RESUMO
Bioethics are widely used in the course of biomedical science’s evolution. It allows to question ethical aspects underlying the setting of new research and clinical intervention techniques. This ethical thinking reflects norms and values socially admitted and question the way new scientific information are integrated to individuals’ system of knowing. Human embryo research, subject to bioethics laws revisions, represents an almost prototypical object of these issues, both lay and scientific. This study aims to study these issues through the context of bioethics revision laws, from users’ comments on Estates-General of Bioethics website, using the social representations theorical frame. A thematic content analysis has been performed. Results shows that embryo status is a structural argument of the debate, and that the opinion on human embryo research results from a set of ethical concerns that come from socially anchored values, accounting for the way individuals define science, biotechnologies and research on the living, that we also find in the bioethics legislation.
Assuntos
Bioética , Pesquisas com Embriões , HumanosRESUMO
Bioethics are widely used in the course of biomedical science’s evolution. It allows to question ethical aspects underlying the setting of new research and clinical intervention techniques. This ethical thinking reflects norms and values socially admitted and question the way new scientific information are integrated to individuals’ system of knowing. Human embryo research, subject to bioethics laws revisions, represents an almost prototypical object of these issues, both lay and scientific. This study aims to study these issues through the context of bioethics revision laws, from users’ comments on Estates-General of Bioethics website, using the social representations theorical frame. A thematic content analysis has been performed. Results shows that embryo status is a structural argument of the debate, and that the opinion on human embryo research results from a set of ethical concerns that come from socially anchored values, accounting for the way individuals define science, biotechnologies and research on the living, that we also find in the bioethics legislation.
Assuntos
Bioética , Pesquisas com Embriões , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Persuasive health messages sometimes induce resistance. This article explores the link between self-compassion and resistance to health messages that threaten autonomy. DESIGN: A pilot study (N = 100) tested whether threatening health messages versus non-threatening messages damage needs for autonomy, which translates into emotional resistance and behavioural intentions of resistance. The main study (N = 83) tested self-compassion and reactant traits as moderators of observable health-behaviour (soft drink consumption) faced with threatening messages versus non-threatening messages. OUTCOME MEASURES: The pilot study tested whether threatening health messages create resistance using self-reports of anger and resistant behavioural intentions. Observable health-behaviour (soft drink vs. water consumption) was measured in the main study. RESULTS: The pilot study showed that the perceived threat to autonomy, which was induced by threatening health messages about soft drink consumption, creates resistance (self-reports of anger and resistant behavioural intentions). The main study shows that the most self-compassionate people act in favour of the arguments of the threatening messages (drinking water rather than soft drinks), whereas the least self-compassionate do not. CONCLUSION: These innovative results are discussed in regard to the compliance role of self-compassion through self-regulatory functions.
