Uterine leiomyoma with RAD51B::NUDT3 fusion: a report of 2 cases.

Three main uterine leiomyoma molecular subtypes include tumors with MED12 mutation, molecular aberrations leading to HMGA2 overexpression, and biallelic loss of FH. These aberrations are mutually exclusive and can be found in approximately 80-90% of uterine leiomyoma, in which they seem to be a driver event. Approximately 10% of uterine leiomyoma, however, does not belong to any of these categories. Uterine leiomyoma with HMGA2 overexpression is the most common subtype in cellular and second most common category of usual leiomyoma. In some of these tumors, rearrangement of HMGA2 gene is present. The most common fusion partner of HMGA2 gene is RAD51B. Limited data suggests that RAD51B fusions with other genes may be present in uterine leiomyoma. In our study, we described two cases of uterine leiomyoma with RAD51B::NUDT3 fusion, which occur in one case of usual and one case of highly cellular leiomyoma. In both cases, no other driver molecular aberrations were found. The results of our study showed that RAD51::NUDT3 fusion can occur in both usual and cellular leiomyoma. RAD51B may be a fusion partner of multiple genes other than HMGA2 and HMGA1. In these cases, RAD51B fusion seems to be mutually exclusive with other driver aberrations defining molecular leiomyoma subtypes. RAD51B::NUDT3 fusion should be added to the spectrum of fusions which may occur in uterine leiomyoma, which can be of value especially in cellular leiomyoma in the context of differential diagnosis against endometrial stromal tumors.

Microscopic extraovarian sex cord proliferation: report of a case with bilateral Fallopian tube involvement and a comprehensive molecular analysis.

We report a case of a 58-year-old female with microscopic extraovarian sex cord proliferations affecting both Fallopian tubes. Molecular analysis showed likely pathogenic germline missense mutations of the KDM5A and KMT2D genes. However, mutations of other genes, including FOXL2 and STK11, were not detected. Our case represents the 12th case of extraovarian sex cord proliferation reported in the literature to date. This is the first time that a molecular genetic analysis of the lesion has been performed, and it showed a wild-type FOXL2 gene, which represents another argument supporting the estimated benign nature of these rare lesions.

Chondroblastoma-like primary malignant giant cell tumor of the humerus - a case report.

35-year-old woman suffered prolonged pain in the left shoulder, where an aggressively growing tumor of the proximal humerus was revealed thereafter. The lesion caused massive osteolysis of the metaepiphysis with cortical disruption, but no soft tissue extension was evident. Given the unsatisfactory effect, the ongoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy was prematurely ceased and the resection 13 cm long segment of bone with modular prosthesis replacement followed. Histologically, clear-cut malignant tumor with both the presence of numerous reactive osteoclast-like giant cells and geographic structural deposition of chondroid matrix bore a close resemblance to chondroblastoma. Dominant cellular composition formed solid mosaic clusters of large, atypical, frequently binucleated cells with voluminous eosinophilic cytoplasm. Impressive nuclear pleomorphism was accentuated by both the grooving and atypical mitotic figures. Thorough sampling disclosed limited, but sharply contrasting parts, where biphasic arrangement of small uniform stromal elements together with regularly distributed, reactive osteoclasts suggested putative precursor giant cell lesion. Except the osteoclasts, all matrical and stromal cells were strongly SOX9 and D2-40 positive; in contrary desmin, SATB2, S100 and p63 yielded completely negative results. Detected H3F3A c.103G>T mutation in exon 2 finally established true nature of that peculiar neoplastic proliferation and lead to descriptive term of primary chondroblastoma-like malignant giant cell tumor. In the setting of all the microscopic variability, histogenesis and complex differential diagnosis of skeletal (malignant) giant cell lesions, there are discussed e.g. aggressive/malignant chondroblastoma, chondroblastoma-like osteosarcoma or giant cell-rich osteosarcoma and practical impact of specific mutational analysis results as well.

Stathmin is a potential therapeutic target but not a prognostic marker in melanoma: an immunohistochemical study of 323 melanocytic lesions.

In several solid tumors, an increased stathmin expression is associated with both poor prognosis and resistance to certain chemotherapy types. However, the data regarding melanocytic lesions are very limited. The goals of our study are as follows: the assessment of stathmin expression in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions, and the significance of its expression for the differential diagnostics between benign and malignant lesions; the analysis of the prognostic significance of stathmin expression in melanoma; and the evaluation of stathmin expression in melanoma and melanoma metastases with respect to possible therapeutic targeting. Immunohistochemical analysis of stathmin expression was done in 323 melanocytic lesions, including 205 primary cutaneous melanomas, 60 melanoma metastases, and 58 melanocytic nevi. Stathmin expression was found in all analyzed groups of melanocytic lesions. Using the H-scoring system, the observed intensity of expression was as follows: melanocytic nevi: 146.1 (mean) and 150 (median); melanomas: 116.7 (mean) and 110 (median); and melanoma metastases: 136.8 (mean) and 140 (median). The stathmin expression was significantly lower in the cohort of primary melanomas when compared with metastases and nevi (P=0.001). The stathmin expression showed no prognostic significance. The high stathmin expression in melanoma suggests that stathmin might be a promising marker for therapeutic targeting in ongoing clinical trials. Compared with several other solid tumors, stathmin expression in melanoma showed no prognostic significance. The potential use of stathmin expression in differential diagnostics is limited by its common expression, and despite the statistically significant differences between nevi and melanoma, it may not be used in this setting.