Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 71(4): 101847, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37167813

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is growing evidence on the ethical challenges raised by cluster randomized trials. This specificity is not reflected in the legal texts regulating research, which creates difficulties for researchers implementing these experimental designs. The Ottawa Statement (Weijer et al. 2012) aims to provide detailed guidance on the ethical design, conduct and assessment of cluster trials. More broadly aims to help research stakeholders and decision-makers to make informed ethical decisions regarding the particularity of these experimental designs. It seems that this international statement, written in English, is not sufficiently accessible to all of the French professionals involved in health research. The aim of this article is to provide these professionals with a contextualized and illustrated French translation of the "Ottawa statement". METHOD: . The "complex design" working group of the RECaP network (Research in Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health), carried out this work. A first version was discussed by the authors in several meetings. It was completed by contextual explanations and examples of French studies currently conducted by the authors. The final version was obtained by consensus and validated by the group. RESULTS: . This work reports 15 recommendations grouped into 7 key questions: How to justify cluster design? How to submit an article to an ethics committee? How to identify research participants? How and when to obtain informed consent? Who are the gatekeepers? How to assess benefits and harm? How to protect vulnerable participants? Each of these recommendations is specific to cluster trials. The recommendations are explained and detailed through concrete examples. CONCLUSION: Without interfering with current French laws, this work provides a framework for the organization, conduct and ethical assessment of cluster randomized trials in France. In the present-day context, it is essential that all concerned groups can base their decisions on recommendations in line with the elementary principles of health research ethics.


Assuntos
Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Projetos de Pesquisa , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Ética em Pesquisa
3.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 66(2): 157-162, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29203133

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Research in the field of primary care has dramatically increased in France in recent years, especially since 2013 with the introduction of primary care as a thematic priority for research proposals launched by the Ministry of Health (Direction générale de l'offre de soins). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The RECaP (Research in Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health) network is a French research network supported by Inserm, which recently implemented a specific working group focusing on research in primary care, based on a multidisciplinary approach. Researchers from different specialties participate in this group. The first aim of the group was to reach a common definition of the perimeter and of the panel of healthcare professionals and structures potentially involved in the field of primary care. For this purpose, a selection of different data sets of sources defining primary care was analyzed by the group, each participant collecting a set of sources, from which a synthesis was made and discussed. RESULTS: A definition of primary care at different levels (international, European and French) was summarized. A special attention was given to the French context in order to adapt the perimeter to the characteristics of the French healthcare system, notably by illustrating the different key elements of the definition with the inclusion of primary care actors and the type of practice premises. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this work illustrates the diversity of primary care in France and the potential offered for research purposes.


Assuntos
Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa Epidemiológica , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , França/epidemiologia , Saúde Global/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/normas , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa/organização & administração
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA