Assessing the Reporting Quality of Machine Learning Algorithms in Head and Neck Oncology.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess reporting quality of machine learning (ML) algorithms in the head and neck oncology literature using the TRIPOD-AI criteria. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, incorporating search terms related to "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," "deep learning," "neural network," and various head and neck neoplasms. REVIEW METHODS: Two independent reviewers analyzed each published study for adherence to the 65-point TRIPOD-AI criteria. Items were classified as "Yes," "No," or "NA" for each publication. The proportion of studies satisfying each TRIPOD-AI criterion was calculated. Additionally, the evidence level for each study was evaluated independently by two reviewers using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence. Discrepancies were reconciled through discussion until consensus was reached. RESULTS: The study highlights the need for improvements in ML algorithm reporting in head and neck oncology. This includes more comprehensive descriptions of datasets, standardization of model performance reporting, and increased sharing of ML models, data, and code with the research community. Adoption of TRIPOD-AI is necessary for achieving standardized ML research reporting in head and neck oncology. CONCLUSION: Current reporting of ML algorithms hinders clinical application, reproducibility, and understanding of the data used for model training. To overcome these limitations and improve patient and clinician trust, ML developers should provide open access to models, code, and source data, fostering iterative progress through community critique, thus enhancing model accuracy and mitigating biases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

Predicting Therapeutic Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Using Deep Learning.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models using drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) images to predict the therapeutic efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) implantation. METHODS: Patients who underwent DISE and subsequent HGNS implantation at a tertiary care referral center were included. Six DL models and five ML algorithms were trained on images from the base of tongue (BOT) and velopharynx (VP) from patients classified as responders or non-responders as defined by Sher's criteria (50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and AHI < 15 events/h). Precision, recall, F1 score, and overall accuracy were evaluated as measures of performance. RESULTS: In total, 25,040 images from 127 patients were included, of which 16,515 (69.3%) were from responders and 8,262 (30.7%) from non-responders. Models trained on the VP dataset had greater overall accuracy when compared to BOT alone and combined VP and BOT image sets, suggesting that VP images contain discriminative features for identifying therapeutic efficacy. The VCG-16 DL model had the best overall performance on the VP image set with high training accuracy (0.833), F1 score (0.78), and recall (0.883). Among ML models, the logistic regression model had the greatest accuracy (0.685) and F1 score (0.813). CONCLUSION: Deep neural networks have potential to predict HGNS therapeutic efficacy using images from DISE, facilitating better patient selection for implantation. Development of multi-institutional data and image sets will allow for development of generalizable predictive models. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

Inequities Associated With Advanced Stage at Presentation of Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Importance: Social determinants of health (SDoH) are defined by a wide range of factors (eg, built environment, economic stability, education level, discrimination, racism, access to health care). Advanced stage at presentation or delayed diagnosis heavily influences health outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). While the drivers of advanced-stage presentation come from a multitude of sources, SDoH plays an outsized role. Objective: To systematically review the published literature to identify which SDoH are established as risk factors for delayed diagnosis or advanced stage at presentation among patients with HNC. Evidence Review: In this systematic review, a literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted on February 27, 2023, using keywords related to advanced stage at presentation and delayed diagnosis of HNC between 2013 and 2023. Quality assessment was evaluated through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Articles were included if they focused on US-based populations and factors associated with advanced stage at presentation or delayed diagnosis of HNC. Findings: Overall, 50 articles were included for full-text extraction, of which 30 (60%) were database studies. Race was the most commonly reported variable (46 studies [92%]), with Black race (43 studies [93%]) being the most studied racial group showing an increased risk of delay in diagnosis of HNC. Other commonly studied variables that were associated with advanced stage at presentation included sex and gender (41 studies [82%]), insurance status (25 studies [50%]), geographic region (5 studies [10%]), and socioeconomic status (20 studies [40%]). Male sex, lack of insurance, rurality, and low socioeconomic status were all identified as risk factors for advanced stage at presentation. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review provides a comprehensive list of factors that were associated with advanced HNC stage at presentation. Future studies should focus on evaluating interventions aimed at addressing the SDoH in communities experiencing disparities to provide a net positive effect on HNC care.

Quantitative measurements of radiation-induced fibrosis for head and neck cancer: A narrative review.

