Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open incisional hernia repair: early outcomes from the Prospective Hernia Study.

PURPOSE: To provide a comparative analysis of short-term outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted (RAS) ventral incisional hernia (VIH) repairs that include subject-reported pain medication usage and hernia-related quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Subjects were ≥ 18 years old and underwent elective open, laparoscopic or RAS VIH repair without myofascial release. Perioperative clinical outcomes through 30 days were analyzed as were prescription pain medication use and subject-reported responses to the HerQLes Abdominal QOL questionnaire. Observed differences in baseline characteristics were controlled using a weighted propensity score analysis to obviate potential selection bias (inverse probability of treatment weighting, IPTW). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-one subjects (RAS, n = 159; open, n = 130; laparoscopic, n = 82) were enrolled in the study across 17 medical institutions within the United States. Operative times were significantly different between the RAS and laparoscopic groups (126.2 vs 57.2, respectively; p < 0.001). Mean length of stay was comparable for RAS vs laparoscopic (1.4 ± 1.0 vs 1.4 ± 1.1, respectively; p = 0.623) and differed for the RAS vs open groups (1.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.0 ± 1.9, respectively; p < 0.001). Conversion rates differed between RAS and laparoscopic groups (0.6% vs 4.9%; p = 0.004). The number of subjects reporting the need to take prescription pain medication through the 2-4 weeks visit differed between RAS vs open (65.2% vs 79.8%; p < 0.001) and RAS vs laparoscopic (65.2% vs 78.75%; p < 0.001). For those taking prescription pain medication, the mean number of pills taken was comparable for RAS vs open (23.3 vs 20.4; p = 0.079) and RAS vs laparoscopic (23.3 vs 23.3; p = 0.786). Times to return to normal activities and to work, complication rates and HerQLes QOL scores were comparable for the RAS vs open and RAS vs laparoscopic groups. The reoperation rate within 30 days post-procedure was comparable for RAS vs laparoscopic (0.6% vs 0%; p = 0.296) and differed for RAS vs open (0.6% vs 3.1%; p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term outcomes indicate that open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted approaches are effective surgical approaches to VIH repair; however, each repair technique may demonstrate advantages in terms of clinical outcomes. Observed differences in the RAS vs laparoscopic comparison are longer operative time and lower conversion rate in the RAS group. Observed differences in the RAS vs open comparison are shorter LOS and lower reoperation rate through 30 days in the RAS group. The operative time in the RAS vs open comparison is similar. The number of subjects requiring the use of prescription pain medication favored the RAS group in both comparisons; however, among subjects reporting a need for pain medication, there was no difference in the number of prescription pain medication pills taken. While the study adds to the body of evidence evaluating the open, laparoscopic, and RAS approaches, future controlled studies are needed to better understand pain and QOL outcomes related to incisional hernia repair. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02715622.

Evaluation of pain and disability in plug repair with the aid of a personal digital assistant.

The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the method of real-time data collection using a hand-held personal digital assistant (PDA) in the operating suite, hospital, and office. The technique for the placement of a round Atrium ProLite self-forming, layered polypropylene plug in 155 hernia repairs is described. The study measured postoperative pain by the number of pills used (6.6) and categorizes patient return to work according to sedentary, manual, and standing with an average return to work time of 15.6 days for unilateral repair and 20.4 days for bilateral repair. Return to normal daily activity was within 22.3 days for unilateral- and 28.5 days for bilateral repair.

Helicobacter pylori infection in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that the incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection in obese patients, including those undergoing gastric reduction surgery, may be increased. METHODS: We examined the histologic findings at the time of surgery in a series of patients who were undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) for morbid obesity and compared these results with patients in our institution undergoing endoscopy. RESULTS: Of 60 patients undergoing RYGBP, material for histologic examination was available in 56 cases, and in 40 cases gastric fundic mucosa from the anastomotic site was sampled at the time of surgery. Active chronic gastritis was present in 6 (15%), and chronic gastritis was present in 27 (68%). H. pylori was present in all 6 cases of active chronic gastritis and in 9 cases of chronic gastritis (total 38%). This incidence of H. pylori infection was higher than that found in the series of gastric biopsies (107/500, 21%, p = 0.03) and fundic biopsies (10/80, 13%, p = 0.003), but was not different when compared with age-matched gastric biopsies (44/177, 25%, p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of H. pylori in patients undergoing RYGBP was higher than that found in all patients undergoing endoscopy and biopsy and than those undergoing fundic biopsies, but not higher when age-matched controls were considered.

Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy and low anterior resection.

Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy or low anterior resection was undertaken in 30 selected patients. The median age was 51 (range, 30-85) years. Eight patients had previous abdominal surgery: four hysterectomies, two appendectomies, and two cholecystectomies. There was no mortality. Complications occurred in three patients. One patient developed a wound infection, there was one iliac artery injury, and one postoperative bleed, which did not require transfusion. Eighteen patients were operated on for primary cancer of the colon and 12 patients for benign disease. Technical aspects are described in detail. The average hospital stay was four days with most patients receiving oral analgesics by the second postoperative day. Laparoscopic colon resection can be an alternative to open surgery.

