Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 216: 138-142, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28763739

RESUMO

Improved performances in gynaecological ultrasonography have enabled an increasing number of often asymptomatic endometrial polyps to be detected. Most of these polyps are removed surgically, as a precautionary measure, so as not to miss a case of endometrial cancer. Nonetheless, this management strategy is based solely on the sonographer's judgement and a number of these operations, which are probably of no benefit, could be avoided. In order to do so, risk factors for malignancy need to be identified. OBJECTIVE: Estimate the prevalence of lesions in menopausal patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of endometrial polyp. Establish risk factors for malignancy. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-centre retrospective study. Enrolment criteria were menopausal patients aged over 45 who had undergone hysteroscopic resection of a polyp. Pre-op diagnosis was made either by ultrasonography or diagnostic hysteroscopy. Malignant lesions included cancers and atypical hyperplasia. Benign lesions consisted of simple polyps, non-atypical simple hyperplasia and non-atypical complex hyperplasia. Risk factors studied were existing abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial thickness, personal or first-degree family history of gynaecological cancer (breast, cervix, endometrium, ovary) and age on diagnosis. RESULTS: 631 patients were enrolled of whom 30 presented a malignant disorder (4.75%); 579 patients (91.76%) presented a simple polyp, 11 a non-atypical simple hyperplasia (1.74%) and 11 a non-atypical complex hyperplasia (1.74%). On univariate analysis age alone proved to be statistically significant (OR 1.05; 95%CI=[1.02-1.09] p<0.01), with a threshold of 59 years of age on the ROC curve. On multivariate analysis, factors predictive of a malignant lesion were age (OR=1.06; 95%CI [1.02-1.10]), existence of AUB (OR=2.4; 95% CI [1.07-5.42]) and family history (OR=2.88; 95%CI [1.08-7.67]). Neither the univariate nor multivariate model was able to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship with respect to endometrial thickness. The risk of malignancy was 12.3% in patients aged over 59 presenting AUB. For all other subgroups, the risk varied between 2.31 and 3.78%. CONCLUSION: The risk of a malignant lesion appears to be high (12%) in menopausal patients aged over 59 presenting an endometrial polyp detected when there is pre-existing AUB. In this situation, hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps should therefore be routinely proposed. For other patients, the risk of a malignant lesion is low but not insignificant, standing at about 3%. Each patient record should therefore be discussed on an individual case basis, taking into consideration the patient's pre-existing conditions, after providing clear and appropriate information.


Assuntos
Menopausa , Pólipos/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pólipos/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Ultrassonografia , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA