defects revealed that both treatment modalities resulted in significant probing depth reduction and clinical attachment gain compared to baseline values. Probing depth improvement was 3.98 +/- 1.02 mm on buccal and 3.94 +/- 0.94 mm on lingual sites for the PRP/BPBM group and 4.19 +/- 0.88 mm on buccal and 4.21 +/- 0.92 mm on lingual sites for the PRP/BPBM/GTR group. Gain in clinical attachment was 3.78 +/- 0.72 mm on buccal and 3.84 +/- 0.76 mm on lingual sites for the PRP/BPBM group and 4.12 +/- 0.78 mm on buccal and 4.16 +/- 0.83 mm on lingual sites for the PRP/BPBM/GTR group. Reentry surgeries revealed similar defect fill for both treatment groups (PRP/BPBM group: 4.82 +/- 1.34 mm on buccal and 4.74 +/- 1.30 mm on lingual sites; PRP/BPBM/GTR group: 4.96 +/- 1.28 mm on buccal and 4.78 +/- 1.32 mm on lingual sites). None of the differences between the 2 treatment groups was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that both combinations of PRP/BPBM/GTR and PRP/BPBM are effective in the treatment of intrabony defects present in patients with advanced chronic periodontitis. The results also suggest that GTR adds no clinical benefit to PRP/BPBM. Further studies are necessary to assess the individual role played by PRP and BPBM in the clinical outcome achieved with their combination.