Mindfulness training in medical education as a means to improve resilience, empathy, and mental health in the medical profession.

The high rates of depression, burnout, and increased risk of suicide among medical students, residents, and physicians in comparison with other careers signal a mental health crisis within our profession. We contend that this crisis coupled with the inadequate acquisition of interpersonal skills during medical education results from the interaction between a challenging environment and the mental capital of individuals. Additionally, we posit that mindfulness-based practices are instrumental for the development of major components of mental capital, such as resilience, flexibility of mind, and learning skills, while also serving as a pathway to enhance empathy, compassion, self-awareness, conflict resolution, and relational abilities. Importantly, the evidence base supporting the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions has been increasing over the years, and a growing number of medical schools have already integrated mindfulness into their curricula. While we acknowledge that mindfulness is not a panacea for all educational and mental health problems in this field, we argue that there is currently an unprecedented opportunity to gather momentum, spread and study mindfulness-based programs in medical schools around the world as a way to address some longstanding shortcomings of the medical profession and the health and educational systems upon which it is rooted.

A palliative care goals model for people with dementia and their family: Consensus achieved in an international Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning in dementia includes supporting the person and their family to consider important goals of care. International research reports the importance of psycho-social-spiritual aspects towards end of life. AIM: To develop a multidimensional international palliative care goals model in dementia for use in practice. DESIGN: International Delphi study integrating consensus and evidence from a meta-qualitative study. The Delphi panel rated statements about the model on a 5-point agreement scale. The criteria for consensus were pre-specified. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen researchers from eight countries developed an initial model, and 169 candidate panellists were invited to the international online Delphi study. RESULTS: Panellists (107; response 63.3%) resided in 33 countries. The model comprised four main care goals: (1) Comfort ensured; (2) Control over function maintained; (3) Identity protected and personhood respected and (4) Coping with grief and loss-person and caregiver supported. The model reflects how needs and care goals change over time with the progression of dementia, concluding with bereavement support. The first version of the model achieved a consensus after which it was slightly refined based on feedback. We did not achieve a consensus on adding a goal of life prolongation, and on use of the model by people with dementia and family themselves. CONCLUSION: A new palliative care goals model for people with dementia and their families includes relationship aspects for use by professionals and achieved a consensus among a panel with diverse cultural background. The position of life prolongation in relation to palliative care goals needs further research.

To what extent does frailty mediate the association between age and the outcomes of brain reperfusion following acute ischemic stroke?

Objective: We evaluated the extent to which frailty mediated the association between age, poor functional outcomes, and mortality after acute ischemic stroke when patients were treated with brain reperfusion (thrombolytic therapy and/or thrombectomy). Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke who had undergone intravenous cerebral reperfusion therapy and/or mechanical thrombectomy. We created a mediation model by analyzing the direct natural effect of an mRS score > 2 and death on age-mediated frailty according to the Frailty Index. Results: We enrolled 292 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent brain reperfusion. Their mean age was 67.7 ± 13.1 years. Ninety days after the stroke ictus, 54 (18.5%) participants died, and 83 (28.4%) lived with moderate to severe disability (2 < mRS < 6). In the mediation analysis of the composite outcome of disability (mRS score > 2) or death, frailty accounted for 28% of the total effect of age. The models used to test for the interaction between age and frailty did not show statistically significant interactions for either outcome, and the addition of the interaction did not significantly change the direct or indirect effects, nor did it improve model fit. Conclusion: Frailty mediated almost one-third of the effect of age on the composite outcome of disability or death after acute ischemic stroke.

Evaluating the Interaction Between Pain Intensity and Resilience on the Impact of Pain in the Lives of People With Fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: Recent theoretical models posit that resilience acts as a resource/mechanism opposing pain catastrophizing and other vulnerability sources against pain adaptation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between resilience, pain, and functionality in people living with fibromyalgia (FM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of people participating in Brazilian fibromyalgia virtual support groups on Facebook in May 2018. Resilience was evaluated by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Average pain and the degree of interference of pain in the lives of participants (DIPLP) were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. The association between these 3 variables was evaluated through multivariable robust linear regression with adjustment for 21 potential confounders. RESULTS: We included 2176 participants with FM. Resilience was associated with a decreased DIPLP (ß: -0.38, 95% CI: -0.54 to -0.22, P <0.001) but not with average pain scores (ß: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.16, P =0.93). A significant interaction between resilience and average levels of pain on the DIPLP was observed so that resilience showed a much stronger protective association among participants with average null-to-mild pain than among those with moderate and severe pain levels. DISCUSSION: Our results provide evidence against beliefs that the pain of people with FM is related to low psychological resilience and shed light on the complex interrelationships between resilience, pain, and functionality. This research signals both the relevance and limits of resilience in the management of FM. Future studies evaluating behavioral interventions for FM should consider how those interventions interact with baseline pain levels and resilience.

