Identification of key residues for the binding of glucagon to the N-terminal domain of its receptor: an alanine scan and modeling study.

Glucagon plays an essential role in the glycemia maintenance during fasting, but also aggravates hyperglycemia in diabetic patients. A series of analogues of glucagon were synthesized replacing each amino acid of the C-terminal region (residues 15-29) with alanine. The residues affecting the binding to the glucagon receptor are found to be located on one face of the glucagon helix. Several 3-dimensional models of the N-terminal domain of the glucagon receptor in complex with its ligand peptide were built and used to analyze the peptide-receptor interface in terms of the nature of the peptide residues and the interactions they form with the receptor. The models suggest that glucagon keeps its native helical structure upon binding, and that a large part of the interface formed with the receptor is hydrophobic. We find that in the C-terminal region, F22, V23, M27, and D15 are the most important residues for peptide binding. They bury a large portion of their solvent accessible surface area and make numerous interactions with the receptor mainly of the hydrophobic type.

Lysine 195 and aspartate 196 in the first extracellular loop of the VPAC1 receptor are essential for high affinity binding of agonists but not of antagonists.

The role in ligand recognition and receptor activation of two adjacent charged residues (lysine 195 and aspartate 196) in the first extracellular loop of the human VPAC(1) receptor was investigated in stably transfected CHO cells expressing the wild type or point mutated receptors.Replacement of lysine 195 by glutamine or of aspartate 196 by asparagine reduced the agonists' ability to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity; VIP behaved like a partial agonist and a partial agonist behaved as an antagonist. The receptor's capacity to recognize agonists was reduced but antagonists' affinity was unaffected. Both results suggesting that the two charged residues are essential for VPAC(1) receptor activation. On the other hand, the double mutant was less severely affected than single mutants suggesting that hydrogen bonds may partially compensate the loss of charged residues. But the inversion of the residues affected receptor recognition and activation more markedly suggesting that the two charged residues do not interact directly.

Identification of secretin, vasoactive intestinal peptide and glucagon binding sites: from chimaeric receptors to point mutations.

We have identified two basic residues that are important for the recognition of secretin and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) by their respective receptors. These two peptides containing an Asp residue at position 3 interacted with an arginine residue in transmembrane helix 2 (TM2) of the receptor, and the lysine residue in extracellular loop 1 (ECL1) stabilized the active receptor conformation induced by the ligand. The glucagon receptor possesses a Lys instead of an Arg in TM2, and an Ile instead of Lys in ECL1; it markedly prefers a Gln side chain in position 3 of the ligand. Our results suggested that, in the wild-type receptor, the Ile side chain prevented access to the TM2 Lys side chain, but oriented the glucagon Gln(3) side chain to its proper binding site. In the double mutant, the ECL1 Lys allowed an interaction between negatively charged residues in position 3 of glucagon and the TM2 Arg, resulting in efficient receptor activation by [Asp(3)]glucagon as well as by glucagon.

A small sequence in the third intracellular loop of the VPAC(1) receptor is responsible for its efficient coupling to the calcium effector.

The stimulatory effect of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) on the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) has been investigated in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with the reporter gene aequorin, and expressing human VPAC(1), VPAC(2), chimaeric VPAC(1)/VPAC(2) or mutated receptors. The VIP-induced increase in [Ca(2+)](i) was linearly correlated with receptor density, and was higher in cells expressing VPAC(1) receptors than in cells expressing a similar density of VPAC(2) receptors. The study was performed to establish the receptor sequence responsible for this difference. VPAC(1)/VPAC(2) chimaeric receptors were first used for broad positioning: those receptors having the third intracellular loop (IC3) of the VPAC(1) or the VPAC(2) receptor behaved, in this respect, phenotypically like VPAC(1) and VPAC(2) receptors respectively. Replacement in the VPAC(2) receptor of the sequence comprising residues 315-318 (VGGN) within IC3 by its VPAC(1) receptor counterpart (residues 328-331; IRKS) and the introduction of VGGN instead of IRKS into VPAC(1) was sufficient to mimic VPAC(1) and VPAC(2) receptor characteristics respectively. Thus a small sequence in the IC3 domain of the VPAC(1) receptor is responsible for the efficient agonist-stimulated increase in [Ca(2+)](i).

Two tyrosine residues in the first transmembrane helix of the human vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors play a role in supporting the active conformation.

