Multimodal Approach of Optical Coherence Tomography and Raman Spectroscopy Can Improve Differentiating Benign and Malignant Skin Tumors in Animal Patients.

As in humans, cancer is one of the leading causes of companion animal mortality. Up to 30% of all canine and feline neoplasms appear on the skin or directly under it. There are only a few available studies that have investigated pet tumors by biophotonics techniques. In this study, we acquired 1115 optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of canine and feline skin, lipomas, soft tissue sarcomas, and mast cell tumors ex vivo, which were subsequently used for automated machine vision analysis. The OCT images were analyzed using a scanning window with a size of 53 × 53 µm. The distributions of the standard deviation, mean, range, and coefficient of variation values were acquired for each image. These distributions were characterized by their mean, standard deviation, and median values, resulting in 12 parameters in total. Additionally, 1002 Raman spectral measurements were made on the same samples, and features were generated by integrating the intensity of the most prominent peaks. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used for sample classification, and sensitivities/specificities were acquired by leave-one-out cross-validation. Three datasets were analyzed-OCT, Raman, and combined. The combined OCT and Raman data enabled the best sample differentiation with the sensitivities of 0.968, 1, and 0.939 and specificities of 0.956, 1, and 0.977 for skin, lipomas, and malignant tumors, respectively. Based on these results, we concluded that the proposed multimodal approach, combining Raman and OCT data, can accurately distinguish between malignant and benign tissues.

Evaluation of Erythema Severity in Dermatoscopic Images of Canine Skin: Erythema Index Assessment and Image Sampling Reliability.

The regular monitoring of erythema, one of the most important skin lesions in atopic (allergic) dogs, is essential for successful anti-allergic therapy. The smartphone-based dermatoscopy enables a convenient way to acquire quality images of erythematous skin. However, the image sampling to evaluate erythema severity is still done manually, introducing result variability. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the most popular erythema indices (EIs) and dermatologists' erythema perception, and we measured intra- and inter-rater variability of the currently-used manual image-sampling methods (ISMs). We showed that the EIBRG, based on all three RGB (red, green, and blue) channels, performed the best with an average Spearman coefficient of 0.75 and a typical absolute disagreement of less than 14% with the erythema assessed by clinicians. On the other hand, two image-sampling methods, based on either selecting specific pixels or small skin areas, performed similarly well. They achieved high intra- and inter-rater reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Krippendorff's alpha well above 0.90. These results indicated that smartphone-based dermatoscopy could be a convenient and precise way to evaluate skin erythema severity. However, better outlined, or even automated ISMs, are likely to improve the intra- and inter-rater reliability in severe erythematous cases.