Real-World Safety and Outcome of First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Metastatic NSCLC with PDL-1 Expression ≥ 50%: A National Italian Multicentric Cohort ("PEMBROREAL" Study).

Results from the phase III Keynote-024 clinical trial established pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic NSCLC who have PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, EGFR, and ALK wild-type tumors. However, given the differences between patients treated in routine clinical practice and those treated in a clinical trial, real-world data are needed to confirm the treatment benefit in standard practice. Given the lack of data on large cohorts of patients with long follow-ups, we designed an observational retrospective study of patients with metastatic NSCLC who were treated with pembrolizumab, starting from its reimbursement eligibility until December 2020. The primary endpoints were PFS and OS, determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Response and safety were also evaluated. We followed 880 patients (median follow-up: 35.1 months) until February 2022. Median PFS and OS were 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.6-10.0) and 25.5 months (95% CI: 21.8-31.6), respectively. We also found that ECOG PS, PD-L1 expression, and habitual smoking were prognostic factors for PFS, while age, sex, ECOG PS, habitual smoking and histology had an impact on OS. Multivariable analysis confirms the prognostic role of PD-L1 for PFS and of ECOG for both PFS and OS. 39.9% of patients reported an adverse event, but only 6.3% of patients discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Our results suggest a long-term benefit of pembrolizumab in the first-line setting, as well as a safety profile consistent with the results of Keynote-024. Many collected variables appear to influence clinical outcome, but results from these exploratory unadjusted analyses should be interpreted with caution.

A real-world retrospective, observational study of first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score < 50% (PEMBROREAL).

Introduction: The phase III Keynote-189 trial established a first-line treatment combining pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and platinum as a standard treatment for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without known EGFR and ALK driver mutations and independent of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. However, in Italy, eligibility for the National Health Service payment program is limited to patients with PD-L1 <50%. The PEMBROREAL study assesses the real-world effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab in patients eligible for the National Health Service payment program. Methods: PEMBROREAL is a retrospective, observational study on patients with NSCLC who started pembrolizumab combined with pemetrexed and platinum within the reimbursability time window, considered as December 2019 to December 2020. The primary endpoints were to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; using the Kaplan-Meier method), response to therapy, and tolerability. Results: Until February 2022, 279 patients (median follow-up: 19.7 months) have been observed. The median PFS was 8.0 months (95% confidence interval: 6.5-9.2). OS was not reached, but we can estimate a 12- to 24-month survival rate for the combined treatment: 66.1% and 52.5%, respectively. PD-L1 expression and Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) Performance Status were both associated with PFS and OS. Overall, only 44.4% of patients reported an adverse event, whereas toxicity led to a 5.4% discontinuation rate. Conclusion: The results of the PEMBROREAL study have shown that the combined treatment of pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and platinum is effective for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC, even for patients with PD-L1 levels below 50%, despite the differences in patient demographics and pathological features compared to the Keynote-189 study. The adverse events reported during the study were more typical of chemotherapy treatment rather than immunotherapy, and physicians were able to manage them easily.

FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel as First Line Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Comparison.

Background/Aim: Advanced pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival rate <5%; thus, treatment of patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic disease is challenging. Current guidelines recommend either gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) or FOLFIRINOX (FOL) as first-line treatment. Data on both efficacy and toxicity of FOL versus GnP in metastatic cancer are limited. This study aimed to compare the two chemotherapy regimens in terms of efficacy and toxicity in a real-world setting. Patients and Methods: This retrospective propensity score matching study reviewed the medical records of 123 consecutive patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who received either GnP or FOL between March 2013 and January 2019 in Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza. Results: Fifty patients (40.65%) received FOL, administered in an attenuated dose, and seventy-three patients (59.35%) received GnP. After a propensity matching score, 100 patients were retrospectively evaluated. In the final matched cohort, there was no difference in neoadjuvant therapy, radiotherapy, and surgery performed before the first-line therapy between the two groups. Progression-free survival and overall survival were comparable between the two groups and no difference was found in the percentage of toxicity. Conclusion: There was no difference in outcomes between patients who received FOL and those who received GnP. Unexpectedly, no greater FOL-related toxicity was found, probably due to the dose reduction.

Reducing the burden of travel and environmental impact through decentralization of cancer care.

Life expectancy, quality of life and satisfaction of oncologic patients highly depend on access to adequate specialized services, that consider their conditions in a holistic way. The present study aims to evaluate the introduction of oncology services in an outpatient setting in a mountain village in Northern Italy. The initiative is evaluated using the three pillars of sustainability (social, economic and environmental) as dimensions that are often overlooked by healthcare policy makers. Using micro data on 18,625 interventions, we estimate the number of kilometers saved by patients (reduction of "travel burden" as indicator of social sustainability), the additional travel costs for the NHS (indicator of economic sustainability) and the implied reduction of CO2 emissions (indicator of environmental sustainability). Over the period July 2016-2021, the decentralized health center delivered 2,292 interventions saving 218,566 km for a corresponding value of €131,140. The additional costs for the NHS was €26,152. The reduction of CO2 emissions was 32.37 Tons (€5,989). Overall, the socio-economic benefit of reducing travel of care for the patients residing in this remote valley was €110,976. This study adds original understanding of the benefits of decentralizing oncologic care and shows its operational feasibility conditions. Given the modest number of similar projects, it provides evidence to policy makers and, especially, managers who are faced with the challenge to implement the decentralization of specialized services.

Cancer Treatment Closer to the Patient Reduces Travel Burden, Time Toxicity, and Improves Patient Satisfaction, Results of 546 Consecutive Patients in a Northern Italian District.

Background and Objectives: The distance to cancer facilities may cause disparities by creating barriers to oncologic diagnosis and treatment, and travel burden may cause time and financial toxicity. Materials and Methods: To relieve travel burden, a program to deliver oncologic treatment closer to the patient was initiated in the district of Piacenza (Northern Italy) several years ago. The oncologic activities are performed by oncologists and by nurses who travel from the oncologic ward of the city hospital to territorial centres to provide cancer patient management. This model is called Territorial Oncology Care (TOC): patients are managed near their home, in three territorial hospitals and in a health centre, named "Casa della Salute" (CDS). A retrospective study was performed and the records of patients with cancer managed in the TOC program were analysed. The primary endpoints were the km and time saved, the secondary endpoints: reduction of caregiver need for transport and patient satisfaction. Results: 546 cancer patients managed in the TOC program from 2 January 2021 to 30 June 2022 were included in this study. Primary endpoints: median km to reach the city hospital: 26 (range 11-79 km) median time: 44 min (range 32-116); median km to reach the territorial clinicians in the TOC program: 7 (range 1-35 km), median time: 16 minutes (range 6-54), p < 0.001. Secondary endpoints: 64.8% of patients who needed a caregiver for the city hospital could travel alone in the TOC program and 99.63% of patients were satisfied. Conclusions: The results of this retrospective study highlight the possibility of treating cancer patients near their residence, reducing travel burden and saving time.

Targeting FGFR Pathways in Gastrointestinal Cancers: New Frontiers of Treatment.

In carcinogenesis of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the deregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling plays a critical role. The aberrant activity of this pathway is described in approximately 10% of gastric cancers and its frequency increases in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs), with an estimated frequency of 10-16%. Several selective FGFR inhibitors have been developed in the last few years with promising results. For example, targeting the FGFR pathway is now a fundamental part of clinical practice when treating iCCA and many clinical trials are ongoing to test the safety and efficacy of anti-FGFR agents in gastric, colon and pancreatic cancer, with variable results. However, the response rates of anti-FGFR drugs are modest and resistances emerge rapidly, limiting their efficacy and causing disease progression. In this review, we aim to explore the landscape of anti-FGFR inhibitors in relation to GI cancer, with particular focus on selective FGFR inhibitors and drug combinations that may lead to overcoming resistance mechanisms and drug-induced toxicities.