Evaluating the performance of the PRISMA-7 frailty criteria for predicting disability and death after acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of the PRISMA-7 frailty criteria regarding the composite outcome of disability or death in patients with an acute ischemic stroke, and to compare it with the Frailty Index and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study involved all patients aged ≥ 40 years admitted with an acute ischemic stroke between March 2019 and January 2020. We performed survival analyses, calculated risk ratios, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for the combined outcome of disability or death according to the presence of frailty as determined by the PRISMA-7 and the Frailty Index, and stroke severity based on the NIHSS. RESULTS: In 174 patients with acute ischemic stroke, being frail in the week before the stroke according to the PRISMA-7 was associated with a Risk Ratio of 4·50 (95%CI 1·77-11·43, P <0·001) and a Positive Predictive Value of 89% (95%CI 77-99%) for being disabled or dead 90 days after the stroke, and a Hazard Ratio of 3·33 (95%CI 1·48-7·51, P = 0·004) for the survival outcome. The predictive performance of the PRISMA-7 was not significantly different from the Frailty Index or the NIHSS. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that the PRISMA-7 frailty criteria may be a useful prognostication tool in acute ischemic stroke.

Position statement of ANCP and SBGG on shared decision-making in palliative care. / Posicionamento da ANCP e SBGG sobre tomada de decisão compartilhada em cuidados paliativos.

Health care for patients with serious illnesses usually implies the need to make a large number of decisions, ranging from how information is shared to which diagnostic or therapeutic procedures will be adopted. The method of such decision-making has important implications from an individual and collective point of view and may contribute to either relieving or aggravating suffering. In this consensus document, the Bioethics Committee of the Brazilian National Academy of Palliative Care (ANCP) and the Permanent Committee on Palliative Care of the Brazilian Geriatrics and Gerontology Society (SBGG) adopt the principles of compassionate listening proposed by Saunders, of the nature of suffering proposed by Cassel, of dignity-preserving care proposed by Chochinov, and of cultural humility as a starting point for the construction of an official position of ANCP and SBGG on shared decision-making in palliative care. The position statement posits that, unlike paternalistic and consumerist models, the decision-making process in the sphere of palliative care must follow the mutualistic model of shared decision, where decisions are built based on dialogue between healthcare professionals and patients/family. The document sets forth the assumptions of this process, the limits of autonomy of patients/family and healthcare professionals and the distinction between futile and potentially inappropriate treatments, besides ratifying its incompatibility with any forms of coercion and conflict of interest foreign to the best interests of patients.

Os cuidados de saúde com pacientes portadores de doenças graves usualmente implicam a necessidade de tomada de um grande número de decisões, envolvendo desde a forma como a informação é compartilhada até quais procedimentos diagnósticos ou terapêuticos serão adotados. A maneira como tais decisões são tomadas têm importantes implicações do ponto de vista individual e coletivo, podendo contribuir tanto para o alívio como para o agravamento do sofrimento. No presente documento de consenso, o Comitê de Bioética da Academia Nacional de Cuidados Paliativos (ANCP) e a Comissão Permanente de Cuidados Paliativos da Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia (SBGG) adotam os princípios da escuta compassiva proposto por Saunders, da natureza do sofrimento proposto por Cassel, dos cuidados preservadores da dignidade propostos por Chochinov e da humildade cultural como ponto de partida para a construção de um posicionamento oficial da ANCP e SBGG acerca do processo de tomada de decisão compartilhada em cuidados paliativos. O posicionamento estabelece que, em contraposição aos modelos paternalistas e consumistas, o processo de tomada de decisão no âmbito dos cuidados paliativos deve seguir o modelo mutualista de decisão compartilhada, no qual as decisões são construídas a partir do diálogo entre profissionais de saúde e pacientes/familiares. O documento estabelece os pressupostos deste processo, os limites da autonomia de pacientes/familiares e profissionais de saúde, a distinção entre tratamentos fúteis e potencialmente inapropriados, bem como ratifica sua incompatibilidade com quaisquer formas de coerção e conflitos de interesse alheios ao melhor interesse dos pacientes.

