Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker for Poor Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Neurofilament light chain (NfL), a biomarker reflecting neuro-axonal damage, may be useful in improving clinical outcome prediction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We explore the robust and additional value of NfL to neurologic and radiologic grading scales in predicting poor outcome after aSAH. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study conducted in a single tertiary center, blood samples were collected of aSAH patients within 24 hours after ictus and before endovascular/surgical intervention. The primary endpoint was poor outcome at 6 months' follow-up. Receiver operating curves (ROC), area under the curve (AUC, 95% CI) and model-fit (Nagelkerke R2) were calculated for NfL, neurologic grading scale (WFNS), modified Fisher, age ,and sex. A combined ROC and AUC were calculated for variables with an AUC ≥ 0.70. RESULTS: A total of 66 (42%) had poor outcome. The AUC of NfL for poor outcome was 0.70 (0.62-0.78). Combining NfL and WFNS resulted in a slightly higher model fit and not-significantly higher AUC for predicting poor outcome (R2 0.51; AUC 0.86, 0.80-0.92) compared with WFNS alone. When patients were stratified according to hemorrhage severity, median NfL [IQR] levels were significantly higher in poor grade (14 [7-32] pg/mL) than good grade patients (7 [5-14] pg/mL). Within poor grade patients, median NfL [IQR] levels were significantly higher in non-survivors (19 [11-36] pg/mL) than survivors (7 [6-13] pg/mL). CONCLUSION: In the entire aSAH cohort, plasma NfL has an acceptable predictive performance but does not improve clinical outcome prediction. However, NfL may have potential value in subgroups based on hemorrhage severity.

Surgical Complications in Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Experience in 800 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: We present our surgical complications resulting in neurological deficit or additional surgery during 25 years of DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all PD patients that received STN DBS in our DBS center between 1998 and 2023. Outcomes were complications resulting in neurological deficit or additional surgery. Potential risk factors (number of microelectrode recording tracks, age, anesthesia method, hypertension, and sex) for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) were analyzed. Furthermore, lead fixation techniques were compared. RESULTS: Eight hundred PD patients (507 men, 293 women) received unilateral (n = 11) or bilateral (n = 789) implantation of STN electrodes. Neurological deficit due to ICH, edema, delirium, or infarction was seen in 8.4% of the patients (7.4% transient, 1.0% permanent). Twenty-two patients (2.8%) had a symptomatic ICH following STN DBS, for which we did not find any risk factors, and five had permanent sequelae due to ICH (0.6%). Of all patients, 18.4% required additional surgery; the proportion was reduced from 27% in the first 300 cases to 13% in the last 500 cases (p < 0.001). The infection rate was 3.5%, which decreased from 5.3% in the first 300 cases to 2.2% in the last 500 cases. The use of a lead anchoring device led to significantly less lead migrations than miniplate fixation. CONCLUSION: STN DBS leads to permanent neurological deficit in a small number of patients (1.0%), but a substantial proportion needs some additional surgical procedure after the first DBS system implantation. The risk of revision surgery was reduced over time but remained significant. These findings need to be discussed with the patient in the preoperative informed consent process in addition to the expected health benefit.

Resilience After High-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Cohort Study on Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Treatment of patients who present with poor clinical condition is often postponed until neurological improvement is observed. Despite previous studies, it is still unclear how survivors perceive their quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate self-perceived QoL in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who present with poor clinical condition, as defined by World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grades 4 to 5, compared with those who present in more favorable clinical condition (WFNS 1-3). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2021, 1160 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were admitted to the Amsterdam UMC. Among the 845 patients who survived, 537 participated in the QoL questionnaires. Patient characteristics, complications, EQ-5D questionnaires, modified Rankin Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were analyzed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables or the Pearson χ2 test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Of the 537 responders, 452 (84%) presented with low grade (WFNS 1-3) and 85 (16%) presented with high grade (WFNS 4-5). The high-grade group reported a self-perceived QoL score of 70 (of 100), while the low-grade group reported a score of 75 (P = .12). The mean EQ-5D index value was 0.74 for the high-grade group and 0.81 for the low-grade group (P < .01). In the high-grade group, 61 patients (72%) had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-3) compared with 419 (94%) in the low-grade group (P < .001). CONCLUSION: High-grade WFNS patients rated their QoL as satisfactory, with only a marginal 5-point difference on a 100-point scale compared with low-grade WFNS patients. In addition, almost three-quarters of high-grade WFNS survivors achieved a favorable outcome. Given that a subset of patients, despite presenting with a poor clinical condition, still achieve a favorable outcome, these findings reinforce our perspective advocating for early and comprehensive treatment.