Prognostic Impact of Ras Mutation on Surgical Strategy in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Complete clinical response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is challenging. Indeed, indication to surgery vs. "watch and wait" is a debate due the poor predictive value of restaging exams in order to identify a pathological complete response (pCR). Improving the knowledge on mutational pathways such as MAPK/ERK could be helpful in assessing the real impact of disease on prognosis and in choosing the best therapeutic target. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of biomolecular parameters as prognostic factors in patients undergoing radical surgery after chemo-radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed including 39 patients who had undergone radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma stage II-III through additional evaluation of the following biomolecular markers on surgical specimens: exons 2, 3 and 4 of the KRAS and NRAS genes and exon 15 of BRAF by pyrosequencing. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to evaluate the association of pathologic response and RAS status with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The log-rank test was used to assess statistical differences among the survival curves. RESULTS: Data analysis showed RAS mutation in 15 patients (38.46%). pCR was achieved in seven patients (18%), including only two RAS mutation cases. The distribution of evaluated variables was homogeneous in the two groups based on pathological response. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed poor outcomes in OS and PFS in patients with RAS mutation (p=0.0022 and p=0.000392, respectively), but no significant differences based on pathological response for both OS and PFS. CONCLUSION: RAS mutation seems to be related to poor prognosis and increased risk of recurrence in rectal cancer patients undergoing radical surgery after chemo-radiotherapy.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the oncologic activities (diagnosis, treatment, clinical trials enrollment) of a general hospital in a district with high prevalence of SARS-COV-2 in Italy.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the real impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the qualitative and quantitative fall-out on the management of cancer patients. Our objective was to provide evidence of the effects of SARS-COV-2 on the management of cancer patients in the real world. METHODS: In a general hospital in a district in Italy with high prevalence of COVID-19 during the first wave, we retrospectively analyzed the data of oncologic activity, namely new cancer diagnosis, types of treatment (intravenous or by mouth), clinical research studies, and drug utilization, and compared the findings with those of 2019, before the pandemic. The data have been summarized in boxplot figures for median and interquartile range. RESULTS: In 2020, a significant reduction in new cancer diagnosis was demonstrated when compared with 2019, with 17.4% fewer cancer diagnoses, 84.5% fewer patients enrolled in clinical trials, a 10.6% reduction in intravenous antitumor treatment, and a 42.7% increase in oral anticancer treatment. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate a significant reduction in cancer diagnosis, antitumor venous treatment, and patients enrolled in clinical research studies in 2020 compared with 2019, although there was a significant increase in oral treatment. These data suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic had a deep impact on the real-world management of cancer patients in a district of Italy with a high prevalence of COVID-19.

[Territorial-based management of patients with cancer on active treatment following the Piacenza (north Italy) Model. Results of 4 consecutive years.] / Le cure oncologiche ed ematologiche sul territorio secondo il modello dell'ASL di Piacenza. Rendiconto di 4 anni consecutivi.

INTRODUCTION: The natural history of cancer has radically changed in the last decade. The burden of travel from patient's residence to health care providers is an important issue that can influence access to diagnosis and treatment of cancer; however this issue is quite neglect by the medical community and by the national health system. In addition, community care in the oncology field is actually debated. METHODS: In the district of Piacenza an innovative model to deliver onco-hematologic treatment near the residence of patients was initiated some years ago. The oncologic and hematologic treatments are delivered by specialized nurses under supervision of medical oncologists or hematologists at the 3 community hospital and at 1 house of health in the district of Piacenza. We conducted a retrospective study involving 1,339 cancer patients (CPs) managed and treated near their residence, CPs were on active medical treatment at the oncology and hematology department Azienda sanitaria (ASL) of Piacenza (North Italy). The electronic data base of the antiblastic drug unit (UFA) of the ASL Piacenza, provided: the number of patients treated each year, number of treatments and the accesses to the territorial medical structure each year. The kms saved to reach the nearest territorial structures instead of the oncologic unit of the city hospital, were registered and recorded. RESULTS: During a 4 years period, from January 2017 to December 2020, 1,339 CPs were treated near their residence, 278 in the year 2017, 347 in 2018, 354 in 2019 and 360 in 2020. The total accesses for treatment in 4 years were 10,003: 2,214 in the year 2017, 2,652 in 2018, 2,524 in 2019 and 2,613 in 2020. The mean distance saved for each patient was 937 kms in the year 2017, 891 in 2018, 879 in 2019, 920 in 2020, totally a mean of 3,627 kms in the 4 years. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We believe that the results of our retrospective study highlight the possibility of treating cancer patients in territorial structures near their residence, with advantages for patients themselves, their caregivers and for the entire community.

Effectiveness of bevacizumab in first- and second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: ITACa randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Cancer trials involving multiple treatment lines substantially increase our understanding of therapeutic strategies. However, even when the primary end-point of these studies is progression-free survival (PFS), their statistical analysis usually focuses on each line separately, or does not consider repeated events, thus missing potentially relevant information. Consequently, the evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment strategies is highly impaired. METHODS: We evaluated the potentially different effect of bevacizumab (B) administered for the first- or second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the ITACa (Italian Trial in Advanced Colorectal Cancer) randomized trial. The ITACa trial consisted of two arms: first-line chemotherapy (CT)+B followed by second-line CT alone versus first-line CT alone followed by second-line CT+B or CT+B+cetuximab according to KRAS status. Cox models for repeated disease progression were performed, and potential selection bias was adjusted using the inverse probability of censoring weighting method. Hazard ratios (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for PFS (primary endpoint) were reported. RESULTS: The overall effect of B across the two lines resulted in a HR = 0.80 (95% CI 0.68-0.95, p = 0.008). Evaluating the differential effect of B in first- and second-line, the addition of B to first-line chemotherapy (CT) produced a 10% risk reduction (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.72-1.12, p = 0.340) versus CT alone; B added to second-line CT produced a 36% risk reduction (HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.84, p = 0.0011) versus CT alone. CONCLUSION: Our results seem to suggest that B confers a PFS advantage when administered in combination with second-line chemotherapy, which could help to improve current international guidelines on optimal sequential treatment strategies.

Modified FOLFIRINOX for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer. A real-world comparison of an attenuated with a full dose in a single center experience.

Purpose: Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a very poor prognosis. Although irinotecan, oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FOLFIRINOX) significantly increases survival in advanced pancreatic cancer, compared to employing only gemcitabine (GEM), toxicities have tempered enthusiasm for its use. Methods: This study retrospectively analyses the real-world clinical practice with full and attenuated doses of FOLFIRINOX in unselected patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer, treated at an Italian general hospital. Efficacy, tolerability, and toxicity were evaluated, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fifty consecutive patients with advanced (13) or metastatic (37) pancreatic adenocarcinomas were treated with FOLFIRINOX at the Medical Oncology Unit, Piacenza General Hospital, North Italy. The first enrolled consecutive 18 patients (36%) of this series started the treatment with a full dose of the regimen, while the subsequent 32 (64%) consecutive patients received dose attenuation (-20% bolus fluorouracil and -25% irinotecan). In the entire group, the response rate, median OS, and median PFS were 30%, 10.1 months, and 5.6 months, respectively, with no differences in objective response in the 32 patients that received an attenuated dose compared with the 18 patients receiving a full dose of chemotherapy. However, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and vomiting were statistically increased in the 18 patients receiving a full dose compared with the 32 patients receiving an attenuated dose of FOLFIRINOX (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the efficacy and tolerability of modified FOLFIRINOX in advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

[The treatment of cancer patients near their residence in the territorial structure "Casa della salute": preliminary results in the province of Piacenza (Italy).] / La cura oncologica nel territorio. Esperienza nella Casa della Salute: risultati preliminari nella provincia di Piacenza.

INTRODUCTION: In the field of oncology, we are all stimulated by the desire to improve the lives of patients with cancer; however little data are available about the amount of time and travel discomfort that patients and families typically spend for clinical examinations and for antitumoral/supportive treatments. The purpose of this study was to determine the advantages for cancer patients to receive clinical, test examinations, and anticancer treatment near their residence in a territorial clinical structure called "Casa della Salute" (CdS). METHODS: Since July 2016 to all the cancer patients treated at the Oncology Unit of the General Hospital in Piacenza, was offered the possibility to be treated near their residence at the CdS located in the mid valley (Val Nure), or to continue the treatment at the Oncology Unit of the General Hospital in Piacenza. The treatments were delivered by an oncology nurse under the supervision of a medical oncologist. RESULTS: From 18 July 2016 to 20 July 2017, 54 patients with cancer were managed in the CdS in Bettola, province of Piacenza in North Italy. All these patients received the planned antitumoral and supportive treatments. The average distance from the patient's residence to the Oncology Unit in Piacenza was 81,65 km (range 31,6-131 km), while it was 21,06 km (range 3-54,2 km) to the CdS (p<0,001). The average time for the round trip to the Oncology Unit in Piacenza was 93,35 minutes (range 40-162) while it took 16,35 minutes (range 10-78) to reach the CdS (p<0,001). 98,5% of patients were very satisfied to receive oncological treatment at the CdS, and 65% of patients who needed a caregiver to reach the Oncology Unit in Piacenza, could travel alone to the CdS. DISCUSSION: The increase in the incidence of cancer, especially in elderly patients with comorbidity, has been accompanied by an increase in the overall survival rate of these patients thus requiring organizational innovations. The results of this study hightlight the possibility of treating cancer patients in territorial structures near their residence, with advantages for the patients, their caregivers and for the entire community.

Gastric cancer with brain metastasis and the role of human epidermal growth factor 2 status.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) are rare, and occur in 0.16-0.69% of patients with gastric or gastro-esophageal (GE) junction cancer. Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) is associated with poor prognosis in the absence of HER-2-targeted therapy, and with an increased incidence of CNS metastases in patients with breast cancer. The role of HER-2 overexpression in CNS metastases is not well known in gastric adenocarcinoma. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to assess the incidence of CNS metastases and to evaluate the associations between the CNS and HER-2 status in a series of consecutive patients with gastric or GE junction cancer. Between 2007 and 2013, 300 patients with gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction, were admitted to Piacenza General Hospital, Italy. These cases were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate CNS metastases. The metastases were diagnosed with imaging techniques performed on symptomatic patients. Gastric histological samples of patients with CNS metastases were reviewed and tested for HER-2. A total of 7 of the 300 patients (2.33%) with GC were observed to have CNS metastases and 6 (85.71%) had HER-2 positive disease. These patients exhibited a poor prognosis with a median overall survival rate of 4.1 months (range, 2.1-6.6 months). These results suggested there may be CNS recurrence susceptibility in patients with HER-2 positive GC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that associates CNS metastases and HER-2 status in gastric or GE junction cancer.

Prevalence study on potential drug-drug interaction in cancer patients in Piacenza hospital's Onco-Haematology department.