Sequential psychomotor skills development in laparoscopic colon surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the complexity of each of three skills used in laparoscopic colon surgery and to quantify the relative complexity of seven laparoscopic colon procedures on a graduated complexity scale. DESIGN: Five surgeons used a scale of 1 through 6 to measure the relative complexity of three laparoscopic skills (intracorporeal mobilization, intracorporeal devascularization, and intracorporeal anastomosis) to assess the relative difficulty of seven laparoscopic procedures (right colon resection, sigmoid colon resection, low anterior resection, Hartmann's procedure, left colon resection, abdominoperineal resection, and transverse colon resection) using detailed evaluation of their first 100 laparoscopic colon resections. SETTING: Three private community hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The complexities of intracorporeal mobilization, intracorporeal devascularization, and intracoporeal anastomosis were recorded for seven laparoscopic colon procedures. RESULTS: The least complex procedure was right colon resection, followed in increasing complexity by sigmoid colon, Hartmann's procedure, low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, left colon resection, and transverse colon resection. The addition of each laparoscopic skill increased the complexity during each procedure. All three skills were not required for every procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Since all procedures do not require all three skills, skills can be learned sequentially if patients are chosen judiciously. A sequence of laparoscopic procedures performed by surgeons is recommended. The relative complexities for each procedure suggest an outline (map) for surgeons to use during laparoscopic colon surgery.

Placement of drains in laparoscopic procedures.

The technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is, in many areas, replacing the standard open cholecystectomy as the method of choice. Many surgeons are accustomed to the use of peritoneal drainage following cholecystectomy. The authors have developed a simple, effective, and rapid, yet controlled method of placing drains into the abdominal cavity, using laparoscopic techniques.

Resección de colon con invasión mínima: colectomía laparoscópica / Colonic resection with minimal invasive technique: laparoscopic coletomy

El éxito de la aplicación de la cirugia laparoscópica en enfermedades de la vesicula y en la apendicitis aguda, ha estimulado a los investigadores a desarrollar avances tecnológicos en un intento para tratar otro tipo de patologias del tracto digestivo. Despues de adquirir experiencia con diversas formas de laparoscopia, y mientras que se perfeccionaba la cirugia clinica del tracto blliar y del apendice y se adelantaban trabajos controlados en animales de laboratorio, se inició un programa piloto para cirugia laparoscópica del colon. Veinte pacientes con rango de edad entre 43 y 88 años, para una edad promedio de 57 años, se sometieron a resección del colon por laparoscopia. En 9 pacientes se realizó hemicolectomía derecha y en 8, sigmoidectomia. El procedimiento de Hartman (resección antero-inferior), y la resección perineoabdominal, fueron realizadas cada una en 1 paciente. Las indicaciones de la cirugia fueron los adenomas vellosos de gran tamaño o adenocarcinoma del colon, en 12 pacientes; enfermedad diverticular, en 5; endometrioma del sigmoide en 1; volvulus cecal en 1 y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en 1. El 80 por ciento de los pacientes toleraron dieta liquida en el primer dia posoperatorio y el 70 por ciento fueron dados de alta a las 96 horas con dieta corriente y deposición normal. Se presentaron tres complicaciones quirurgicas: 1) Un paciente presento sangrado posoperatorio que requirió 3 unidades de sangre, tratado sin cirugia. 2) Un paciente desarrolló un edema marcado de la anastomosis rectosigmoidea que requirió descompresion con sonda rectal. 3) Un paciente con cancer metastasico del colon presentó una obstruccion mecánica del intestino delgado 7 dias despues de la cirugia laparoscopica del colon. Aunque la cirugia laparoscopica esta considerada como un procedimiento en evolucion, se piensa que en el future sera potencialmente popular tanto como la colecistectomia laparoscopica.

Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

The successful application of laparoscopic surgery to gallbladder disease and acute appendicitis has encouraged clinical investigators to develop this technology further in an attempt to manage other pathologic disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. After gaining experience with various laparoscopic skills while performing clinical biliary tract surgery, appendectomy and then in a controlled animal laboratory, a pilot program for laparoscopic colonic surgery was initiated. Twenty patients with ages ranging from 43 to 88 years (mean age of 57 years) underwent laparoscope-assisted colon resection. In nine patients, a right hemicolectomy was performed and a sigmoid colectomy in eight. A low anterior resection, Hartman's procedure, and abdominal perineal resection were each performed in one patient. Indications for surgery were large villous adenomas or adenocarcinoma in 12, diverticular disease in 5, sigmoid endometrioma in 1, cecal volvulus in 1, and inflammatory bowel disease in 1. Eighty percent of patients were able to tolerate a liquid diet on the first postoperative day and 70% were discharged within 96 h eating a regular diet and having normal bowel movements. There were three operative complications: a 3 unit postoperative bleed managed without surgery, one patient developed marked edema of the rectosigmoid anastomosis requiring decompression with a rectal tube, and one individual with metastatic colon cancer was operated on for a mechanical small bowel obstruction 7 days after the initial laparoscopic surgery. Although laparoscope-assisted colonic surgery may still be considered a procedure in evolution, we feel that in time it has the potential to be as popular as laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.

The experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 79 patients with acute cholecystitis is described. This group is subdivided into acute and severe acute cholecystitis. These categories are defined. Six percent of our patients with acute disease and 30% of our patients with severe acute disease were converted to open cholecystectomy. Those patients who were converted to open cholecystectomy are discussed. The four port technique and decompression of the gallbladder is described. We conclude that acute cholecystitis should not be a contra-indication to the well-trained laparoscopic surgeon.

Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy.

Common duct stones present a special problem to the surgeon when he performs a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We describe a method of exploring the common duct and extracting stones. The procedures for opening of the common duct, removal of stones, and the placement of a T-tube are carefully outlined.