RESUMO
Burrhole craniostomy is commonly performed for subdural hematoma (SDH) evacuation, but residual scalp depressions are often cosmetically suboptimal for patients. OsteoplugTM, a bioresorbable polycaprolactone burrhole cover, was introduced by the National University Hospital, Singapore, in 2006 to cover these defects, allowing osseous integration and vascular ingrowth. However, the cosmetic and safety outcomes of OsteoplugTM-C-the latest (2017) iteration, with a chamfered hole for subdural drains-remain unexplored. Data were collected from a single institution from April 2017 to March 2021. Patient-reported aesthetic outcomes (Aesthetic Numeric Analog (ANA)) and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L including Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) were assessed via telephone interviews. Clinical outcomes included SDH recurrence, postoperative infections, and drain complications. OsteoplugTM-C patients had significantly higher satisfaction and quality of life compared to those without a burrhole cover (ANA: 9 [7, 9] vs. 7 [5, 8], p = 0.019; VAS: 85 [75, 90] vs. 70 [50, 80], p = 0.021), and the absence of a burrhole cover was associated with poorer aesthetic outcomes after multivariable adjustment (adjusted OR: 4.55, 95% CI: 1.09-22.68, p = 0.047). No significant differences in other clinical outcomes were observed between OsteoplugTM-C, OsteoplugTM, or no burrhole cover. Our pilot study supports OsteoplugTM-C and its material polycaprolactone as suitable adjuncts to burrhole craniostomy, improving cosmetic outcomes while achieving comparable safety outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypertension is an important etiology of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in neurosurgical practice. Contrast extravasation on computed tomography angiography, known as the "spot sign", has been described as an independent predictor of hematoma progression and clinical deterioration. However, its role in hypertensive ICH alone has not been determined and is the primary aim of this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out of patients with hypertensive ICH admitted to our institution between May 2014 and December 2016. Evaluation of the neuroimaging studies of these patients revealed two distinct morphologies, "spot" and "blush" sign. These distinct signs and covariates were tested for association with hematoma expansion and mortality using multivariate logistic regression. The accuracy of the "spot" and "blush" signs as predictors of hematoma expansion and mortality was determined using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were identified as hypertensive ICH during the study period. "spot" sign was observed in 11 (20.4%) of the study population. Contrast extravasation (blush-sign) was seen in 7 (14.8%) patients. The "blush" was an independent predictor of hematoma expansion (odds ratio [OR] 6.052; confidence interval [CI] 1.036-15.945 [P = .012]) and mortality (OR 3.305; CI 1.240-25.414 [P = .032]). With ROC analysis, the "blush" sign was found to have a better predictive value for significant hematoma expansion (area under the curve [AUC]: .795) than the spot sign (AUC: .432). CONCLUSION: The "blush" sign has better accuracy for predicting hematoma expansion in hypertensive ICH and could be used to risk stratify these patients for early therapeutic interventions.