Objectives: To provide a comprehensive summary of the different modalities available to measure soft tissue fibrosis after radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients. Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences. Review Methods: A search was conducted using a list of medical subject headings and terms related to head and neck oncology, radiation fibrosis, and quantitative measurements, including bioimpedance, MRI, and ultrasound. Original research related to quantitative measurement of neck fibrosis post-radiotherapy was included without time constraints, while reviews, case reports, non-English texts, and inaccessible studies were excluded. Discrepancies during the review were resolved by discussing with the senior author until consensus was reached. Results: A total of 284 articles were identified and underwent title and abstract screening. Seventeen articles had met our criteria for full-text review based on relevance, of which nine had met our inclusion criteria. Young's modulus (YM) and viscoelasticity measures have demonstrated efficacy in quantifying neck fibrosis, with fibrotic tissues displaying significantly higher YM values and altered viscoelastic properties such as increased stiffness rate-sensitivity and prolonged stress-relaxation post-radiation. Intravoxel incoherent motion offers detailed insights into tissue changes by assessing the diffusion of water molecules and blood perfusion, thereby differentiating fibrosed from healthy tissues. Shear wave elastography has proven to be an effective technique for quantifying radiation-induced fibrosis in the head and neck region by measuring shear wave velocity. Conclusion: There are various modalities to measure radiation-induced fibrosis, each with its unique strengths and limitations. Providers should be aware of these implications and decide on methodologies based on their specific clinical workflow. Level of Evidence: Step 5.

Evaluating olfactory function and quality of life in patients with traumatic brain injury.

KEY POINTS: Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) had worse olfactory quality of life (QoL) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 scores compared to a normal cohort. A worse olfactory QoL correlated with concussion symptom burden. Olfactory dysfunction among TBI patients should be addressed to improve overall outcomes.

Six-week postoperative opioid use and pain following a randomized controlled trial evaluating multimodal analgesia for head and neck free flap patients.

Introduction: Head and neck malignancy treatment often involves invasive surgeries, necessitating effective postoperative pain control. However, chronic reliance on opioid medications remains a challenge for many patients after surgery. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) within enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has shown success in limiting narcotic pain medications for other cancer types. In a prior study, MMA comprising acetaminophen, ketorolac, gabapentin, and a neurogenic block reduced opioid use in the 7-day postoperative period for major head and neck reconstructive surgery. This study investigates the impact of multimodal analgesia on opioid prescription and pain during the 6-week postoperative period for patients undergoing major head and neck oncologic surgeries, aiming to understand the longer-term effects of narcotic use. Methods: The study retrospectively examined participants in a [hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pragmatic trial to assess multimodal analgesia's long-term effectiveness in head and neck free flap surgery. Arm A received scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed opioids, while Arm B received scheduled gabapentin, ketorolac, a regional nerve block at the donor site, scheduled acetaminophen, and as-needed opioids. Retrospective data collection included opioid prescription use and pain scores up to 6 weeks after surgery, gathered from the Kansas prescription drug monitoring program, K-TRACS. Results: Thirty patients participated, 14 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B. The average morphine milligram equivalents per day of filled prescriptions were not significantly different between Arm A and Arm B (7.23 vs. 7.88, p = .845). Additionally, average pain scores at 6 weeks showed no significant difference between the two groups (1.4 vs. 1.9, p = .612). Conclusion: Patients with head and neck cancer treated with multimodal analgesia during the perioperative period did not exhibit significant differences in opioid use and pain within 6 weeks after discharge. To confirm these findings, a re-examination with strict measures of opioid use and scheduled pain assessments in a prospective manner is warranted. Level of Evidence: 4.

Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Setting on Quality-of-Life in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in post-treatment QoL across treatment settings in patients receiving adjuvant radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients with HNSCC initially evaluated in a head and neck surgical oncologic and reconstructive clinic at an academic medical center (AMC). Participants were enrolled prior to treatment in a prospective registry collecting demographic, social, and clinical data. Physical and social-emotional QoL (phys-QoL and soc-QoL, respectively) was measured using the University of Washington-QoL questionnaire at pre-treatment and post-treatment visits. RESULTS: A cohort of 177 patients, primarily male and White with an average age of 61.2 ± 11.2 years, met inclusion criteria. Most patients presented with oral cavity tumors (n = 132, 74.6%), had non-HPV-mediated disease (n = 97, 61.8%), and were classified as Stage IVa (n = 72, 42.8%). After controlling for covariates, patients treated at community medical centers (CMCs) reported a 7.15-point lower phys-QoL compared with those treated at AMCs (95% CI: -13.96 to -0.35, p = 0.040) up to 12 months post-treatment. Additionally, patients who were treated at CMCs had a 5.77-point (-11.86-0.31, p = 0.063) lower soc-QoL score compared with those treated at an AMC, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that HNSCC patients treated with radiation at AMCs reported significantly greater phys-QoL in their first-year post-treatment compared to those treated at CMCs, but soc-QoL did not differ significantly. Further observational studies are needed to explore potential factors, including treatment planning and cancer resource engagement, behind disparities between AMCs and CMCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3645-3655, 2024.

Right Versus Left Cuff Position for Upper Airway Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is a treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea in which electrical stimulation is applied to the hypoglossal nerve. Nerve branches that control tongue protrusion are located inferiorly. Due to positioning, left-sided implants are typically placed with an inferiorly oriented electrode cuff (L-down) as opposed to superiorly on the right (R-up). In this study, we assess the impact of left- versus right-sided UAS on patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary Academic Medical Center. METHODS: Patients who underwent UAS implantation between 2016 and 2021 with an L-down or R-up oriented cuff as confirmed by X-ray were included. Data were collected retrospectively. Most recent sleep study variables were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 61.0 ± 11.0 years, with 55 (28.9%) females. L-down orientation was present in 21 (11.1%) patients vs 169 (88.9%) R-up. Indications for L-down included hunting/shooting (n = 15), prior radiation/surgery (n = 4), central port (n = 1), and brachial plexus injury (n = 1). Adherence was higher among L-down patients (47.1 vs 41.0 hours use/week, P = .037) in univariate analysis, with a similar time to adherence data collection (4.4 vs 4.2 months, P = .612), though this finding was not maintained in the multivariate regression analysis. Decrease in apnea-hypopnea index (21.3 vs 22.8, P = .734), treatment success (76.5% vs 84.0%, P = .665), functional threshold (1.5 vs 1.6, P = .550), therapeutic amplitude (2.3 vs 2.4, P = .882), and decrease in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (4.9 vs 2.6, P = .060) were not significantly different between cohorts. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to examine the orientation of the UAS electrode cuff concerning the electrodes' natural position and the potential effect on postoperative outcomes. Our study found no significantly different treatment outcomes between the L-down versus R-up cohort, with the exception of device adherence, which was significantly higher in the L-down group on univariate analysis though not on multivariate analysis. Future studies with larger patient cohorts are needed to further investigate this potential relationship between treatment outcomes and electrode cuff orientation.

Upper airway stimulation device failure: A 7-year single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and report a single center experience with upper airway stimulator device-related failures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Single tertiary academic center. METHODS: Retrospective data on 352 patients who underwent UAS surgery with an Inspire device from 2016 to 2023 was collected, including demographics, comorbidities, and nature of device failure requiring revision surgery. RESULTS: Out of the 348 patients included in our analysis, 16 (4.6 %) required revision due to device failure, with an average interval of 772 days (∼2 years) between initial implant and revision. Most failures were attributed to respiratory sensing lead damage (n = 11, 68.8 %), resulting in high system impedance and subsequent device malfunction. Lead fracture causes varied, including idiopathic occurrences and potential trauma. Lead migration was noted in one case (6.3 %), where the hypoglossal electrode detached from the nerve. Two patients (12.3 %) required implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacement, one after experiencing trauma and the other due to unclear source of malfunction. One patient (6.3 %) required complete system replacement following high lead impedance and absent tongue motion. The last patient required replacement of both the IPG and respiratory lead after experiencing high lead impedance (6.3 %). CONCLUSION: Respiratory sensing lead fracture emerged as the leading cause of device failure in this cohort, underscoring the need to address this under-reported issue, potentially linked to the time lapse after device implantation.

The Impact of Surgical and Nonsurgical Interventions on Overall Oral, Palpebral Fissure, and Brow Height Symmetry in a Patient with Facial Synkinesis.

