Social admissions in older trauma patients, not just a one night stay.

PURPOSE: Older trauma patients (65 years or older), who suffer minor or moderate injury for which immediate hospitalization is not strictly indicated, are often admitted to the hospital due to a self-sufficiency problem. Although hospitalization is expensive and associated with risks, little is known about the course of such a social admission. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the course and outcome of social admissions. METHODS: A single centre retrospective cohort study was performed in a level II trauma centre. All hospitalized trauma patients aged 65 or older between 2015 and 2021 with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) code of 1 or 2 were included. The primary outcome was defined as the number of complications during admission (e.g. pneumonia, urinary tract infection, delirium, decubitus and, in-hospital mortality). Secondary outcomes were missed injury, length of stay, discharge location (home, with homecare or a skilled nursing facility), 30-day hospital return and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Out of 2900 older hospitalized trauma patients, 563 (19.4%) were included. Complications occurred in 99 patients (17.6%), eight patients (1.4%) died during admission, and in 17 patients (3.0%) a previously missed injury was found during the admission. The median length of stay was 5 days [IQR 2.00-9.00] and of all independent living patients, 49.1% could be discharged to their homes. After discharge, 4.4% of the patients returned within 30 days and, a total of 17.6% of all patients died within one year after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: One out of five older trauma patients presenting at the emergency department were admitted because of social reasons. Social admissions are lengthy and are accompanied by a considerable amount of complications.

Treatment of extra-articular proximal and middle phalangeal fractures of the hand: a systematic review.

The aim of the study was to systematically review the patient reported and functional outcomes of treatment for extra-articular proximal or middle phalangeal fractures of the hand in order to determine the best treatment options. The review methodology was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic bibliographic databases. Two independent reviewers performed screening and data extraction. The evaluation of quality of the included studies was performed using the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation scale. The initial search yielded 2354 studies. The full text manuscripts of 79 studies were evaluated of which 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 513 extra-articular proximal and middle phalangeal fractures of the hand were included of which 118 (23%) were treated non-operatively, 188 (37%) were treated by closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF) and 207 (40%) by open reduction internal fixation. It can be recommended that closed displaced extra-articular phalangeal fractures can be treated non-operatively, even fractures with an oblique or complex pattern, provided that closed reduction is possible and maintained. Conservative treatment is preferably performed with a cast/brace allowing free mobilization of the wrist. No definite conclusion could be drawn upon whether closed reduction with extra-articular K-wire pinning or transarticular pinning is superior; however, it might be suggested that extra-articular K-wire pinning is favoured. When open reduction is necessary for oblique or spiral extra-articular fractures, lag screw fixation is preferable to plate and screw fixation. But, similar recovery and functional results are achieved with transversally inserted K-wires compared to lag screw fixation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: therapeutic III.

Correction osteotomy of distal radius malunion stabilised with dorsal locking plates without grafting.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of our correction osteotomies of distal radial malunions without a bone graft. Eleven consecutive patients (mean age 52 years, range 18-71) were treated. A dorsal approach was utilised to perform an opening-wedge osteotomy which then was stabilised with two dorsal columnar plates without filling the osteotomy gap. All patients went on to radiographic union with a filling of the osteotomy gap within a mean period of 3 months (range 2-6 months). All patients had satisfactory results in terms of function and pain. Correction osteotomy and stabilisation with bicolumnar locked plate fixation without a bone graft provides sufficient stability to allow the highly vascularised metaphysis to heal. In patients without risk factors predisposing to non-union, this procedure is safe and feasible.

Proximal fractures of the humerus in patients older than 75 years of age: should we consider operative treatment?

BACKGROUND: Over 75 % of patients presenting with a proximal humerus fracture are 70 years or older. Very little is known about the outcome after operative treatment of these fractures in very old patients. This study was performed to gain more insight in safety and functional outcome of surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational study, we analyzed all operatively treated patients, aged 75 or older, with a proximal humerus fracture between January 2003 and December 2008 in our center. Patient selection was on clinical grounds, based on physical, mental, and social criteria. Complications were evaluated. We used the DASH Questionnaire to investigate functional outcome, pain, and ADL limitations. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were treated surgically for a displaced proximal fracture of the humerus: 15 two-part, 32 three-part, and 17 four-part fractures. Mean DASH scores were 37.5, 36.9, and 48.6, respectively. Regarding the operative methods, overall good results were obtained with the modern locked plate osteosynthesis (mean DASH 34.4). Prosthetic treatment, mostly used in highly comminuted fractures, often resulted in poor function (mean DASH 72.9). Persistent pain and ADL limitations were more present in more comminuted fractures (64 and 50 % in patients with 4-part fractures vs. 14 % in 2-part fractures). There were no postoperative deaths within 3 months of surgery, and fracture-related and non-fracture-related complication rates were low (non-union 3 %; 1 myocardial infarction). CONCLUSION: This study shows that it is safe and justifiable to consider surgical treatment of a severely dislocated proximal humerus fracture in selected patients aged 75 and older. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: According to OCEBM Working Group,Level IV.

Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to collect and summarize published data on the indications for implant removal after fracture healing, since these are not well defined and guidelines hardly exist. METHODS: A literature search was performed. RESULTS: Though there are several presumed benefits of implant removal, such as functional improvement and pain relief, the surgical procedure can be very challenging and may lead to complications or even worsening of the complaints. Research has focused on the safety of metal implants (e.g., risk of corrosion, allergy, and carcinogenesis). For these reasons, implants have been removed routinely for decades. Along with the introduction of titanium alloy implants, the need for implant removal became a subject of debate in view of potential (dis)advantages since, in general, implants made of titanium alloys are more difficult to remove. Currently, the main indications for removal from both the upper and lower extremity are mostly 'relative' and patient-driven, such as pain, prominent material, or simply the request for removal. True medical indications like infection or intra-articular material are minor reasons. CONCLUSION: This review illustrates the great variety of view points in the literature, with large differences in opinions and practices about the indications for implant removal after fracture healing. Since some studies have described asymptomatic patients developing complaints after removal, the general advice nowadays is to remove implants after fracture healing only in symptomatic patients and after a proper informed consent. Well-designed prospective studies on this subject are urgently needed in order to form guidelines based on scientific evidence.

Implant removal associated complications in children with limb fractures due to trauma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the number and type of complications that occurred after fracture implant removal and to investigate whether implant removal should be performed routinely in children. METHODS: In a retrospective study, patient records were used for the analyses of patient characteristics, surgery reports, and complications. Children under the age of 16 years with a limb fracture due to trauma, treated with either Kirschner wires (K-wires), elastic stable intramedullary nails (ESIN), or screw fixation between 2000 and 2007, were included. Exclusion criteria were as follows: refracture, pathological fracture, fracture of the hands and feet, or polytrauma patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > 15). RESULTS: Three-hundred and nine fractures were analyzed. All K-wires (173) and ESIN (96) were removed as per standard procedure, resulting in 17/173 and 7/96 complications after removal, respectively. In 19/40 patients with screw fixation treatments, it was decided to remove the material after fracture consolidation, resulting in 4/19 complications. The decision in 21 treatments to leave the screw in situ led to four complications. No significant difference in complication rates could be found for the three groups after removal surgery (17/173, 7/96, and 4/19) or between hardware removal (4/19) and retention (4/21) in the case of screw fixation. CONCLUSIONS: The removal of K-wires, ESIN, and screws is considered to be a safe procedure in children and is, by definition, indicated for K-wires and ESIN after fracture healing.

An in vivo evaluation of surface polishing of TAN intermedullary nails for ease of removal.

Fractures of the tibia and femoral diaphysis are commonly repaired by intra-medullary (IM) nailing. Currently IM nails are available in either electropolished stainless steel (SS) or in Titanium-Aluminium-Niobium (TAN). After healing, removal of the nails still is common but removal of TAN IM nails often has complications whereas SS IM nails of the same design are less often associated with problems. We believe the differences in removal are due to the ability of TAN to promote strong bone on-growth. We have previously shown in vivo that polishing cortical screws reduces removal torque and the percentage of bone-implant contact. Therefore, we postulate that bony on-growth onto IM nails can be reduced by means of surface polishing, for ease of removal. Here we aim to compare the pull-out forces for removal of standard TAN (TAN-S) compared to experimental paste polished TAN (TAN-PP) IM nails from a bilateral non-fracture sheep tibia model after 12 months implantation. Histological analysis was also performed to assess tissue on-growth to the nails. We show that polishing significantly reduces (p=0.05) the extraction force required for TAN IM nail removal. This effect in part is attributable to the distinct tissue-material reaction produced. For TAN-S nails direct bone contact was observed while for TAN-PP nails a fibrous tissue interface was noted. Since TAN is preferred over SS for IM nailing due to superior biocompatibility and mechanical properties, we believe these findings could be used to recommend changes to current surface technologies of intramedullary nails to reduce complications seen with nail removal especially in rapidly growing bone in children.

Incidence and outcome of surgical repair of spigelian hernia.

BACKGROUND: A spigelian hernia develops through a defect present in a locus minoris resistentiae between abdominal muscles. It is generally considered rare but is probably underdiagnosed. This study was undertaken to characterize the history, presenting features and efficacy of surgical correction of spigelian hernia. METHODS: Medical and surgical charts of 25 patients treated for a spigelian hernia over 22 years were studied retrospectively. Patients were invited for an outpatient interview and physical examination. RESULTS: Dominant symptoms were an intermittent palpable mass (22 patients) and postural pain (16). A quarter of the patients reported a history of other hernias. Two individuals presented with a painful palpable mass and signs of bowel obstruction necessitating emergency small bowel resection. Hernia repair was performed by primary closure in 20 patients and by use of mesh graft in five. During a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, one early recurrence was observed. Two patients reported mild tenderness in the operated area but were not impaired in daily activities. CONCLUSION: Spigelian hernia is commonly encountered and requires surgical treatment because of the risk of strangulation. Operative treatment is simple and effective in the long term.

[Phyllodes tumor in the breast]. / Fyllodestumor in de mamma.

In three women aged 51, 37 and 58 years, with a palpable tumour in the breast, excision and pathological examination led to the diagnosis of 'phyllodes tumour'. During 3-5 years after radical excision, in one patient followed by radiotherapy, no recurrences were seen. This rare breast tumour with a variable clinical course usually affects women between the ages of 30 and 50. There is often a large tumour and (or) rapid growth. Mammography and ultrasound are unhelpful diagnostically. Cytology is unreliable as the tumour is heterogeneous. Histologically the tumour can be benign, borderline malignant or malignant. Surgical excision with a margin of > or = 1 cm is the therapy of choice. The risk of recurrence after insufficient excision is considerable and histological deterioration can occur. Multiple samples, examination of resection margins and investigation into atypia, mitotic activity and stromal overgrowth are essential for making a prognosis and a treatment plan. In case of doubt regarding radicality, surgeon and pathologist should compare views; non-radicality necessitates re-excision.