Timeliness of routine immunization in non-preterm children less than 2 years old using electronic data capture in an ambulatory setting in France in the context of vaccine hesitancy.

OBJECTIVES: The vaccine schedule was changed in 2013 in France, which resulted in fewer vaccinations. However, to maintain disease protection, both vaccine timeliness and high coverage should be respected. In the context of growing vaccine hesitancy, we aimed to describe compliance with the immunization program according to the age recommended for each dose for non-preterm children less than 2 years old. METHODS: Between May 2013 and April 2016, we used automated electronic data capture of electronic medical records for non-preterm children less than 2 years old. Children were followed up by 92 randomly selected pediatricians from the French ambulatory pediatricians group. Delayed immunization was defined as more than 15 days after the recommended age for the primary series of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-polio-Haemophilus influenzae b-hepatitis B (DTaP-IPV-Hib±HB) and 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13), 2 months for boosters, 1 month for measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)/meningococcal C conjugate (Men-C), and 6 months for the second dose of MMR. An association between delayed first dose and other doses delayed were described with odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Data for 22,097 children in France with 124,702 vaccinations were analyzed: 21.8%, 20.4%, and 30.7% of children had one or more delayed doses of DTaP-IPV-Hib±HB, PCV13, and MMR vaccines, respectively. For 47.6% of children, the single-dose Men-C vaccination was delayed. A delayed first dose of DTaP-IPV-Hib±HB, PCV13, and MMR was associated with a delayed second dose of the same vaccine (OR 7.5 [95% CI 6.6-8.6], 39.0 [34.1-44.8], and 23.5 [19.1-29.0], respectively) and with a third dose of DTaP-IPV-Hib±HB and PCV13 (14.7 [13.3-17.7] and 3.7 [3.1-4.5]). CONCLUSION: This large study shows that the proportion of children with delayed vaccination in France was globally high and substantial for Men-C and the first MMR vaccination. Risk of a delayed second and third dose was increased with a delayed first dose, which may reflect vaccine hesitancy.

Human cytomegalovirus quantification in toddlers saliva from day care centers and emergency unit: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most important cause of congenital viral infection in developed countries. In utero transmission occurs at higher rates in seronegative women during primary infection, especially those in contact with young children in day-care centers (DCC). Nevertheless data on variability of CMV excretion among children in French DCCs are lacking, and are important for public health planning. OBJECTIVES: Our main objective was to assess the feasibility of a salivary sample in DCCs in order to study CMV excretion among toddlers. Our secondary aims were to assess prevalence of CMV excretion in children attending Hospital Emergency Unit (EU) in comparison with various types of DCCs and to validate the analytical chain for collected specimens. STUDY DESIGN: Excretion of CMV in saliva was quantified using a real-time PCR assay in children aged from 3 months to 6 years old in EU and in DCC, with gB, gH and gN genotypes determined in infected children. Salivary sampling was performed using small sponges placed into a DNA conservation medium. Socio cultural and medical information were collected from attending parents. RESULTS: A total of 625 children were included, with 256 from six DCCs and 369 from one EU. In DCCs, the acceptability of the procedure was 87.3% (95%CI 78.5-96.2) amongst parents and children, and in the EU, acceptability was higher at 97.6% (95%CI 95.5-98.9). CMV shedding overall prevalence was 21.7% (95%CI 17.6-26.2), with CMV shedding prevalence in DCCs of 51.9% (95%CI 22.8-81.1). CONCLUSION: We validated the feasibility and acceptability of measuring CMV shedding in the saliva of French toddlers. The discrepancy between CMV infection rates in day care centers and in the general population (as sampled in the EU) indicates the need for a further study to determine risk factors and shedding levels in the DCC population.

[Is the new vaccination schedule recommended in France adapted to premature babies?]. / Le nouveau calendrier vaccinal est-il adapté à l'ancien prématuré ?

