Racial and Ethnic Demographic Reporting in Phase 2 Proton Therapy Clinical Trials: A Review.

Purpose: Equitable inclusion of racial and ethnic participation in clinical trials is crucial to improving disparities in health care, especially for historically marginalized populations. Our study aims to describe the racial and ethnic demographics of patients enrolled in published phase 2 clinical trials involving proton therapy in the United States. Materials and Methods: Published manuscripts were identified in PubMed, Embase, World of Science, and Cochrane. Phase 2 trials evaluating proton therapy for US patients were included. For each article in the study, data were collected comprising authors, title, and publication year, and clinical trial numbers were verified. Additional data included tumor site, primary institution, sample size, reported race/ethnicity, and raw number/percentile of race/ethnicity. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Results: Overall, 970 titles were identified; 636 remained after duplicate screening, and 75 full-text articles were assessed. We identified 38 eligible manuscripts for inclusion comprising 2648 patients. Only 15 (39%) of the publications reported race/ethnicity. Of these, 8 (21%) and 10 (26%) documented Hispanic or Black trial participants, respectively; however, only 6 (16%) documented trial participation for both Hispanic and Black patients. Of the 1409 patients with a documented race/ethnicity, 89.0% (n = 1254) were non-Hispanic white, 5.3% (n = 75) were Black, and 2.2% (n = 31) were Hispanic. Other and unknown race/ethnicity comprised the remaining patients (3.5%; n = 49). Conclusion: We identified underreporting of demographic data in published phase 2 proton therapy trials, which unfortunately mirrored underreporting for cancer drug clinical trials. We also noted dramatic Black and Hispanic patient underrepresentation across the trials in which race and ethnicity are reported. Findings highlight the urgent need to identify and address barriers to proton therapy trials for Black and Hispanic patients ensuring clinical trials in radiation oncology are representative of the patients seen in clinical practice.

Proton Radiation Therapy After Chemotherapy in the Management of Aggressive Mediastinal Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Lymphoma Subcommittee Collaboration.

Purpose: Combined modality therapy with multiagent chemotherapy and radiation therapy is a standard treatment option for aggressive mediastinal non-Hodgkin lymphomas (AMNHLs); however, concerns regarding acute and late radiation toxicities have fueled an effort to use systemic therapy alone. The use of proton therapy (PT) is a promising treatment option, but there are still limited data regarding clinical outcomes with this treatment modality. In this Particle Therapy Cooperative Group lymphoma subcommittee collaboration, we report outcomes of patients with AMNHL treated with pencil-beam scanning PT or double-scatter PT after chemotherapy. Methods and Materials: This was a multi-institutional retrospective observational cohort study of patients with AMNHL treated with PT following chemotherapy between 2011 and 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. PT toxicity was graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. A 2-tailed paired t test was used for dosimetric comparisons. Results: Twenty-nine patients were identified. With a median follow-up time of 4.2 years (range, 0.2-8.9 years), the estimated 5-year PFS for all patients was 93%, 5-year LRFS was 96%, and estimated 5-year OS was 87%. Maximum acute grade 1 (G1) toxicities occurred in 18 patients, and 7 patients had maximum G2 toxicities. No G3+ radiation-related toxicities were observed. Average mean lung dose and lung V20 Gy were lower for patients treated with pencil-beam scanning PT compared with double-scatter PT (P = .016 and .006, respectively), while patients with lower mediastinal disease had higher doses for all evaluated dosimetric heart parameters. Conclusions: PT after chemotherapy for patients with AMNHL resulted in excellent outcomes with respect to 5-year PFS, LRFS, and OS without high-grade toxicities. Future work with larger sample sizes is warranted to further elucidate the role of PT in the treatment of AMNHL.

Modern Therapy for Chest Wall Ewing Sarcoma: An Update of the University of Florida Experience.

