Infection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Infection is an uncommon side effect of arthroscopic surgery, and this percentage is higher in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery, where graft and fixation devices are used. Infections can not only lead to high re-admission rates and poor functional recovery of the knee but can also have a significant negative impact on the patient's psychological and economic health, especially in athletes, as it can affect their sports career. It is important to be aware of the many risk factors, especially the manifestation of symptoms. These may sometimes be non-specific to the infectious pathology and common to other situations, such as the presence of a significant intra-articular hematoma. Septic arthritis after ACLR can occur at any time after surgery but typically presents acutely, while late manifestation is relatively rare. Diagnosis of infection is based on patient history, physical examination, laboratory parameters, and analysis of synovial fluid after joint aspiration, which is the gold standard for diagnosing post-operative infection. Once symptoms appear and the diagnosis seems certain, it is necessary to intervene quickly with arthroscopic debridement and long-term antibiotic treatment to try to save the graft and resolve the infectious situation to avoid graft failure and arthrofibrotic sequelae. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and current treatment guidelines of septic arthritis after ACLR surgery by analyzing recent literature, in particular meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

Debridement, Antibiotic Pearls, and Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) in the Treatment of Early Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infections: A Literature Review.

(1) Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are severe and frightening complications in orthopaedic surgery, and they are generally divided into three categories: early infections (those occurring within the first 4-6 weeks), delayed infections (those occurring between 3 and 24 months), and late infections (those occurring more than 2 years after surgery). PJI treatment comprises "debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention" (DAIR), single-stage revision, and double-stage revision. Nowadays, to improve the chances of retaining an infected implant and to improve the traditional DAIR method, a modified surgical technique has been developed, named DAPRI (debridement, antibiotic pearls, and retention of the implant). Our study aims to present an up-to-date concept evaluation of the DAPRI technique and its success rate. (2) Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards were followed, applying a protocol defined by the authors: a total of 765 articles were identified, and at the end of the screening process only 7 studies were included. (3) Results: Currently, the DAPRI procedure can be performed only on patients who have had PJI symptoms for less than 4 weeks, and in order to achieve the highest success rate, indications are quite strict: it is appropriate in patients with acute, superficial infections without sinus tract presence, and well-fixed implants with known sensitive bacteria. The DAPRI surgical method follows a step-by-step process consisting of a first phase of biofilm identification with intra-articular injection of methylene blue, followed by biofilm removal (thermic, mechanical, and chemical aggression), and a last step consisting of prevention of PJI recurrence by using calcium sulphate antibiotic-added beads. (4) Conclusions: The DAPRI approach improves the traditional DAIR technique. It is a correct treatment for acute and early haematogenous PJI, and improves the DAIR success rate.

Comparison of cutout risk factors between single- and doublescrew proximal nails in intertrochanteric femur fractures - a multicentric study.

Aim Significant risk factors for femoral nail cutout are well-documented, primarily in the context of single-screw proximal nails. However, it remains uncertain whether those same risk factors are applicable when considering different implant devices. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare cutout risk factors between single- versus double-screw proximal femoral nails. Methods Patients over the age of 75 with intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO Classification 31-A1 or 31-A2) were included in the multicentre study. A study group was treated with a double-screw nail, while a control group received single-screw device. Demographic data, surgical time (min), fracture pattern, distal locking, reduction quality, comorbidities, tip-apex distance (TAD) and 12-month functional scores was collected. Results Two hundred patients were enrolled, 100 for each group. Nine patients experienced a cutout complication, five in the study and four in the control group. The main differences were in distal locking configurations (p<0.05) and in TAD values (p<0.05). The TAD value was higher in the study than in the control group (30.40±0.89 versus 26.79±1.79). No differences at 12-month follow up were reported according to functional scores. Conclusion This study provides insights into the choice of nail systems for intertrochanteric femur fractures, highlighting the importance of distal locking configurations and TAD values. The double screw nail exhibits quite a tolerance by having a higher average TAD value. These findings may guide clinical decisionmaking in the treatment of this challenging fracture type.

Total hip arthroplasty following the failure of intertrochanteric nailing: First implant or salvage surgery?

BACKGROUND: Proximal femur fractures, including both intracapsular (femoral neck fractures) and extracapsular fractures (intertrochanteric femoral fractures, IFFs), affect around 1.5 million people per year worldwide. Mechanical failures of intertrochanteric nailing in IFFs could be managed with revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). AIM: To describe the surgical complexity and the procedure-related complication rates in patients with trochanteric nailing failure and treated with THA. METHODS: Patients referred to our level I trauma center between April 2012 and July 2018 with failed cephalomedullary nailing following trochanteric fractures were retrospectively recruited. All patients underwent a salvage surgical procedure, i.e., cephalomedullary nail removal and conversion to THA. The same surgical and anesthesiology team performed the surgical procedures under spinal anesthesia. All patients underwent clinical and radiographic follow-ups for at least 24 mo. Complications and re-operations were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria (male: 29; female: 45; mean age: 73.8-years-old; range: 65-89) and were included in the current study. The average operative time was 117 min (76-192 min). The average blood loss was 585 mL (430-1720 mL). Among the 74 patients, 43 (58.1%) required transfusion of three or more blood units. Two patients died within the 4th d after surgery because of pulmonary embolism, and 1 patient died 9 mo after surgery due to ischemic myocardial infarction. The complication rate in the 71 patients who completed the minimum 24-mo follow-up was 22.5%. In 3 cases out of 71 (4.2%) periprosthetic acetabular fracture was observed during the follow-up. One of these periacetabular fractures occurred intraoperatively. An intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture was observed in 5 patients out of 71 (7.0%). Four of these patients needed a re-operation to fix the fracture with plates and cerclages; in one of these patients, femoral stem revision was also necessary. In 4 patients out of 71 (5.6%), an early THA dislocation was observed, whereas in 1 case (1.4%) a late THA dislocation was observed. Three patients out of 71 (4.2%) developed a periprosthetic joint infection during the study follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that salvage options for IFF fixation failure are complex procedures with a relevant intraoperative and postoperative complication rate.

Italian Orthopaedic and Traumatology Society (SIOT) position statement on the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease associated with a severe impact on quality of life. However, unfortunately, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the non-surgical management of this disease. While recognising the gap between scientific evidence and clinical practice, this position statement aims to present recommendations for the non-surgical management of knee OA, considering the available evidence and the clinical knowledge of experienced surgeons. The overall goal is to offer an evidenced-based expert opinion, aiding clinicians in the management of knee OA while considering the condition, values, needs and preferences of individual patients. METHODS: The study design for this position statement involved a preliminary search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline and Cochrane databases for literature spanning the period between January 2021 and April 2023, followed by screening of relevant articles (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). A Società Italiana Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SIOT) multidisciplinary task force (composed of four orthopaedic surgeons and a rheumatologist) subsequently formulated the recommendations. RESULTS: Evidence-based recommendations for the non-surgical management of knee OA were developed, covering assessment, general approach, patient information and education, lifestyle changes and physical therapy, walking aids, balneotherapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, pharmacological interventions and injections. CONCLUSIONS: For non-surgical management of knee OA, the recommended first step is to bring about lifestyle changes, particularly management of body weight combined with physical exercise and/or hydrotherapy. For acute symptoms, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), topic or oral, can be used. Opioids can only be used as third-line pharmacological treatment. Glucosamine and chondroitin are also suggested as chronic pharmacological treatment. Regarding intra-articular infiltrative therapy, the use of hyaluronic acid is recommended in cases of chronic knee OA [platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as second line), in the absence of active acute disease, while the use of intra-articular injections of cortisone is effective and preferred for severe acute symptoms.

Physiologic postoperative presepsin kinetics following primary cementless total hip arthroplasty: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Presepsin is an emerging biomarker in the diagnosis of sepsis. In the field of orthopaedics, it could be useful in diagnosing and managing periprosthetic joint infections. AIM: To define the normal postoperative presepsin plasmatic curve, in patients undergoing primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Patients undergoing primary cementless THA at our Institute were recruited. Inclusion criteria were: Primary osteoarthritis of the hip; urinary catheter time of permanence < 24 h; peripheral venous cannulation time of permanence < 24 h; no postoperative homologous blood transfusion administration and hospital stay ≤ 8 d. Exclusion criteria were: The presence of other articular prosthetic replacement or bone fixation devices; chronic inflammatory diseases; chronic kidney diseases; history of recurrent infections or malignant neoplasms; previous surgery in the preceding 12 mo; diabetes mellitus; immunosuppressive drug or corticosteroid assumption. All the patients received the same antibiotic prophylaxis. All the THA were performed by the same surgical and anaesthesia team; total operative time was defined as the time taken from skin incision to completion of skin closure. At enrollment, anthropometric data, smocking status, osteoarthritis stage according to Kellgren and Lawrence, Harris Hip Score, drugs assumption and comorbidities were recorded. All the patients underwent serial blood tests, including complete blood count, presepsin (PS) and C-reactive protein 24 h before arthroplasty and at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h postoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12-mo follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 96 patients (51 female; 45 male; mean age = 65.74 ± 5.58) were recruited. The mean PS values were: 137.54 pg/mL at baseline, 192.08 pg/mL at 24 h post-op; 254.85 pg/mL at 48 h post-op; 259 pg/mL at 72 h post-op; 248.6 pg/mL at 96-h post-op; 140.52 pg/mL at 3-mo follow-up; 135.55 pg/mL at 6-mo follow-up and 130.11 pg/mL at 12-mo follow-up. In two patients (2.08%) a soft-tissue infection was observed; in these patients, higher levels (> 350 pg/mL) were recorded at 3-mo follow-up. CONCLUSION: The dosage of plasmatic PS concentration is highly recommended in patients undergoing THA before surgery to exclude the presence of an unknown infection. The PS plasmatic concentration should be also assessed at 72 h post-operatively, evaluate the maximum postoperative PS value, and at 96 h post-operatively when a decrease of presepsin should be found. The lack of a presepsin decrease at 96 h post-operatively could be a predictive factor of infection.

A Gel-Based Proteomic Analysis Reveals Synovial α-Enolase and Fibrinogen ß-Chain Dysregulation in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The identification of synovial fluid (SF) biomarkers that could anticipate the diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) is gaining increasing importance in orthopaedic clinical practice. This controlled trial aims to assess the differences between the SF proteome of patients affected by severe OA undergoing Total Knee Replacement (TKR) compared to control subjects (i.e., subjects younger than 35, undergoing knee arthroscopy for acute meniscus injury). METHODS: The synovial samples were collected from patients with Kellgren Lawrence grade 3 and 4 knee osteoarthritis undergoing THR (study group) and young patients with meniscal tears and no OA signs undergoing arthroscopic surgery (control group). The samples were processed and analyzed following the protocol defined in our previous study. All of the patients underwent clinical evaluation using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation (main outcome), Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. The drugs' assumptions and comorbidities were recorded. All patients underwent preoperative serial blood tests, including complete blood count and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). RESULTS: The synovial samples' analysis showed a significantly different fibrinogen beta chain (FBG) and alpha-enolase 1 (ENO1) concentration in OA compared to the control samples. A significant correlation between clinical scores, FBG, and ENO1 concentration was observed in osteoarthritic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Synovial fluid FBG and ENO1 concentrations are significantly different in patients affected by knee OA compared with non-OA subjects.

Graft and Flap: Orthoplastic Approach to Achilles Tendon Secondary Rupture.

SUMMARY: Achilles tendon rupture represents one of the most common tendon ruptures. Although primary repair remains the treatment of choice, surgical complications, such as secondary rupture and tendon exposure, require salvage procedures. This article aims to present the authors' orthoplastic approach for the functional reconstruction of composite secondary Achilles tendon defects. Seven patients with chronic open-wound and large Achilles tendon defects (Kuwada type IV) underwent one-stage reconstruction between October of 2018 and October of 2020. The size of the average soft-tissue defect was 126.2 cm 2 (range, 86.1 to 175.9 cm 2 ), with a tendon gap of 8.2 cm (range, 7.1 to 10.3 cm). A combined team of orthoplastic surgeons performed the reconstructive procedure, using a turndown gastrocnemius fascial flap and a fascia lata autograft for the tendon reconstruction and a free fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap for soft-tissue coverage (graft and flap). Subjective evaluation and quality-of-life measures were obtained preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire. Mean follow-up was 18.3 months (range, 12 to 24 months). The flap survival rate was 100%. Overall range of motion of the reconstructed side was 87% of the unaffected side (54 degrees versus 62 degrees). The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores of all patients improved significantly ( P < 0.005) at 12 months of follow-up. A microsurgical approach combined with orthopedic techniques can solve complex cases of Achilles tendon secondary rupture, providing a reconstructed tendon that achieves satisfactory anatomic shape and function. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Unstable lesions of the forearm: Terminology, evaluative score and synoptic table.

The term "unstable lesions of the forearm" (ULF) was born to more easily describe how a partial or complete instability of the forearm unit might occur due to a traumatic loss of the transverse or longitudinal connection between the radius and ulna. For such an alteration to occur, at least two of the three main osteoligamentous locks (proximal, middle and distal) must be interrupted, often in association with a radial and/or ulnar fracture. Examining the historical patterns (Monteggia, Galeazzi, Essex-Lopresti and criss-cross lesions) and variants described in the literature, out of a total of 586 recorded interventions for forearm trauma, two elbow teams and one wrist team selected 75 cases of ULF. The aim was to describe the instability depending on its clinical and radiographic features, together with the anatomopathological evolution of the lesions based on the time of diagnosis and treatment. The clinical results, evaluated using a new score (FIPS) the Forearm Italian Performance, revealed a correlation between earlier diagnosis and treatment and a better score. The authors suggest a synoptic table that describes 1) the type of instability (proximal transverse, distal transverse, longitudinal and transverse, proximal and distal transverse), 2) classic patterns and variants with characteristic lesions and evolution over time (acute, chronic dynamic, chronic static) and 3) the three forearm constraints and segmental involvement of radius and/or ulna using an alphanumeric classification. Finally, some generic surgical suggestions are proposed.

Atypical Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Fractures: The Unsolved Problem.

Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) are stress or insufficiency fractures induced by low energy trauma or no trauma, frequently correlated with prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. The diagnosis follows major and minor criteria, originally described by the Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research in 2010 and updated in 2014. However, the definition of AFFs in the report excluded periprosthetic fractures. When atypical fractures occur close to a prosthetic implant the situation become critical, the surgical treatment is often demolitive and supported by medical treatment. Moreover, acute ORIF as a first line treatment is frequently burdened by a high failure rate , and often a stem revision is required as second line treatment. The healing process is long and difficult with poor functional results and impairing outcomes. We present a case treated at our institution of a 78 year old woman with a history of a femoral atypical periprosthetic fracture, complicated by multiple surgical revisions. Its arduous management reflects all the difficulties that these type of fractures could present to the surgeon, while its good final result may teach us how to approach them in a correct way.

Polydeoxyribonucleotide in the Treatment of Tendon Disorders, from Basic Science to Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review.

Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) is a proprietary and registered drug with several beneficial effects, including tissue repairing, anti-ischemic action, and anti-inflammatory properties. The present study aims to summarize the current evidence about PRDN's clinical effectiveness in the management of tendon disorders. From January 2015 to November 2022, OVID-MEDLINE®, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Google Scholar and PubMed were searched to identify relevant studies. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated, and relevant data were extracted. Nine studies (two in vivo studies and seven clinical studies) were finally included in this systematic review. Overall, 169 patients (male: 103) were included in the present study. The effectiveness and safeness of PDRN has been investigated in the management of the following diseases: plantar fasciitis; epicondylitis; Achilles tendinopathy; pes anserine bursitis; chronic rotator cuff disease. No adverse effects have been recorded in the included studies and all the patients showed an improvement in clinical symptoms during the follow-up. PDRN are a valid emerging therapeutic drug in the treatment of tendinopathies. Further multicentric randomized clinical studies are needed to better define the therapeutic role of PDRN, especially in combined clinical protocols.

Periprosthetic femoral re-fractures pathogenesis, classification, and surgical implications.

Periprosthetic femoral re-fractures (PFRFs) represent an emerging challenge for orthopaedic surgeons, since their incidence is growing in the last years, but very few experiences about their management have been currently published. The present study aims to (1) introduce, for the first time, an etiologic classification for PRFRs and (2) to provide surgical and pharmacological tips for the correct management of these injuries. Periprosthetic femoral re-fractures (PFRFs) could be classified into traumatic-PFRFs (T-PFRFs) and pathological-PFRFs (P-PFRFs). T-PFRFs, i.e. the "true" periprosthetic re-fractures, present as new fracture lines occurring proximally or distally to a previous periprosthetic fracture, that has correctly healed. They are generally unpredictable injuries but, in selected cases, it is possible to predict them by analyzing the construct used in the treatment of the previous periprosthetic fracture. P-PFRFs, on the other hand, define re-fractures occurring on a previous periprosthetic non-union or delayed union: the new fracture line appears in the same district of the old one. According to the etiologic factors influencing the P-PFRFs pathogenesis, it is possible to define re-fractures caused by mechanical failures, biological failures, septic failures and multifactorial failures, i.e., a combination of the previously mentioned concerns. A successful postoperative outcome, following the surgical management of PFRFs, requires the correct identification of all the underlying causes, which should be promptly and appropriately managed.