Background: The treatment of facial nerve synkinesis remains complex and variable. Objective: To compare oral, palpebral fissure, and brow symmetry among surgical and nonsurgical interventions in patients with facial synkinesis. Methods: Patients with facial nerve synkinesis at a single tertiary care center between 2008 and 2022 were analyzed before and after interventions using Emotrics software. Symmetry was compared among treatment combination groups (chemodenervation and rehabilitation [CR] vs. chemodenervation and surgery [CS] vs. chemodenervation, surgery, and rehabilitation [CSR]) and among surgical intervention groups (selective neurectomy [SN] vs. selective neurectomy with facelift [SnFa] vs. no surgery). Results: Of the 29 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 72.4% were female and the median age was 60.6 years (interquartile range 49.9-67.6). The median follow-up was 32.6 months; patients who received surgery had a greater follow-up time (57.4 months vs. 26.5 months, p = 0.045). The use of a trimodal approach (CSR) was associated with improved symmetry versus CR for smile angle (p = 0.021). Among surgical interventions, the greatest improvement in palpebral fissure symmetry was in patients who received SN versus no surgery (p = 0.039); the greatest improvement in smile angle was in patients who received SnFa versus no surgery (p = 0.008). Conclusion: We recommend a comprehensive approach to the management of facial synkinesis consisting of chemodenervation, rehabilitation, and surgery tailored to each patient's needs.

Warren B. Davis and the Birth of Plastic Surgery in Philadelphia: A Historical Vignette.

The field of plastic surgery, formally organized in 1931 with the founding of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, was shaped in many ways by a small practice of Philadelphia physicians. At the center of the practice was Warren B. Davis, a Philadelphia otolaryngologist and plastics pioneer whose innovations in cleft palate surgery would lead to significant improvements in functional and cosmetic outcomes in his time. In addition to his own innovations, Davis was responsible for the training of John Reese, the inventor of the Reese dermatome that changed the face of burn medicine during World War II. Aside from his contributions to surgery and the founding of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Dr. Davis was also the founder and first editor of the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery journal which to this day is the premiere, authoritative journal of plastic surgery. Lastly, Dr. Davis established a plastic surgical practice, now Jefferson Plastic Surgery. Unique in its longevity, this practice would continue to shape the field of plastic surgery and continues to improve lives today-109 years after its founding in 1913.

A randomized control trial employing infraorbital nerve stimulation as a neural distractor during nasopharyngeal swab.

INTRODUCTION: With the global COVID-19 pandemic, nasopharyngeal swabbing has become commonplace and can occasionally cause discomfort, tearing, and anxiety. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether using a neural distraction device during nasopharyngeal swabbing can mitigate patient discomfort. METHODS: Participants were randomized into nasal swab with vibration first (treatment-control or Tc) or nasal swab without vibration first (control-treatment or Ct). Then the swab was repeated with the opposite technique. The vibration device was used to stimulate the infraorbital nerve at the midpupillary line, while a nasopharyngeal swab was performed according to CDC protocol. After each swab, participants filled out a survey to assess pain, discomfort, and tearing. This procedure was replicated on the contralateral nostril for a total of 4 swabs and 4 surveys. RESULTS: Thirty-four subjects were included in the analysis. In the Ct group, there was a median 1.0-point decrease in pain with the use of vibration (95% CI [-1.8, -0.3], P = 0.0117), 2.5-point decrease (95% CI [-3.0, -0.8], P = 00039) in discomfort, and a 1.0-point decrease (95% CI [-2.6, -0.2] P = 0.0303) in tearing when the vibratory device was used. In the Tc group, there was a median 2.0-point decrease in pain with vibration (95% CI [ -2.7, -1.1], P < 0.0001), 2.3-point decrease in discomfort (95% CI [-3.1, -1.5], P < 0.0001), and a 1.5-point decrease in tearing (95% CI [-2.5, -0.5], P = 0.0037) when vibration was used. CONCLUSION: Vibratory stimulation of the infraorbital nerve is safe and effectively reduced pain, discomfort, and tearing during nasopharyngeal swab. Vibration is a reasonable option to minimize patient discomfort during COVID-19 or other microbiological testing.