Los cuidados de salud de pacientes portadores de enfermedades graves usualmente implican la necesidad de tomar un gran número de decisiones, que abarcan desde cómo se comparte la información hasta qué procedimientos diagnósticos o terapéuticos se adoptarán. La forma en que se toman tales decisiones tiene importantes implicaciones desde el punto de vista individual y colectivo, y puede contribuir tanto a aliviar como a agravar el sufrimiento. En el presente documento de consenso, el Comité de Bioética de la Academia Nacional de Cuidados Paliativos (ANCP) y la Comisión Permanente de Cuidados Paliativos de la Sociedad Brasileña de Geriatría y Gerontología (SBGG) adoptan los principios de la escucha compasiva propuesta por Saunders; de la naturaleza del sufrimiento propuesta por Cassel, de los cuidados preservadores de la dignidad propuestos por Chochinov y de la humildad cultural como punto de partida para la construcción de un posicionamiento oficial de la ANCP y SBGG sobre el proceso de toma de decisiones compartidas en cuidados paliativos. El posicionamiento establece que, en contraposición a los modelos paternalistas y consumistas, el proceso de toma de decisiones en el ámbito de los cuidados paliativos debe seguir el modelo mutualista de decisión compartida, donde las decisiones son construidas a partir del diálogo entre los profesionales de salud y los pacientes/familiares. El documento establece los supuestos de este proceso, los límites de la autonomía de los pacientes/familiares y de los profesionales de la salud, la distinción entre los tratamientos inútiles y los potencialmente inapropiados, así como ratifica su incompatibilidad con cualquier forma de coerción y los conflictos de intereses distintos del interés superior de los pacientes.

Transcranial doppler as screening method for sickling crises in children with sickle cell anemia: a latin America cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell anemia (SCA) is the leading cause of childhood stroke. We aimed to evaluate whether altered cerebral flow velocities, as measured by transcranial Doppler (TCD), are associated with vaso-occlusive complications in addition to stroke in pediatric SCA patients. METHODS: We evaluated 37 children aged between 2 and 16 years with SCA who underwent screening for TCD between January 2012 and October 2018. Genotypic profiles and demographic data were collected, TCD examinations were performed during follow-up, and the presence of sickling crises was compared. Survival analyses were performed using simple frailty models, in which each predictor variable was analyzed separately in relation to the occurrence of a sickling crisis. RESULTS: The variables related to sickle cell crises in the univariate analysis were peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA), hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 (1.00-1.02) p = 0.04; end-diastolic velocity (EDV) in the MCA, HR 1.02 (1.01-1.04) p = 0.01; time average mean maximum velocity (TAMMV) in the basilar artery (BA), HR 1.02 (1.00-1.04) p = 0.04; hemoglobin, HR 0.49 (0.38-0.65) p < 0.001; hematocrit, HR 0.78 (0.71-0.85) p < 0.001; leukocyte counts, HR 1.1 (1.05-1.15) p < 0.001; platelets counts, HR 0.997 (0.994-0.999) p = 0.02; and reticulocyte numbers, HR 1.14 (1.06-1.23) p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate PSV and EDV in the MCA and TAMMV in the BA as markers of risk for the occurrence of sickling crises in SCA.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Patients Receiving Cerebral Reperfusion Therapy: A Stroke Databank Study in Brazil.