1: We investigated the human vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) receptors VPAC(1) and VPAC(2) mutated at conserved tyrosine residues in the first transmembrane helix (VPAC(1) receptor Y146A and Y150A and VPAC(2) receptor Y130A and Y134A). 2: [(125)I]-Acetyl-His(1) [D-Phe(2), K(15), R(16), L(27)]-VIP (1-7)/GRF (8-27) (referred to as [(125)I]-VPAC(1) antagonist) labelled VPAC(1) binding sites, that displayed high and low affinities for VIP (IC(50) values and per cent of high affinity binding sites: wild-type, 1 nM (57+/-9%) and 160 nM; Y146A, 30 nM (40+/-8%) and 800 nM; Y150A, 4 nM (27+/-8%) and 300 nM). [R(16)]-VIP behaved as a "super agonist" at both mutated VPAC(1) receptors and the efficacies of VIP analogues modified in positions 1, 3 and 6 were significantly decreased. 3: VIP was less potent at the Y130A and Y134A mutated VPAC(2) receptors (EC(50) 200 and 400 nM, respectively) than at the wild-type VPAC(2) receptor (EC(50) 7 nM). Furthermore, [hexanoyl-His(1)]-VIP behaved as a "super agonist" at the two mutated VPAC(2) receptors, and VIP analogues modified in positions 1, 3 and 6 were less potent and efficient at the mutated than at wild-type VPAC(2) receptors. However, the Y130A and Y134A mutants could not be studied in binding assays. 4: Our results suggest that the conserved tyrosine residues do not interact directly with the VIP His(1), Asp(3) or Phe(6) residues (that are necessary for receptor activation), but stabilize the correct active receptor conformation.

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) stimulates [Ca2+]i and cyclic AMPin CHO cells expressing Galpha16.

The stimulatory effect of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and analogues on [Ca2+]i has been investigated in chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with the reporter gene aequorin, and expressing either the human VPAC1or VPAC2 receptor in absence or in presence of the Galpha16. In cells that were not transfected with Galpha16 and expressed a similar density of receptors, the VIP induced [Ca2+]i ncrease was higher in VPAC1 than in VPAC2 receptor expressing cells. In aequorin/Galpha16 cotransfected cells, the VIP-induced response was higher, reaching 70 to 80% of the maximal calcium response, obtained after digitonin treatment, in response to both VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptor stimulation. The results suggest that in hematopoietic cells, which express both VIP receptors and Galpha16, the signalling pathway of VIP could be mediated through both cyclic AMP and [Ca2+]i increase.

Mutational analysis of the human vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor subtype VPAC(2): role of basic residues in the second transmembrane helix.

1. We investigated the role of two conserved basic residues in the second transmembrane helix arginine 172 (R172) and lysine 179 (K179) of the VPAC(2) receptor. 2. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) activated VPAC(2) receptors with an EC(50) value of 7 nM, as compared to 150, 190 and 4000 nM at R172L, R172Q and K179Q-VPAC(2) receptors, respectively. It was inactive at K179I mutated VPAC(2) receptors. These results suggested that both basic residues were probably implicated in receptor recognition and activation. 3. The VPAC(2)-selective VIP analogue, [hexanoyl-His(1)]-VIP (C(6)-VIP), had a higher affinity and efficacy as compared to VIP at the mutated receptors. 4. VIP, Asn(3)-VIP and Gln(3)-VIP activated adenylate cyclase through R172Q receptors with EC(50) values of 190, 2 and 2 nM, respectively, and through R172L receptors with EC(50) values of 150, 12 and 8 nM, respectively. Asn(3)-VIP and Gln(3)-VIP behaved as partial agonists at the wild type receptor, with E(max) values (in per cent of VIP) of 75 and 52%, respectively. In contrast, they were more efficient than VIP (E(max) values of 150 and 150% at the R172Q VPAC(2) receptors, and of 400 and 360% at the R172L receptors, respectively). These results suggested that the receptor's R172 and the ligand's aspartate 3 are brought in close proximity in the active ligand-receptor complex. 5. The K179I and K179Q mutated receptors had a lower affinity than the wild-type receptors for all the agonists tested in this work: we were unable to identify the VIP amino acid(s) that interact with K179.

Proline residue 280 in the second extracellular loop (EC2) of the VPAC2 receptor is essential for the receptor structure.