Ultra-Early and Short-Term Tranexamic Acid Treatment in Patients With Good- and Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The results of the ULTRA trial showed that ultra-early and short-term treatment with tranexamic acid (TXA) does not improve clinical outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Possibly, the lack of a beneficial effect in all patients with aSAH is masked by antagonistic effects of TXA in certain subgroups. In this post hoc subgroup analysis, we investigated the effect of TXA on clinical outcome in patients with good-grade and poor-grade aSAH. METHODS: The ULTRA trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment. Participants received ultra-early and short-term TXA in addition to usual care or usual care only. This post hoc subgroup analysis included only ULTRA participants with confirmed aSAH and available World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade on admission. Patients were categorized into those with good-grade (WFNS 1-3) and poor-grade (WFNS 4-5) aSAH. The primary outcome was clinical outcome assessed by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs were calculated using ordinal regression analyses. Analyses were performed using the as-treated principle. In all patients with aSAH, no significant effect modification of TXA on clinical outcome was observed for admission WFNS grade (p = 0.10). RESULTS: Of the 812 ULTRA participants, 473 patients had (58%; N = 232 TXA, N = 241 usual care) good-grade and 339 (42%; N = 162 TXA, N = 176 usual care) patients had poor-grade aSAH. In patients with good-grade aSAH, the TXA group had worse clinical outcomes (OR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94, aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.94) compared with the usual care group. In patients with poor-grade aSAH, clinical outcomes were comparable between treatment groups (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.55, aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.70-1.56). DISCUSSION: This post hoc subgroup analysis provides another important argument against the use of TXA treatment in patients with aSAH, by showing worse clinical outcomes in patients with good-grade aSAH treated with TXA and no clinical benefit of TXA in patients with poor-grade aSAH, compared with patients treated with usual care. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02684812; submission date February 18, 2016, first patient enrollment on July 24, 2013). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that tranexamic acid, given for <24 hours within the first 24 hours, does not improve the 6-month outcome in good-grade or poor initial-grade aneurysmal SAH.

Impact of time to start of tranexamic acid treatment on rebleed risk and outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: The ULTRA-trial investigated effectiveness of ultra-early administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and showed that TXA reduces the risk of rebleeding without concurrent improvement in clinical outcome. Previous trials in bleeding conditions, distinct from SAH, have shown that time to start of antifibrinolytic treatment influences outcome. This post-hoc analysis of the ULTRA-trial investigates whether the interval between hemorrhage and start of TXA impacts the effect of TXA on rebleeding and functional outcome following aneurysmal SAH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A post-hoc comparative analysis was conducted between aneurysmal SAH patients of the ULTRA-trial, receiving TXA and usual care to those receiving usual care only. We assessed confounders, hazard ratio (HR) of rebleeding and odds ratio (OR) of good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-3) at 6 months, and investigated the impact of time between hemorrhage and start of TXA on the treatment effect, stratified into time categories (0-3, 3-6 and >6 h). RESULTS: Sixty-four of 394 patients (16.2%) in the TXA group experienced a rebleeding, compared to 83 of 413 patients (19.9%) with usual care only (HR 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-1.19). Time to start of TXA modifies the effect of TXA on rebleeding rate (p < 0.001), with a clinically non-relevant reduction observed only when TXA was initiated after 6 h (absolute rate reduction 1.4%). Tranexamic acid treatment showed no effect on good outcome (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.72-1.27) with no evidence of effect modification on the time to start of TXA (p = 0.53). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the effect of TXA on rebleeding is modified by time to treatment, providing a protective, albeit clinically non-relevant, effect only when started after 6 h. No difference in functional outcome was seen. Routine TXA treatment in the aneurysmal SAH population, even within a specified time frame, is not recommended to improve functional outcome.

Clinical course of patients with conservatively managed cerebral cavernous malformations.