Objectives: Cerebral reperfusion therapy is recommended for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. However, the outcomes of patients receiving this therapy in middle- and low-income countries should be better defined. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of cerebral reperfusion therapy in patients with ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with ischemic stroke treated with cerebral reperfusion therapy, including intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and IVT with MT. The primary outcomes were death and disability, assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), and stroke severity, assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), after intervention and 90 days after ictus. The association between the type of treatment and the primary outcome was assessed using binary logistic regression after adjusting for confounding variables. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to identify the cutoff point of the NIHSS score that could best discriminate the mRS score in all types of treatments. Results: Patients (n = 291) underwent IVT only (n = 241), MT (n = 21), or IVT with MT (n = 29). In the IVT with MT group, the incidence of death within 90 days increased by five times (OR, 5.192; 95% CI, 2.069-13.027; p = 0.000), prevalence of disability increased by three times (OR, 3.530; 95% CI, 1.376-9.055; p = 0.009) and NIHSS score increased after IVT (from 14.4 ± 6.85 to 17.8 ± 6.36; p = 0.045). There was no significant difference between the initial NIHSS score and that after MT (p = 0.989). Patients' NIHSS score that increased or decreased by 2.5 points had a sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.65, indicating severe disability or death in these patients. Conclusion: Altogether, a 2.5-point variation in NIHSS score after reperfusion is an indicator of worse outcomes. In our particular context, patients receiving the combination of IVT and MT had inferior results, which probably reflects challenges to optimize MT in LMIC.

Posicionamento da ANCP e SBGG sobre tomada de decisão compartilhada em cuidados paliativos / Posicionamiento de la ANCP y SBGG sobre la toma de decisiones compartida en cuidados paliativos / Position statement of ANCP and SBGG on shared decision-making in palliative care

Os cuidados de saúde com pacientes portadores de doenças graves usualmente implicam a necessidade de tomada de um grande número de decisões, envolvendo desde a forma como a informação é compartilhada até quais procedimentos diagnósticos ou terapêuticos serão adotados. A maneira como tais decisões são tomadas têm importantes implicações do ponto de vista individual e coletivo, podendo contribuir tanto para o alívio como para o agravamento do sofrimento. No presente documento de consenso, o Comitê de Bioética da Academia Nacional de Cuidados Paliativos (ANCP) e a Comissão Permanente de Cuidados Paliativos da Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia (SBGG) adotam os princípios da escuta compassiva proposto por Saunders, da natureza do sofrimento proposto por Cassel, dos cuidados preservadores da dignidade propostos por Chochinov e da humildade cultural como ponto de partida para a construção de um posicionamento oficial da ANCP e SBGG acerca do processo de tomada de decisão compartilhada em cuidados paliativos. O posicionamento estabelece que, em contraposição aos modelos paternalistas e consumistas, o processo de tomada de decisão no âmbito dos cuidados paliativos deve seguir o modelo mutualista de decisão compartilhada, no qual as decisões são construídas a partir do diálogo entre profissionais de saúde e pacientes/familiares. O documento estabelece os pressupostos deste processo, os limites da autonomia de pacientes/familiares e profissionais de saúde, a distinção entre tratamentos fúteis e potencialmente inapropriados, bem como ratifica sua incompatibilidade com quaisquer formas de coerção e conflitos de interesse alheios ao melhor interesse dos pacientes.

Los cuidados de salud de pacientes portadores de enfermedades graves usualmente implican la necesidad de tomar un gran número de decisiones, que abarcan desde cómo se comparte la información hasta qué procedimientos diagnósticos o terapéuticos se adoptarán. La forma en que se toman tales decisiones tiene importantes implicaciones desde el punto de vista individual y colectivo, y puede contribuir tanto a aliviar como a agravar el sufrimiento. En el presente documento de consenso, el Comité de Bioética de la Academia Nacional de Cuidados Paliativos (ANCP) y la Comisión Permanente de Cuidados Paliativos de la Sociedad Brasileña de Geriatría y Gerontología (SBGG) adoptan los principios de la escucha compasiva propuesta por Saunders; de la naturaleza del sufrimiento propuesta por Cassel, de los cuidados preservadores de la dignidad propuestos por Chochinov y de la humildad cultural como punto de partida para la construcción de un posicionamiento oficial de la ANCP y SBGG sobre el proceso de toma de decisiones compartidas en cuidados paliativos. El posicionamiento establece que, en contraposición a los modelos paternalistas y consumistas, el proceso de toma de decisiones en el ámbito de los cuidados paliativos debe seguir el modelo mutualista de decisión compartida, donde las decisiones son construidas a partir del diálogo entre los profesionales de salud y los pacientes/familiares. El documento establece los supuestos de este proceso, los límites de la autonomía de los pacientes/familiares y de los profesionales de la salud, la distinción entre los tratamientos inútiles y los potencialmente inapropiados, así como ratifica su incompatibilidad con cualquier forma de coerción y los conflictos de intereses distintos del interés superior de los pacientes.

