Computed tomography and coronary artery calcium score for screening of coronary artery disease and cardiovascular risk management in asymptomatic individuals.

Several risk prediction models exist to predict atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in asymptomatic individuals, but systematic reviews have generally found these models to be of limited utility. The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) offers an improvement in risk prediction, yet its role remains contentious. Notably, its negative predictive value has a high ability to rule out clinically relevant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nonetheless, CACS 0 does not permanently reclassify to a lower cardiovascular risk and periodic reassessment every 5 to 10 years remains necessary. Conversely, elevated CACS (> 100 or > 75th percentile adjusted for age, sex and ethnicity) can reclassify intermediate-risk individuals to a high risk, benefiting from preventive medication. The forthcoming update to the Dutch cardiovascular risk management guideline intends to re-position CACS for cardiovascular risk assessment as such in asymptomatic individuals. Beyond CACS as a single number, several guidelines recommend coronary CT angiography (CCTA), which provides additional information about luminal stenosis and (high-risk) plaque composition, as the first choice of test in symptomatic patients and high-risk patients. Ongoing randomised studies will have to determine the value of atherosclerosis evaluation with CCTA for primary prevention in asymptomatic individuals.

Reference formulas for chest CT-derived lobar volumes in the lung-healthy general population.

INTRODUCTION: Lung hyperinflation, a key contributor to dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), can be quantified via chest computed tomography (CT). Establishing reference equations for lobar volumes and total lung volume (TLV) can aid in evaluating lobar hyperinflation, especially for targeted lung volume reduction therapies. METHODS: The Imaging in Lifelines study (ImaLife) comprises 11,729 participants aged 45 and above with analyzed inspiratory low-dose thoracic CT scans. Lung and lobar volumes were measured using an automatic AI-based segmentation algorithm (LungSeg). For the main analysis, participants were excluded if they had self-reported COPD/asthma, lung disease on CT, airflow obstruction on lung function testing, were currently smoking, aged over 80 years, or had height outside the 99% confidence interval. Reference equations for TLV and lobar volumes were determined using linear regression considering age and height, stratified by sex. For the subanalysis, participants who were currently smoking or experiencing airflow obstruction were compared to the group of the main analysis. RESULTS: The study included 7306 lung-healthy participants, 97.5% Caucasian, 43.6% men, with mean age of 60.3 ± 9.5 years. Lung and lobar volumes generally increased with age and height. Men consistently had higher volumes than women when adjusted for height. R2 values ranged from 7.8 to 19.9%. In smokers and those with airway obstruction, volumes were larger than in lung-healthy groups, with the largest increases measured in the upper lobes. CONCLUSION: The established reference equations for CT-derived TLV and lobar volumes provide a standardized interpretation for individuals aged 45 to 80 of Northern European descent. KEY POINTS: Question Lobar lung volumes can be derived from inspiratory CT scans, but healthy-lung reference values are lacking. Findings Lung and lobar volumes generally increased with age and height. Reference equations for lung/lobar volumes were derived from a sizeable lung-healthy population. Clinical relevance This study provides reference equations for inspiratory CT-derived lung and lobar volumes in a lung-healthy population, potentially useful for assessing candidates for lung volume reduction therapies, for lobe removal in lung cancer patients, and in case of restrictive pulmonary diseases.

Clinically Relevant Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac Imaging: Insights from the European MR/CT Registry.