Background Cancer patients can be a human model of potential drug interactions. Usually they receive a large number of different medications, including antineoplastic agents, drugs for comorbid illness and medication for supportive care, however information about these interactions are fragmented and poor. Objective We assessed a prospective study to evaluate the prevalence of drug interaction among patients hospitalized in the Onco-Haematology department, Hospital of Piacenza. Methods Data on drugs administered for cancer, comorbidities, or supportive care were collected from different computerized prescription software in use in the department; we compared them with a database to focus on the co-administration of drugs. A literature review was performed to identify major potential drug interaction and to classify them by level of severity and by strengths of scientific evidence. Results In this study 284 cancer patients were enrolled; patients had taken an average of seven drugs on each day of therapy plus chemotherapeutic agents, we identified 67 potential drug interactions. At least 53 patients had one potential drug interaction. Of all potential drug interactions 63 were classified as moderate severity and only four as major. In 55 cases chemotherapeutic agents were involved in possible interactions with supportive care drugs, meanwhile in 12 cases the potential drug interactions were between supportive care drugs. Conclusions In our centre, thanks to a computerized prescription software, integrated with caution alarm in case of possible interaction, we had a lower rate of potential drug interactions than the one from literature. It is possible to improve the software integrating the alarm with the potential drug interactions between chemotherapy agents and supportive care drugs.

An Anticancer Drug Unit for the whole provincial oncologic network of Piacenza: improving safety and savings.

In recent years, the expenditure for cancer care is increased largely due to the increase in cancer prevalence, demographic changes and incorporation into clinical practice of new and expensive drugs. For these reasons, solutions to contain costs are necessaries. The drugs-related expenditure is proportionally higher in oncology than in other medical specialties and overcomes staffing costs for outpatient care. The introduction of additional measures to contain and reduce expenditures such as waste reduction and human resources optimization is highly desirable. On April 2013, we started a day-to-day monitoring of the consumption of drugs and developed an internal protocol for waste minimization, consisting of five measures. A computerized research through Medline, Cancerlit and Embase was performed, applying the words drug waste, cost-containment, Anticancer Drug Unit and stability instructions. Articles and abstracts were also identified by back-referencing from other relevant papers. Selected for the present review were papers published in English without limit of year. The day-to-day monitoring of the consumption of drugs and the internal protocol for waste minimization were able to achieve a saving of 15,700 every month. The projection of an annual cost-saving result of 188.00 corresponds to a recovery of 4 % on the spending for oncologic drugs. Our data show that in a proper structure working according to the standards of quality, safety and sterility, preserving and reusing the drug waste within the limits imposed by the datasheets, it is possible to achieve a cost-containment policy and produce durable benefits.

Ultrasound guidance reduces pneumothorax rate and improves safety of thoracentesis in malignant pleural effusion: report on 445 consecutive patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is an extremely common problem affecting cancer patients, and thoracentesis is an essential procedure in an attempt to delineate the etiology of the fluid collections and to relieve symptoms in affected patients. One of the most common complications of thoracentesis is pneumothorax, which has been reported to occur in 20% to 39% of thoracenteses, with 15% to 50% of patients with pneumothorax requiring tube thoracostomy.The present study was carried out to assess whether thoracenteses in cancer patients performed with ultrasound (US) guidance are associated with a lower rates of pneumothorax and tube thoracostomy than those performed without US guidance. METHODS: A total of 445 patients were recruited in this retrospective study. The medical records of 445 consecutive patients with cancer and MPE evaluable for this study, undergoing thoracentesis at the Oncology-Hematology and Internal Medicine Departments, Piacenza Hospital (Italy) were reviewed. RESULTS: From January 2005 to December 2011, in 310 patients (69.66%) thoracentesis was performed with US guidance and in 135 (30.34%) without it. On post-thoracentesis imaging performed in all these cases, 15 pneumothoraces (3.37%) were found; three of them (20%) required tube thoracostomy. Pneumothorax occurred in three out of 310 procedures (0.97%) performed with US guidance and in 12 of 135 procedures (8.89%) performed without it (P<0.0001). It must be emphasized that in all three patients with pneumothorax requiring tube thoracostomy, thoracentesis was performed without US guidance. CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of US guidance during thoracentesis drastically reduces the rate of pneumothorax and tube thoracostomy in oncological patients, thus improving safety as demonstrated in this study.