RESUMO
Distinction between anal canal and perianal squamous cell carcinomas (pSCCs) is essential, as these two subgroups have different anatomical, histological, and lymphatic drainage features. Early-stage true perianal tumors are very uncommon and have been rarely included in clinical trials. Perianal skin cancers and aCCs are included in the same tumor classification, even though they have different lymphatic drainage features. Furthermore, pSCCs are treated similarly to carcinomas originating from the anal canal. Radiation therapy (RT) is an essential treatment for anal canal tumors. Guidelines do not differentiate between treatment volumes for perianal tumors and anal cancers. So far, in pSCC, no study has considered modulating treatment volume selection according to the stage of the disease. We conducted a narrative literature review to describe the sites at higher risk for microscopic disease in patients with early-stage perianal cancers (T1-T2 N0 M0) to propose a well-thought selection of RT elective volumes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used in the treatment of early-stage lung cancers. Guidelines provide indications regarding the constraints to the organs at risk (OARs) and the minimum coverage of the planning target volume but do not suggest optimal dose distribution. Data on dose distribution from the different published series are not comparable due to different prescription modalities and reported dose parameters. METHODS: We conducted a review of the published data on dose prescription, focusing on the role of homogeneity on local tumor control, and present suggestions on how to specify and report the prescriptions to permit comparisons between studies or between cases from different centers. CONCLUSIONS: To identify the dose-prescription modality that better correlates with oncologic outcomes, future studies should guarantee a close uniformity of dose distribution between cases and complete dose parameters reporting for treatment volumes and OARs.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Humanos , Pulmão/efeitos da radiação , Órgãos em Risco , Prescrições , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: About a third of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (Pca) develop a biochemical failure (BF) within 10 years from surgery, and about a half of them receive salvage radiation therapy (SRT). Factors to predict risk to relapse after SRT are still lacking. Dynamic models, based on the assessment of changes in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) postsurgery seem to show good reliability. AIMS: The goal of the study was to identify a simple analytical method for the postsalvage radiation therapy biochemical failure (post-SRTBF) prediction before the end of the SRT, regardless of the PSA value at the beginning of the treatment (PSA start), measuring the PSA values at the start and 1 week before the end of SRT. METHODS: In a series of 83 patients treated with SRT for BF of Pca we measured PSA values at the first day and 1 week before the end of SRT. These values were used to define an analytical method for the post-SRTBF prediction. RESULTS: PSA value in patients without post-SRTBF show a significant difference in term of difference during the SRT with respect to patients with post-SRTBF. Starting from this difference, we identified a simple and practical analytical method for the post-SRTBF prediction before the end of the SRT. The data corresponds with the model and the analytical method is highly predictive (Sensitivity = 81%, Specificity = 85%, Accuracy = 83%). CONCLUSION: This study offers a new tool to early predict Pca relapse overtime and to select patients who can benefit from an early additional systemic treatment.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/sangue , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Terapia de SalvaçãoRESUMO
The aim of this cross-sectional study is to evaluate the factors associated with patient-reported dysphagia in patients affected by locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy (CHT), with or without induction CHT. We evaluated 148 OPC patients treated with IMRT and concurrent CHT, without evidence of disease and who had completed their treatment since at least 6 months. At their planned follow-up visit, patients underwent clinical evaluation and completed the M.D. Anderson dysphagia inventory (MDADI) questionnaire. The association between questionnaire composite score (MDADI-CS) and different patients' and tumor's characteristics and treatments (covariates) was investigated by univariable and multivariable analyses, the latter including only covariates significant at univariable analysis. With a median time from treatment end of 30 months [range 6-74 months, interquartile range (IQR) 16-50 months], the median (IQR) MDADI-CS was 72 (63-84). The majority of patients (82.4%) had a MDADI-CS ≥ 60. At multivariable analysis, female gender, human papilloma virus (HPV)-negative status, and moderate and severe clinician-rated xerostomia were significantly associated with lower MDADI-CS. Patient-perceived dysphagia was satisfactory or acceptable in the majority of patients. HPV status and xerostomia were confirmed as important predictive factors for swallowing dysfunction after radiochemotherapy. Data regarding female gender are new and deserve further investigation.
Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
AIM: A retrospective analysis was performed in our two Institutions in order to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of a hypofractionated-radiotherapy regimen in the treatment of frail elderly patients with facial basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of elderly patients (age >75 years) with histologically-confirmed BCC, T1-2, treated to a total radiation dose of 25-30 Gy over 5-6 weeks, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: From February 2007-December 2010, 134 ambulatory patients with 159 BCCs were treated. Their median age was 82.5 years (range=75-103). Grade 1-2 skin acute toxicities were observed in 30.6% of patients (41/134). Complete responses were observed in 157 tumors in 132 patients. At the last follow-up, June 2014, no late toxicities had been noted; three patients had local recurrent disease. CONCLUSION: Our results seem to demonstrate both the feasibility and efficacy of curative hypofractionated radiation therapy in elderly patients with BCCs unfit for daily irradiation.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular/radioterapia , Neoplasias Faciais/radioterapia , Idoso Fragilizado , Neoplasias Cutâneas/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , MasculinoRESUMO
Performing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on head and neck cancer patients (HNCPs) requires robust training and experience. Thus, in 2011, the Head and Neck Cancer Working Group (HNCWG) of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) organized a study group with the aim to run a literature review to outline clinical practice recommendations, to suggest technical solutions and to advise target volumes and doses selection for head and neck cancer IMRT. The main purpose was therefore to standardize the technical approach of radiation oncologists in this context. The following paper describes the results of this working group. Volumes, techniques/strategies and dosage were summarized for each head-and-neck site and subsite according to international guidelines or after reaching a consensus in case of weak literature evidence.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Humanos , ItáliaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The presence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-bounce after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and hormone therapy (HT) makes PSA an unreliable marker in determining PSA biochemical failure (PSA-BF) during the first 2 years after EBRT + HT in patients with non-operated prostate cancer (CaP). To determine the reliability of PSA-BF in predicting clinical outcomes, the Kamat definition, which does not consider PSA-BF during the first 24 months after EBRT, was tested against three other more frequently used methods (American Society of Radiation Oncology, Vancouver, and American Society of Radiation Oncology-Phoenix), which do. Secondly, their relative accuracies in predicting the clinical outcomes were also calculated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In January 2011, 193 consecutive CaPs, treated with radical EBRT + HT in our institution from 1999 to 2002, were retrospectively investigated. BF was calculated according to the Kamat definition against the other three above-mentioned methods. Each BF-free survival was analyzed in function of every clinical endpoint (clinical-failure-free survival, cause specific survival, and overall survival) using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The accuracy of each definition in predicting clinical relapse was also calculated and compared. RESULTS: Only the Kamat BF definition had both a significant Cox hazard ratio, regarding clinical events or cancer deaths, and the best accuracy values in predicting clinical outcomes. Retrospective study design was the major limitation of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Only the Kamat definition, which does not consider PSA-BF during the first 24 months after EBRT + HT, was shown to be a reliable predictor of clinical events. Thus, our results suggest that solely PSA-based BF should not be considered as a reliable surrogate endpoint during the first 24 months after EBRT + HT. Consequently, caution should be used in adopting rescue treatment without further work-up on an individual basis.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Hormônios/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To date, the specific role of "in-field" crusting exudation on pain and on activity of daily living (ADL) in head and neck cancer (HNSCC) patients undergoing treatment with cetuximab and radiochemotherapy has been neglected. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the role of crusting exudation on the severity of pain and ADL METHODS: Thirty-seven of the 45 HNSCC patients enrolled in the alternating radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and cetuximab trial were evaluated in this study. The main radiodermatitis signs (the intensity of erythema, the extension of dry, and moist desquamation and of necrosis)--including crusting exudation severity--pain, ADL, and radiodermatitis scores were registered at least weekly during and after treatment. The correlation between crusting exudation and pain or ADL was evaluated. RESULTS: The "in-field" crusting exudation score seemed to have the strongest correlation with pain (Spearman's rho = 0.897; p < 0.001) and the most intense influence on it (Co-B = 0.715; 95% C.I. = 0.643-0.787). However, it seemed to have a weaker correlation with ADL than the other clinical radiodermatitis signs. CONCLUSIONS: Crusts have the strongest correlation with pain in patients with Cetuximab-related radiation dermatitis. Moreover, the presence of crusts can lead operators to misclassify dermatitis as score 4, causing unnecessary delays or interruptions in treatment.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Exsudatos e Transudatos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Dor/fisiopatologia , Radiodermite/fisiopatologia , Atividades Cotidianas , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Cetuximab , Humanos , Dor/etiologia , Radiodermite/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Our previous survey showed that the patterns of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) in Italy might be suboptimal. A prospective observational study was therefore designed to evaluate this issue in greater detail. METHODS: All radiotherapy centers involved in the HNC Working Group of the Italian Radiation Oncology Association were asked to enter into the study all patients treated with PORT during a 6-month period. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were accrued by 24 centers from December 2008 to May 2009. Larynx (38%) and oral cavity (34%) were the most common primary sites. The median time between surgery and the start of radiotherapy was 69 days (range, 25-215 days). Seventy-nine percent of cases with no evidence of risk factors for local recurrence were treated with high-dose radiotherapy to the primary site. In about 75% of cases the pN0 neck was included in the target volume. Concomitant chemotherapy was delivered to about 60% of patients with major risk factors and 21% of patients with no risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Three issues emerged from our study as potential targets for future investigations: the impact on clinical outcome of the interval between surgery and the start of PORT; factors driving radiation oncologists to overtreat volumes at low risk of recurrence; and problems associated with the delivery of concomitant chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
Aim of the present study was to test, activity and toxicity of a rapidly alternating chemoradiation (paclitaxel based) in 31 patients with unresectable, locally advanced or recurrent after surgery, head and neck cancer. Three-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 61.4 and 73.7%, respectively. Main side effects remain a major problem.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We report two cases of multiple myeloma relapse and progression following a combination of autologous stem cell transplantation and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. After failure of donor lymphocyte infusions and thalidomide salvage therapy, the patients were treated successfully with bortezomib and eventually underwent a second non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation.