Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS® Registry Analysis.

Purpose: To investigate patterns of ancillary imaging testing among vitreoretinal specialists for patients with vitreoretinal disease in the United States (US). Methods: Optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography (CFP), and fluorescein angiography (FA), ordered by vitreoretinal specialists and documented within the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2020, were retrospectively assessed. Trends in imaging modality choice were analyzed by payer type, geographic region, and practice type. Sub-analyses were conducted according to categorization of vitreoretinal specialists into those treating a high versus low volume of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Results: OCT was the most common imaging modality used, followed by CFP and FA. Following normalization, the highest volume of OCT procedures performed were identified among Medicare Advantage and Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries, within the South of the US, and at medium and large practices. Minimal differences were observed for CFP and FA volume across payer types and regions. Across practice types, the largest volume of CFP and FA procedures were identified in small and private equity owned practices, respectively. Vitreoretinal specialists with a high nAMD volume more frequently performed OCT than those with a low nAMD volume. Conclusion: Vitreoretinal specialists demonstrated a strong preference for OCT, with real-world associations according to payer type, geographic location, and practice type. Volume of nAMD patients seen impacted the likelihood of specialists ordering OCTs.

One-Year Brolucizumab Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration from a Large United States Cohort in the IRIS® Registry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual acuity (VA) and injection intervals in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) after 12 months of brolucizumab therapy in clinical practice. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults in the United States-based IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) with nAMD who received brolucizumab exclusively for 12 months (2308 eyes of 2079 patients). METHODS: Observational study of eyes with a first injection of brolucizumab (index), followed by 2 or more brolucizumab injections over the following 12 months without switching to another anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were change in best recorded VA and, for eyes receiving prior anti-VEGF therapy (treatment-experienced eyes), the difference between the brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months and the anti-VEGF injection interval before switching. The interval before switching was defined as the time between the prior anti-VEGF and index brolucizumab injections; brolucizumab interval was the time between the closest injection to day 365 and the preceding injection. Secondary outcomes included incident adverse events. RESULTS: Overall VA at index was 61.6 ± 18.4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters; 83.7% of treatment-naive eyes (184/220) and 86.1% of treatment-experienced eyes (1797/2088) showed stable (< 10 letters gained or lost) or improved (≥ 10 letters gained) VA at 12 months. Among treatment-experienced eyes receiving a prior anti-VEGF injection within 365 days before index, 29.5% (594/2015) showed an interval before switching of 8 weeks or more (mean, 7.6 ± 5.5 weeks), whereas 83.1% (1734/2015) showed a brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months of 8 weeks or more (mean, 10.3 ± 4.0 weeks). In all, 77.1% of treatment-experienced eyes (1554/2015) showed an interval extension of 1 week or more; of these, 55.4% (861/1554) showed an extension of 4 weeks or more. CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based study, at 12 months, brolucizumab treatment prolonged the interval between anti-VEGF injections for most treatment-experienced eyes, particularly those with shorter intervals before switching, while maintaining or improving VA. With careful balancing of the benefits and risks, switching to brolucizumab treatment may offer the advantage of extending the treatment interval for patients with a high anti-VEGF therapy burden. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Factors Linked to Injection Interval Extension in Eyes with Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration Switched to Brolucizumab.

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection interval extension in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) switched to brolucizumab treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults in the United States-based IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) with nAMD who switched from another anti-VEGF agent to brolucizumab-only treatment for ≥ 12 months from October 8, 2019, through November 26, 2021. METHODS: Univariable and multivariable analyses examined associations of demographic and clinical characteristics with the likelihood of interval extension after switching to brolucizumab therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eyes were classified as either extenders or nonextenders at 12 months. Extenders were eyes that achieved (1) an extension of ≥ 2 weeks in the brolucizumab injection interval at 12 months versus the interval before switching (time between the last known prior anti-VEGF injection and first [index] brolucizumab injection) and (2) stable (< 10 letters gained or lost) or improved (≥ 10 letters gained) visual acuity (VA) at 12 months versus VA at index injection. RESULTS: Of 2015 eyes among 1890 patients who switched to brolucizumab treatment, 1186 (58.9%) were extenders. In univariable analyses, demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between extenders and nonextenders, except that extenders had shorter intervals before switching versus nonextenders (mean, 5.9 ± 2.1 weeks vs. 10.1 ± 7.6 weeks, respectively). In multivariable logistic regression modeling, a shorter interval before switching was associated significantly and positively with interval extension with brolucizumab therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 5.6 for interval before switching of < 8 weeks versus ≥ 8 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 4.5-6.9; P < 0.001), and eyes with an index VA of 40 to 65 letters were significantly less likely to be extenders than eyes in the higher (better) index VA categories. CONCLUSIONS: Length of the treatment interval before switching was the characteristic associated most strongly with successful interval extension with brolucizumab. Treatment-experienced patients who required more frequent injections (i.e., shorter intervals before switching) showed the greatest extensions when switching to brolucizumab. With careful consideration of benefits and risks, brolucizumab may be a valuable option for patients with higher treatment burdens because of the need for frequent injections. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.