Gender Differences in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Clinical Features, Risk Prediction, and Outcomes in a Hub Center.

Introduction: There is scarce knowledge about gender differences in clinical presentation, management, use of risk stratification tools and prognosis in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. Purpose: The primary endpoint was to investigate the differences in characteristics, management, and in-hospital mortality according to gender in a cohort of CS patients admitted to a tertiary hub center. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the prognostic performance of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) classification in predicting in-hospital mortality according to sex. Methods: This is a retrospective single-Center cohort study of CS patients treated by a multidisciplinary shock team between September 2014 and December 2020. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes according to gender were registered. Discrimination of SCAI classification was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Overall, 163 patients were included, 39 of them female (24%). Mean age of the overall cohort was 55 years (44-62), similar between groups. Compared with men, women were less likely to be smokers and the prevalence of COPD and diabetes mellitus was significantly lower in this group (p < 0.05). Postcardiotomy (44 vs. 31%) and fulminant myocarditis (13 vs. 2%) were more frequent etiologies in females than in males (p = 0.01), whereas acute myocardial infarction was less common among females (13 vs. 33%). Regarding management, the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support, mechanical ventilation, or renal replacement therapy was frequent and no different between the groups (88, 87, and 49%, respectively, in females vs. 42, 91, and 41% in males, p > 0.05). In-hospital survival in the overall cohort was 53%, without differences between groups (52% in females vs. 55% in males, p = 0.76). Most of the patients (60.7%) were in SCAIE at presentation without differences between sexes. The SCAI classification showed a moderate ability for predicting in-hospital mortality (overall, AUC: 0.653, 95% CI 0.582-0.725). The AUC was 0.636 for women (95% CI 0.491-0.780) and 0.658 for men (95% CI 0.575-0.740). Conclusions: Only one in four of patients treated at a dedicated CS team were female. This may reflect differences in prevalence of severe heart disease at young (<65) ages, although a patient-selection bias cannot be ruled out. In this very high-risk CS population of multiple etiologies, overall, in-hospital survival was slightly above 50% and showed no differences between sexes. Treatment approaches, procedures, and SCAI risk stratification performance did not show gender disparities among treated patients.

Optimal surgical timing after post-infarction ventricular septal rupture.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a dangerous condition. Surgical VSR closure is the definitive therapy, but there is controversy regarding the surgical timing and the bridging therapy between diagnosis and intervention. The objective of this study is to analyze the ideal time of surgical repair and to establish the contribution of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices on the prognosis. METHODS: We designed an observational, retrospective, multicenter study, selecting all consecutive patients with post-AMI VSR between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018, with non-exclusion criteria. The main objective of this study was to analyze the optimal timing for surgical repair of post-AMI VSR. Secondary endpoints were to determine which factors could influence mortality in the patients of the surgical group. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were included. We identified lower mortality rates with an odds ratio of 0.3 (0.1-0.9) in patients operated on from day 4 compared with the surgical mortality in the first 24 hours after VSR diagnosis. The use of MCS was more frequent in patients treated with surgery, particularly for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP; 79.6% vs. 37.8%, p < 0.001), but also for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO; 18.2% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.134). Total mortality was 91.5% for conservative management and 52.3% with surgical repair (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we observed that the lowest mortality rates in patients with surgical repair of post-AMI VSR were observed in patients operated on from day 4 after diagnosis of VSR, compared to earlier interventions.

Value of advanced interatrial block in the diagnosis of the ischemic stroke's aetiology: A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced interatrial block has been linked with atrial fibrillation (AF) (Bayes syndrome). On the other hand, the aetiology of the stroke remains unknown in approximately 20-25% of patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether advanced interatrial block and CHADS2-VASC scale is linked to AF in patients admitted due to ischaemic stroke without previous AF history. METHODS: A prospective analysis of consecutive in-hospital patients admitted with ischemic stroke between January/2018 and April/2019 in a stroke hospital was performed. Patients had to be in sinus rhythm at admission and without previous history of AF/atrial flutter. During follow up patients receive the usual care. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were included. The median follow-up was 540 days (407-695). 19 patients (8.1%) had advanced interatrial block at admission. Advanced interatrial block was associated with the diagnosis of AF during follow up (5 (26.3%) Vs 21 (9.7%) p=0.027). A CHADS2-VASC score>4 at admission was also associated with AF diagnosis during follow up (23(14.6%) vs 3(3.9%) p=0.009). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the association of advanced interatrial block and CHADS2-VASC>4 at admission with the diagnosis of AF during follow up in patients with ischemic stroke. This association could have important implications in patients with ischemic stroke who present advanced interatrial block and without previous history of AF.

Temporal trends in postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: the CIVIAM Registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture is a rare but severe complication of myocardial infarction with high mortality rates. Our goal was to analyze which factors could have an impact on mortality due to this entity over the past decade, including those related to mechanical circulatory support. METHODS: The CIVIAM registry is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study carried out in Spain. We designed a comparative analysis, focused on description of in-hospital management and in-hospital and 1-year total mortality as the primary endpoints, dividing the total observation time into 2 equal temporal periods (January 2008 to June2013 and July 2013 to December 2018). RESULTS: We included 120 consecutive patients. Total mortality during this period was 61.7% at 1-year follow-up. Patients in the second period were younger. One-year mortality was significantly reduced in the second period (75.6% vs 52.7%, P=.01), and this result was confirmed after adjustment by confounding factors (OR, 0.40; 95%CI, 0.17-0.98). Surgical repair was attempted in 58.7% vs 70.3%, (P=.194), and percutaneous closure in 8.7% and 6.8%, respectively (P=.476). Heart transplant was performed in 1 vs 5 patients (2.2% vs 6.8%, P=.405). The main difference in the clinical management between the 2 periods was the greater use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenatiom in the second half of the study period (4.4% vs 27%; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture still carries a very high mortality risk. There has been a progressive trend to increased support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenatiom and greater access to available corrective treatments, with higher survival rates.