INTRODUCTION: There is uncertainty whether patients with a cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) should undergo conservative or surgical treatment, resulting in practice variation among hospitals. Our objective was to report clinical outcomes of patients with primarily conservatively managed CCMs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center cohort study included consecutive adult CCM patients, diagnosed in 2000-2023, who underwent conservative management as primary treatment strategy. Data were extracted from medical records, and we systematically conducted telephone and questionnaire follow-up. Functional status was assessed on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). RESULTS: Of 345 patients, we included 265 patients with a CCM (median age 46 years; 45% male). At baseline, 131 (49%) patients presented with symptomatic hemorrhage (SH), and 134 (51%) with other symptoms or asymptomatically. During 58 months (IQR 35-94) median follow-up, 51 (19%) patients experienced a SH, 33 (12%) a seizure, and 13 (5%) focal neurological deficits. Fourteen (5%) patients underwent intervention (surgery n = 11, radiosurgery n = 4). Presentation with SH was associated with higher annual bleeding rates (6.0% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001), and higher cumulative 5-/10-year bleeding risks (31%/41% vs 7%, p < 0.001). Brainstem CCM was associated with higher cumulative 5-/10-year bleeding risks (27%/38% vs 17%/21%, p = 0.038). Nineteen (7%) patients died; two (0.8%) directly attributable to CCM. Of 246 surviving patients, 205 (83%) completed the questionnaire. At follow-up, 172/224 (77%) patients were functionally independent (mRS score ⩽2). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The majority of conservatively managed CCM patients remained free of a SH during follow-up. Few patients required intervention, and death attributable to the CCM was rare. These data may help patient counseling and treatment decisions.

Factors associated with success of conservative therapy in chronic subdural hematoma: a single-center retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Conservative therapy is a viable option for patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) who express no, or only mild symptoms. It is not clear which factors are associated with success of conservative therapy. This study aims to determine conservative therapy's success rate and to identify features possibly associated with success. METHODS: A monocenter retrospective cohort study, including cSDH patients treated conservatively (wait-and-watch) from 2012 to 2022, was performed. The primary outcome was success of conservative therapy, defined as 'no crossover to surgery' during the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were (1) factors associated with success, analyzed with univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, (2) 30-day mortality (3) time to crossover and (4) reasons for crossover. RESULTS: We included 159 patients. Conservative therapy was successful in 96 (60%) patients. Hematoma volume (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.92) and hypodense hematoma type (OR 3.57, 95% 1.38-9.23) were associated with success. Thirty-day mortality rate was 5% and the median duration between diagnosis and surgery was 19 days (IQR 8-39). Clinical deterioration was the most frequent reason for crossover (in 61/63 patients, 97%) and was accompanied by radiological hematoma progression in 42 patients (67%). CONCLUSION: In this selected group of patients, conservative therapy was successful in 60%. Smaller hematoma volume and hypodense hematoma type were associated with success. As time until crossover was approximately three weeks, deploying conservative therapy as primary treatment seems safe and could be rewarding as surgical complications can be avoided. Improvement in patient selection in future cohorts remains warranted.

Study on prognosis of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms (SPARTA): a protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Ruptured intracranial aneurysms resulting in subarachnoid haemorrhage can be treated by open surgical or endovascular treatment. Despite multiple previous studies, uncertainties on the optimal treatment practice still exists. The resulting treatment variation may result in a variable, potentially worse, patient outcome. To better inform future treatment strategies, this study aims to identify the effectiveness of different treatment strategies in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms by investigating long-term functional outcome, complications and cost-effectiveness. An explorative analysis of the diagnostic and prognostic value of radiological imaging will also be performed. METHODS: This multi-centre observational prospective cohort study will have a follow-up of 10 years. A total of 880 adult patients with a subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by a ruptured intracranial aneurysm will be included. Calculation of sample size (N = 880) was performed to show non-inferiority of clip-reconstruction compared to endovascular treatment on 1 year outcome, assessed by using the ordinal modified Rankin Scale. The primary endpoint is the modified Rankin Scale score and mortality at 1 year after the initial subarachnoid haemorrhage. Patients will receive 'non-experimental' regular care during their hospital stay. For this study, health questionnaires and functional outcome will be assessed at baseline, before discharge and at follow-up visits. DISCUSSION: Despite the major healthcare and societal burden, the optimal treatment strategy for patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage caused by ruptured intracranial aneurysms is yet to be determined. Findings of this comparative effectiveness study, in which in-between centre variation in practice and patient outcome are investigated, will provide evidence on the effectiveness of treatment strategies, hopefully contributing to future high value treatment standardisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05851989 DATE OF REGISTRATION: May 10th, 2023.