Health care for patients with serious illnesses usually implies the need to make a large number of decisions, ranging from how information is shared to which diagnostic or therapeutic procedures will be adopted. The method of such decision-making has important implications from an individual and collective point of view and may contribute to either relieving or aggravating suffering. In this consensus document, the Bioethics Committee of the Brazilian National Academy of Palliative Care (ANCP) and the Permanent Committee on Palliative Care of the Brazilian Geriatrics and Gerontology Society (SBGG) adopt the principles of compassionate listening proposed by Saunders, of the nature of suffering proposed by Cassel, of dignity-preserving care proposed by Chochinov, and of cultural humility as a starting point for the construction of an official position of ANCP and SBGG on shared decision-making in palliative care. The position statement posits that, unlike paternalistic and consumerist models, the decision-making process in the sphere of palliative care must follow the mutualistic model of shared decision, where decisions are built based on dialogue between healthcare professionals and patients/family. The document sets forth the assumptions of this process, the limits of autonomy of patients/family and healthcare professionals and the distinction between futile and potentially inappropriate treatments, besides ratifying its incompatibility with any forms of coercion and conflict of interest foreign to the best interests of patients.

Metformin for the treatment of breast cancer: protocol for a scoping review of randomised clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Innovation through the repurposing of generic drugs encloses several advantages when compared with the process of developing new drugs from scratch. Metformin is an established and inexpensive antidiabetic drug for which anticancer properties have been hypothesised. A systematic review of observational studies found promising results for metformin related to breast cancer in women with diabetes. Although the number of randomised clinical trials of metformin for the treatment of breast cancer increased over the last decades, the overall landscape of those studies in this heterogeneous field remains unclear. Hence, we designed the present scoping review protocol to map the literature on randomised clinical trials of metformin in the treatment of breast cancer to determine the value and scope of future systematic reviews on this subject and identify research gaps. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, Web of Science and sources of grey literature. We will include any randomised clinical trial of metformin for the treatment of breast cancer in adult women, and will not impose restrictions regarding context, language or publication date. Two independent reviewers will screen and select studies, and chart the data. We will structure the presentation of our results based on the molecular types of breast cancer, their stages and treatment modalities. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As a literature review, this study is exempt from ethics approval. Findings will be disseminated through presentations in conferences and a peer-reviewed publication. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK REGISTRATION: osf.io/yquba.

The Impact of Age on Mortality and Disability in Patients With Ischemic Stroke Who Underwent Cerebral Reperfusion Therapy: A Brazilian Cohort Study.

Introduction: The main driver for increased stroke prevalence is the aging of the population; however, the best evidenced-based strategies for stroke treatment and prevention are not always followed for older patients. Therefore, the aim was studying the association of age with clinical outcomes (mortality and functional disability) in stroke patients who underwent cerebral reperfusion therapy at hospital discharge and 90 days after ictus. Methods: This was a retrospective (stroke databank analysis) cohort study of participants who had been diagnosed with ischemic stroke and undergone intravenous cerebral reperfusion therapy or mechanical thrombectomy. The variable of interest was patient age, which was categorized into four groups: (1) up to 59 years; (2) 60 to 69 years; (3) 70 to 79 years old; and (4) above 79 years. The primary outcome was mortality at hospital discharge and 90 days after stroke, and the secondary outcome was functional capacity at hospital discharge and 90 days after stroke. Results: A total of 281 patients was included in the study (235 treated by thrombolysis alone, and 46 treated with mechanical thrombectomy). The mean age of the total sample was 67 ± 13.1 years. The oldest patients had the most unfavorable outcomes, except for mortality rate, at hospital discharge (mRS > 2; OR: 1.028; 95% CI 1.005 to 1.051; p = 0.017; mRS > 3; OR: 1.043, 95% CI 1.018 to 1.069; p = 0.001) and 90 days after stroke (mRS > 2; OR: 1.028; 95% CI 1.005 to 1.051; p = 0.017; mRS > 3; OR: 1.043, 95% CI 1.018 to 1.069; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Cerebral reperfusion was a viable treatment for ischemic stroke in both elderly and very elderly patients, as it did not increase mortality. However, it was observed that older individuals had worse functional outcomes at hospital discharge and 90 days after stroke.

Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence and Survival after Liver Transplantation in Patients with HCV-Related Cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to identify prognostic factors for survival and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) for patients with HCC and hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis (HCV-cirrhosis). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study followed all adult patients with HCV-cirrhosis who underwent LT because of HCC or had incidental HCC identified through pathologic examination of the explanted liver at a university hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over 11 years (1998-2008). We used Cox regression models to assess the following risk factors regarding HCC recurrence or death after LT: age, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, Child-Pugh classification, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), whether patients had undergone locoregional treatment before transplantation, the number of packed red blood cell units (PRBCU) transfused during surgery, the number and size of HCC lesions in the explanted liver, and the presence of microvascular invasion and necrotic areas within HCC lesions. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were followed up for a median (interquartile range (IQR)) of 4.4 (0.7-6.6) years. Thirteen (17%) patients had HCC recurrence during the follow-up period, and 26 (34%) died. The median survival time was 6.6 years (95% CI: 2.4-12.0), and the 5-year survival was 52.5% (95% CI: 42.3-65.0%). The final regression model for overall survival included four variables: age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.02, 95% CI: 0.96-1.08, P = 0.603), transplantation waiting time (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.00, P = 0.190), preoperative AFP serum levels (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, P = 0.006), and whether >4 PRBCU were transfused during surgery (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.25, P = 0.001). The final cause-specific Cox regression model for HCC recurrence included only microvascular invasion (HR: 14.86, 95% CI: 4.47-49.39, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study of LT for HCV-cirrhosis, preoperative AFP levels and the number of PRBCU transfused during surgery were associated with overall survival, whereas microvascular invasion with HCC recurrence.

Is the number of previous hospitalizations associated with increased in-hospital mortality after hip fracture in a developing country?

PURPOSE: We aimed to examine whether the number of previous hospitalizations and the main diagnoses of those hospitalizations are associated with increased in-hospital hip fracture mortality for older people. That assessment is relevant because if those variables are shown to be associated with increased mortality, that finding could support their use as proxies for comorbidity burden for case-mix adjustment in statistical models seeking to compare the performance of hospitals regarding hip fracture mortality in settings with limited hospital information systems. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study of all public hospital admissions for older adults with hip fractures in the city of Rio de Janeiro between 2010 and 2011, we used data from the Hospital Admission Information System database to examine the association between in-hospital mortality and the number of hospitalizations in the previous two years and their main diagnoses through logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 1938 patients included in the study there were 103 (5.3%) in-hospital deaths. Although the presence of hospitalization episodes within the two years preceding the index hip fracture was associated with increased mortality (OR: 1.78, 95%CI: 1.07 to 2.97) we did not find evidence of a gradient of increased mortality with a growing number of previous hospitalizations. Additionally, several diseases recorded as main diagnoses of previous hospitalizations were not associated with increased mortality rates, as was expected based on existing knowledge on risk factors for decreased survival in older adults with hip fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, in settings where local hospital information systems have limited access to secondary diagnoses, the use of the number of previous hospitalizations or the main diagnoses associated with those hospitalizations as proxies for the profile of comorbidities of older adults with hip fractures may not be an effective way to adjust for case-mix when comparing in-hospital mortality rates among hospitals.

Evaluation of the Interrater Reliability of End-of-Life Medical Orders in the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form.

