RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients who have not improved after physiotherapy for multidirectional instability (MDI) remains challenging, with no agreed best practice. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether arthroscopic plication is safe and effective for these patients. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients who had not improved after at least 6 months of specialized shoulder physiotherapy for symptomatic MDI and no labral lesion at arthroscopy underwent arthroscopic plication between 2006 and 2013. Outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative Oxford Instability Scores (OIS), recurrence of instability, return to work and sport, surgical complications, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The study comprised 32 male and 18 female patients, with a mean age of 26 years (range, 16-46 years). Complete OISs were available in 43 of 50 patients, and 41 patients had good or excellent postoperative OIS. The mean OIS was 16.2 preoperatively compared with 42.5 postoperatively (P < .001). There was no difference in OIS improvement between male and female patients (P = .962) or in those aged younger than 25 years vs. older than 25 years (P = .789). Patients with Beighton scores of 4 to 9 showed smaller OIS improvement (P = .030) and were less likely to achieve excellent postoperative OISs (P = .010). There were 2 patients with recurrent instability. All patients successfully returned to work, and 45 of 50 patients returned to the same level of sport. Surgical complications were shoulder stiffness in 1 patient that resolved with physiotherapy and 1 superficial wound infection that was successfully treated with flucloxacillin. Forty-seven of 50 patients were satisfied. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic plication is a safe and effective treatment for MDI in patients without labral lesions who have not improved after 6 months of specialized shoulder physiotherapy.
Assuntos
Artroscopia , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Articulação do Ombro , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Recidiva , Volta ao Esporte , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Cirurgiões/educação , Currículo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Humanos , Internato e Residência/organização & administração , Internato e Residência/tendências , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/tendências , Ensino/tendênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The shoulder is the most frequently dislocated joint, with an incidence of 10 to 20 per 100,000 each year. The optimum number of anchors to use in arthroscopic stabilization is a topic of growing interest; most surgeons use 3. Our stabilization technique is to commonly use only a single suture anchor to purse-string the capsulolabral tissue up and toward the glenoid. This study aimed to ascertain whether successful stabilization can be achieved with fewer than 3 anchors. METHODS: Our study comprised 114 consecutive patients with anterior instability and a Bankart lesion undergoing arthroscopic stabilization with 4 years of follow-up. Outcome was measured by Oxford Instability Score (OIS) and recurrence of instability or dislocation. Patient demographics were 86.8% male, 13.2% female, mean age of 31 years, 76.3% Hill-Sachs lesions, 13.2% bony Bankart lesions, 13.2% glenoid defects, and 9.6% SLAP lesions. The majority of patients, 71 patients (62.3%), received only 1 anchor; 40 patients (35.1%) received 2 anchors, and 3 patients (2.6%) had 3 anchors. RESULTS: The mean OIS was 44.3 preoperatively and 17.3 postoperatively (P < .0001). There was no difference in OIS improvement between the patients who received a single anchor and those who received 2 or 3 anchors (P > .05). Even with minor bony Bankart lesions and glenoid defects, a single suture anchor can be sufficient. Our failure rate of 6.1% is comparable with that of other published series. CONCLUSION: Successful shoulder stabilization can be achieved with fewer than 3 anchors, and a single anchor is usually sufficient.
Assuntos
Artroscopia/métodos , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Articulação do Ombro/cirurgia , Âncoras de Sutura , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Artralgia/classificação , Artralgia/etiologia , Artralgia/prevenção & controle , Artroscopia/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos em Atletas/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/classificação , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prevenção Secundária , Ombro , Luxação do Ombro/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Articulação Acromioclavicular/lesões , Articulação Acromioclavicular/cirurgia , Plexo Braquial/lesões , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Clavicle fractures accounting for 3 to 5% of all adult fractures are usually treated non-operatively. There is an increasing trend toward their surgical fixation. The aim of our study was to investigate the outcome following titanium elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for midshaft non-comminuted clavicle fractures with >20 mm shortening/displacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 38 patients, which met inclusion criteria, were reviewed retrospectively. There were 32 males and six females. The mean age was 27.6 years. The patients were assessed for clinical/radiological union and by Oxford Shoulder and QuickDASH scores. 71% patients required open reduction. RESULTS: 100% union was achieved at average of 11.3 weeks. The average follow-up was 12 months. The average Oxford Shoulder and QuickDASH scores were 45.6 and 6.7, respectively. 47% patients had nail removal. One patient had lateral nail protrusion while other required its medial trimming. CONCLUSION: In our hands, ESIN is safe and minimally invasive with good patient satisfaction, cosmetic appearance, and overall outcome.