Sodium and Its Impact on Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Patients With and Without Delayed Cerebral Ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a detailed examination of sodium levels, hyponatremia and sodium fluctuations, and their association with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and poor outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). DESIGN: An observational cohort study from a prospective SAH Registry. SETTING: Tertiary referral center focused on SAH treatment in the Amsterdam metropolitan area. PATIENTS: A total of 964 adult patients with confirmed aSAH were included between 2011 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 277 (29%) developed DCI. Hyponatremia occurred significantly more often in DCI patients compared with no-DCI patients (77% vs. 48%). Sodium levels, hyponatremia, hypernatremia, and sodium fluctuations did not predict DCI. However, higher sodium levels were significantly associated with poor outcome in DCI patients (DCI onset -7, DCI +0, +1, +2, +4, +5, +8, +9 d), and in no-DCI patients (postbleed day 6-10 and 12-14). Also, hypernatremia and greater sodium fluctuations were significantly associated with poor outcome in both DCI and no-DCI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium levels, hyponatremia, and sodium fluctuations were not associated with the occurrence of DCI. However, higher sodium levels, hypernatremia, and greater sodium fluctuations were associated with poor outcome after aSAH irrespective of the presence of DCI. Therefore, sodium levels, even with mild changes in levels, warrant close attention.

Cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in the GALAXY trial: effect of anaesthesia in deep brain stimulation.

BACKGROUND: This study aims: (1) To compare cognitive and psychiatric outcomes after bilateral awake versus asleep subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD). (2) To explore the occurrence of psychiatric diagnoses, cognitive impairment and quality of life after surgery in our whole sample. (3) To validate whether we can predict postoperative cognitive decline. METHODS: 110 patients with PD were randomised to receive awake (n=56) or asleep (n=54) STN DBS surgery. At baseline and 6-month follow-up, all patients underwent standardised assessments testing several cognitive domains, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life. RESULTS: There were no differences on neuropsychological composite scores and psychiatric symptoms between the groups, but we found small differences on individual tests and cognitive domains. The asleep group performed better on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test delayed memory test (f=4.2, p=0.04), while the awake group improved on the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test delayed memory test. (f=4.4, p=0.04). The Stroop III score was worse for the awake group (f=5.5, p=0.02). Worse scores were present for Stroop I (Stroop word card) (f=6.3, p=0.01), Stroop II (Stroop color card) (f=46.4, p<0.001), Stroop III (Stroop color-word card) (f=10.8, p=0.001) and Trailmaking B/A (f=4.5, p=0.04). Improvements were seen on quality of life: Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (f=24.8, p<0.001), and psychiatric scales: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (f=6.2, p=0.01), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (f=5.5, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the choice between awake and asleep STN DBS does not affect cognitive, mood and behavioural adverse effects, despite a minor difference in memory. STN DBS has a beneficial effect on quality of life, mood and anxiety symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5809.

Directional versus ring-mode deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: protocol of a multi-centre double-blind randomised crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) therapy for Parkinson's disease can be limited by side-effects caused by electrical current spillover into structures adjacent to the target area. The objective of the STEEred versus RING-mode DBS for Parkinson's disease (STEERING) study is to investigate if directional DBS for Parkinson's disease results in a better clinical outcome when compared to ring-mode DBS. METHODS: The STEERING study is a prospective multi-centre double-blind randomised crossover trial. Inclusion criteria are Parkinson's disease, subthalamic nucleus DBS in a 'classic' ring-mode setting for a minimum of six months, and optimal ring-mode settings have been established. Participants are categorised into one of two subgroups according to their clinical response to the ring-mode settings as 'responders' (i.e., patient with a satisfactory effect of ring-mode DBS) or 'non-responder' (i.e., patient with a non-satisfactory effect of ring-mode DBS). A total of 64 responders and 38 non-responders will be included (total 102 patients). After an optimisation period in which an optimal directional setting is found, participants are randomised to first receive ring-mode DBS for 56 days (range 28-66) followed by directional DBS for 56 days (28-66) or vice-versa. The primary outcome is the difference between ring-mode DBS and directional DBS settings on the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Motor Evaluation (MDS-UPDRS-ME) in the off-medication state. Secondary outcome measures consist of MDS-UPDRS-ME in the on-medication state, MDS-UPDRS Activities of Daily Living, MDS-UPDRS Motor Complications-Dyskinesia, disease related quality of life measured with the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39, stimulation-induced side-effects, antiparkinsonian medication use, and DBS-parameters. Participants' therapy preference is measured at the end of the study. Outcomes will be analysed for both responder and non-responder groups, as well as for both groups pooled together. DISCUSSION: The STEERING trial will provide insights into whether or not directional DBS should be standardly used in all Parkinson's disease DBS patients or if directional DBS should only be used in a case-based approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on the Netherlands Trial Register, as trial NL6508 ( NTR6696 ) on June 23, 2017.