Inspection of the amino acid sequence of the human VPAC1 and the VPAC2 receptors after alignment of the conserved residues indicates that the second extracellular loop (EC2) is one amino acid shorter in the VPAC1 receptor due to the lack of a proline residue in position 294. We hypothesized that this could be of importance for receptor structure and/or for ligand recognition. Insertion by directed mutagenesis of a proline in that position (294 VPAC1) had little consequence on the binding of several agonists but reduced the affinity for the VPAC1 antagonist. Coupling of the 294 VPAC1 receptor to adenylate cyclase was improved, as demonstrated by an increased affinity for VIP and other agonists, and by a shift of the VPAC1 antagonist to partial agonist behavior. Deletion of the proline 280 (DeltaPro280 VPAC2) in the VPAC2 receptor markedly reduced the apparent affinity for all the agonists tested. Replacement of the proline by a glycine residue had a smaller effect on the ligands affinities. The proline residue in the VPAC2 receptor EC2 is thus essential for the receptor structure, and the EC2 domain is involved in ligand recognition and receptor functionality.

Activation of guanosine 5'-[gamma-(35)S]thio-triphosphate binding through M(1) muscarinic receptors in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cell membranes; 1. Mathematical analysis of catalytic G protein activation.

I analyzed in this work the effect of agonists and unlabeled guanyl nucleotides on [(35)S]GTP gamma S and [(3)H]NMS binding to transfected CHO cells expressing hM(1) muscarinic receptors. I was unable to explain my kinetic results by "traditional" (one-site, two-site, or two-step) bimolecular binding models. I therefore examined the equations that describe catalytic G protein activation. My results were fully consistent with the following interpretation: G protein-coupled receptors either interacted with GDP-bound G proteins and facilitated the GDP release or recognized empty G proteins, depending on the incubation conditions. The receptor-coupled empty G proteins (RG) then recognized GTP gamma S, and the occupied G protein (G) dissociated reversibly from the receptor. Agonists accelerated the GDP release from receptor-coupled G proteins and accelerated the G dissociation: both effects accelerated synergically the G protein-GTP gamma S association reaction in the presence of GDP. GTP gamma S-bound G proteins, G, competed efficiently with inactive (empty or GDP-bound) G proteins for receptor recognition, and were able, therefore, at low concentrations, to quench the [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding reaction.

Activation of guanosine 5'-[gamma-(35)S]thio-triphosphate binding through M(1) muscarinic receptors in transfected Chinese Hamster ovary cell membranes: 2. Testing the "two-states" model of receptor activation.

I suggested in the accompanying article [Mol Pharmacol 2001;59:875-885] that muscarinic receptors catalyzed G protein activation. Acetylcholine or carbamylcholine recognition facilitated not only the GDP release from receptor-coupled inactive G proteins but also the release of G from the (unstable) HRG complex. The two effects facilitated [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the presence of GDP, but could be studied separately by comparing [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the absence and presence of GTP. Guanyl nucleotides affected the efficiency of receptor-G protein coupling. The relative efficacies of partial agonists in the absence and presence of GTP should remain nonlinearly correlated if all agonists stabilize (to different extents) the same active receptor conformation. The correlation between M(1) muscarinic agonists' efficacy in accelerating [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the absence of other nucleotides and their in vivo efficacy (inositol phosphate accumulation) was in fact very poor. This probably reflected the presence of GTP in intact cells: pertussis toxin pretreatment (which inactivates the G(i/o) proteins) did not affect the agonists' efficacy profile (evaluated in the absence of spare receptors), but the addition of GTP to the [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding medium did. These results did not support the allosteric "two states" model of receptor activation, but suggested that different agonists induced different receptor conformations ("induced fit").

Two basic residues of the h-VPAC1 receptor second transmembrane helix are essential for ligand binding and signal transduction.

We mutated the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) Asp(3) residue and two VPAC(1) receptor second transmembrane helix basic residues (Arg(188) and Lys(195)). VIP had a lower affinity for R188Q, R188L, K195Q, and K195I VPAC(1) receptors than for VPAC(1) receptors. [Asn(3)] VIP and [Gln(3)] VIP had lower affinities than VIP for VPAC(1) receptors but higher affinities for the mutant receptors; the two basic amino acids facilitated the introduction of the negatively charged aspartate inside the transmembrane domain. The resulting interaction was necessary for receptor activation. 1/[Asn(3)] VIP and [Gln(3)] VIP were partial agonists at VPAC(1) receptors; 2/VIP did not fully activate the K195Q, K195I, R188Q, and R188L VPAC(1) receptors; a VIP analogue ([Arg(16)] VIP) was more efficient than VIP at the four mutated receptors; and [Asn(3)] VIP and [Gln(3)] VIP were more efficient than VIP at the R188Q and R188L VPAC(1) receptors; 3/the [Asp(3)] negative charge did not contribute to the recognition of the VIP(1) antagonist, [AcHis(1),D-Phe(2),Lys(15),Arg(16),Leu(27)] VIP ()/growth hormone releasing factor (8-27). This is the first demonstration that, to activate the VPAC(1) receptor, the Asp(3) side chain of VIP must penetrate within the transmembrane domain, in close proximity to two highly conserved basic amino acids from transmembrane 2.

Development of selective agonists and antagonists for the human vasoactive intestinal polypeptide VPAC(2) receptor.

Ro 25-1553 is a cyclic VIP derivative with a high affinity for the VPAC(2) receptor subtype. Our goal was to identify the modifications that support its selectivity for VPAC(2) receptors, and to develop a VIP or Ro 25-1553 analog behaving as a high affinity, VPAC(2) selective antagonist. The selectivity of Ro 25-1553 for the human receptor was supported mainly by the acetylation of the amino-terminus, by the introduction of a lysine residue in position 12, and by the carboxyl-terminal extension. The lactam bridge created between positions 21 and 25 contributed to the affinity of the compound for the VIP receptors but participated only marginally to its selectivity. Deletion of the first five aminoacid residues led to a low affinity antagonist with a low selectivity. Introduction of a D-Phe residue in position 2 reduced the affinity, the selectivity and the intrinsic activity, the compound being a partial agonist. Myristoylation of the amino-terminus of [K(12)]VIP(1-26) extended carboxyl-terminally with the -K-K-G-G-T sequence of Ro 25-1553 led to a high affinity, selective VPAC(2) receptor antagonist. This molecule represents the first selective human VPAC(2) receptor antagonist described to date.

Evidence that the lizard helospectin peptides are O-glycosylated.

Six forms of helospectin (a vasoactive intestinal peptide analogue) were purified from the venom of the Heloderma horridum lizard. Their identification was performed by combining sequencing by automated Edman degradation and electrospray mass spectrometry analysis on the complete peptides and their tryptic fragments. The products resulting from the action of an O-glycosidase were also analysed. Two forms were identified as the previously named Hs1 and Hs2 of 38 and 37 amino-acid residues, respectively. Two forms corresponded to Hs1 and Hs2 O-glycosylated by a N-acetylhexosamine-hexose motif attached to the Ser32 residue. Two other forms were not completely characterized but might correspond to the O-glycosylated forms bearing a phosphate or a sulfate group. The glycosylation did not affect the capacity of the helospectins to recognize and to activate the human and the rat VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors.

Characterization of a novel VPAC(1) selective agonist and identification of the receptor domains implicated in the carboxyl-terminal peptide recognition.

Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide (VIP) interacts with a high affinity to two subclasses of G protein coupled receptors named VPAC(1) and VPAC(2), and has a 3 - 10 fold preference for VPAC(1) over VPAC(2) receptors. Selective ligands for each receptor subclass were recently described. [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) and [L(22)]-VIP are two selective VPAC(1) agonists. Chimaeric human VPAC(2)-VPAC(1) recombinant receptors expressed in CHO cells were used to identify the receptor domains implicated in these two selective ligands recognition. The VPAC(2) preference for [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 27) over [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) did not require the receptor's NH(2)-terminus domain but involved the whole transmembrane domain. In contrast, the selectivity of [L(22)]-VIP depended only on the presence of the NH(2) terminus and EC(2) domains of the VPAC(1) receptor. The present data support the idea that in the GPCR-B family of receptors the different selective ligands require different domains for their selectivity, and that the peptides carboxyl terminal sequence (amino acids 24 - 27) folds back on the transmembrane receptor domain, close to the peptides, aminoterminus.

Role of charged amino acids conserved in the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide/secretin family of receptors on the secretin receptor functionality.

