[Comments on the guidelines (2018) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) on the management of arterial hypertension]. / Kommentar zu den Leitlinien (2018) der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) und der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Hypertonie (ESH) für das Management der arteriellen Hypertonie.

Arterial hypertension represents one of the most frequent chronic diseases that can lead to complications, such as stroke, dementia, heart attack, heart failure and renal failure. By 2025 the number of hypertensive patients will increase to approximately 1.6 billion people worldwide. The new guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) on the management of arterial hypertension replace the guidelines of the ESC/ESH from 2013. The 2018 guidelines of the ESC/ESH were adopted by the German Cardiac Society and the German Hypertension League. In these comments national characteristics are worked out and the essential new aspects of the guidelines are critically discussed. These include, for example, the definition of hypertension, the importance of out of office blood pressure measurements, revised blood pressure targets, the modified algorithm for drug treatment and the relevance of device-based hypertension treatments. Important aspects for the management of hypertensive emergencies are also presented.

[Baroreceptor activation therapy for therapy-resistant hypertension: indications and patient selection : Recommendations of the BAT consensus group 2017]. / Barorezeptorakivierungstherapie bei therapierefraktärer Hypertonie: Indikation und Patientenselektion : Empfehlungen der BAT-Konsensusgruppe 2017.

Baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT) has been available for several years for treatment of therapy-refractory hypertension (trHTN). This procedure is currently being carried out in a limited number of centers in Germany, also with the aim of offering a high level of expertise through sufficient experience; however, a growing number of patients who are treated with BAT experience problems that treating physicians are confronted with in routine medical practice. In order to address these problems, a consensus conference was held with experts in the field of trHTN in November 2016, which summarizes the current evidence and experience as well as the problem areas in handling BAT patients.

Multidisciplinary Approach in the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension.

With its high prevalence and the eminent number of undetected or poorly controlled patients, the management of arterial hypertension is still a challenging task. Uncontrolled blood pressure is the major adjustable risk factor for cardiovascular end organ damage for coronary heart disease, heart failure, stroke, and renal disease. Patients with resistant hypertension often need a multidisciplinary approach in order to control their blood pressure sustainably. In cooperation with hypertension specialists, the underlying cause for therapy resistance should be evaluated. Pseudohypertension, white coat hypertension, and non-adherence need to be addressed. The medication can often be optimized and simplified. Reducing the number of pills per day can enhance the drug-adherence remarkably. The multidisciplinary evaluation of secondary causes of hypertension includes an endocrinological work-up, ruling out relevant sleeping disorders, and renal diagnostics. If there are no causative treatments possible and pharmacological and non-pharmacological measurements are not sufficient to control the blood pressure, one has to consider multidisciplinary approaches bringing nurses, pharmacists, dieticians, physiotherapists, social workers, psychologists, and community health workers onboard. Utilizing various strategies might improve medication management, patient follow-up, adherence, and self-management. Interventional therapy such as renal renervation, baroreflex activation therapy, or carotid body modulation is the final option that can be discussed with interventional active colleagues. However, large randomized controlled trials proving a benefit of these interventional therapies are still missing. The use of these still experimental approaches should be restricted to randomized controlled trials accordingly.

Predictors of Impaired Postpartum Renal Function in Women after Preeclampsia: Results of a Prospective Single Center Study.

Objective. The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the predictive value of single prepartum findings combined with serum biomarkers sFlt-1 (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1) and PlGF (placental growth factor) indicating severity of preeclampsia (PE) for occurrence and extent of impaired postpartum kidney function. Study Design. In this prospective, single center study 44 PE patients were compared to 39 healthy controls (similar in age and gestational age with singleton pregnancy) evaluated at time of delivery and at 6 months and 12 months postpartum. p values below 0.05 are considered statistically significant. Results. The majority of the PE patients had persistence of proteinuria (>120 mg/L after delivery) 6 months (p = 0.02) and 12 months postpartum (p < 0.0001) compared to controls. Also reduced GFR (glomerular filtration rate) persisted up to 6 months postpartum in PE patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). Prepartum sFlt-1 levels indeed correlated with impaired renal function parameters. Conclusion. A significant proportion of our PE patients had lower GFR levels and persistent proteinuria up to 12 months postpartum. Prepartum sFlt-1 is a trend-setting marker for impaired renal function postpartum, but it is not sufficient enough to predict renal impairment after PE. An evaluation of 24-month follow-up data is scheduled.

[Primay hyperaldosteronism--diagnostic and treatment]. / Primärer Hyperaldosteronismus--Diagnostik und Therapie.

Primary hyperaldosteronism (PHA) is characterized by an increased Aldosterone synthesis which is independent of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System (RAAS). The prevalence of PHA in patients who present in specialized hypertension centers is approx. 10 %. Besides patients with the classical symptoms known as "Conn-Trias" (hypertension, hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis), the more frequent normokalemic patients with PHA also show a worse outcome compared to patients with essential hypertension. Identifying these patients is an important task in the evaluation of hypertension since targeted treatment options are available. Screening for PHA using the Aldosterone-Renin-Ratio (ARR) should be performed in patients with hypokalemic, severe or resistant hypertension. In addition, young patients with early onset of severe hypertension and/or positive family history should be screened. A positive screening result should be followed by a confirmatory test. The saline infusion test is the preferred clinical test for confirming a suspected PHA since it is accessible and time efficient. Other confirmatory tests are not used on a regular basis. After any confirmatory test, CT- or MRI-imaging and adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is used in order to differentiate between a unilateral adenoma, a bilateral hyperplasia or another cause of PHA. CT or MRI usually cannot discriminate smaller tumors form hyperplasia. Therefore AVS is used to detect lateralization of autonomous aldosterone production. Lateralization of aldosterone production indicates a unilateral adenoma. In these cases, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the therapeutic option of choice with a hypertension cure rate of up to 60 %. If no lateralization is detectable, bilateral hyperplasia as the underlying cause of PHA is likely. Pharmacological inhibition of the mineralocorticoid receptor is the preferred treatment option in these cases. If Spironolactone is not well tolerated, Eplerenone and potassium-sparing diuretics should be prescribed. Often, however, in order to fully control hypertension, additional antihypertensive therapy is necessary.

[Treatment resistant hypertension. Value of a new treatment concept]. / Therapierefraktäre Hypertonie. Stellenwert neuer Therapiekonzepte.

Sympathetic overexpression can be found in a majority of hypertensive patients. Resistant arterial hypertension requires a targeted diagnostic procedure in order to exclude secondary causes of hypertension which can be treated specifically with established therapies. If secondary reasons are not identified, the antihypertensive medication is already optimal and lifestyle changes have been realized, but still the goal of antihypertensive therapy cannot be achieved, alternative invasive therapy strategies such as renal sympathetic denervation and baroreflex activation have been developed to achieve blood pressure control. These therapies are restricted to specialized centers which treat well-defined patients with therapy-resistant hypertension. Little long-term data concerning safety and efficacy are available for the two strategies. However, they should preferably be used as an ultima-ratio and add-on pathway to conservative procedures when established medication fails to achieve blood pressure control. To date, the effectiveness of the interventional antihypertensive therapies has only been shown on patients with systolic blood pressure over 160 mmHg and a mean oral medication of five drugs.

Comparison of the saline infusion test and the fludrocortisone suppression test for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.

For the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA), confirmatory testing is mandatory and different function tests can be employed. There are, however, sparse data comparing the fludrocortisone suppression test (FST) and the saline infusion test (SIT). Patients with PA (n=90) or essential hypertension (n=65) were studied. They underwent one or the other test or both of them. Using the DPC Siemens aldosterone radioimmunoassay, we found that the SIT led to a stronger suppression of aldosterone than the FST. Post-test aldosterone-to-renin ratios (ARRs) and the percentage of suppression of aldosterone serum concentrations performed worse. The same results were observed in patients who underwent both FST and SIT. Some patients had divergent results in both tests. For the SIT, a lower cutoff value should be used than for the FST for the adequate identification of patients with unilateral PA. Long-term prospective studies are needed to address the question at what cutoff values patients benefit from subtype differentiation of PA. We discuss here possible explanations for divergent results obtained with both tests.

[Expert consensus statement on interventional renal sympathetic denervation for hypertension treatment]. / Interventionelle renale Sympathikusdenervation zur Behandlung der therapieresistenten Hypertonie.

This commentary summarizes the expert consensus and recommendations of the working group 'Herz und Niere' of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK), the German Society of Nephrology (DGfN) and the German Hypertension League (DHL) on renal denervation for antihypertensive treatment. Renal denervation is a new, interventional approach to selectively denervate renal afferent and efferent sympathetic fibers. Renal denervation has been demonstrated to reduce office systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension, defined as systolic office blood pressure ≥ 160 mm Hg and ≥ 150 mm Hg in patients with diabetes type 2, which should currently be used as blood pressure thresholds for undergoing the procedure. Exclusion of secondary hypertension causes and optimized antihypertensive drug treatment is mandatory in every patient with resistant hypertension. In order to exclude pseudoresistance, 24-hour blood pressure measurements should be performed. Preserved renal function was an inclusion criterion in the Symplicity studies, therefore, renal denervation should be only considered in patients with a glomerular filtration rate > 45 ml/min. Adequate centre qualification in both, treatment of hypertension and interventional expertise are essential to ensure correct patient selection and procedural safety. Long-term follow-up after renal denervation and participation in the German Renal Denervation (GREAT) Registry are recommended to assess safety and efficacy after renal denervation over time.