Transient conformational remodeling of folding proteins by GroES-individually and in concert with GroEL.

The commonly accepted dogma of the bacterial GroE chaperonin system entails protein folding mediated by cycles of several ATP-dependent sequential steps where GroEL interacts with the folding client protein. In contrast, we herein report GroES-mediated dynamic remodeling (expansion and compression) of two different protein substrates during folding: the endogenous substrate MreB and carbonic anhydrase (HCAII), a well-characterized protein folding model. GroES was also found to influence GroEL binding induced unfolding and compression of the client protein underlining the synergistic activity of both chaperonins, even in the absence of ATP. This previously unidentified activity by GroES should have important implications for understanding the chaperonin mechanism and cellular stress response. Our findings necessitate a revision of the GroEL/ES mechanism.

Domain-specific chaperone-induced expansion is required for beta-actin folding: a comparison of beta-actin conformations upon interactions with GroEL and tail-less complex polypeptide 1 ring complex (TRiC).

Actin, an abundant cytosolic protein in eukaryotic cells, is dependent on the interaction with the chaperonin tail-less complex polypeptide 1 ring complex (TRiC) to fold to the native state. The prokaryotic chaperonin GroEL also binds non-native beta-actin, but is unable to guide beta-actin toward the native state. In this study we identify conformational rearrangements in beta-actin, by observing similarities and differences in the action of the two chaperonins. A cooperative collapse of beta-actin from the denatured state to an aggregation-prone intermediate is observed, and insoluble aggregates are formed in the absence of chaperonin. In the presence of GroEL, however, >90% of the aggregation-prone actin intermediate is kept in solution, which shows that the binding of non-native actin to GroEL is effective. The action of GroEL on bound flourescein-labeled beta-actin was characterized, and the structural rearrangement was compared to the case of the beta-actin-TRiC complex, employing the homo fluorescence resonance energy transfer methodology previously used [Villebeck, L., Persson, M., Luan, S.-L., Hammarström, P., Lindgren, M., and Jonsson, B.-H. (2007) Biochemistry 46 (17), 5083-93]. The results suggest that the actin structure is rearranged by a "binding-induced expansion" mechanism in both TRiC and GroEL, but that binding to TRiC, in addition, causes a large and specific separation of two subdomains in the beta-actin molecule, leading to a distinct expansion of its ATP-binding cleft. Moreover, the binding of ATP and GroES has less effect on the GroEL-bound beta-actin molecule than the ATP binding to TRiC, where it leads to a major compaction of the beta-actin molecule. It can be concluded that the specific and directed rearrangement of the beta-actin structure, seen in the natural beta-actin-TRiC system, is vital for guiding beta-actin to the native state.

Conformational rearrangements of tail-less complex polypeptide 1 (TCP-1) ring complex (TRiC)-bound actin.

The mechanism of chaperonins is still under intense investigation. Earlier studies by others and us on the bacterial chaperonin GroEL points to an active role of chaperonins in unfolding the target protein during initial binding. Here, a natural eukaryotic chaperonin system [tail-less complex polypeptide 1 (TCP-1) ring complex (TRiC) and its target protein actin] was investigated to determine if the active participation of the chaperonin in the folding process is evolutionary-conserved. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements on four distinct doubly fluorescein-labeled variants of actin, we have obtained a fairly detailed map of the structural rearrangements that occur during the TRiC-actin interaction. The results clearly show that TRiC has an active role in rearranging the bound actin molecule. The target is stretched as a consequence of binding to TRiC and further rearranged in a second step as a consequence of ATP binding; i.e., the mechanism of chaperonins is conserved during evolution.