Assessment of fracture healing in orthopaedic trauma.

Fracture healing is a complex physiologic process, relying on the crucial interplay between biological and mechanical factors. It is generally assessed using imaging modalities, including conventional radiology, CT, MRI and ultrasound (US), based on the fracture and patient features. Although these techniques are routinely used in orthopaedic clinical practice, unfortunately, they do not provide any information about the biomechanical status of the fracture site. Therefore, in recent years, several non-invasive techniques have been proposed to assess bone healing using ultrasonic wave propagation, changes in electrical properties of bones and callus stiffness measurement. Moreover, different research groups are currently developing smart orthopaedic implants (plates, intramedullary nails and external fixators), able to provide information about the fracture healing process. These devices could significantly improve orthopaedic and trauma clinical practice in the future and, at the same time, reduce patients' exposure to X-rays. This study aims to define the role of traditional imaging techniques and emerging technologies in the assessment of the fracture healing process.

Optimum timing of conversion from DCO to definitive fixation in closed fractures of the lower limb: When and how?

INTRODUCTION: In damage control orthopaedics (DCO), fractures are initially stabilised with external fixation followed by delayed conversion to definitive internal fixation. The aim of this study is to determine whether the timing of the conversion influences the development of deep infection and fracture healing in a cohort of patients treated by DCO after a closed fracture of the lower limb. Furthermore, we wanted to evaluate whether the one-stage conversion procedure is always safe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single level 1 trauma centre. Ninety-four cases of closed fractures of lower limb treated by DCO subsequently converted to internal fixation from 2012 to 2019 were included. Development of deep infection, superficial infection, non-union and time to union were recorded. Patients were then divided into three groups according to the timing of conversion: Group A (<7 days), Group B (7-13 days), Group C (> 14 days). Comparison between groups was performed to assess intergroup variabilty. RESULTS: The mean number of days between DCO and conversion was 6.7±4.52 (range 1-22). We observed one case of deep infection (1.1%), one case of non-union (1.1%), four cases of superficial infection (4.3%) and mean time to union was 4.9±1.38 months months. Comparison between groups demonstrated no significant correlation between timing of conversion and development of superficial or deep infection and non-union, while it highlighted that complexity of the fracture and longer surgical time of conversion procedure were significantly higher in Group C. CONCLUSIONS: One-stage conversion to definitive internal fixation within 22 days from DCO is a safe and feasible procedure, which does not influence the incidence of infection or non-union.

Development of the Italian fractures registry (RIFra): A call for action to improve quality and safety.

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the development of arthroplasty registries, therefore, in our country, the Italian Arthroplasty Registry (RIAP), was issued by the National Law No. 221/2012. In the last decade, however, some European countries -namely Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Germany (in development)- have introduced another nationwide orthopaedic registry than arthroplasty registers: the fracture registry. The development of this new tool aims to improve quality and safety in fracture management, thus trying to provide a better postoperative quality of life in trauma patients. Based on these findings, the AO-Trauma Italy Council encouraged the development of a national fracture registry in Italy. The present study aims to (1) provide an overview of the fracture registries in Europe and (2) to develop, for the first time, a pilot Italian Fracture Registry (RIFra). Thirteen AO-Trauma Italy members, chairmen of Level-I orthopaedic and trauma centres, diffused throughout Italy, were involved in the RIFra project. The RIFra form, developed between November 2019 and March 2020, consists of 5 main sections, namely: epidemiologic data, previous surgical procedure (if any), patient and fracture features, surgical procedure, surgical implant details. This study constitutes the first step to start, in future years, the bureaucratic procedure leading to the final establishment of a RIAP-like fracture registry in Italy.

Choice of treatments of the coronal shear fractures of the humerus. A national survey of Italian AO members.