PURPOSE: Owing to adjacent critical organs, the aggressive multimodality local therapy necessary for Ewing sarcoma of the chest wall is a challenge. Our previous review of historical outcomes at our institution revealed suboptimal disease control and a high incidence of grade ≥3 toxic effects in patients treated before 2006. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes during the past decade since the introduction of proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-nine consecutive pediatric patients with a chest wall Ewing sarcoma treated between 2006 and 2020 at the University of Florida were identified. The median maximum tumor diameter was 10 cm (range, 4-28 cm). At diagnosis, 19 patients had local disease and the others had a pleural effusion (11), pleural nodules (5), or pulmonary metastases (4). Patients were treated with chemotherapy regimens according to contemporary North American and European protocols: 7 were treated with preoperative, 18 with postoperative, and 14 with definitive radiation. Preceding primary site treatment, 15 patients required hemithorax radiation and 4 patients underwent whole-lung irradiation using photon techniques. The total median radiation dose to the primary tumor was 52.8 GyRBE [relative biological effectiveness] (range, 44.4-55.8 GyRBE). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4 years (range, 0.7-14.7 years), the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 97.2%, 74.4%, and 81.6%, respectively, for the whole cohort. For the 19 patients with nonmetastatic disease, the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 100%, 78.9%, and 78.9%, respectively. No patients developed grade ≥4 toxic effects. Two patients (5%) experienced grade 3 toxic effects related to multimodality treatment; both were patients who required surgery to correct scoliosis. Two patients (5%) developed grade 2 pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with our prior published institutional experience, our data suggest improvements in disease control and multimodality toxic effects since the introduction of proton therapy. This should be confirmed with a larger sample size and longer follow-up.

Demographics of ASTRO Student Members and Potential Implications for Future U.S. Radiation Oncology Workforce Diversity.

PURPOSE: The radiation oncology workforce in the United States is comparatively less diverse than the U.S. population and U.S. medical school graduates. Workforce diversity correlates with higher quality care and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether student members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) are any more diverse than resident members-in-training using the recently established medical student membership category. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Self-reported sex, race and Hispanic ethnicity, medical school, and degree(s) earned for all medical students (n = 268) and members-in-training (n = 713) were collected from the ASTRO membership database. International members were excluded. The χ2 test was used to assess for differences between subgroups. RESULTS: Compared with members-in-training, student members were more likely to be female (40.0% vs 31.5%, P = .032), black or African American (10.7% vs 4.8%, P = .009), candidates for or holders of a DO rather than MD degree (5.2% vs 1.5%, P = .002), and from a U.S. medical school that is not affiliated with a radiation oncology residency program (30.5% vs 20.9%, P = .001). There was no significant difference in self-reported Hispanic ethnicity (7.3% vs 5.4%, P = .356). There were no indigenous members in either category assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Medical student members of ASTRO are more diverse in terms of black race, female sex, and osteopathic training, though not in terms of Hispanic ethnicity or nonmultiracial indigenous background, than the members-in-training. Longitudinal engagement with these students and assessment of the factors leading to specialty retention versus attrition may increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in radiation oncology.

Modern Therapy for Spinal and Paraspinal Ewing Sarcoma: An Update of the University of Florida Experience.

PURPOSE: In 2010, we published a comprehensive review of our institutional outcomes about treating children with spinal and paraspinal Ewing sarcoma using photon therapy. Multimodality therapy was associated with fair disease control but also with serious toxicity, including a 37% rate of grade 3 or greater toxicity. We therefore sought to assess our more recent experience about treating children with more modern technology and treatment regimens. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2010 and 2021, 32 pediatric patients with nonmetastatic spinal and paraspinal Ewing sarcoma were treated at University of Florida and enrolled in a retrospective outcome study. Median age at diagnosis was 9.8 years (range, 2.1-21.8 years). Within the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine regions, 3, 22, and 7 tumors arose, respectively. Median maximum tumor diameter was 5 cm (range, 3-19 cm). At diagnosis, 28 of 32 patients had motor, bowel, or bladder deficits. Chemotherapy was delivered according to contemporary North American and European interval-compressed regimens. Before radiation therapy, 14 patients underwent gross total resection, whereas 18 underwent a biopsy or subtotal resection with cord decompression. All patients were treated with proton therapy; 6 with hardware stabilization also received a component of intensity modulated photon therapy. Median prescription dose was 50.4 gray relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE; range, 45-55.8 GyRBE). Median maximum dose to the spinal cord was 50.2 GyRBE (range, 0-54.9 GyRBE). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4.1 years (range, 0.7-9.4 years), the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 92%, 79%, and 85%, respectively. Ten of 30 living patients have residual motor, bowel, or bladder deficits. Overall, 22% of patients experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 late toxicity related to multimodality treatment: kyphosis (n = 4), esophagitis (n = 2), and chronic kidney disease (n = 1). No patients developed grade 4 or greater toxicity, new neurologic deficits, or second malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Modern treatment advances may offer an improved therapeutic ratio for pediatric patients with spinal and paraspinal Ewing sarcoma. With appropriate management, most patients can be cured with recovery of long-term neurologic function and modest side effects.