Aneurysm treatment within 6 h versus 6-24 h after rupture in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: The risk of rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is the highest during the initial hours after rupture. Emergency aneurysm treatment may decrease this risk, but is a logistic challenge and economic burden. We aimed to investigate whether aneurysm treatment <6 h after rupture is associated with a decreased risk of poor functional outcome compared to aneurysm treatment 6-24 h after rupture. METHODS: We used data of patients included in the ULTRA trial (NCT02684812). All patients in ULTRA were admitted within 24 h after aneurysm rupture. For the current study, we excluded patients in whom the aneurysm was not treated <24 h after rupture. We calculated crude and adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals using Poisson regression analyses for poor functional outcome (death or dependency, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale) after aneurysm treatment <6 h versus 6-24 h after rupture. Adjustments were made for age, sex, clinical condition on admission (WFNS scale), amount of extravasated blood (Fisher score), aneurysm location, tranexamic acid treatment, and aneurysm treatment modality. RESULTS: We included 497 patients. Poor outcome occurred in 63/110 (57%) patients treated within 6 h compared to 145/387 (37%) patients treated 6-24 h after rupture (crude RR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24-1.88; adjusted RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11-1.66). CONCLUSION: Aneurysm treatment <6 h is not associated with better functional outcome than aneurysm treatment 6-24 h after rupture. Our results do not support a strategy aiming to treat every patient with a ruptured aneurysm <6 h after rupture.

Aneurysm Prevalence and Quality of Life During Screening in Relatives of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Screening for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is effective for first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Whether screening is also effective for FDRs of patients with UIA is unknown. We determined the yield of screening in such FDRs, assessed rupture risk and treatment decisions of aneurysms that were found, identified potential high-risk subgroups, and studied the effects of screening on quality of life (QoL). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we included FDRs, aged 20-70 years, of patients with UIA without a family history of aSAH who visited the Neurology outpatient clinic in 1 of 3 participating tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. FDRs were screened for UIA with magnetic resonance angiography between 2017 and 2021. We determined UIA prevalence and developed a prediction model for UIA risk at screening using multivariable logistic regression. QoL was evaluated with questionnaires 6 times during the first year after screening and assessed with a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: We detected 24 UIAs in 23 of 461 screened FDRs, resulting in a 5.0% prevalence (95% CI 3.2-7.4). The median aneurysm size was 3 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4 mm), and the median 5-year rupture risk assessed with the PHASES score was 0.7% (IQR 0.4%-0.9%). All UIAs received follow-up imaging, and none were treated preventively. After a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 13-38 months), no UIA had changed. Predicted UIA risk at screening ranged between 2.3% and 14.7% with the highest risk in FDRs who smoke and have excessive alcohol consumption (c-statistic: 0.76; 95% CI 0.65-0.88). At all survey moments, health-related QoL and emotional functioning were comparable with those in a reference group from the general population. One FDR with a positive screening result expressed regret about screening. DISCUSSION: Based on the current data, we do not advise screening FDRs of patients with UIA because all identified UIAs had a low rupture risk. We observed no negative effect of screening on QoL. A longer follow-up should determine the risk of aneurysm growth requiring preventive treatment.