Purpose To determine the prevalence of clinically relevant extracardiac findings at cardiac CT and MRI examinations from a multicenter, multinational MR/CT registry and the relationship of prevalence with examination indications and patient characteristics. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective analysis of data from the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology MR/CT Registry. Data from 208 506 cardiac CT examinations (median patient age, 66 years [IQR, 55-77]; 121 617 [58.33%] male patients) and 228 462 cardiac MRI examinations (median patient age, 57 years [IQR, 42-69]; 145 792 [63.81%] male patients) entered into the registry between January 2011 and November 2023 were analyzed. Clinically relevant extracardiac findings were defined as findings requiring follow-up examinations or influencing clinical management. The association of examination indication and patient characteristics, including age, with prevalence of extracardiac findings was evaluated using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) derived from multivariable Poisson regression models. Results The prevalence of clinically relevant extracardiac findings was 3.28% (6832 of 208 506) at cardiac CT and 1.50% (3421 of 228 462) at cardiac MRI examinations. Extracardiac findings were more common at CT examinations performed for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (IRR, 2.07; P < .001) and structural heart disease (IRR, 1.44; P < .001) compared with CT performed for coronary artery disease (IRR, 1; reference). Extracardiac findings were more common at MRI examinations performed for myocarditis (IRR, 1.36; P < .001) and structural heart disease (IRR, 1.16; P < .001) than for coronary artery disease. Older patient age was also significantly associated with higher prevalence of extracardiac findings, with an IRR for both CT and MRI examinations of 1.02 (P < .001). Conclusion Data from the multicenter, multinational MR/CT registry indicate that clinically relevant extracardiac findings are present at cardiovascular CT and MRI examinations, and the prevalence of these findings is associated with examination indication and patient age. Keywords: Cardiac Imaging Techniques, Incidental Findings, MRI, CT Angiography, CT, Heart Disease Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Recommendations for the creation of benchmark datasets for reproducible artificial intelligence in radiology.

Various healthcare domains have witnessed successful preliminary implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, including radiology, though limited generalizability hinders their widespread adoption. Currently, most research groups and industry have limited access to the data needed for external validation studies. The creation and accessibility of benchmark datasets to validate such solutions represents a critical step towards generalizability, for which an array of aspects ranging from preprocessing to regulatory issues and biostatistical principles come into play. In this article, the authors provide recommendations for the creation of benchmark datasets in radiology, explain current limitations in this realm, and explore potential new approaches. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Benchmark datasets, facilitating validation of AI software performance can contribute to the adoption of AI in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Benchmark datasets are essential for the validation of AI software performance. Factors like image quality and representativeness of cases should be considered. Benchmark datasets can help adoption by increasing the trustworthiness and robustness of AI.

Exploration of the relationship between general health-related problems and subclinical coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study in a general population.

OBJECTIVE: To explore associations between general health-related problems and subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD), determined by CT coronary calcium score (CT-CCS), in a general population. DESIGN: A cross-sectional design. SETTING: This study was performed in a prospective population-based cohort, examining the health and health-related behaviour of individuals living in the Northern Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: The initial cohort comprised 6763 participants ≥45 years of age who underwent CT-scanning. Participants were included for the current analysis if they filled in three validated questionnaires (Symptomatic Checklist-90, Research and Development Survey-36 and Reviving the Early Diagnosis of CardioVascular Diseases questionnaire (RED-CVD)) and did not have a history of cardiovascular disease. The final analysis included 6530 participants. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Backward-stepwise and forward-stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to determine associations between general health-related problems and subclinical CAD (CCS≥100 and ≥300). RESULTS: The median age was 53 years (25th, 75th percentile: 48, 58); 57% were women. CRCS≥100 was found in 1236 (19%) participants, 437 (12%) in women and 799 (29%) men and CCS≥300 in 643 (9.9%) participants of which 180 (4.8%) were women and 463 (16.6%) men. In univariate analysis, in women the expectation of health to worsen (OR=1.13, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.21), and in men reduced exercise intolerance (OR=1.14, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.23) were associated with CCS≥100. The total RED-CVD score in women (OR=1.06, (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.08) and men (OR=1.07, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.09), and in men also reduced exercise intolerance (OR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.25) and headache (OR=0.55, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.79) were associated with CCS≥300. In multivariate analyses, only general health expectation in women was still significantly associated with subclinical CAD (CCS≥300) (OR=1.92, 95% CI: 1.56 to 2.37). CONCLUSION: Only a few general health-related problems were associated with the presence of subclinical CAD in the general population, however, these problems showed no strong association. Therefore, using health-related symptoms does not seem useful to pre-select for CT-CCS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CCMO Register, NL17981.042.07 and NL58592.042.16.