INTRODUCTION: Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are uncommon injuries representing 6% of distal humeral fractures. There is no univocal consensus about the correct management of this type of fracture. A national survey was conducted to gain more insight into the current classification, diagnosis and treatment of coronal shear fractures in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A postal survey was sent to all AO Italian members including residency orthopaedic surgeons. The survey consisted of general questions about personal experience in the management of these fractures: types of classification systems used, surgical approaches, treatment options and rehabilitation programs. RESULTS: 114 orthopaedic surgeons answered a 13-items questionnaire. The most used classification system was AO/OTA (72,8%). Independent screws and if necessary plates were the most answered regarding surgical treatment (81,6%). The most encountered post-surgical complication was stiffening of the elbow (81,6%). CONCLUSION: An algorithm of treatment has been proposed. To better classify coronal shear fractures, the authors recommended the integration of two classification systems: AO and Dubberley classifications. In the case of posterior wall comminution, a Kocher extensile approach is recommended, otherwise, if a posterior wall is intact, Kocher or Kaplan approach can be used. The posterior transolecranic approach can be reserved to Dubberley type III or AO 13B3.3. The best treatment choice is represented by independent screws and plates placed according to fracture patterns while arthroplasty is indicated when a stable ORIF is not possible. Mobilization is postponed for about 2 weeks.

A Newly Identified Complication of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: Case Report and Literature Review.

Background: Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is a surgical option for patients older than 40 years old who are affected by patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Regarding the complications of PFAs, few studies have investigated periprosthetic fractures. The purpose of this literature review was to highlight a previously overlooked complication of primary prosthetic surgery of the patellofemoral joint. Methods: Three literature databases were searched for studies published between 2000 to 2020 using relevant keywords. A total of 4,942 articles were originally identified. After excluding duplicates and analysing the titles and abstracts, 20 studies were considered. From these, data regarding the number of cases, clinical outcomes and complications were extracted. Results: Among the 20 selected articles, only one described periprosthetic fractures as a complication of PFAs. Herein, we also report an illustrative case of an unknown fracture complication. No cases in the literature were found that described the type of complications experienced by our patient during the postoperative period. Conclusions: This review confirms the lack of data about clinical outcomes and fracture complications of PFAs. In primary prosthetic surgery of the patellofemoral joint, patient selection and close consideration of demographic factors (such as BMI and age) and intraoperative factors (such as patellar thickness and size of the trochlear component) play a key role in optimising pre-operative planning to avoid intraoperative periprosthetic fractures.

What's New in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Focus on Synovial Fluid Biomarkers.

Periprosthetic joint infections are some of the leading causes of revision prosthetic surgery, accounting for 25% of failed total knee replacements and 15% of failed total hip replacements. The search for a biomarker that, together with clinical and radiological findings, could improve the management of such patients is currently a significant challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Synovial fluid is a viscous and mucinous substance produced by the synovium, a specialized connective tissue that lines diarthrodial joints. Synovial fluid is an ultrafiltrate of plasma but also contains proteins secreted from the surrounding tissues, including the articular cartilage and synovium. Therefore, synovial fluid represents a source of disease-related proteins that could be used as potential biomarkers in several articular diseases. Based on these findings, the study of synovial fluid has been gaining increasing importance in recent years. This review aims to assess the accuracy and the limitations of the most promising synovial fluid biomarkers-i.e., Alpha-Defensin, Leukocyte Esterase, C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, Calprotectin, Presepsin and Neopterin-in the diagnosis of PJI. Special attention will be given to emerging synovial biomarkers, which could soon be important in diagnosing PJIs.

Second and Third Pandemic Waves in Apulia: How COVID-19 Affected Orthopedic and Trauma Care-A Single-Center Study.

PURPOSE: In orthopedics and traumatology, as a direct consequence of the COVID-19 first wave, there was a massive reorganization and a stop to all elective activities, which were postponed. In this study, we aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopedic surgery in Apulia during the second wave, from March to June 2021 (when Apulia was under social distancing restrictions), and during the third wave, from September to December 2021 (when Apulia was under no restrictions). We compared these months to the same periods in 2019 for an evaluation of the surgical decrease during the pandemic period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of major orthopedic procedures, day-surgery procedures and urgent procedures (trauma and non-traumatic amputation) performed during the second and third waves of the pandemic in our clinic, and we compared these data with the same procedures performed in the corresponding periods of 2019, before the pandemic. RESULTS: Surgical activity was significantly decreased during both periods; the only increase in surgical activity in 2021 compared to 2019 was in total hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty, with a surge of +7.69% registered in the period September-December 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Longer waiting lists and limited healthcare resources were the big challenges for the orthopedic community, and they still represent a substantial issue to confront today.