Recurrent Chronic Subdural Hematoma After Burr-Hole Surgery and Postoperative Drainage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Reported recurrence rates of chronic subdural hematoma treated by burr-hole surgery with postoperative drainage vary considerably in the literature. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the recurrence rate of burr-hole surgery with postoperative drainage. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for quality assessment of included studies and the random-effects model to calculate pooled incidence rates in R with the metaprop function if appropriate. RESULTS: The search yielded 2969 references; 709 were screened full text, and 189 met the inclusion criteria. In 174 studies (34 393 patients), the number of recurrences was reported as per patient and 15 studies (3078 hematomas) reported the number of recurrences per hematoma, for a pooled incidence of 11.2% (95% CI: 10.3-12.1; I 2 = 87.7%) and 11.0% (95% CI: 8.6-13.4; I 2 = 78.0%), respectively. The pooled incidence of 48 studies (15 298 patients) with the highest quality was 12.8% (95% CI 11.4-14.2; I 2 = 86.1%). Treatment-related mortality (56 patients) has a pooled incidence of 0.7% (95% CI 0.0-1.4; I 2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSION: The recurrence rate of chronic subdural hematoma treated by burr-hole surgery and postoperative drainage is 12.8%.

Clinical response following hypertension induction for clinical delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension induction (HTI) is often used for treating delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH); however, high-quality studies on its efficacy are lacking. We studied immediate and 3-/6-month clinical efficacy of HTI in aSAH patients with clinical DCI. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter, comparative, observational cohort study in aSAH patients with clinical deterioration due to DCI, admitted to three tertiary referral hospitals in the Netherlands from 2015 to 2019. Two hospitals used a strategy of HTI (HTI group) and one hospital had no such strategy (control group). We calculated adjusted relative risks (aRR) using Poisson regression analyses for the two primary (clinical improvement of DCI symptoms at days 1 and 5 after DCI onset) and secondary outcomes (DCI-related cerebral infarction, in-hospital mortality, and poor clinical outcome [modified Rankin Scale 4-6] assessed at 3 or 6 months), using the intention-to-treat principle. We also performed as-treated and per-protocol analyses. RESULTS: The aRR for clinical improvement on day 1 after DCI in the HTI group was 1.63 (95% CI 1.17-2.27) and at day 5 after DCI 1.04 (95% CI 0.84-1.29). Secondary outcomes were comparable between the groups. The as-treated and per-protocol analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: No clinical benefit of HTI is observed 5 days after DCI due to spontaneous reversal of DCI symptoms in patients treated without HTI. The 3-/6-month clinical outcome was similar for both groups. Therefore, these data suggest that one may consider to not apply HTI in aSAH patients with clinical DCI.

Laboratory biomarkers of delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review.

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) substantially contributes to disability and death in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients; however, its pathophysiology is incompletely understood and diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are lacking. Biomarkers may help to elucidate the pathophysiology, optimize early diagnosis, or provide treatment targets. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase on October 13, 2021, for studies that evaluated at least one laboratory biomarker in patients with DCI, using the most up-to-date definition of DCI as proposed by a panel of experts in 2010. Quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias assessment tool. Biomarkers of clinical and radiological DCI were analyzed separately. Results were meta-analyzed if possible, otherwise narratively reviewed. Biomarkers were classified as significant, inconclusive, or nonsignificant. We defined validated biomarkers as those with significant results in meta-analyses, or in at least two studies using similar methodologies within the same time interval after SAH. The search yielded 209 articles with 724 different biomarkers; 166 studies evaluated 646 biomarkers of clinical DCI, of which 141 were significant and 7 were validated biomarkers (haptoglobulin 2-1 and 2-2, ADAMTS13, vWF, NLR, P-selectin, F2-isoprostane); 78 studies evaluated 165 biomarkers of radiological DCI, of which 63 were significant and 1 was a validated biomarker (LPR). Hence, this review provides a selection of seven biomarkers of clinical DCI and one biomarker of radiological DCI as most promising biomarkers of DCI. Future research should focus on determining the exact predictive, diagnostic, and therapeutic potentials of these biomarkers.