Short-term impact of cardiovascular screening by traditional risk assessment or coronary artery calcium score on health-related quality of life: the ROBINSCA trial.

Aims: Evidence on the impact of screening for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important for policy decisions about screening implementation and to uncover teachable moments to motivate healthy lifestyle choices. It is unknown whether screening by cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan has a stronger impact on HRQoL than screening by traditional risk prediction models. The study aims to investigate differences in HRQoL across the screening process between participants who were randomized to CVD risk estimation by coronary artery calcium score or Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation. Methods and results: A subset of 2687 ROBINSCA participants filled in questionnaires at (T0) randomization, (T1) invitation, (T2) 1-3 days before screening, (T3) 1-3 days after, and (T4) screening result. Generic HRQoL (SF-12; EQ-5D) and anxiety (STAI-6) were measured. We investigated the differences in changes in HRQoL across the screening process with linear mixed models. We found comparable levels of HRQoL at all screening moments for the two intervention groups. Mental health scores were worse at invitation and randomization than at the later time points, irrespective of screening group (all P < 0.001). A result indicating a heightened CVD risk was associated with increased anxiety in the CT screening group. Conclusion: Computed tomography screening for CVD risk has no detrimental impact on HRQoL and anxiety levels compared to screening by traditional risk assessment. Receiving an invitation to screenning or a result implying increased CVD risk could function as teachable moments for high-risk individuals. Registration: ROBINSCA trial registration number: NTR6471 in Dutch Trial Register (NTR).

Distribution of Solid Lung Nodules Presence and Size by Age and Sex in a Northern European Nonsmoking Population.

Background Most of the data regarding prevalence and size distribution of solid lung nodules originates from lung cancer screening studies that target high-risk populations or from Asian general cohorts. In recent years, the identification of lung nodules in non-high-risk populations, scanned for clinical indications, has increased. However, little is known about the presence of solid lung nodules in the Northern European nonsmoking population. Purpose To study the prevalence and size distribution of solid lung nodules by age and sex in a nonsmoking population. Materials and Methods Participants included nonsmokers (never or former smokers) from the population-based Imaging in Lifelines study conducted in the Northern Netherlands. Participants (age ≥ 45 years) with completed lung function tests underwent chest low-dose CT scans. Seven trained readers registered the presence and size of solid lung nodules measuring 30 mm3 or greater using semiautomated software. The prevalence and size of lung nodules (≥30 mm3), clinically relevant lung nodules (≥100 mm3), and actionable nodules (≥300 mm3) are presented by 5-year categories and by sex. Results A total of 10 431 participants (median age, 60.4 years [IQR, 53.8-70.8 years]; 56.6% [n = 5908] female participants; 46.1% [n = 4812] never smokers and 53.9% [n = 5619] former smokers) were included. Of these, 42.0% (n = 4377) had at least one lung nodule (male participants, 47.5% [2149 of 4523]; female participants, 37.7% [2228 of 5908]). The prevalence of lung nodules increased from age 45-49.9 years (male participants, 39.4% [219 of 556]; female participants, 27.7% [236 of 851]) to age 80 years or older (male participants, 60.7% [246 of 405]; female participants, 50.9% [163 of 320]). Clinically relevant lung nodules were present in 11.1% (1155 of 10 431) of participants, with prevalence increasing with age (male participants, 8.5%-24.4%; female participants, 3.7%-15.6%), whereas actionable nodules were present in 1.1%-6.4% of male participants and 0.6%-4.9% of female participants. Conclusion Lung nodules were present in a substantial proportion of all age groups in the Northern European nonsmoking population, with slightly higher prevalence for male participants than female participants. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR versus Invasive FFR for Hemodynamic Relevance of Coronary Artery Disease.

