Suicidality among clients in a network of coordinated specialty care (CSC) programs for first-episode psychosis: Rates, changes in rates, and their predictors.

BACKGROUND: People experiencing their first episode of psychosis have high risk of suicide, and programs specializing in early psychosis have not always achieved reduced risk. The present study analyzes patterns of suicide ideation, self-harm, and suicide attempts within the Connection Learning Healthcare System of 23 early psychosis programs in Pennsylvania and Maryland that follow the Coordinated Specialty Care treatment model. METHOD: People with first episode psychosis (n = 1101) were assessed at admission and every six months using a standardized battery that included self-reported past-month ideation and clinician-reported past-six-month ideation, self-harm, and suicide attempts. RESULTS: At admission, there were 28 % rates of self-reported past-month suicide ideation and 52 % rates clinician-reported past-six-month suicide ideation, 23 % rate of clinician-reported self-harm, and 15 % rate of attempts. After the first six months of treatment there were significantly lower rates of clinician-reported suicidality (with reductions of at least 77 %), and after the first year of treatment there was significantly lower self-reported ideation (with approximately 54 % reporting lower past-month ideation). Changes were not accounted for by differential early discharge. A range of psychosocial variables predicted within- and between-subject variability in suicidality. Social and role functioning, depressive symptom severity, and a sense of recovery were significant within-subject predictors of all four measures of suicidality. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to admission, we observed substantially lower rates of suicidality within the first year of treatment for clients with first episode psychosis in Coordinated Specialty Care. Reductions were predicted by some of the variables targeted by the treatment model.

Tobacco smoking and nicotine vaping in persons with first episode psychosis.

Tobacco smoking is highly prevalent in persons with psychosis and is the leading cause of preventable mortality in this population. Less is known about tobacco smoking in persons with first episode psychosis (FEP) and there have been no estimates about the prevalence of nicotine vaping in FEP. This study reports rates of tobacco smoking and nicotine vaping in young people with FEP enrolled in Coordinated Specialty Care programs in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Using data collected from 2021 to 2023, we examined lifetime and recent smoking and vaping and compared smokers and vapers to nonusers on symptoms, functioning, and substance use. The sample included 445 participants aged 13-35 with recent psychosis onset. Assessments were collected by program staff. Overall, 28 % of participants engaged in either smoking or vaping within 30 days of the admission assessment. Smokers and vapers were disproportionately male, cannabis users, and had lower negative symptom severity than non-smokers. Vapers had higher role and social functioning. Both smoking and vaping were related to a longer time from psychosis onset to program enrollment. We compare these findings to previous studies and suggest steps for addressing smoking and vaping in this vulnerable population.

Tele-mental Health Transitions for Pennsylvania Coordinated Specialty Care Programs for Early Psychosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This study examined provider and client perspectives of tele-mental health (TMH) in early psychosis care during the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this goal, thirty-three mental health providers and 31 clients from Pennsylvania Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs completed web-based surveys assessing TMH usage, experiences, and perceptions between May and September 2020. Three additional TMH-related questions were asked two years later of PA CSC Program Directors between Feb and March 2022. Descriptive statistics characterized responses. Open-ended items were coded and grouped into themes for qualitative synthesis. As early as mid-2020, participants reported extensive use of TMH technologies, including telephone and video visits. Although most providers and clients preferred in-person care to TMH, most clients still found TMH to be comparable to or better than in-person care; 94% of clients indicated interest in future TMH services. Providers also noted more successes than challenges with TMH. Nine themes emerged regarding provider-perceived client characteristics that could benefit from TMH and were grouped into two categories: client-level (access to technology, comfort with technology, transportation, young age, symptom severity, functioning level, motivation for treatment adherence) and interpersonal-level (external support systems and engagement with program prior to the pandemic) characteristics. Two years later, program directors reported continued perceived advantages of TMH in CSCs, although some barriers persisted. Despite the unexpected shift to TMH in early psychosis programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, findings indicated a relatively positive transition to TMH and perceived promise of TMH as a sustained part of routine care.