RESUMO
Treatment of tibiofibular syndesmotic ankle injury remains controversial in regard to the best method, although surgeons agree that the goal of treatment is reduction and operative stabilization. Ideally, the implant should stabilize the syndesmosis and allow physiologic micromotion and early mobilization, and conventional screws are limited in this regard. We reviewed use of the Ankle TightRope(®) fixation device for repair of syndesmotic injuries. From April to September 2006, 16 patients with evidence of syndesmotic injury were treated by means of ankle fracture open reduction with internal fixation, combined with use of the Ankle TightRope(®) device for repair of the syndesmosis. The mean age of the 16 patients was 36.6 ± 16.71 (range 15 to 69) years; they were followed up for at least 2 years. Mean follow-up duration was 26 ± 3.94 (range 24 to 38) months. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score at 2-year follow-up was 86.88 ± 11.49 (range 48 to 100). The mean time to full weight-bearing was 4.5 ± 0.87 weeks. Two (12.5%) patients had postoperative superficial wound infections, each of which was treated with oral antibiotics. One (6.25%) patient had the TightRope(®) removed because of irritation from the knot. There was no failure of syndesmotic fixation, despite early weight-bearing in the postoperative phase. The results of this case series indicate that tibiofibular syndesmosis repair with the Ankle TightRope(®) yields satisfactory results.
Assuntos
Traumatismos do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Fíbula/lesões , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Intra-Articulares/cirurgia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Traumatismos do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Fixadores Internos , Fraturas Intra-Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of 28 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: 24 women and 4 men aged 38 to 87 (mean, 65) years underwent intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures. 17 (61%) of them were aged >70 years. Fractures were classified into 2-part (n = 8), 3-part (n = 17), and 4-part (n = 3), and corresponded to AO 11 A3 (n = 8), B1 (n = 3), B2 (n = 9), and C2 (n = 8) types. The Constant and Oxford scores were assessed at the final follow-up. RESULTS: All patients had bone union except for one who had tuberosity failure. 23 (82%) patients had satisfactory-to-excellent and 5 had poor Constant scores; outcomes were worse with more complex fractures. 20 (71%) patients had satisfactory Oxford scores. Seven (25%) patients had impingement of a nail tip. Other complications included avascular necrosis (n = 1), proximal locking screw back-out (n = 1), and screw penetration into the joint (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Intramedullary nailing provides a stable fixation with minimal soft tissue dissection for displaced proximal humeral fractures. It enables early mobilisation and functional recovery.
Assuntos
Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Luxação do Ombro/cirurgia , Fraturas do Ombro/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Consolidação da Fratura , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Luxação do Ombro/diagnóstico , Luxação do Ombro/etiologia , Fraturas do Ombro/diagnóstico , Fraturas do Ombro/etiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Severe pain and shoulder stiffness after soft tissue trauma or fracture is a major cause of dysfunction. Some patients may have residual, resistant, significant shoulder stiffness that causes long-term functional impairment. This study reports the results of arthroscopic capsular release in 21 patients who presented with posttraumatic stiff shoulders resistant to nonoperative therapy. They underwent arthroscopic circumferential capsular and subacromial release of adhesions under interscalene block, followed with immediate regular physiotherapy. A highly significant improvement in the range of motion (ROM) was achieved immediately postoperatively (P < .0001). At 6 months, a mean 48% of the ROM gain was lost. Thereafter, ROM steadily improved to a mean net gain of 110% compared with the immediate postoperative time (mean follow-up, 33 months). Most patients (95%) expressed satisfaction with their outcome. Arthroscopic capsular release is a useful treatment for resistant posttraumatic stiff shoulder, particularly to alleviate of pain and restore a functional ROM.
Assuntos
Artroscopia , Contratura/cirurgia , Cápsula Articular/cirurgia , Lesões do Ombro , Articulação do Ombro/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Some patients presenting with subacromial impingement syndrome complain of tingling and numbness radiating to hand. In the current literature, there is no description of such paresthesia being a part of the clinical picture of impingement syndrome. OBJECTIVE: This observational study aimed at looking whether these symptoms resolve with successful arthroscopic decompression of the impingement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery were enlisted for the study. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent reported paresthesia during the course of the shoulder problem (63% of them had radial sided symptoms, 29.6% ulnar-sided symptoms and 7.4% involving all fingers). Significant association was observed between the occurrence of paresthesia and worst pain levels (P = 0.0053), age of the patient (P = 0.0104) and the acromial impingement grade (P = 0.0377). Nerve conduction studies done in seven patients (with paresthesia) selected by systematic random sampling did not show any significant attributable entrapment neuropathy. Up to 12 months follow-up, 48 of 54 (88%) had complete relief of pain and paresthesia and 50 (92.5%) were satisfied. CONCLUSION: Some patients with subacromial impingement syndrome report associated peripheral paresthesia radiating to hand, which is strongly associated with the age, pain level and the grade of impingement. In most (88%) of such cases, these symptoms are relieved after treatment of the impingment lesion. The incidence and aetiology of such paresthesia is the subject of further studies.