Background CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging enhance the specificity of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for ruling out coronary artery disease (CAD). However, evidence on comparative diagnostic value remains scarce. Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA plus CT-FFR, CCTA plus CT perfusion, and sequential CCTA plus CT-FFR and CT perfusion for detecting hemodynamically relevant CAD with that of invasive angiography. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of a prospective study included patients with chest pain referred for invasive coronary angiography at nine centers from July 2016 to September 2019. CCTA and CT perfusion were performed with third-generation dual-source CT scanners. CT-FFR was assessed on-site. Independent core laboratories analyzed CCTA alone, CCTA plus CT perfusion, CCTA plus CT-FFR, and a sequential approach involving CCTA plus CT-FFR and CT perfusion for the presence of hemodynamically relevant stenosis. Invasive coronary angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve was the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy metrics and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were compared with the Sign test and DeLong test. Results Of the 105 participants (mean age, 64 years ± 8 [SD]; 68 male), 49 (47%) had hemodynamically relevant stenoses at invasive coronary angiography. CCTA plus CT-FFR and CCTA plus CT perfusion showed no evidence of a difference for participant-based sensitivities (90% vs 90%, P > .99), specificities (77% vs 79%, P > .99) and vessel-based AUCs (0.84 [95% CI: 0.77, 0.91] vs 0.83 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.91], P = .90). Both had higher participant-based specificity than CCTA alone (54%, both P < .001) without evidence of a difference in sensitivity between CCTA (94%) and CCTA plus CT perfusion (P = .50) or CCTA plus CT-FFR (P = .63). The sequential approach combining CCTA plus CT-FFR with CT perfusion achieved higher participant-based specificity than CCTA plus CT-FFR (88% vs 77%, P = .03) without evidence of a difference in participant-based sensitivity (88% vs 90%, P > .99) and vessel-based AUC (0.85 [95% CI: 0.77, 0.93], P = .78). Compared with CCTA plus CT perfusion, the sequential approach showed no evidence of a difference in participant-based sensitivity (P > .99), specificity (P = .06), or vessel-based AUC (P = .54). Conclusion There was no evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between CCTA plus CT-FFR and CCTA plus CT perfusion for detecting hemodynamically relevant CAD. A sequential approach combining CCTA plus CT-FFR with CT perfusion led to improved participant-based specificity with no evidence of a difference in sensitivity compared with CCTA plus CT-FFR. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT02810795 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sinitsyn in this issue.

Automated evaluation of diaphragm configuration based on chest CT in COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often results in hyperinflation and flattening of the diaphragm. An automated computed tomography (CT)-based tool for quantifying diaphragm configuration, a biomarker for COPD, was developed in-house and tested in a large cohort of COPD patients. METHODS: We used the LungQ platform to extract the lung-diaphragm intersection, as direct diaphragm segmentation is challenging. The tool computed the diaphragm index (surface area/projected surface area) as a measure of diaphragm configuration on inspiratory scans in a COPDGene subcohort. Visual inspection of 250 randomly selected segmentations served as a quality check. Associations between the diaphragm index, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % predicted, and CT-derived emphysema scores were explored using analysis of variance and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: The tool yielded incomplete segmentation in 9.2% (2.4% major defect, 6.8% minor defect) of 250 randomly selected cases. In 8431 COPDGene subjects (4240 healthy; 4191 COPD), the diaphragm index was increasingly lower with higher GOLD stages (never-smoked 1.83 ± 0.16; GOLD-0 1.79 ± 0.18; GOLD-1 1.71 ± 0.15; GOLD-2: 1.67 ± 0.16; GOLD-3 1.58 ± 0.14; GOLD-4 1.54 ± 0.11) (p < 0.001). Associations were found between the diaphragm index and both FEV1% predicted (r = 0.44, p < 0.001) and emphysema score (r = -0.36, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We developed an automated tool to quantify the diaphragm configuration in chest CT. The diaphragm index was associated with COPD severity, FEV1%predicted, and emphysema score. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Due to the hypothesized relationship between diaphragm dysfunction and diaphragm configuration in COPD patients, automatic quantification of diaphragm configuration may prove useful in evaluating treatment efficacy in terms of lung volume reduction. KEY POINTS: Severe COPD changes diaphragm configuration to a flattened state, impeding function. An automated tool quantified diaphragm configuration on chest-CT providing a diaphragm index. The diaphragm index was correlated to COPD severity and may aid treatment assessment.

Association between skin autofluorescence and coronary calcification in the general population.

OBJECTIVE: To address the relationship between tissue accumulation of advanced glycation end-products, assessed by skin autofluorescence (SAF), and subclinical atherosclerosis quantified with coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in the general Dutch population. METHODS: A total of 3,839 participants of the LifeLines Cohort Study without diabetes or cardiovascular disease were included in this cross-sectional evaluation. They underwent SAF measurement and cardiac computed tomography to measure CACS. Associations between SAF and CACS was assessed using regression models. Participants at elevated risk for cardiovascular disease were selected by either CACS≥100, or SAF value in the top 15%; overlap and cardiovascular risk profile of these participants were compared. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, every 1 arbitrary unit (AU) increase in SAF resulted in an odds ratio of 2.91 (95% confidence interval 2.44-3.48, p<0.001) for coronary calcification. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, there was still 20% higher odds of coronary calcification with 1 AU increase in SAF, but significance was lost. In total, 1025 (27%) participants either had high SAF and/or high CACS, of these 441 (12%) had only high SAF, 450 (12%) had only high CACS and 134 (3%) participants had high SAF and high CACS. CONCLUSION: In a population-based Dutch cohort, SAF was associated with the degree of coronary calcification. This association was largely explained by classical cardiovascular risk factors. Limited overlap was found in subgroups with high SAF or high CACS, indicating that SAF and CACS may have complementary role in identifying individuals at elevated cardiovascular risk.

Standards for conducting and reporting consensus and recommendation documents: European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology policy from the Guidelines Committee.

Cardiovascular imaging is exponentially increasing in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic management of patients with cardiovascular disease. The European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) is a non-profit scientific medical society dedicated to promoting and coordinating activities in cardiovascular imaging. The purpose of this paper, written by ESCR committees and Executive board members and approved by the ESCR Executive Board and Guidelines committee, is to codify a standardized approach to creating ESCR scientific documents. Indeed, consensus development methods must be adopted to ensure transparent decision-making that optimizes national and global health and reaches a certain scientific credibility. ESCR consensus documents developed based on a rigorous methodology will improve their scientific impact on the management of patients with cardiac involvement. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This document aims to codify the methodology for producing consensus documents of the ESCR. These ESCR indications will broaden the scientific quality and credibility of further publications and, consequently, the impact on the diagnostic management of patients with cardiac involvement. KEY POINTS: Cardiovascular imaging is exponentially increasing for diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic management. The ESCR is committed to promoting cardiovascular imaging. A rigorous methodology for ESCR consensus documents will improve their scientific impact.

Low-Dose CT-derived Bronchial Parameters in Individuals with Healthy Lungs.

Background CT-derived bronchial parameters have been linked to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma severity, but little is known about these parameters in healthy individuals. Purpose To investigate the distribution of bronchial parameters at low-dose CT in individuals with healthy lungs from a Dutch general population. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, low-dose chest CT performed between May 2017 and October 2022 were obtained from participants who had completed the second-round assessment of the prospective, longitudinal Imaging in Lifelines study. Participants were aged at least 45 years, and those with abnormal spirometry, self-reported respiratory disease, or signs of lung disease at CT were excluded. Airway lumens and walls were segmented automatically. The square root of the bronchial wall area of a hypothetical airway with an internal perimeter of 10 mm (Pi10), luminal area (LA), wall thickness (WT), and wall area percentage were calculated. Associations between sex, age, height, weight, smoking status, and bronchial parameters were assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses. Results The study sample was composed of 8869 participants with healthy lungs (mean age, 60.9 years ± 10.4 [SD]; 4841 [54.6%] female participants), including 3672 (41.4%) never-smokers and 1197 (13.5%) individuals who currently smoke. Bronchial parameters for male participants were higher than those for female participants (Pi10, slope [ß] range = 3.49-3.66 mm; LA, ß range = 25.40-29.76 mm2; WT, ß range = 0.98-1.03 mm; all P < .001). Increasing age correlated with higher Pi10, LA, and WT (r2 range = 0.06-0.09, 0.02-0.01, and 0.02-0.07, respectively; all P < .001). Never-smoking individuals had the lowest Pi10 followed by formerly smoking and currently smoking individuals (3.62 mm ± 0.13, 3.68 mm ± 0.14, and 3.70 mm ± 0.14, respectively; all P < .001). In multivariable regression models, age, sex, height, weight, and smoking history explained up to 46% of the variation in bronchial parameters. Conclusion In healthy individuals, bronchial parameters differed by sex, height, weight, and smoking history; male sex and increasing age were associated with wider lumens and thicker walls. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Emrich and Varga-Szemes in this issue.