A Systematic Review of Viscoelastic Testing in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: Bleeding and thromboembolic complications frequently occur after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and substantially contribute to poor outcome. Viscoelastic testing could be used for detection of coagulopathies after SAH. This review summarizes literature on the usefulness of viscoelastic testing to detect coagulopathy in patients with SAH and explores whether viscoelastic parameters are associated with SAH-related complications and clinical outcome. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were systematically searched on August 18, 2022. Two authors independently selected studies that reported viscoelastic testing in patients with SAH and assessed the quality of studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or a previously reported framework for quality assessment. Data were meta-analyzed if methodologically possible. RESULTS: The search yielded 19 studies (1160 patients with SAH). Pooling of data including all relevant studies was not possible for any of the outcome measurements because of methodological differences. Thirteen of 19 studies evaluated the association of coagulation profiles and SAH, of which 11 studies showed a hypercoagulable profile. Rebleeding was associated with platelet dysfunction, deep venous thrombosis was associated with faster clot initiation, and both delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcome were associated with increased clot strength. CONCLUSIONS: This explorative review shows that patients with SAH frequently have a hypercoagulable profile. Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters are associated with rebleeding, delayed cerebral ischemia, deep venous thrombosis, and poor clinical outcome after SAH; however, more research on the subject is needed. Future studies should focus on determining the optimal time frame and cutoff values for TEG or ROTEM to predict these complications.

Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Rebleeding is an important cause of death and disability in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rebleeding is probably related to the dissolution of the blood clot at the site of the aneurysm rupture by natural fibrinolytic activity. This review is an update of previously published Cochrane Reviews. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of antifibrinolytic treatment in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (May 2022), CENTRAL (in the Cochrane Library 2021, Issue 1), MEDLINE (December 2012 to May 2022), and Embase (December 2012 to May 2022). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished, and ongoing studies, we searched reference lists and trial registers, performed forward tracking of relevant references, and contacted drug companies (the latter in previous versions of this review). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing oral or intravenous antifibrinolytic drugs (tranexamic acid, epsilon amino-caproic acid, or an equivalent) with control in people with subarachnoid haemorrhage of suspected or proven aneurysmal cause. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (MRG & WJD) independently selected trials for inclusion, and extracted the data for the current update. In total, three review authors (MIB & MRG in the previous update; MRG & WJD in the current update) assessed risk of bias. For the primary outcome, we dichotomised the outcome scales into good and poor outcome, with poor outcome defined as death, vegetative state, or (moderate) severe disability, assessed with either the Glasgow Outcome Scale or the Modified Rankin Scale. We assessed death from any cause, rates of rebleeding, delayed cerebral ischaemia, and hydrocephalus per treatment group. We expressed effects as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used random-effects models for all analyses. We assessed the quality of the evidence with GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included one new trial in this update, for a total of 11 included trials involving 2717 participants. The risk of bias was low in six studies. Five studies were open label, and we rated them at high risk of performance bias. We also rated one of these studies at high risk for attrition and reporting bias.  Five trials reported on poor outcome (death, vegetative state, or (moderate) severe disability), with a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.13; P = 0.53; 5 trials, 2359 participants; high-quality evidence), which showed no difference between groups. All trials reported on death from all causes, which showed no difference between groups, with a pooled RR of 1.02 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.16; P = 0.77; 11 trials, 2717 participants; high-quality evidence). In trials that combined short-term antifibrinolytic treatment (< 72 hours) with preventative measures for delayed cerebral ischaemia, the RR for poor outcome was 0.98 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.18; P = 0.83; 2 trials, 1318 participants; high-quality evidence).  Antifibrinolytic treatment reduced the risk of rebleeding, reported at the end of follow-up (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.91; P = 0.01; 11 trials, 2717 participants; absolute risk reduction 7%, 95% CI 3 to 12%; moderate-quality evidence), but there was heterogeneity (I² = 59%) between the trials. The pooled RR for delayed cerebral ischaemia was 1.27 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.62; P = 0.05; 7 trials, 2484 participants; moderate-quality evidence). However, this effect was less extreme after the implementation of ischaemia preventative measures and < 72 hours of treatment (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.46; P = 0.49; 2 trials, 1318 participants; high-quality evidence). Antifibrinolytic treatment showed no effect on the reported rate of hydrocephalus (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.20; P = 0.09; 6 trials, 1992 participants; high-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence does not support the routine use of antifibrinolytic drugs in the treatment of people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. More specifically, early administration with concomitant treatment strategies to prevent delayed cerebral ischaemia does not improve clinical outcome. There is sufficient evidence from multiple randomised controlled trials to incorporate this conclusion in treatment guidelines.