The French 2013 immunization schedule having a goal of simplification with comparable efficacy, has decreased the number of injections and removed the injection performed at three months of age in the general population. Apart from the prevention of invasive pneumococcal infections for which it is recommended to maintain three dose primary immunization, vaccination of premature is not addressed in this new calendar. Can the extremely preterm infants (<33 weeks of gestational age) benefit from this new schedule or should we keep them in three injections schedule? The objective of this paper is to clarify this point through the data available in the literature. Children born prematurely and especially the "extremely premature" born before 33 weeks are at high risk of infections, some of them are preventable by immunization. Although there is no clinical evidence, for pertussis, pneumococcus, Haemophilus influenzae b, hepatitis B, whatever the immunogenicity criteria, immunogenicity is significantly lower in preterm than in term newborn after 3 doses primary schedule. This lower immunogenicity raises concerns about the transition to two doses, about the ability to give short term protection and booster responses. Given these data, GPIP takes the position for maintaining a primary 3-dose vaccination at 2.3 and 4 months for premature infants less than 33 weeks.

[Plea for advancement of the age of vaccination against human papillomavirus in France: Position of the Pediatric Infections Pathology Group (GPIP) and the French Association of Ambulatory Pediatrics (AFPA)]. / Plaidoyer pour un avancement de l'âge de la vaccination contre les papillomavirus en France: Position du Groupe de Pathologie Infectieuse Pédiatrique (GPIP) et de l'Association Française de Pédiatrie Ambulatoire (AFPA).

Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) is recommended in France at 14 years. The Groupe de Pathologie Infectieuse Pédiatrique de la Société Française de Pédiatrie takes a clear position for advancement of age of vaccination at 11-12 years based on the following arguments: (i) data on the long-term persistence of protective antibodies are reassuring; (ii) these vaccines can be co-administered with vaccines recommended in the current immunization schedule at this age; (iii) actually, nearly 20% of adolescents have had sexual intercourse when the vaccination schedule is finished; (iv) vaccination beyond 14 years increases the risk of occurrence of coincidental autoimmune diseases; (v) the immunogenicity of vaccines against HPV is better when they are administered before age 15; (vi) finally, especially by reducing the number of injections from 3 to 2, the immunization at 11-12 years could improve immunization coverage which is insufficient nowadays.

[Rotavirus vaccination in 2012. Position of the Pediatric Infections Pathology Group (GPIP) and the French Association of Ambulatory Pediatrics (AFPA)]. / La vaccination rotavirus en 2012. Position du Groupe de Pathologie Infectieuse Pédiatrique (GPIP) et de l'Association Française de Pédiatrie Ambulatoire (AFPA).

In 2008 and 2010, the Comité technique des vaccinations and the Haut Conseil de Santé Publique have not recommended generalized vaccination against rotavirus (RV) in France. The Groupe de Pathologie Infectieuse Pédiatrique (GPIP) and the Association Française de Pédiatrie Ambulatoire (AFPA) believes that it is time to reconsider the recommendation. Indeed, on the one hand, answers were made on the presence of circovirus in vaccines and the risk of intussusception, on the other hand, these vaccines are already implemented in vaccination programs in many developing countries or countries with income intermediate and high. Finally, independent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness in countries with widespread vaccinations (without significant genotypic changes of circulating strains). In addition, implementation would have a major impact on our health care system, changes of the epidemic curve of RV infections (delayed and shortened) to prevent the coexistence of different epidemics occurring during the fall and winter. Remains medico-economic evaluation, which is not of the competence and the responsibility of GPIP and AFPA. However, it seems surprising that developing or middle-income countries have been able to generalize this vaccination and that France can't do it.

[Survey about the perception of the gastroenteritis and the infection due to rotavirus by the mothers in France]. / Enquête sur la perception de la gastro-entérite et de l'infection à Rotavirus par les mères en France.