Who is at risk of lung nodules on low-dose CT in a Western country? A population-based approach.

BACKGROUND: This population-based study aimed to identify the risk factors for lung nodules in a Western European general population. METHODS: We quantified the presence or absence of lung nodules among 12 055 participants of the Dutch population-based ImaLife (Imaging in Lifelines) study (age ≥45 years) who underwent low-dose chest computed tomography. Outcomes included the presence of 1) at least one solid lung nodule (volume ≥30 mm3) and 2) a clinically relevant lung nodule (volume ≥100 mm3). Fully adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were applied overall and stratified by smoking status to identify independent risk factors for the presence of nodules. RESULTS: Among the 12 055 participants (44.1% male; median age 60 years; 39.9% never-smokers; 98.7% White), we found lung nodules in 41.8% (5045 out of 12 055) and clinically relevant nodules in 11.4% (1377 out of 12 055); the corresponding figures among never-smokers were 38.8% and 9.5%, respectively. Factors independently associated with increased odds of having any lung nodule included male sex, older age, low educational level, former smoking, asbestos exposure and COPD. Among never-smokers, a family history of lung cancer increased the odds of both lung nodules and clinically relevant nodules. Among former and current smokers, low educational level was positively associated with lung nodules, whereas being overweight was negatively associated. Among current smokers, asbestos exposure and low physical activity were associated with clinically relevant nodules. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides a large-scale evaluation of lung nodules and associated risk factors in a Western European general population: lung nodules and clinically relevant nodules were prevalent, and never-smokers with a family history of lung cancer were a non-negligible group.

Ct-defined emphysema prevalence in a Chinese and Dutch general population.

PURPOSE: We determine and compare the prevalence, subtypes, severity, and risk factors for emphysema assessed by low-dose CT(LDCT) in Chinese and Dutch general populations. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included LDCT scans of 1143 participants between May and October 2017 from a Chinese Cohort study and 1200 participants with same age range and different smoking status between May and October 2019 from a Dutch population-based study. An experienced radiologist visually assessed the scans for emphysema presence (≥trace), subtype, and severity. Logistic regression analyses, overall and stratified by smoking status, were performed and adjusted for fume exposure, demographic and smoking data. RESULTS: The Chinese population had a comparable proportion of women to the Dutch population (54.9 % vs 58.9 %), was older (61.7 ± 6.3 vs 59.8 ± 8.1), included more never smokers (66.4 % vs 38.3 %), had a higher emphysema prevalence ([58.8 % vs 39.7 %], adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 2.06, 95 %CI = 1.68-2.53), and more often had centrilobular emphysema (54.8 % vs 32.8 %, p < 0.001), but no differences in emphysema severity. After stratification, only in never smokers an increased odds of emphysema was observed in the Chinese compared to the Dutch (aOR = 2.55, 95 %CI = 1.95-3.35). Never smokers in both populations shared older age (aOR = 1.59, 95 %CI = 1.25-2.02 vs 1.26, 95 %CI = 0.97-1.64) and male sex (aOR = 1.50, 95 %CI = 1.02-2.22 vs 1.93, 95 %CI = 1.26-2.96) as risk factors for emphysema. CONCLUSIONS: Only never smokers had a higher prevalence of mainly centrilobular emphysema in the Chinese general population compared to the Dutch after adjusting for confounders, indicating that factors other than smoking, age and sex contribute to presence of CT-defined emphysema.