Importance: Despite its spread in much of the United States and increased international interest, the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) paradigm still lacks supporting evidence. The interrater reliability of the POLST form to translate patients' values and preferences into medical orders for care at the end of life remains to be studied. Objective: To assess the interrater reliability of the medical orders documented in POLST forms. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a public university hospital in southeastern Brazil. Two independent researchers interviewed the same patients or decision-making surrogates (n = 64) during a single episode of hospitalization within a time frame of 1 to 7 days. Eligible participants were hospitalized adults aged 21 years or older who were expected to remain hospitalized for at least 4 days and whose attending physician responded no to the question, Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year? Data collection occurred between November 1, 2015, and September 20, 2016, and first data analyses were performed on October 3, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Interrater reliability as measured by κ statistics. Results: Of the 64 participants interviewed in the study, 53 (83%) were patients and 11 (17%) were surrogates. Patients' mean (SD) age was 64 (14) years, and 35 patients (55%) and 8 surrogates (73%) were women. Overall, in 5 cases (8%), disagreement in at least 1 medical order for life-sustaining treatment was found in the POLST form, changing from the first interview to the second interview. The κ statistic for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80-1.00); for level of medical intervention, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.76-1.00); and for artificially administered nutrition, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1.00). Conclusions and Relevance: The high interrater reliability of the medical orders in POLST forms appears to offer further support for this advance care planning paradigm; in addition, the finding that this interrater reliability was not 100% underscores the need to ensure that patients or their surrogates have decision-making capacity and to confirm that the content of POLST forms accurately reflects patients' current treatment preferences.

Nutritional interventions for the treatment of frailty in older adults: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Frailty has been defined as a clinical syndrome of multicausal origin characterized by a reduction of physiologic reserves that increase the vulnerability of an individual to adverse outcomes such as the development of functional dependence and death. Considered one of the most important geriatric syndromes, frailty's prevention and management represent important goals for gerontology and geriatrics. Although nutrition plays an important role within the multifactorial susceptibility for this syndrome, up to the present no systematic review specifically addressed the effectiveness of nutritional interventions for the treatment of frailty. Therefore, we propose the present systematic review with the aim to assess the effectiveness of nutritional interventions for the treatment of frailty in older adults living in the community or in long-term care facilities. METHODS: We will search Medline (via Pubmed), Embase, Cinahl, Central, Lilacs, Web of Science, and sources of gray literature. We will accept trials whereby the unit of randomization consisted of individuals or clusters of individuals. Our primary outcome is all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, functional status, cognitive function, frailty status, body composition, and physical activity. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. We will analyze the overall strength of the evidence for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Two independent researchers will conduct all evaluations and any disagreements will be resolved through the participation of a 3rd author. If possible, we will perform random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses concerning specific details of nutritional interventions (e.g., components and duration), research scenario, risk of bias, and criteria used to diagnose frailty. CONCLUSION: In this systematic review protocol we outline the details of the aims and methods of a systematic review on the effectiveness of nutritional interventions for the management of frailty in older adults living in the community or in long-term care facilities". We believe this wording to be more objective and balanced than the previous one. We understand that it is not ideal to propose changes to the text after manuscripts have been accepted. However, we feel that the new wording of the conclusion section of the abstract is more consistent with the overall content of the main text of the review than its previous version. Hence, we hope you may accept our request.

Teaching medical students about dementia: A brief review / O ensino de demência nas escolas médicas: uma breve revisão

Underdeveloped nations have the largest absolute number of the world's elderly population. Approximately 10.7% of the Brazilian population comprises aged individuals. Aging populations are associated with a higher incidence of chronic degenerative diseases such as dementia. Demented individuals place a high burden of care on healthcare systems and family members. General practitioners should be able to diagnose the most common elderly diseases such as dementia since they act as gatekeepers to specialized care. In Brazil, many medical students work as general practitioners upon graduating. The present study shows some scenarios of medical schools worldwide, including Brazilian, regarding teaching on dementia.

Países subdesenvolvidos têm o maior número absoluto de idosos do mundo. Cerca de 10,7% da população brasileira é constituída por indivíduos com idade igual ou superior a 60 anos. Como o envelhecimento populacional, uma maior incidência de doenças crônico-degenerativas, como a demência, é observada. Indivíduos com demência demandam múltiplos cuidados por parte dos sistemas de saúde e de suas famílias. Os clínicos gerais devem ser capazes de diagnosticar as doenças mais comuns nos idosos, incluindo as demências, já que são eles os profissionais que mais atendem esta população. No Brasil, muitos estudantes de medicina começam a trabalhar como médicos generalistas logo após a graduação em medicina. O presente estudo mostra alguns cenários de escolas médicas do mundo, incluindo algumas brasileiras, acerca do ensino de demências.