The secretin receptor is a member of a large family of G-protein-coupled receptors that recognize polypeptide hormone and/or neuropeptides. Charged, conserved residues might play a key role in their function, either by interacting with the ligand or by stabilizing the receptor structure. Of the four charged amino acids that are conserved in the whole secretin receptor family, D49 and R83 (in the N-terminal domain) were probably important for the secretin receptor structure: replacement of D49 by H or R and of R83 by D severely reduced both the maximal response to secretin and its potency. No functional secretin receptor could be detected after replacement of R83 by L. Mutation of D49 to E, A, or N had no effect or reduced 5-fold the potency of secretin. The highly conserved positive charges found at the extracellular ends of TM III (K194) and IV (R255) were important for the secretin receptor function, as K194 mutation to A or Q and R255 mutation to Q or D decreased the secretin's affinity 15- to 1000-fold, respectively. Six extracellular charged residues are conserved in closely related receptors but not in the whole family. K121 (TM I) and R277 (TM V) were not important for functional secretin receptor expression. D174 (TM II) was necessary to stabilize the active receptor structure: the D174N mutant receptors were unable to stimulate normally the adenylate cyclase in response to secretin, and functional D174A receptors could not be found. Mutation of R255, E259 (second extracellular loop), and E351 (third extracellular loop) to uncharged residues reduced only 10- to 100-fold the secretin potency without changing its efficacy: these residues either stabilized the active receptor conformation or formed hydrogen rather than ionic bonds with secretin. Mutation of K121 (TM I) to Q or L and of R277 (TM V) to E or Q did not affect the receptor functional properties.

Different vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptor domains are involved in the selective recognition of two VPAC(2)-selective ligands.

A vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) analog, acylated on the amino-terminal histidine by hexanoic acid (C(6)-VIP), behaved as a VPAC(2) preferring agonist in binding and functional studies on human VIP receptors, and radioiodinated C(6)-VIP was a suitable ligand for binding studies on wild-type and chimeric receptors. We evaluated the properties of C(6)-VIP, its analog AcHis(1)-VIP, and the VPAC(2)-selective agonist Ro 25-1553 on the wild-type VPAC(1) and VPAC(2) receptors and on the chimeric receptors exchanging the different domains between both receptors. VIP had a normal affinity and efficacy on the chimeras starting with the amino-terminal VPAC(2) receptor sequence. The binding and functional profile of these chimeric receptors suggested that the high affinity of Ro 25-1553 for VPAC(2) receptors is supported by the amino-terminal extracellular domain, whereas the ability to prefer C(6)-VIP over VIP is supported by the VPAC(2) fifth transmembrane (TM5)-EC(3) receptor domain. These results further support the hypothesis that the central and carboxyl-terminal regions of the peptide (modified in RO 25-1553) recognize the extracellular amino-terminal region domain, whereas the amino-terminal VIP amino acids bind to the TM receptor core. VIP had a reduced affinity and efficacy on the N-VPAC(1)/VPAC(2) and on the N-->EC(2)-VPAC(1)/VPAC(2) chimeric receptors. C(6)-VIP behaved as a high-affinity agonist on these constructions. The antagonists [AcHis(1),D-Phe(2),Lys(15),Arg(16), Leu(27)]VIP(3-7)/GRF(8-27) and VIP(5-27) had comparable affinities for the wild-type receptors and for the two latter chimeras, supporting the hypothesis that these chimeras were properly folded but unable to reach the high-agonist-affinity, active receptor conformation in response to VIP binding.

Evidence for multiple rat VPAC1 receptor states with different affinities for agonists.

We compare the binding properties of [125I-VIP] and [125I]-Ro 25 1553 to VPAC1 receptors, expressed in stably transfected CHO cells. [125I]-VIP labelled two VPAC1 receptor states, while [125I]-Ro 25 1553 labelled selectively a limited number of high-affinity receptors. This high-affinity state probably corresponds to an agonist-receptor-Gs ternary complex as its properties (guanyl nucleotides, EC50 values and maximal effect) were affected by cholera toxin pre-treatment. Both high- and low-affinity receptors participated in the adenylate cyclase activation. This suggested that agonists activate not only low-affinity uncoupled receptors by facilitating the ternary complex formation, but also activated the high-affinity ternary complex by accelerating the GTP binding to emptied, receptor-bound G proteins.

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptor chimeras identify domains responsible for the specificity of ligand binding and activation.

In order to identify the receptor domains responsible for the VPAC1 selectivity of the VIP1 agonist, [Lys15, Arg16, Leu27] VIP (1-7)/GRF (8-27) and VIP1 antagonist, Ac His1 [D-Phe2, Lys15, Arg16, Leu27] VIP (3-7)/GRF (8-27), we evaluated their binding and functional properties on chimeric VPAC1/VPAC2 receptors. Our results suggest that the N-terminal extracellular domain is responsible for the selectivity of the VIP1 antagonist. Selective recognition of the VIP1 agonist was supported by a larger receptor area: in addition to the N-terminal domain, the first extracellular loop, as well as additional determinants in the distal part of the VPAC1 receptor were involved. Furthermore, these additional domains were critical for an efficient receptor activation, as replacement of EC1 in VPAC1 by its counter part in the VPAC2 receptor markedly reduced the maximal response.