Effect of emphysema on AI software and human reader performance in lung nodule detection from low-dose chest CT.

BACKGROUND: Emphysema influences the appearance of lung tissue in computed tomography (CT). We evaluated whether this affects lung nodule detection by artificial intelligence (AI) and human readers (HR). METHODS: Individuals were selected from the "Lifelines" cohort who had undergone low-dose chest CT. Nodules in individuals without emphysema were matched to similar-sized nodules in individuals with at least moderate emphysema. AI results for nodular findings of 30-100 mm3 and 101-300 mm3 were compared to those of HR; two expert radiologists blindly reviewed discrepancies. Sensitivity and false positives (FPs)/scan were compared for emphysema and non-emphysema groups. RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants with and 82 without emphysema were included (n = 121, aged 61 ± 8 years (mean ± standard deviation), 58/121 males (47.9%)). AI and HR detected 196 and 206 nodular findings, respectively, yielding 109 concordant nodules and 184 discrepancies, including 118 true nodules. For AI, sensitivity was 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.77) in emphysema versus 0.71 (0.62-0.78) in non-emphysema, with FPs/scan 0.51 and 0.22, respectively (p = 0.028). For HR, sensitivity was 0.76 (0.65-0.84) and 0.80 (0.72-0.86), with FPs/scan of 0.15 and 0.27 (p = 0.230). Overall sensitivity was slightly higher for HR than for AI, but this difference disappeared after the exclusion of benign lymph nodes. FPs/scan were higher for AI in emphysema than in non-emphysema (p = 0.028), while FPs/scan for HR were higher than AI for 30-100 mm3 nodules in non-emphysema (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: AI resulted in more FPs/scan in emphysema compared to non-emphysema, a difference not observed for HR. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In the creation of a benchmark dataset to validate AI software for lung nodule detection, the inclusion of emphysema cases is important due to the additional number of FPs. KEY POINTS: • The sensitivity of nodule detection by AI was similar in emphysema and non-emphysema. • AI had more FPs/scan in emphysema compared to non-emphysema. • Sensitivity and FPs/scan by the human reader were comparable for emphysema and non-emphysema. • Emphysema and non-emphysema representation in benchmark dataset is important for validating AI.

Phase angle and donor type are determinants of coronary artery calcification in stable kidney transplant recipients at twelve months after transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) partially explains the excess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. This study aimed to investigate determinants of CAC in stable kidney transplant recipients at 12 months post-transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: CAC-score was quantified by the Agatston method using non-contrast enhanced computed tomography, and age- and sex-standardized CAC-percentiles were calculated. Univariable and multivariable multinomial logistic regression was performed to study potential determinants of CAC. The independent determinants were included in multivariable multinomial logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders. 203 KTRs (age 54.0 ± 14.7 years, 61.1% male) were included. Participants were categorized into four groups according to CAC percentiles (p = 0 [CAC-score = 0], n = 68; p ≥ 1%-p ≤ 50% [CAC score = 29.0 (4.0-166.0)], n = 31; p > 50 ≤ 75% [CAC score = 101.0 (23.8-348.3)], n = 26; and p>75% [CAC score = 581.0 (148.0-1652)], n = 83). Upon multivariable multinomial logistic regression, patients with a narrower phase angle and patients who had received a graft from a deceased donor had a higher risk of being in the >75th CAC-percentile. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies not only metabolic and transplant-related factors, but also phase angle, a composite marker of cell integrity, as an independent determinant of CAC at 12 months after kidney transplantation. This study offers new perspectives for future research into the value of bioelectrical impedance analysis in relation to vascular calcification in kidney transplant recipients.

Feasibility of virtual non-iodine coronary calcium scoring on dual source photon-counting coronary CT angiography: a dynamic phantom study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our current systematic dynamic phantom study was first, to optimize reconstruction parameters of coronary CTA (CCTA) acquired on photon counting CT (PCCT) for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring, and second, to assess the feasibility of calculating CAC scores from CCTA, in comparison to reference calcium scoring CT (CSCT) scans. METHODS: In this phantom study, an artificial coronary artery was translated at velocities corresponding to 0, < 60, and 60-75 beats per minute (bpm) within an anthropomorphic phantom. The density of calcifications was 100 (very low), 200 (low), 400 (medium), and 800 (high) mgHA/cm3, respectively. CCTA was reconstructed with the following parameters: virtual non-iodine (VNI), with and without iterative reconstruction (QIR level 2, QIR off, respectively); kernels Qr36 and Qr44f; slice thickness/increment 3.0/1.5 mm and 0.4/0.2 mm. The agreement in risk group classification between CACCCTA and CACCSCT scoring was measured using Cohen weighted linear κ with 95% CI. RESULTS: For CCTA reconstructed with 0.4 mm slice thickness, calcium detectability was perfect (100%). At < 60 bpm, CACCCTA of low, and medium density calcification was underestimated by 53%, and 15%, respectively. However, CACCCTA was not significantly different from CACCSCT of very low, and high-density calcifications. The best risk agreement was achieved when CCTA was reconstructed with QIR off, Qr44f, and 0.4 mm slice thickness (κ = 0.762, 95% CI 0.671-0.853). CONCLUSION: In this dynamic phantom study, the detection of calcifications with different densities was excellent with CCTA on PCCT using thin-slice VNI reconstruction. Agatston scores were underestimated compared to CSCT but agreement in risk classification was substantial. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Photon counting CT may enable the implementation of coronary artery calcium scoring from coronary CTA in daily clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Photon-counting CTA allows for excellent detectability of low-density calcifications at all heart rates. Coronary artery calcium scoring from coronary CTA acquired on photon counting CT is feasible, although improvement is needed. Adoption of the standard acquisition and reconstruction protocol for calcium scoring is needed for improved quantification of coronary artery calcium to fully employ the potential of photon counting CT.

ESR Essentials: imaging in stable chest pain - practice recommendations by ESCR.

Stable chest pain is a common symptom with multiple potential causes. Non-invasive imaging has an important role in diagnosis and guiding management through the assessment of coronary stenoses, atherosclerotic plaque, myocardial ischaemia or infarction, and cardiac function. Computed tomography (CT) provides the anatomical evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) with the assessment of stenosis, plaque type and plaque burden, with additional functional information available from CT fractional flow reserve (FFR) or CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Stress magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear stress myocardial perfusion imaging, and stress echocardiography can assess myocardial ischaemia and other cardiac functional parameters. Coronary CT angiography can be used as a first-line test for many patients with stable chest pain, particularly those with low to intermediate pre-test probability. Functional testing may be considered for patients with known CAD, where the clinical significance is uncertain based on anatomical testing, or in patients with high pre-test probability. This practice recommendations document can be used to guide the selection of non-invasive imaging for patients with stable chest pain and provides brief recommendations on how to perform and report these diagnostic tests. KEY POINTS: The selection of non-invasive imaging tests for patients with stable chest pain should be based on symptoms, pre-test probability, and previous history. Coronary CT angiography can be used as a first-line test for many patients with stable chest pain, particularly those with low to intermediate pre-test probability. Functional testing can be considered for patients with known CAD, where the clinical significance of CAD is uncertain based on anatomical testing, or in patients with high pre-test probability. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: Non-invasive imaging is an important part of the assessment of patients with stable chest pain. The selection of non-invasive imaging test should be based on symptoms, pre-test probability, and previous history. (Level of evidence: High). Coronary CT angiography can be used as a first line test for many patients with stable chest pain, particularly those with low to intermediate pre-test probability. CT provides information on stenoses, plaque type, plaque volume, and if required functional information with CT fractional flow reserve or CT perfusion. (Level of evidence: High). Functional testing can be considered for patients with known CAD, where the clinical significance of CAD is uncertain based on anatomical testing, or in patients with high pre-test probability. Stress MRI, SPECT, PET, and echocardiography can provide information on myocardial ischemia, along with cardiac functional and other information. (Level of evidence: Medium).