Socioeconomic position and healthy ageing: A systematic review of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

BACKGROUND: The association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and health is well-established. However, the association between SEP and healthy ageing as a multidimensional construct is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed cross-sectional and longitudinal studies on the associations between SEP and multidimensional healthy ageing measures. Studies were identified from a systematic search across major electronic databases from inception to February 2021. RESULTS: Fourthy-five articles met inclusion criteria (26 cross-sectional and 19 longitudinal studies). There was no consistency in method of operationalizing healthy ageing across studies, domains included in the healthy ageing measures, or in the definition and number of levels of SEP indicators. Overall, regardless of heterogeneity between studies, a positive association between educational level (85.0 % of studies) and income/wealth (81.4 % of studies) and healthy ageing was evident. Regarding occupational position, evidence from 11 studies was inconclusive. The number of studies including home ownership, parenteral SEP, or composite SEP scores was insufficient to be able to draw a conclusion. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that socioeconomic inequalities, as assessed by educational level and income/wealth, are associated with healthy ageing. These findings, and the broader evidence base on SEP and healthy ageing, highlight the importance of addressing inequality through integrated health and social policies and strategies.

What do young women living in regional and rural Victoria say about chlamydia testing? A qualitative study.

Background Chlamydia trachomatis is the most commonly notified sexually transmissible infection in Australia, with almost 100000 cases diagnosed in 2018. Chlamydia is easy to diagnose and treat, but infections are underdiagnosed. Eighty per cent of chlamydia cases are asymptomatic. Without testing, infections will remain undetected. Several barriers to testing have been identified in previous research, including cost, privacy concerns for young rural people, knowledge gaps, embarrassment and stigma. The aim of this study was to investigate young regional and rural women's understanding of chlamydia and factors that may prevent or delay testing. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 women aged between 18 and 30 years residing in north-east Victoria, Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Themes were grouped under four categories: (1) chlamydia and stigma; (2) the application of stigma to self and others; (3) factors affecting testing; and (4) knowledge. A chlamydia infection was associated with stigma. The young women in this study anticipated self-stigma in relation to a positive diagnosis, but resisted stigmatising others. Increased knowledge about chlamydia prevalence was associated with reduced self-stigma. The most consistent factor affecting testing decisions was personal risk assessment. Knowledge gaps about symptoms, testing and treatment were also identified, with participants not always accessing information from reputable sources. CONCLUSION: Chlamydia testing was viewed as a positive activity among this cohort. However, there is considerable perceived stigma about being diagnosed with an infection. Interventions that communicate prevalence, reduce stigma and provide factual information about testing and risk are still needed. Clinicians have an opportunity to convey this information at consultation. Health promotion workers should continue to develop and run campaigns at a community level to encourage regular screening.