Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with or without a Split-Thickness Skin Graft in the Surgical Management of Axillary Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) alone or with the addition of a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) are 2 reconstructive options available after surgical excision of axillary hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The aim of this study was to retrospectively examine patients undergoing these treatments and to assess clinical and patient-related outcome measures. Methods: A single-centre, retrospective analysis was conducted, evaluating surgical excision of axillary HS, with STSG and NPWT, or NPWT alone. Data collected included No. of post-operative clinic visits, time to heal, size of wound, disease recurrence, follow-up time, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9), Pain Visual Analogue Scale (PAINVAS2), the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), and Dermatology Visual Analogue Scale (DERMVAS). Two-tailed t-test and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon U-tests were used to assess for significant relationships. Results: One hundred five patients were included in the study, 44 who received NPWT alone, and 61 who received NPWT + STSG. There was no significant difference in follow-up time (P = .934) or No. of follow-up appointments between groups (P = .287). There was a significant difference in time to heal between groups, with STSG + NPWT observing a mean time of 2.77 months and NPWT alone observing a mean time of 4.40 months (P = .0006). There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups. Conclusion: There is no difference in patient-reported outcomes with the addition of an STSG to NPWT after surgical excision of HS. Wide excision and use of NPWT alone is an effective procedure for the treatment of axillary HS.

Introduction: Le traitement des plaies par pression négative (NPWT) seule ou associée à une greffe de peau d'épaisseur partielle (STSG) sont les deux options disponibles pour la reconstruction après excision chirurgicale d'hidradénite suppurée (HS) axillaire. Le but de cette étude rétrospective était d'examiner les patients subissant ces traitements et d'évaluer les mesures des résultats cliniques et liés aux patients. Méthodes: Une analyse rétrospective monocentrique a été menée pour évaluer l'excision chirurgicale de l'HS axillaire avec NPWT et STSG ou NPWT seule. La collecte de données a inclus : le nombre de visites cliniques postopératoires, le délai de guérison, la taille de la plaie, la récidive de la maladie, la durée du suivi, l'indice de qualité de vie dermatologique (DLQI), l'évaluation du trouble anxieux généralisé (GAD-7), l'échelle de dépression du Questionnaire sur la santé du patient (PHQ-9), l'échelle visuelle analogique de la douleur (PAINVAS2), le Court Questionnaire sur la perception de la maladie (BIPQ) et la DERMVAS. Un test t de Fisher bilatéral et un test de Mann-Whitney Wilcox ont servi à évaluer les relations significatives. Résultats: 105 patients ont été inclus dans l'étude : 44 ont reçu uniquement le traitement par pression négative et 61 ont reçu NPWT + STSG. Il n'y a pas eu de différence significative dans la durée du suivi (P = 0934) ou le nombre de rendez-vous de suivi entre les groupes (P = 0287). Il y a eu une différence significative sur le délai de guérison entre les groupes avec un délai moyen de 2,77 mois pour le groupe STSG + NPWT et de 4,40 mois pour le groupe NPWT seul (P = 0,0006). Il n'y a pas eu de différence entre les deux groupes pour ce qui concernait les résultats signalés par les patients. Conclusion: L'ajout d'une greffe de peau d'épaisseur partielle (STSG) au traitement par pression négative (NPWT) n'a pas entraîné d'augmentation de problèmes signalés par les patients après excision chirurgicale d'une hidradénite suppurée. Une excision large et l'utilisation du NPWT seul constituent une procédure efficace pour le traitement de l'HS axillaire.

Differential attainment, socioeconomic factors and surgical training.

INTRODUCTION: Differential attainment (DA) is the gap in levels of achievement between different groups; socioeconomic factors are thought to play a significant role in DA. The aim of this study was to review and assess the evidence for DA in early surgical training and to examine the potential influence of socioeconomic status. METHODS: Data were obtained from the General Medical Council GMC for those taking Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examinations between 2016 and 2019 and core surgical training annual review of competency progression (ARCP) outcomes between 2017 and 2019. The index of multiple deprivation (IMD) was used as a measure of socioeconomic background. Trainees were then divided into deprivation quintiles (DQ1=most deprived, DQ5=least deprived). MRCS and ARCP outcomes were compared between DQ groups using 95% confidence intervals and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds had significantly lower overall MRCS pass rates (DQ1=45.5%, DQ2=48.9% vs DQ4=59.6%, DQ5=61.5%, p<0.05) and 1st time pass rates (DQ1&2=46.6% vs DQ4&5=63.5%, p<0.001). Additionally, they had a significantly higher number of attempts required to pass MRCS (DQ 1&2=1.86 vs DQ 4&5=1.54, p<0.01). Those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds had a significantly greater proportion of unsatisfactory ARCP outcomes (DQ1&2=24.4% vs DQ 4&5=14.2%, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is clear evidence of the influence of socioeconomic background on DA in early surgical training. However, the reasons for this are likely complex and more work is required to investigate this relationship.

Severe dissecting scalp cellulitis successfully treated with serial excisions in combination with anti-TNF therapy.

The management of dissecting scalp cellulitis involves medical treatment with oral antibiotics and isotretinoin, as well as surgical input in more severe cases. In extensive disease, a full scalpectomy with reconstruction can be required. We report a case of severe dissecting scalp cellulitis in a 34-year-old man who underwent serial scalp excisions over three years, with wounds being left to heal by secondary intention. Initially, the excisions helped to control symptoms but, once the patient was on concurrent anti-TNF therapy, further excisions were successful in reducing disease load and inducing remission. He remained disease free at the 20 months follow-up. This case is the first of its kind to be described in the literature and it highlights how a conservative, staged surgical approach, in combination with anti-TNF therapy, can be effective in the management of severe dissecting scalp cellulitis. In doing so, it offers an alternative to full scalpectomy with reconstruction.

Publication rates from BAPRAS meetings: where are we now?

In the UK the BAPRAS (British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons) meetings have always represented the ideal platform for disseminating new information in the field of plastic surgery. Previous studies have suggested the publication rate for these meetings has been falling. Our aim was to re-assess the conversion rates of presented abstracts to publications. All abstracts from BAPRAS meetings between Winter 2014 and Summer 2016 were included. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were used to search for full publications. A database was collated, this included; time to publication, journal of publication and impact factor of journal. A total of 500 abstracts were presented during the study period for which the publication rate was 28.4%. The average time to publication was 16.8 months. The most common publication journal was the Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (JPRAS) (34%). Free papers were published in journals with significantly greater impact factors (p = 0.046). Publication rates were similar to previous literature for BAPRAS meetings and have increased since 2007. A continued downward trend of publication rates for BAPRAS meetings is not seen in our data. A reduction in the number of publications in JPRAS may be explained by a rise in the impact factor of the journal or increasing competitiveness for publications. When variations in methodology are accounted for publication rates are similar to other specialties. In order to continually assess the quality of papers presented at BAPRAS meetings, the conversion to publication should be regularly re-audited.

An unusual diaphragmatic hernia with gastric perforation and sub-acute presentation.

Gastric perforation into the thoracic cavity through a diaphragmatic hernia is rare but, when it occurs, patients present in severe distress, with mortality approaching 50%. We present a unique case in which a fibrotic reaction between the stomach and the parietal pleura led to a subacute presentation upon perforation. The extra time that this afforded led to more effective multidisciplinary team management and ultimately an excellent outcome for the patient.