Development of the SAFETEA Scores for Predicting Risks of Complications of Preventive Endovascular or Microneurosurgical Intracranial Aneurysm Occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: Preventive unruptured intracranial aneurysm occlusion can reduce the risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage, but both endovascular and microneurosurgical treatment carry a risk of serious complications. To improve individualized management decisions, we developed risk scores for complications of endovascular and microneurosurgical treatment based on easily retrievable patient, aneurysm, and treatment characteristics. METHODS: For this multicenter cohort study, we combined individual patient data from unruptured intracranial aneurysm patients ≥18 years undergoing preventive endovascular treatment (standard, balloon-assisted or stent-assisted coiling, Woven EndoBridge-device, or flow-diverting stent) or microneurosurgical clipping at one of 10 participating centers from three continents between 2000-2018. The primary outcome was death from any cause or clinical deterioration from neurological complications ≤30 days. We selected predictors based on previous knowledge about relevant risk factors and predictor performance and studied the association between predictors and complications with logistic regression. We assessed model performance with calibration plots and concordance (c) statistics. RESULTS: Of 1282 included patients, 94 (7.3%) had neurological symptoms that resolved <30 days, 140 (10.9%) had persisting neurological symptoms, and 6 died (0.5%)). At 30 days, 52 patients (4.1%) were dead or dependent. Predictors of procedural complications were: size of aneurysm, aneurysm location, familial subarachnoid hemorrhage, earlier atherosclerotic disease, treatment volume, endovascular modality (for endovascular treatment) or extra aneurysm configuration factors (for microneurosurgical treatment; branching artery from aneurysm neck or unfavorable dome-to-neck ratio), and age (acronym: SAFETEA). For endovascular treatment (n=752), the c-statistic was 0.72 (95%CI:0.67-0.77) and the absolute complication risk ranged from 3.2% (95%CI:1.6%-14.9%;≤1 point) to 33.1% (95%CI:25.4%-41.5%;≥6 points). For microneurosurgical treatment (n=530), the c-statistic was 0.72 (95%CI:0.67-0.77) and the complication risk ranged from 4.9% (95%CI:1.5%-14.9%;≤1 point) to 49.9% (95%CI:39.4%-60.6%;≥6 points). CONCLUSIONS: The SAFETEA risk scores for endovascular and microneurosurgical treatment are based on seven easily retrievable risk factors to predict the absolute risk of procedural complications in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The scores need external validation before the predicted risks can be properly used to support decision making in clinical practice.

Tranexamic Acid After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Post-Hoc Analysis of the ULTRA Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ULTRA-trial showed that ultra-early and short-term tranexamic acid treatment after subarachnoid hemorrhage did not improve clinical outcome at six months. An expected proportion of the included patients had non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage In this post-hoc study, we will investigate whether ultra-early and short-term tranexamic acid treatment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage improves clinical outcome at six months. METHODS: The ULTRA-trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment, conducted between July 24, 2013 and January 20, 2020. After confirmation of subarachnoid hemorrhage on non-contrast computer tomography, patients were allocated to either ultra-early and short-term tranexamic acid treatment with usual care, or usual care only. In this post-hoc analysis, we included all ULTRA-participants with a confirmed aneurysm on CT angiography and/or digital subtraction angiography. The primary endpoint was clinical outcome at six months, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, dichotomized into good (0-3) and poor (4-6) outcome. RESULTS: Of the 813 ULTRA-trial patients who had an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, 409 (50%) were assigned to the tranexamic acid group and 404 (50%) to the control group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 233 of 405 (58%) patients in the tranexamic acid group and 238 of 399 (60%) patients in the control group had a good clinical outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0·92; 95% confidence interval (C.I.) 0·69 to 1·24). None of the secondary outcomes showed significant differences between the treatment groups: excellent clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) aOR 0.76, 95% C.I. 0.57-1.03, all-cause mortality at 30 days aOR 0.91, 95% C.I. 0.65-1.28), all-cause mortality at six months aOR 1.10 (95% C.I. 0.80-1.52). DISCUSSION: Ultra-early and short-term tranexamic acid treatment did not improve clinical outcome at six months in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and therefore, cannot be recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02684812; submission date February 18, 2016, first patient enrollment on July 24th, 2013). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that tranexamic acid does not improve outcomes in patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.