AIM: To describe the perception of the acute gastroenteritis (AGE) and the interest for the vaccination of the AGE due to Rotavirus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational investigation realized by phone by the IPSOS institute, with 1002 French women of 18 years and more, constituting a representative national sample, having at least a child below 2 years, between 7 and January 31st, 2008. RESULTS: AGE is mainly considered by the mothers questioned as a grave pathology (43.1%) or very grave (51.3%) for the children below 2 years. This perception is bound to the symptoms and to the complications known for the disease. For the questioned mothers, the AGE comes along very often or often with diarrheas (97.2%), vomits (94.3%) or dehydration (94%). Hospitalizations are also perceived as frequent. The quasi-totality of the questioned women (98.3%) considers finally that it is about a very contagious disease (75.4%) or rather contagious (22.8%). The AGE at the child below 2 years provoke very frequently a medical consultation (91.8%), during which some solutions of oral rehydration are prescribed in six cases on 10 (62%). The questioned mothers are for the greater part favorable (86.3%) to a drinkable vaccine to prevent the AGE due to Rotavirus, and 88.1% say that they would intend to protect their child with this vaccine. CONCLUSION: The questioned mothers know the potential gravity of the AGE and a very wide majority of them (86.3%) declare themselves favorable to the prevention of the AGE at Rotavirus by the vaccination.

Direct genotyping of cytomegalovirus envelope glycoproteins from toddler's saliva samples.

BACKGROUND: The polymorphism of genes encoding CMV envelope protein is used for strain classification and may influence pathogenesis and/or infectivity. CMV genotyping is usually based on sequencing or acrylamide gel-RFLP, but these methods are not suited to rapid screening of large populations. OBJECTIVES: We developed a high-throughput method to analyze CMV strains diversity and to detect multiple-strain infection in a large population of toddlers (six daycare centers (DCC) and an emergency unit (EU)). METHODS: We developed a new PCR-RFLP method coupled with capillary electrophoresis fragment detection for UL55-gB, UL75-gH and UL73-gN genotyping. To detect gB recombinants, gpUL55 typing was applied to two variable zones (NTerminal and central). We applied this method to 212 CMV-positive saliva samples and controlled the results by direct sequencing of PCR products. RESULTS: We identified 112 strains, that fell into eight groups in UL55-gB, two groups in UL75-gH, and seven groups in UL73-gN. The 79 samples from the emergency unit contained 30 strains, 28 children harboring 2 strains. The samples (n=133) from the six daycare centers contained respectively 4, 1, 6, 1 and 11 strains. Fifteen percent of strains were UL55-gB recombinants. CONCLUSION: Our new method can simultaneously determine gB, gH and gN genotypes and offers more precise classification of CMV strains than previous RFLP-based methods. This could constitute the basis for a new classification, particularly in UL55-gB. Easy direct identification of multiple strains and recombinants in pathological samples could facilitate large epidemiologic studies.

[Comparison of prescriptions by pediatricians and general practitioners: a population-based study in Franche-Comté from the database of Regional Health Insurance Fund]. / Comparaison des prescriptions des pédiatres et des médecins généralistes : une étude en population en Franche-Comté sur la base de données de la caisse régionale d'assurance maladie.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the medical management of children by private pediatricians or by general practitioners. POPULATION AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzed information from the automated database of the Regional Health Insurance Fund for salaried workers in Franche-Comté from January 2001 through December 2002 and compared the mean rates of prescriptions in the populations seen only by general practitioners or mainly by pediatricians. RESULTS: Analysis concerned 1 535 208 visits (office and home). Management by pediatricians was associated with 25% fewer consultations and 6% fewer hospitalizations. Pediatricians also wrote 25% fewer prescriptions for drugs, 17% fewer for laboratory tests, and 42% fewer for speech and language therapy. Children seen by pediatricians took antibiotics much less often (penicillin: -24%; cephalosporins: -74%; macrolides: -53%) as well as half as many corticoids and NSAIDs. Their vaccination coverage was more complete (31% more hepatitis B vaccines, 7% more MMR), as was prevention against rickets and cavities (twice the rate of vitamin D and fluoride prescriptions). The population followed mainly by pediatricians included 25% more children with a chronic disease. CONCLUSION: General practitioners and pediatricians appear to differ significantly in their management of children. Other studies that can take into account such confounding factors as health status are needed to confirm these results.