RBE-weighted dose and its impact on the risk of acute coronary event for breast cancer patients treated with intensity modulated proton therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose to the heart and to estimate RBE uncertainties when assuming a constant RBE of 1.1, for breast cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Further, to study the impact of RBE uncertainties on the risk of an acute coronary event (ACE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 20 patients who received IMPT to either the left breast (n = 10) or left chest wall (n = 10) and regional lymph nodes. The Monte Carlo simulation engine, MCsquare, was used to simulate the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) map. The RBE-weighted dose to the heart and its substructures was calculated using three different RBE models. The risk of ACE was estimated per its linear relationship with mean heart dose (MHD) as established by Darby et al. RESULTS: The median MHD increased from 1.33 GyRBE assuming an RBE of 1.1 to 1.64, 1.87, and 1.99 GyRBE when using the RBE-weighted dose models. The median values (and ranges) of the excess absolute risk of ACE were 0.4% (0.1%-0.8%) when assuming an RBE of 1.1, and 0.6% (0.2%-1.0%), 0.6% (0.2%-1.1%), and 0.7% (0.2%-1.1%) with the RBE-weighted models. For our patient cohort, the maximum excess absolute risk of ACE increased by 0.3% with the RBE-weighted doses compared to the constant RBE of 1.1, reaching an excess absolute ACE risk of 1.1%. The interpatient LETd variation was small for the relevant high-dose regions of the heart. CONCLUSION: All three RBE models predicted a higher biological dose compared to the clinical standard dose assuming a constant RBE of 1.1. An underestimation of the biological dose results in underestimation of the ACE risk. Analyzing the voxel-by-voxel biological dose and the LET map alongside clinical outcomes is warranted in the development of a more accurate normal-tissue complication probability model.

Pulmonary dose tolerance in hemithorax radiotherapy for Ewing sarcoma of the chest wall: Are we overestimating the risk of radiation pneumonitis?

BACKGROUND: Children with chest wall Ewing sarcoma with malignant pulmonary effusion or pleural stranding require hemithorax radiation, often with plans that exceed lung constraints. We investigated disease control and pneumonitis in children requiring hemithorax radiation. PROCEDURE: Eleven children (median age 13 years) received hemithorax radiotherapy. Symptomatic radiation pneumonitis was considered National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1+ with respiratory symptoms. Mean lung dose (MLD), volume of lung exposed to a dose ≥5 Gy (V5), ≥20 Gy (V20), and ≥35 Gy (V35) were recorded. Adult and pediatric lung constraints were obtained from Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) guidelines and Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocols, respectively. RESULTS: Median hemithorax dose was 15 Gy (1.5 Gy/fraction). Median total dose was 51 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction). Most plans delivered both protons and photons. The ipsilateral MLD, V5, and V20 were 27.2 Gy, 100%, and 48.3%; the bilateral MLD, V20, and V35 were 14.1 Gy, 22.8%, and 14.3%, respectively. One hundred percent, 36%, and 91% of treatments exceeded recommended adult ipsilateral lung constraints of V5 <65%, V20 <52%, and MLD of 22 Gy; 64%, 45%, and 82% exceeded COG bilateral lung constraints of V20 <20%, MLD <15 Gy, and MLD <12 Gy, respectively; 82% of treatments exceeded the COG ipsilateral lung constraint of V20 <30%. At a median 36 months (range 12-129), the symptomatic radiation pneumonitis incidence was 0%. Two patients progressed with nonpulmonary metastatic disease and died at a median 12 months following radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Existing guidelines may overestimate pneumonitis risk, even among young children receiving multiagent chemotherapy. For children with chest wall Ewing sarcoma and other thoracic malignancies, more data are needed to refine pediatric dose-effect models for pulmonary toxicity.

Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Breast Cancer Subcommittee.

Radiation therapy plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. Recent years have seen improvements in breast cancer survival and a greater appreciation of potential long-term morbidity associated with the dose and volume of irradiated organs. Proton therapy reduces the dose to nontarget structures while optimizing target coverage. However, there remain additional financial costs associated with proton therapy, despite reductions over time, and studies have yet to demonstrate that protons improve upon the treatment outcomes achieved with photon radiation therapy. There remains considerable heterogeneity in proton patient selection and techniques, and the rapid technological advances in the field have the potential to affect evidence evaluation, given the long latency period for breast cancer radiation therapy recurrence and late effects. In this consensus statement, we assess the data available to the radiation oncology community of proton therapy for breast cancer, provide expert consensus recommendations on indications and technique, and highlight ongoing trials' cost-effectiveness analyses and key areas for future research.

Proton radiotherapy for infant rhabdomyosarcoma: Rethinking young age as an adverse prognostic factor.

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: In infants with rhabdomyosarcoma, young age is considered an adverse prognostic factor and treatment is often attenuated to reduce side effects. Proton therapy may improve the therapeutic ratio in these patients. We report outcomes in infants with rhabdomyosarcoma treated with proton therapy. MATERIALS & METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, 37 infants <24 months old with non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma received proton therapy. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit. The log-rank test assessed significance between selected prognostic factors. Toxicity was graded per CTCAEv5.0. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Overall, 76% of patients had an unfavorable primary site. Median dose was 50.4GyRBE. At 5 years, LC, PFS, and OS rates were 83%, 78%, and 83%. On univariate analysis, 5-year LC and OS were inferior for favorable versus unfavorable disease sites (67% vs 89%, 67% vs 89%, respectively; p < .05) and 5-year OS was superior in stage 3 versus stage 1-2 disease (91% vs 69%; p = .05), owing to inclusion of nasal ala patients among stage 1. Of 9 recurrences, 7 were in-field, 4 occurring in infants with nasal ala primaries. Recategorizing nasal ala as an unfavorable site resulted in 100% 5-year LC and OS for favorable sites. Six infants experienced late grade 3 toxicity. None developed grade 4 or 5 late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Young age alone may not be an adverse prognostic factor provided infants receive local therapy similar to older children. Consideration should be given to classifying nasal ala primaries as an unfavorable site.

Patient-specific quality assurance and plan dose errors on breast intensity-modulated proton therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate, in proton therapy, whether the Gamma passing rate (GPR) is related to the patient dose error and whether MU scaling can improve dose accuracy. METHODS: Among 20 consecutively treated breast patients selected for analysis, two IMPT plans were retrospectively generated: (1) the pencil-beam (PB) plan and (2) the Monte Carlo (MC) plan. Patient-specific QA was performed. A 3%/3-mm Gamma analysis was conducted to compare the TPS-calculated PB algorithm dose distribution with the measured 2D dose. Dose errors were compared between the plans that passed the Gamma testing and those that failed. The MU was then scaled to obtain a better GPR. MU-scaled PB plan dose errors were compared to the original PB plan. RESULTS: Of the 20 PB plans, 8 were passed Gamma testing (G_pass_group) and 12 failed (G_fail_group). Surprisingly, the G_pass_group had a greater dose error than the G_fail_group. The median (range) of the PTV DVH RMSE and PTV ΔDmean were 1.36 (1.00-1.91) Gy vs 1.18 (1.02-1.80) Gy and 1.23 (0.92-1.71) Gy vs 1.10 (0.87-1.49) Gy for the G_pass_group and the G_fail_group, respectively. MU scaling reduced overall dose error. However, for PTV D99 and D95, MU scaling worsened some cases. CONCLUSION: For breast IMPT, the PB plans that passed the Gamma testing did not show smaller dose errors compared to the plans that failed. For individual plans, the MU scaling technique leads to overall smaller dose errors. However, we do not suggest use of the MU scaling technique to replace the MC plans when the MC algorithm is available.